2005 BAR EXAMINATIONS
IN MERCANTILE LAW
BAR EXAMINATIONS 2005
MERCANTILE LAW
18 September 2005 8 A.M. — 12 Noon
INSTRUCTIONS
This questionnaire consists of fifteen (15) numbers contained in ten
(10) pages. Read each question very carefully. Answer legibly, clearly
and concisely. Start each number on a separate page; an answer to a
sub-question under the same number may be written continuously on the
same and immediately succeeding pages until completed. Do not repeat
the question.
HAND IN YOUR
NOTEBOOK WITH THIS QUESTIONNAIRE GOOD LUCK!!!
(Sgd.) Romeo J. Callejo, Sr.
Chairman
2005 Bar Examination Committee
PLEASE CHECK THE NUMBER OF PAGES IN
THIS SET WARNING: NOT FOR SALE OR UNAUTHORIZED USE
MERCANTILE LAW
- I -
(1.) What is a negotiable instrument? Give the characteristics of a
negotiable instrument. (2%)
(2.) Distinguish a negotiable document from a negotiable instrument.
(2%)
(3.) State and explain whether the following are negotiable instruments
under the Negotiable Instruments Law:cralaw:red
(i) Postal Money Order;
(ii)
A certificate of time deposit which states “This is to certify that
bearer has deposited in this bank the sum of FOUR THOUSAND PESOS
(P4,000.00) only, repayable to the depositor 200 days after date.”
(iii) Letters of credit;
(iv) Warehouse receipts;
(v) Treasury warrants payable from a
specific fund. (5%)
- II -
(1.) Dagul has a business arrangement with Facundo. The latter would
lend money to another, through Dagul, whose name would appear in the
promissory note as the lender. Dagul would then immediately indorse the
note to Facundo.
Is Dagul an accommodation party? Explain. (2%)
(2.) a) What is a crossed check?
What are the effects of crossing a check? Explain.
b) Distinguish an irregular indorser from a general indorser. (3%)
(3.) Brad was in desperate need of money to pay his debt to Pete, a
loan shark. Pete threatened to take Brad’s life if he failed to pay.
Brad and Pete went to see Señorita Isobel, Brad’s rich cousin,
and asked her if she could sign a promissory note in his favor in the
amount of P10,000.00 to pay Pete. Fearing that Pete would kill Brad,
Señorita Isobel acceded to the request. She affixed her
signature on a piece of paper with the assurance of Brad that he will
just fill it up later. Brad then filled up the blank paper, making a
promissory note for the amount of P100,000.00. He then indorsed and
delivered the same to Pete, who accepted the note as payment of the
debt.
What defense or defenses can Señorita Isobel set up against
Pete? Explain. (3%)
- III -
(1.) Under what conditions may a stock corporation acquire its own
shares? (2%)
(2.) Janice rendered some consultancy work for XYZ Corporation. Her
compensation included shares of stock therein.
Can XYZ Corporation issue shares of stock to pay for the services of
Janice as its consultant?
Discuss your answer. (2%)
- IV -
Divine Corporation is engaged in the manufacture of garments for
export. In the course of its business, it was able to obtain loans from
individuals and financing institutions. However, due to the drop in the
demand for garments in the international market, Divine Corporation
could not meet its obligations. It decided to sell all its equipment
such as sewing machines, perma-press machines, high speed sewers,
cutting tables, ironing tables, etc., as well as its supplies and
materials to Top Grade Fashion Corporation, its competitor.
a) How would you classify the
transaction?
b) Can Divine Corporation sell the
aforesaid items to its competitor, Top Grade Fashion Corporation?
What are the requirements to validly
sell the items? Explain.
c) How would you protect the interests
of the creditors of Divine Corporation?
d)
In case Divine Corporation violated the law, what remedies are
available to Top Grade Fashion Corporation against Divine Corporation?
(5%)
- V -
(1.) a) Under what circumstances may a corporation declare dividends?
(2%)
b) Distinguish dividend from profit; cash dividend from stock dividend.
(2%)
c) From what funds are cash and stock dividends sourced? Explain why.
(2%)
(2.) A Korean national joined a corporation which is engaged in the
furniture manufacturing business. He was elected to the Board of
Directors. To complement its furniture manufacturing business, the
corporation also engaged in the logging business.
With the additional logging activity, can the Korean national still be
a member of the Board of Directors? Explain. (3%)
- VI -
Jojo deposited several cartons of goods with SN Warehouse Corporation.
The corresponding warehouse receipt was issued to the order of Jojo. He
endorsed the warehouse receipt to EJ who paid the value of the goods
deposited. Before EJ could withdraw the goods, Melchor informed SN
Warehouse Corporation that the goods belonged to him and were taken by
Jojo without his consent. Melchor wants to get the goods, but EJ also
wants to withdraw the same.
a) Who has a better right to the goods?
