ChanRobles Virtual law Library









 
RULES AND REGULATIONS ON
ADMINISTRATIVE COMPLAINTS FOR VIOLATION OF LAWS
INVOLVING INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS
FULL TEXT
Read full text of:chanroblesvirtuallawlibrary
MODIFIED RULES AND REGULATIONS ON
ADMINISTRATIVE COMPLAINTS FOR VIOLATION OF LAWS
INVOLVING INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS
[March 28, 2001]
 
RULE 10 
EVIDENCE


Section 1. Evidence required.  Substantial evidence shall be sufficient to support a decision or order.  

 A fact may be deemed established if it is supported by substantial evidence.  It means such relevant evidence which a reasonable mind might accept as adequate to support or justify a conclusion.  


Section 2. Ex-parte evidence.  In addition to sworn statements, testimonies and documentary evidence submitted by the parties, the Hearing Officer may receive ex parte evidence material and relevant to the case or conduct an ocular inspection without prior notice to the parties.  All ex parte evidence received by the Hearing Officer shall be reduced to writing and any party in interest shall have the opportunity to examine and rebut the same by further evidence.  


Section 3. Burden of proof in process patents.  If the subject matter of a patent is a process for obtaining a product, any identical product shall be presumed to have been obtained through the use of the patented process if the product is new or there is substantial likelihood that the identical product was made by the process and the owner of the patent has been unable despite reasonable efforts, to determine the process actually used.  In ordering the defendant  to  prove  that  the  process  to obtain   the  identical product is different from the patented process, the Director shall adopt measures to protect, as far as practicable, his manufacturing and business secrets. [Sec. 78, R. A. 8293]  


Section 4. Power to stop further evidence.  The Hearing Officer may stop the introduction of further testimony upon any particular point when the evidence upon it is already so full that more witness to the same point cannot be reasonably expected to be additionally persuasive.  The Hearing Officer, however, should exercise this power with caution so as not to cause manifest injustice to the parties.  


Section 5. Equitable principles to govern proceedings.  In all cases involving Trademarks, the equitable principles of laches, estoppel, and acquiescence where applicable, may be considered and applied.   

 
   

 

Back to Top   -  Back to Home   -  Back to IPR Index   -  Back to Rules on Administrative Complaints Index




































chanrobles.com




ChanRobles Legal Resources:

ChanRobles On-Line Bar Review

ChanRobles Internet Bar Review : www.chanroblesbar.com

ChanRobles MCLE On-line

ChanRobles Lawnet Inc. - ChanRobles MCLE On-line : www.chanroblesmcleonline.com