Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence


Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence > Year 1906 > September 1906 Decisions > G.R. No. 2850 September 7, 1906 - UNITED STATES v. EUGENIO VERGARA

006 Phil 428:




PHILIPPINE SUPREME COURT DECISIONS

FIRST DIVISION

[G.R. No. 2850. September 7, 1906. ]

THE UNITED STATES, Complainant-Appellee, v. EUGENIO VERGARA, Defendant-Appellant.

Ambrosio Flores, for Appellant.

Solicitor-General Araneta, for Appellee.

SYLLABUS


1. BRIGANDS; NOTICE OF PRESENCE OF. — The notice of the presence of brigands required by section 5 of Act No. 781 may be forwarded by a municipal officer through the president where circumstances render responsible his personal report to the provincial governor or inspector of Constabulary.


D E C I S I O N


TRACEY, J. :


The defendant being a councilor of the pueblo of Abucay, in the Province of Bataan, was accused of failing to give prompt notice to the provincial governor or inspector of police of the presence of ladrones or brigands, as required by section 5 of Act No. 781, amending Act No. 175. It appears that on three occasions he gave such notice to the president of the municipality, who transmitted it to the inspector; it is claimed, however, that the three occasions upon which he was seen by witnesses for the prosecution in conservation with Felix Encarnacion, the bandit chief, or his men, do not correspond in time and place with these notices, and further that the communication to the president did not satisfy the requirements of the statute. On the other hand it is maintained that the design of the defendant was to forward through the president his report to the higher authorities and that such was the course taken.

Considering the circumstances of time and place, the sending of word through the municipal president appears to have been the only available course open to the accused, as it does not seem to have been possible for him to have reached either the governor or the inspector personally; consequently there was no breach of duty, as there might have been had immediate communication by him with the governor or inspector been practicable. The lack of correspondence between the interviews testified to with Encarnacion and the reports sent by the accused is not sufficiently established by the evidence to justify his conviction of a crime; indeed, the fair conclusion is that they do correspond.

Therefore the accused should be acquitted and set at liberty forthwith, with the costs of the case de oficio. So ordered.

Arellano, C.J., Torres, Mapa, Carson, and Willard, JJ., concur.




Back to Home | Back to Main




















chanrobles.com





ChanRobles On-Line Bar Review

ChanRobles Internet Bar Review : www.chanroblesbar.com

ChanRobles MCLE On-line

ChanRobles Lawnet Inc. - ChanRobles MCLE On-line : www.chanroblesmcleonline.com






September-1906 Jurisprudence                 

  • G.R. No. 2537 September 1, 1906 - UNITED STATES v. SERAPIO SISON

    006 Phil 421

  • G.R. No. 3463 September 5, 1906 - JUAN FAJARDO v. JULIO LLORENTE

    006 Phil 426

  • G.R. No. 2850 September 7, 1906 - UNITED STATES v. EUGENIO VERGARA

    006 Phil 428

  • G.R. No. 3500 September 7, 1906 - MACONDRAY & CO. v. J.M. QUINTERO

    006 Phil 429

  • G.R. No. 3045 September 8, 1906 - UNITED STATES v. TIBURCIO ZABALA

    006 Phil 431

  • G.R. No. 3046 September 8, 1906 - UNITED STATES v. DAVID FRANK

    006 Phil 433

  • G.R. No. 2655 September 11, 1906 - UNITED STATES v. MODESTO ANGELES

    006 Phil 435

  • G.R. No. 2794 September 11, 1906 - UNITED STATES v. CLARO PAGUIO

    006 Phil 436

  • G.R. No. 2815 September 11, 1906 - UNITED STATES v. BRIGIDO SALVADOR

    006 Phil 439

  • G.R. No. 2867 September 11, 1906 - UNITED STATES v. JULIAN REYES

    006 Phil 441

  • G.R. No. 3000 September 11, 1906 - UNITED STATES v. ANGEL MONTES

    006 Phil 443

  • G.R. No. 2433 September 15, 1906 - UNITED STATES v. DEOGRACIAS BUENAVENTURA

    006 Phil 447

  • G.R. No. 2949 September 17, 1906 - UNITED STATES v. EDUARDO DE OCAMPO

    006 Phil 449

  • G.R. No. 2829 September 19, 1906 - UNITED STATES v. PIO CASTILLO

    006 Phil 453

  • G.R. No. 2772 September 21, 1906 - UNITED STATES v. LOUIS A. UNSELT

    006 Phil 456

  • G.R. No. 2865 September 21, 1906 - UNITED STATES v. ANICETO ORUGA

    006 Phil 458

  • G.R. No. 1771 September 22, 1906 - MARTIN JALANDONI v. LIZARRAGA HERMANOS

    006 Phil 471

  • G.R. No. 1305 September 24, 1906 - RAMON SANTOS v. E. FINLEY JOHNSON

    006 Phil 473

  • G.R. No. 2420 September 24, 1906 - MARTIN CASALLA v. EMETERIO ENAGE

    006 Phil 475