Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence


Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence > Year 1904 > February 1904 Decisions > G.R. No. 1482 February 29, 1904 - UNITED STATES v. ANTONIO FERNANDEZ

003 Phil 380:




PHILIPPINE SUPREME COURT DECISIONS

EN BANC

[G.R. No. 1482. February 29, 1904. ]

THE UNITED STATES, Complainant-Appellee, v. ANTONIO FERNANDEZ, Defendant-Appellant.

Antonio Fernandez, on his own behalf.

Solicitor-General Araneta, for Appellee.

SYLLABUS


1. CRIMINAL LAW; RAPE; AGGRAVATING CIRCUMSTANCES; ABUSE OF OFFICE. — The fact that the defendant, found guilty of the crime of rape, was a sergeant of the Constabulary force and availed himself of an opportunity afforded him by his position as such to commit the crime should be considered in aggravation of the penalty.

The defendant, who is a member of the Constabulary, went to the house of the father of the complaining witness, together with some other members of the corps, for the purpose of searching the house for firearms. No arms were found. His men having gone into a barn near by, the defendant was left alone in the house with complaining witness, a girl of 16. The defendant then told her that unless she would submit to him he would kill her and by threatening her with his revolver intimidated her to the point of permitting him to have sexual intercourse with her. The trial court found the defendant guilty of rape and imposed upon him the maximum penalty of seventeen years four months and one day of reclusion temporal. Against this the defendant appealed.

D E C I S I O N

MAPA, J. :



The guilt of the defendant of the crime of rape with which he is charged is fully established by the proof. The crime was committed with the aggravating circumstance that the accused availed himself of his position as sergeant of the Constabulary forces to commit the crime, and the further circumstance of its commission in the dwelling of the complaining witness. Consequently the penalty of seventeen years four months and one day of reclusion temporal imposed on the defendant by the trial judge is in accordance with law and should therefore be affirmed.

The court below also condemned the defendant to the payment of the sum of 500 pesos to the father of the complaining witness. There is no authority of law for this, and consequently the decision can not in this respect be sustained. In lien thereof the defendant should be obliged to endow the complaining witness, who it appears is unmarried, in the sum of 500 Philippine pesos, and to acknowledge and support the offspring, should there be any, in accordance with the provision of article 449 of the Penal Code.

With this modification we affirm the judgment of the court below, with the costs of this instance against the defendant.

Arellano, C.J., Torres, Cooper and McDonough, JJ., concur.

Willard and Johnson, JJ., dissent.




Back to Home | Back to Main




















chanrobles.com





ChanRobles On-Line Bar Review

ChanRobles Internet Bar Review : www.chanroblesbar.com

ChanRobles MCLE On-line

ChanRobles Lawnet Inc. - ChanRobles MCLE On-line : www.chanroblesmcleonline.com






February-1904 Jurisprudence                 

  • G.R. Nos. 1561 & 1562 February 2, 1904 - RAFAEL ENRIQUEZ v. A. S. WATSON & CO. ET AL.

    003 Phil 279

  • G.R. No. 1300 February 3, 1904 - E. C. McCULLOUGH v. R. AENLLE & Co.

    003 Phil 285

  • G.R. No. 1444 February 4, 1904 - UNITED STATES v. SEVERO ALCANTARA, ET AL.

    003 Phil 309

  • G.R. No. 1693 February 5, 1904 - FRANCISCO GARCIA v. JOHN C. SWEENEY

    004 Phil 751

  • G.R. No. 1464 February 11, 1904 - UNITED STATES v. MAXIMO OANGOANG, ET AL.

    003 Phil 312

  • G.R. No. 1522 February 11, 1904 - UNITED STATES v. POLICARPO IDICA

    003 Phil 313

  • G.R. No. 1548 February 11, 1904 - UNITED STATES v. PAULINO GARCIA, ET AL.

    003 Phil 317

  • G.R. No. 1368 February 12, 1904 - UNITED STATES v. FRED FREIMUTH

    003 Phil 318

  • G.R. No. 1399 February 12, 1904 - UNITED STATES v. NORBERTO OBREGON

    003 Phil 320

  • G.R. No. 1513 February 12, 1904 - UNITED STATES v. CASIANO SADIAN

    003 Phil 323

  • G.R. No. 1437 February 13, 1904 - UNITED STATES v. AGATON AMBATA, ET AL.

    003 Phil 327

  • G.R. No. 1460 February 16, 1904 - UNITED STATES v. MAXIMO GUILLERMO

    003 Phil 329

  • G.R. No. 1478 February 16, 1904 - UNITED STATES v. JUAN DE LA CRUZ, ET AL.

    003 Phil 331

  • G.R. No. 1480 February 16, 1904 - UNITED STATES v. FRANCISCO DE LA CRUZ, ET AL.

    003 Phil 332

  • G.R. No. 1509 February 16, 1904 - UNITED STATES v. NICOLAS GLORIA

    003 Phil 333

  • G.R. No. 1446 February 17, 1904 - UNITED STATES v. AMBROSIO DE LA CRUZ

    003 Phil 337

  • G.R. No. 1481 February 17, 1903

    UNITED STATES v. LIBERATO EXALTACION, ET AL.

    003 Phil 339

  • G.R. No. 1092 February 18, 1904 - LUIS QUERIDO v. RAMON FLORENDO, ET AL.

    003 Phil 342

  • G.R. No. 1372 February 20, 1903

    JOHN E. SPRINGER v. ARTHUR F. ODLIN

    003 Phil 344

  • G.R. No. 1434 February 23, 1904 - UNITED STATES v. ANTONIO DE LOS REYES

    003 Phil 349

  • G.R. No. 1532 February 23, 1904 - UNITED STATES v. CASIMIRO GASAL

    003 Phil 354

  • G.R. No. 1705 February 23, 1904 - TOMAS BLANCO v. BYRON S. AMBLER

    003 Phil 358

  • G.R. No. 1293 February 23, 1904 - ILDELFONSO DORONILA v. JOSE LOPEZ

    003 Phil 360

  • G.R. No. 1498 February 24, 1904 - UNITED STATES v. MARTIN CABUENAS

    003 Phil 366

  • G.R. No. 1493 February 25, 1904 - UNITED STATES v. BERNARDO USIS, ET AL.

    003 Phil 373

  • G.R. No. 1506 February 26, 1904 - UNITED STATES v. FACUNDO PINEDA, ET AL.

    003 Phil 376

  • G.R. No. 1482 February 29, 1904 - UNITED STATES v. ANTONIO FERNANDEZ

    003 Phil 380