Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence


Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence > Year 1907 > February 1907 Decisions > G.R. No. L-3371 February 23, 1907 - UNITED STATES v. HILARIO BUENCONSEJO

007 Phil 520:




PHILIPPINE SUPREME COURT DECISIONS

FIRST DIVISION

[G.R. No. L-3371. February 23, 1907. ]

THE UNITED STATES, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. HILARIO BUENCONSEJO, ET AL., Defendants-Appellants.

Fernando de la Cantera, for Appellants.

Attorney-General Araneta, for Appellee.

SYLLABUS


BRIGANDAGE; DEATH PENALTY. — In imposing sentences under the Brigandage Act, No. 518, the courts will take into account the peculiar qualities and surroundings of each case. The only acts of cruelty proved against a band of robbers being a single murder and a violation perpetrated by two individual members, only one of whom is fully identified, the death penalty will not be imposed upon a second member of the band upon the strength of a mere probability that of two suspected men he is the guilty one.


D E C I S I O N


TRACEY, J. :


In the Court of First Instance of Albay, nine of the defendants were convicted of brigandage. On the 7th of November, 1905, at Daraga, about 3 o’clock in the morning a party of seven men broke into the house of a Chinaman named Copua, killed the owner, violated a servant, and stole the money and jewelry worth 625 pesos. About an hour later, on the same morning, the shop of the Chinaman, Tan Joco, about 200 meters further on, was robbed by a gang of ten men, who carried off 230 pesos, a clock, and a watch.

On the night of the 28th of November, 1905, the shop of the Chinaman, Dy-Paco, in the pueblo of Rapu-Rapu, was entered by robbers who secured money and property worth 1,500 pesos.

On the night of 21st of December, 1905, a like band stole 2,700 pesos in money and effects worth 810 pesos from the shop of Lim-Young-Chung in Bato in the Island of Catanduanes.

It is proved by abundant testimony that these four robberies were the work of the same band of which all the defendants, with the exception of Remigio Baron were active members. But one member was committed, that of the Chinaman, Copua. In the use of the discretion accorded under the terms of the Brigandage Act, No. 518, we think that the court below properly restricted the death penalty in this case to two of the accused who were immediately guilty of the murder. In this respect each case arising under the act must be adjudged according to its peculiar qualities and surroundings. It is therefore necessary to determine which of the defendants were directly responsible for this deed. The trial court has convicted Pedro de la Torre and Martiniano Buenconsejo and had sentenced them to death. As to Pedro de la Torre the conviction is affirmed, his complete identification being reenforced by his own express admission of guilt upon the stand and is detailed narration of the crime. He was also proved to have been the man guilty of the violation of the servant.

It appears that of the seven men who attacked the house three, Pedro de la Torre, Martiniano Buenconsejo, and Eleno Barbadillo, entered by a window, and of these three, two only were murdered Copua. Neither of the women who were present at the act have clearly identified Martiniano as the second man rather than Barbadillo. The probability that he was, is not sufficient foundation for his ability that he was, is not sufficient foundation for his selection for a sentence of death. As to him and Eleno Barbadillo, who was sentenced to twenty years, the sentence of the court below is reversed and each of them is condemned to life imprisonment (cadena perpetua).

The sentence of Hilario Buenconsejo, who in a manner acted as leader of the expeditions to Rapu-Rapu and Catanduanes and of the Chinamen Quiama to thirty years imprisonment each, as well as that of Thomas Flor and Calixto Beo to twenty years imprisonment each, is affirmed.

Remigio Baron was sentenced to ten years imprisonment. One witness swore that he has seen in close conversation with Hilario Buenconsejo just before the party started for Rapu-Rapu, and some cloth found in the house of his brother was identified by one of the plundered Chinamen, as part of his property taken in the robbery. There is no other evidence against Baron, who was a man of intelligence and better position than his codefendants and was declared by some of them to have no connection with the band of its crimes. This evidence does not sustain his conviction and he is acquitted.

Each of the condemned shall pay one-eighth part of the costs of both instances. After the expiration of ten days let judgment be entered in accordance herewith, and ten days thereafter let the case be returned to the court from whence it came for proper action. So ordered.

Arellano, C.J., Torres, Mapa, Johnson, Carson, and Willard, JJ., concur.