Why?
b)
If SN Warehouse Corporation is uncertain as to who is entitled to the
property, what is the proper recourse of the corporation? Explain. (5%)
- VII -
(1.) Briefly discuss the doctrine of corporate opportunity. (2%)
(2.) Malyn, Schiera and Jaz are the directors of Patio Investments, a
close corporation formed to run the Patio Café, an al fresco
coffee shop in Makati City. In 2000, Patio Café began
experiencing financial reverses, consequently, some of the checks it
issued to its beverage distributors and employees bounced. In October
2003, Schiera informed Malyn that she found a location for a second
café in Taguig City. Malyn objected because of the dire
financial condition of the corporation. Sometime in April 2004, Malyn
learned about Fort Patio Café located in Taguig City and that
its development was undertaken by a new corporation known as Fort
Patio, Inc., where both Schiera and Jaz are directors. Malyn also found
that Schiera and Jaz, on behalf of Patio Investments, had obtained a
loan of P500,000.00, from PBCom Bank, for the purpose of opening Fort
Patio Café. This loan was secured by the assets of Patio
Investments and personally guaranteed by Schiera and Jaz. Malyn then
filed a corporate derivative action before the Regional Trial Court of
Makati City against Schiera and Jaz, alleging that the two directors
had breached their fiduciary duties by misappropriating money and
assets of Patio Investments in the operation of Fort Patio Café.
a) Did Schiera and Jaz violate the
principle of corporate opportunity? Explain.
b) Was it proper for Malyn to file a
derivative suit with a prayer for injunctive relief? Explain.
c)
Assuming that a derivative suit is proper, may the action continue if
the corporation is dissolved during the pendency of the suit? Explain.
(5%)
- VIII -
Aaron, a well-known architect, is suffering from financial reverses. He
has four creditors with a total claim of P26 Million. Despite his
intention to pay these obligations, his current assets are insufficient
to cover all of them. His creditors are about to sue him. Consequently,
he was constrained to file a petition for insolvency.
a)
Since Aaron was merely forced by circumstances to petition the court to
declare him insolvent, can the judge properly treat the petition as one
for involuntary insolvency? Explain.
b)
If Aaron is declared an insolvent by the court, what would be the
effect, if any, of such declaration on his creditors? Explain.
c)
Assuming that Aaron has guarantors for his debts, are the guarantors
released from their obligations once Aaron is discharged from his
debts? Explain.
d) What remedies are available to the
guarantors in case they are made to pay the creditors? Explain. (5%)
- IX -
(1.) What are the effects of an irrevocable designation of a
beneficiary under the Insurance Code? Explain. (2%)
(2.) Jacob obtained a life insurance policy for P1 Million designating
irrevocably Diwata, a friend, as his beneficiary. Jacob, however,
changed his mind and wants Yob and Jojo, his other friends, to be
included as beneficiaries considering that the proceeds of the policy
are sufficient for the three friends.
Can Jacob still add Yob and Jojo as his beneficiaries? Explain. (2%)
- X -
(1.) M/V Pearly Shells, a passenger and cargo vessel, was insured for
P40,000,000.00 against “constructive total loss.” Due to a typhoon, it
sank near Palawan. Luckily, there were no casualties, only injured
passengers. The shipowner sent a notice of abandonment of his interest
over the vessel to the insurance company which then hired professionals
to afloat the vessel for P900,000.00. When re-floated, the vessel
needed repairs estimated at P2,000,000.00. The insurance company
refused to pay the claim of the shipowner, stating that there was “no
constructive total loss.”chanroblesvirtualawlibrary
a) Was there “constructive total loss”
to entitle the shipowner to recover from the insurance company?
Explain.
b) Was it proper for the shipowner to
send a notice of abandonment to the insurance company? Explain. (5%)
(2.) a) When does double insurance exist? (2%)
b) What is the nature of the liability of the several insurers in
double insurance? Explain. (2%)
- XI -
Ricardo mortgaged his fishpond to AC Bank to secure a P1 Million loan.
