December 1906 - Philippine Supreme Court Decisions/Resolutions
Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence
Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence > Year 1906 > December 1906 Decisions >
G.R. No. L-3204 December 17, 1906 - UNITED STATES v. FLAVIANO SALANATIN
007 Phil 199:
007 Phil 199:
FIRST DIVISION
[G.R. No. L-3204. December 17, 1906. ]
THE UNITED STATES, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. FLAVIANO SALANATIN, (alias ANO), Defendant-Appellant.
Emiliano Tria Tirona, for Appellant.
Solicitor-General Araneta, for Appellee.
SYLLABUS
EVIDENCE; CERTIFICATE BY INTERPRETER; NEW TRIAL. — Held, That for the reason that the interpreter did not properly certify to the evidence take in the lower court, in accordance with section 32 of General Orders, No. 58, the cause be remanded to the lower court for new trial.
D E C I S I O N
ARELLANO, C.J. :
This case is here on appeal. The court has nothing before it except what purports to be the answers given by the various witnesses, but not the question that were put to them, either in their direct or cross examination; which are followed by the certificate of one who signs himself "interpreter," to the effect that the foregoing is a correct translation of the notes taken by the court in longhand during the absence of the official stenographer.
Section 32 of General Orders, No. 58, provides that where the testimony and proceedings are taken in shorthand they must be certified to by the official stenographer in order to be considered prima facie as a correct statement of such testimony and proceedings; otherwise the testimony after being reduced to writing must be signed by the witness and the judge and duly attested by the clerk.
The testimony in this case not being certified to in either of the above manners, it can not be considered as a correct statement of the facts which this court is called upon to review.
The judgment of the court below is accordingly set aside and the case remanded for a new trial with direction to that court to enter judgment in accordance with the testimony introduced, which said testimony shall be taken and received in the manner and form prescribed by law. Let judgment be entered in conformity herewith, without special provisions as to costs, and the case returned to the lower court forthwith. So ordered.
Torres, Mapa, Carson, and Tracey, JJ., concur.
Willard, J., dissents.
Johnson, J., did not sit in this case.
Section 32 of General Orders, No. 58, provides that where the testimony and proceedings are taken in shorthand they must be certified to by the official stenographer in order to be considered prima facie as a correct statement of such testimony and proceedings; otherwise the testimony after being reduced to writing must be signed by the witness and the judge and duly attested by the clerk.
The testimony in this case not being certified to in either of the above manners, it can not be considered as a correct statement of the facts which this court is called upon to review.
The judgment of the court below is accordingly set aside and the case remanded for a new trial with direction to that court to enter judgment in accordance with the testimony introduced, which said testimony shall be taken and received in the manner and form prescribed by law. Let judgment be entered in conformity herewith, without special provisions as to costs, and the case returned to the lower court forthwith. So ordered.
Torres, Mapa, Carson, and Tracey, JJ., concur.
Willard, J., dissents.
Johnson, J., did not sit in this case.