Back to Home | Back to Main




















chanrobles.com





ChanRobles On-Line Bar Review

ChanRobles Internet Bar Review : www.chanroblesbar.com

ChanRobles MCLE On-line

ChanRobles Lawnet Inc. - ChanRobles MCLE On-line : www.chanroblesmcleonline.com






February-1907 Jurisprudence                 

  • G.R. No. L-3150 February 1, 1907 - CIRILA DOMINGO v. ANTONIO OSORIO

    007 Phil 405

  • G.R. No. L-3088 February 6, 1907 - EL BANCO ESPAÑOL-FILIPINO v. JAMES PETERSON

    007 Phil 409

  • G.R. No. L-3148 February 6, 1907 - ENRIQUE MA. BARRETTO v. CITY OF MANILA

    007 Phil 416

  • G.R. No. L-3225 February 6, 1907 - BEHN v. W. H. MITCHELL

    007 Phil 420

  • G.R. No. L-1210 February 7, 1907 - UNITED STATES v. FILOMENO APURADO

    007 Phil 422

  • G.R. No. L-2409 February 7, 1907 - IN RE: FELIPE G. CALDERON

    007 Phil 427

  • G.R. No. L-3086 February 7, 1907 - MITSUI BUSSAN KAISHA v. GOVERNMENT OF THE PHIL. ISLANDS

    007 Phil 436

  • G.R. No. L-3240 February 8, 1907 - PABLO TRINIDAD v. LUCAS RICAFORT

    007 Phil 449

  • G.R. No. L-3019 February 9, 1907 - LA COMPAÑIA GENERAL DE TABACOS DE FILIPINA v. VICENTE ARAZA

    007 Phil 455

  • G.R. No. L-3176 February 9, 1907 - UNITED STATES v. C. M. PENDLETON

    007 Phil 457

  • G.R. No. L-3246 February 9, 1907 - CADWALLADER & CO. v. SMITH

    007 Phil 461

  • G.R. No. L-3253 February 9, 1907 - UNITED STATES v. E. S. JOCKERS

    007 Phil 464

  • G.R. No. L-3345 February 9, 1907 - JUAN HERNANDEZ TIO-QUINCHUAN v. MANUEL LIM

    007 Phil 467

  • G.R. No. L-3070 February 11, 1907 - UNITED STATES v. JUAN CABILING

    007 Phil 469

  • G.R. No. L-3346 February 13, 1907 - UNITED STATES v. FRANCISCO DIMITILLO

    007 Phil 475

  • G.R. No. L-2001 February 14, 1907 - SALVADOR PANGANIBAN v. AGUSTIN CUEVAS

    007 Phil 477

  • G.R. No. L-2963 February 14, 1907 - COMPAÑIA GENERAL DE TABACOS DE FILIPINAS v. CITY OF MANILA

    007 Phil 488

  • G.R. No. L-3462 February 16, 1907 - UNITED STATES v. SANTACRUZ DURUELO

    007 Phil 497

  • G.R. No. L-2973 February 18, 1907 - JUAN MUYCO v. PEDRO MONTILLA ET AL

    007 Phil 498

  • G.R. No. L-3199 February 21, 1907 - ANGEL ORTIZ v. LA COMPAÑIA MARITIMA

    007 Phil 507

  • G.R. No. L-3390 February 21, 1907 - UNITED STATES v. CIRIACO NUECA

    007 Phil 511

  • G.R. No. L-3305 February 23, 1907 - UNITED STATES v. PILAR JAVIER

    007 Phil 514

  • G.R. No. L-3347 February 23, 1907 - UNITED STATES v. ALVARO PADLAN

    007 Phil 517

  • G.R. No. L-3371 February 23, 1907 - UNITED STATES v. HILARIO BUENCONSEJO

    007 Phil 520

  • G.R. No. L-3380 February 23, 1907 - UNITED STATES v. SIMON SCHNEER

    007 Phil 523

  • G.R. No. L-3650 February 23, 1907 - MARGARITA TORIBIO v. MODESTA TORIBIO

    007 Phil 526

  • G.R. No. L-3066 February 25, 1907 - H. L. HEATH v. STEAMER "SAN NICOLAS

    007 Phil 532

  • G.R. No. L-3351 February 25, 1907 - ANG SENG QUEN v. JUAN TE CHICO

    007 Phil 541

  • G.R. No. L-2938 February 26, 1907 - GOV’T. OF THE PHIL. ISLANDS v. GRACIANO PUNZALAN

    007 Phil 546

  • G.R. No. L-3444 February 26, 1907 - CITY OF MANILA v. CHENG Y CHIANG

    007 Phil 550

  • G.R. No. L-2962 February 27, 1907 - B. H. MACKE v. JOSE CAMPS

    007 Phil 553

  • G.R. No. L-3229 February 27, 1907 - ARSENIO DE LA ROSA v. MARIANO ARENAS

    007 Phil 556

  • G.R. No. L-3255 February 27, 1907 - UNITED STATES v. CANDIDO ULAT

    007 Phil 559

  • G.R. No. L-3298 February 27, 1907 - FELISA NEPOMUCENO, ET AL. v. GENARO HEREDIA

    007 Phil 563

  • G.R. No. L-3007 February 28, 1907 - ROMAN CATHOLIC APOSTOLIC CHURCH v. MUNICIPALITY OF BADOC

    007 Phil 566

  • G.R. No. L-3135 February 28, 1907 - E. M. BACHRACH v. JAMES J. PETERSON

    007 Phil 571

  • G.R. No. L-3402 February 28, 1907 - JOSE ITURRALDE v. FRANCISCA ALFONSO

    007 Phil 576