Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence


Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence > Year 1903 > February 1903 Decisions > G.R. No. 571 February 14, 1903 - UNITED STATES v. THOMAS E. KEPNER

001 Phil 727:




PHILIPPINE SUPREME COURT DECISIONS

FIRST DIVISION

[G.R. No. 571. February 14, 1903. ]

THE UNITED STATES, Complainant-Appellant, v. THOMAS E. KEPNER, Defendant-Appellee.

Solicitor-General Araneta, for Appellant.

Frederick Garfield Waite, for Appellee.

SYLLABUS


1. CRIMINAL LAW; APPEAL FROM ACQUITTAL. — Under General Orders, No. 58, the Government has the right to appeal from judgments of acquittal in criminal cases.

The defendant was tried in the Court of First Instance of Manila on a charge of estafa and was acquitted. The prosecuting attorney appealed, and after the case was lodged in the Supreme Court the defendant moved to dismiss the appeal.


D E C I S I O N


ARELLANO, C.J. :


Under General Orders, No. 58, series 1900, which is the law of criminal procedure in force, the Government has the right of appeal from all judgments of acquittal rendered in criminal cases. The letter and spirit of the order itself are the most conclusive argument in support of this right on the part of the Government.

Its letter, because this right is thus expressly declared in section 43. "From all final judgments," it says, "of the Courts of First Instance or courts of similar jurisdiction, and in all cases in which the law now provides for appeals . . . an appeal may be taken to the Supreme Court . . ." If an appeal can be taken against all final judgments, the judgment of acquittal being also final judgment, it is evident that an appeal lies against a judgment of acquittal. This law grants the right of appeal in all cases in which it was formerly allowed by the local "existing laws," declared in force by section 1 of said General Orders, No. 58. If prior to this law the right of appeal in cases of acquittal was allowed, as will be more explicitly shown hereafter, now as then, and after the publication of said order, the right of appeal from judgments of acquittal will continue to be granted.

Moreover, section 64 is quite plain and reads as follows: "In case of appeal after judgment, the defendant may be admitted to bail pending action on the appeal: (1) As a matter of right if the appeal is from an acquittal . . . "Under the letter of the order, then, the Government has the right of appeal from an acquittal.

In its spirit, General Orders, No. 58, undoubtedly contemplates the allowance of the right of appeal from judgment of acquittal. Such phrases as that contained in section 43, to wit: ". . . in all cases in which the law now provides for appeals . . .," and the provision contained in section 50 to the effect that cases in the Supreme Court "shall thereafter take the same course as is now provided by law," or as that contained in section 107, "the privileges now secured by law to the person claiming to be injured by the commission of the crime . . .," show that the purpose of the legislator in this respect was to bring into the new law some of the provisions previously in force on the subject, and to establish a criminal procedure not entirely new, as are the majority of the provisions of General Orders, No. 58, based on principles of American law, but mixed, preserving part of the local legislation which is the principle upon which sections 50 and 107 are based.

Therefore, the right of the Government to appeal from a judgment of acquittal being well founded, the motion is overruled without costs.

Torres, Cooper, Willard, Mapa and Ladd, JJ., concur.




Back to Home | Back to Main




















chanrobles.com





ChanRobles On-Line Bar Review

ChanRobles Internet Bar Review : www.chanroblesbar.com

ChanRobles MCLE On-line

ChanRobles Lawnet Inc. - ChanRobles MCLE On-line : www.chanroblesmcleonline.com






February-1903 Jurisprudence                 

  • G.R. No. 413 February 2, 1903 - JOSE FERNANDEZ v. FRANCISCO DE LA ROSA

    001 Phil 671

  • G.R. No. 971 February 3, 1903 - UNITED STATES ET AL. v. PONCIANO VILORIA

    001 Phil 682

  • G.R. No. 858 February 5, 1903 - FRANCISCO MARTINEZ v. PEDRO MARTINEZ

    001 Phil 686

  • G.R. No. 949 February 6, 1903 - UNITED STATES v. EULOGIO DE SOSA

    001 Phil 687

  • G.R. No. 857 February 10, 1903 - EULALIO HERNAEZ v. ROSENDO HERNAEZ

    001 Phil 689

  • G.R. No. 873 February 10, 1903 - UNITED STATES v. SECUNDINO MENDEZONA

    001 Phil 696

  • G.R. No. 910 February 10, 1903 - PRAUTCH v. DOLORES HERNANDEZ DE GOYENECHEA

    001 Phil 705

  • G.R. No. 999 February 10, 1903 - UNITED STATES v. CARLOS SANTIAGO ET AL.

    001 Phil 716

  • G.R. No. 847 February 12, 1903 - EULALIO HERNAEZ v. ROSENDO HERNAEZ

    001 Phil 718

  • G.R. No. 905 February 12, 1903 - ISABEL VELASCO v. FRANCISCO LOPEZ

    001 Phil 720

  • G.R. No. 979 February 12, 1903 - UNITED STATES v. EUSEBIO SANTA CRUZ

    001 Phil 726

  • G.R. No. 571 February 14, 1903 - UNITED STATES v. THOMAS E. KEPNER

    001 Phil 727

  • G.R. No. 900 February 14, 1903 - UNITED STATES v. PEDRO LARDIZABAL

    001 Phil 729

  • G.R. No. 506 February 16, 1903 - UNITED STATES v. MUNICIPAL COUNCIL OF SANTA CRUZ DE MALABON

    001 Phil 731

  • G.R. No. 1018 February 17, 1903 - UNITED STATES v. IGNACIO CRUZ

    001 Phil 734

  • G.R. No. 1043 February 17, 1903 - UNITED STATES v. JULIAN ATIENZA

    001 Phil 736

  • G.R. No. 1012 February 19, 1903 - UNITED STATES v. ISABELO DINSING ET AL.

    001 Phil 738

  • G.R. No. 1032 February 19, 1903 - UNITED STATES v. AGUSTIN ABLAZA

    001 Phil 740

  • G.R. No. 980 February 20, 1903 - UNITED STATES v. EUGENIO BARBOSA

    001 Phil 741

  • G.R. No. 1195 February 20, 1903 - TRANQUILINA ALMADIN v. CELESTINO ALMADIN

    001 Phil 748

  • G.R. No. 1001 February 21, 1903 - UNITED STATES v. GERONIMO TORRENTE

  • G.R. No. 1070 February 28, 1903 - UNITED STATES v. PABLO JUDIT

    002 Phil 5