In a separate transaction, he opened a letter of credit with the same
bank for $500,000.00 in favor of HS Bank, a foreign bank, to purchase
outboard motors. Likewise, Ricardo executed a Surety Agreement in favor
of AC Bank. The outboard motors arrived and were delivered to Ricardo,
but he was not able to pay the purchase price thereof.
a) Can AC Bank take possession of the
outboard motors? Why?
b) Can AC Bank also foreclose the
mortgage over the fishpond? Explain. (5%)
- XII -
Hi Yielding Corporation filed a complaint against five of its officers
for violation of Section 31 of the Corporation Code. The corporation
claimed that the said officers were guilty of advancing their personal
interests to the prejudice of the corporation, and that they were
grossly negligent in handling its affairs. Aside from documents and
contracts, the corporation also submitted in evidence records of the
officers’ U.S. Dollar deposits in several banks overseas - Boston Bank,
Bank of Switzerland, and Bank of New York. For their part, the officers
filed a criminal complaint against the directors of Hi Yielding
Corporation for violation of Republic Act No. 6426, otherwise known as
the Foreign Currency Deposit Act of the Philippines. The officers
alleged that their bank deposits were illegally disclosed for want of a
court order, and that such deposits were not even the subject of the
case against them.
a) Will the complaint filed against the
directors of Hi Yielding Corporation prosper? Explain.
b) Was there a violation of the Secrecy
of Bank Deposits Law (Republic Act No. 1405)? Explain. (5%)
- XIII -
(1.) Discuss the “kabit system” in land transportation and its legal
consequences. (2%)
(2.) Procopio purchased an Isuzu passenger jeepney from Enteng, a
holder of a certificate of public convenience for the operation of
public utility vehicle plying the Calamba-Los Baños route. While
Procopio continued offering the jeepney for public transport services,
he did not have the registration of the vehicle transferred in his
name. Neither did he secure for himself a certificate of public
convenience for its operation. Thus, per the records of the Land
Transportation Franchising and Regulatory Board, Enteng remained its
registered owner and operator. One day, while the jeepney was traveling
southbound, it collided with a ten-wheeler truck owned by Emmanuel. The
driver of the truck admitted responsibility for the accident,
explaining that the truck lost its brakes.
Procopio sued Emmanuel for damages, but the latter moved to dismiss the
case on the ground that Procopio is not the real party in interest
since he is not the registered owner of the jeepney. Resolve the motion
with reasons. (3%)
(3.) Baldo is a driver of Yellow Cab Company under the boundary system.
While cruising along the South Expressway, Baldo’s cab figured in a
collision, killing his passenger, Pietro. The heirs of Pietro sued
Yellow Cab Company for damages, but the latter refused to pay the
heirs, insisting that it is not liable because Baldo is not its
employee.
Resolve with reasons. (2%)
- XIV -
(1.) On a clear weather, M/V Sundo, carrying insured cargo, left the
port of Manila bound for Cebu. While at sea, the vessel encountered a
strong typhoon forcing the captain to steer the vessel to the nearest
island where it stayed for seven days. The vessel ran out of provisions
for its passengers. Consequently, the vessel proceeded to Leyte to
replenish its supplies.
a)
Assuming that the cargo was damaged because of such deviation, who
between the insurance company and the owner of the cargo bears the
loss? Explain.
b) Under what circumstances can a
vessel properly proceed to a port other than its port of destination?
Explain. (4%)
(2.) Star Shipping Lines accepted 100 cartons of sardines from Master
to be delivered to 555 Company in Manila. Only 88 cartons were
delivered, however, these were in bad condition. 555 Company claimed
from Star Shipping Lines the value of the missing goods, as well as the
damaged goods. Star Shipping Lines refused because the former failed to
present a bill of lading.
Resolve with reasons the claim of 555 Company. (4%)
- XV -
(1.) S Development Corporation sued Shangrila Corporation for using the
“S” logo and the tradename “Shangrila”. The former claims that it was
the first to register the logo and the tradename in the Philippines and
that it had been using the same in its restaurant business. Shangrila
Corporation counters that it is an affiliate of an international
organization which has been using such logo and tradename “Shangrila”
for over 20 years. However, Shangrila Corporation registered the
tradename and logo in the Philippines only after the suit was filed.
a) Which of the two corporations has a
better right to use the logo and the tradename? Explain.
b) How does the international
affiliation of Shangrila Corporation affect the outcome of the dispute?
Explain. (5%)
(2.) Cezar works in a car manufacturing company owned by Joab. Cezar is
quite innovative and loves to tinker with things. With the materials
and parts of the car, he was able to invent a gas-saving device that
will enable cars to consume less gas. Francis, a co-worker, saw how
Cezar created the device and likewise, came up with a similar gadget,
also using scrap materials and spare parts of the company. Thereafter,
Francis filed an application for registration of his device with the
Bureau of Patents. Eighteen months later, Cezar filed his application
for the registration of his device with the Bureau of Patents.
a) Is the gas-saving device patentable?
Explain. b) Assuming that it is patentable, who is entitled to the
patent?
What, if any, is the remedy of the
losing party?
c)
Supposing Joab got wind of the inventions of his employees and also
laid claim to the patents, asserting that Cezar and Francis were using
his materials and company time in making the devices, will his claim
prevail over those of his employees? Explain. (5%)
NOTHING FOLLOWS.
Back to
Main Index
|