Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence


Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence > Year 1906 > February 1906 Decisions > G.R. No. 2409 February 27, 1906 - IN RE: FELIPE G. CALDERON

005 Phil 658:




PHILIPPINE SUPREME COURT DECISIONS

EN BANC

[G.R. No. 2409. February 27, 1906. ]

In re FELIPE G. CALDERON

Felipe G. Calderon, in his own behalf.

Solicitor-General Araneta, for the State.

SYLLABUS


1. LAWYER, DISBARMENT ON SUSPENSION OF; PRACTICE IN THE SUPREME COURT. — When a member of the bar is suspended from the practice of his profession by a judge of the Court of First Instance under section 22 of the Code of Procedure in Civil Actions, and the cause is transmitted to the Supreme Court, such lawyer has a right to answer the charges against him and to produce witnesses on his own behalf and to be heard by himself and counsel, if he so desires, upon reasonable notice. Upon a petition the Supreme Court may appoint a commission to hear and take such testimony as the interested parties may desire to present.


D E C I S I O N


JOHNSON, J. :


On the 29th of December, 1904, the Hon, John C. Sweeney, judge of the Court of First Instance of the city of Manila, for certain alleged professional misconduct on the part of the said Felipe G. Calderon, made the following order:jgc:chanrobles.com.ph

"It is therefore ordered by the court that Señor Felipe Calderon be, and he hereby is, suspended from the practice of law in the Philippine Islands.

"It is further ordered that this record be transmitted to the Supreme Court of the Philippine Islands for consideration."cralaw virtua1aw library

This order was based upon the authority given the judges of the Courts of First Instance under sections 21 and 22 of the Code of Procedure in Civil Actions.

The record, including all the proceedings in said cause, was received by the clerk of the Supreme Court on the 20th of January, 1905. The existence of this record in this court was reported by the clerk to the court on the 28th of January, 1905; whereupon the court made the following order:jgc:chanrobles.com.ph

"Pase dicho expediente al Fiscal General de las Islas Filipinas para los efectos queren derecho procedan."cralaw virtua1aw library

In accordance with said order the said record was transmitted to the Attorney-General. On the 3d day of November, 1905, the Solicitor-General filed his brief. On the 21st of November, 1905, Mr. Calderon presented his brief in his own defense. Mr. Calderon complains that he has not been given an opportunity to be heard in this court upon the charges preferred against him, neither has he had an opportunity to present witnesses for the purpose of showing that said charges are false. He alleges that he was willing and ready to produce witnesses for the purpose of showing that said allegations were false. He claims that he has been deprived of the rights accorded to him under section 25 of the Code of Procedure in Civil Actions.

Said section 25 provides that —

"No lawyer shall be removed from the roll or be suspended from the performance of his profession until he has had full opportunity to answer the charges against him, and to produce witnesses in his own behalf and to be heard by himself and counsel, if he so desires, upon reasonable notice. But if upon reasonable notice the accused fails to appear and answer the accusation, the court may proceed to determine the matter ex parte."cralaw virtua1aw library

The privileges accorded to the defendant by virtue of this section have not been extended to him. When this court transferred the record to the Attorney-General it was understood and intended that the proceedings heretofore followed in the cases of In re Robert S. McDougall 1 (Case No. 1167) and In re Terrell 2 (Case No. 1203 should be followed. The practice in these two cases was in accordance with the provisions of the said Code of Procedure.

Inasmuch as the defendant has not been given an opportunity to exercise the rights accorded to him by said section 25, all proceedings which have heretofore been taken in this court in said cause are hereby suspended, and it is hereby ordered that if none of the parties present an application for the taking of testimony in this case within a period of ten days from the date on which they receive notice of this resolution, the cause will be disposed of in this court upon the record of proceedings had in the Court of First Instance of the city of Manila. If the said application be presented within the period fixed, by any of the parties, the court will appoint a commission for the purpose of taking testimony in said cause.

It is further ordered that a copy of this resolution be served upon the Attorney-General as well as upon Felipe Calderon. So ordered.

Torres, Mapa, Carson and Willard, JJ., concur.

Endnotes:



1. 3 Phil. Rep., 70.

2. 2 Phil. Rep., 266.




Back to Home | Back to Main




















chanrobles.com





ChanRobles On-Line Bar Review

ChanRobles Internet Bar Review : www.chanroblesbar.com

ChanRobles MCLE On-line

ChanRobles Lawnet Inc. - ChanRobles MCLE On-line : www.chanroblesmcleonline.com






February-1906 Jurisprudence                 

  • G.R. No. 2607 February 2, 1906 - UNITED STATES v. FERNANDO NIETO

    005 Phil 582

  • G.R. No. 2243 February 8, 1906 - MATEO ALDEGUER v. GREGORIO APOSAGA, ET AL.

    005 Phil 584

  • G.R. No. 2404 February 8, 1906 - PEDRO SISON v. CALIXTO SILVA, ET AL.

    005 Phil 587

  • G.R. No. 2343 February 10, 1906 - ILDEFONSO TAMBUNTING v. CITY OF MANILA

    005 Phil 590

  • G.R. No. 2344 February 10, 1906 - GONZALO TUASON v. DOLORES OROZCO

    005 Phil 596

  • G.R. No. 2641 February 10, 1906 - UNITED STATES v. DOMINGO MACASADIA

    005 Phil 602

  • G.R. No. 1524 February 12, 1906 - UNITED STATES v. TRANQUILINO HERRERA

    005 Phil 604

  • G.R. No. 2282 February 12, 1906 - UNITED STATES v. JOSE DIAZ TAN-BAUCO

    005 Phil 606

  • G.R. No. 2357 February 13, 1906 - FREDERICK NELLE v. BAER

    005 Phil 608

  • G.R. No. 2437 February 13, 1906 - MONICA CASON v. FRANCISCO WALTERIO RICKARDS, ET AL.

    005 Phil 611

  • G.R. No. 1618 February 14, 1906 - MIGUEL SIOJO v. GERARDO DIAZ

    005 Phil 614

  • G.R. No. 2650 February 16, 1906 - UNITED STATES v. PEDRO TOLOSA

    005 Phil 616

  • G.R. No. 1311 February 17, 1906 - UNITED STATES v. PEDRO GIRON

    005 Phil 619

  • G.R. No. 1409 February 17, 1906 - UNITED STATES v. WILLIAM CROZIER

    005 Phil 621

  • G.R. No. 2250 February 17, 1906 - PEDRO REGALADO v. LUCHSINGER & CO.

    005 Phil 625

  • G.R. No. 2424 February 17, 1906 - UNITED STATES v. COSME GUZMAN

    005 Phil 630

  • G.R. No. 2451 February 17, 1906 - UNITED STATES v. LEON LINESES

    005 Phil 631

  • G.R. No. 2622 February 17, 1906 - TEODORO S. BENEDICTO v. JULIAN PERIZUELO

    005 Phil 632

  • G.R. No. 2647 February 17, 1906 - UNITED STATES v. FELIX PAQUIT

    005 Phil 635

  • G.R. No. 2333 February 19, 1906 - EDWARD B. MERCHANT v. ABELARDO LAFUENTE

    005 Phil 638

  • G.R. No. 1752 February 26, 1906 - NICASIO CAPULE v. EVARISTO CAPISTRANO

    005 Phil 646

  • G.R. No. 2442 February 26, 1906 - GREGORIO CEDRE v. JAMES C. JENKINS

    005 Phil 647

  • G.R. No. 2618 February 26, 1906 - UNITED STATES v. JOHN M. FLEMISTER

    005 Phil 650

  • G.R. No. 2409 February 27, 1906 - IN RE: FELIPE G. CALDERON

    005 Phil 658

  • G.R. No. 2715 February 27, 1906 - BEHN v. F. ROSATZIN

    005 Phil 660

  • G.R. No. 2789 February 27, 1906 - WILLIAM JOHNSON v. CIRILO DAVID

    005 Phil 663

  • G.R. No. 1489 February 28, 1906 - RAFAEL ENRIQUEZ v. FRANCISCO V. ENRIQUEZ

    005 Phil 668

  • G.R. No. 2702 February 28, 1906 - UNITED STATES v. ISIDORO OLIVAN ET AL.

    005 Phil 671

  • G.R. No. 3120 February 28, 1906 - BRYAN, LANDON CO. v. AMERICAN BANK

    005 Phil 672