Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence


Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence > Year 1907 > November 1907 Decisions > G.R. No. L-3908 November 1, 1907 - ENRIQUE SERRANO v. LEANDRO SERRANO

009 Phil 142:




PHILIPPINE SUPREME COURT DECISIONS

FIRST DIVISION

[G.R. No. L-3908. November 1, 1907. ]

ENRIQUE SERRANO, ET AL., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. LEANDRO SERRANO, Defendant-Appellee.

No appearance for Appellants.

Jose M. del Valle and Lucas Paredes, for Appellee.

SYLLABUS


1. CIVIL PROCEDURE; BILL OF EXCEPTIONS UNDULY APPROVED AND SUBMITTED TO THE SUPREME COURT. — An exception to an order of the court sustaining a demurrer can not forthwith be the subject of a bill of exceptions to be heard separately and in anticipation of any final judgment in a suit, because, according to sections 101 and 123 of the Code of Civil Procedure, a bill of exceptions can only be considered after final judgment, for a review by the Supreme Court of all rulings, orders, and judgments made in the action to which the party has duly excepted at the time of making such ruling, order, or judgment. (Sec. 143.)


D E C I S I O N


ARELLANO, C.J. :


On the 6th of March, 1906, the plaintiffs, as executors, presented to the Court of First Instance of Ilocos Norte a complaint asking that judgment be rendered against the defendant ordering him (1) to immediately deliver to the plaintiffs the real property, or land, and other property set forth in the complaint, together with a drag net and a carriage, upon the same being previously declared to be the property of the late Margarita Sivila, and that the partition thereof, as set forth in the said writing, be annulled in order that the same should be included in the inventory of the property of the estate of the deceased; and, further, to return the fruits of the aforesaid land since the year 1890 to date, or the value thereof, amounting to P75,000; (2) to pay to the plaintiffs the sum of P15,000 by way of expenses, loss, and damages, as set forth in the complaint; and (3) to pay to the plaintiffs such loss and damage as may be proper, in addition to the foregoing, and the costs of the proceedings.

On the 21st of April of the same year the defendant demurred to the complaint on the ground that the court of the Province of Ilocos Norte had no jurisdiction over the above-entitled case, because the complaint referred to property situated in the Province of Ilocos Sur, with the exception of one piece situated in the Province of Ilocos Norte, and because personal property is claimed therein, and that both the plaintiffs and the defendant are residents of the Province of Ilocos Sur. On January 21, 1907, the following decision was rendered:jgc:chanrobles.com.ph

"Whereas the real property claimed herein is mostly situated in the Province of Ilocos Sur, and whereas both the plaintiffs and the defendant reside in said province, action should be taken there as desired by the defendant, and not in that of Ilocos Norte, notwithstanding the fact that the plaintiffs act in the capacity of executors of an estate which is in the last-named province, to wit, Ilocos Norte, since the place where the real property and the defendant are is preferable to that of the plaintiff. Therefore, the demurrer is sustained and the plaintiffs are directed to take action before the Court of First Instance of Ilocos Sur."cralaw virtua1aw library

On the same date the plaintiffs excepted to the above decision and on the following day, the 26th, they filed their bill of exceptions.

Upon considering this appeal we declare that the same has been prematurely interposed, and that the bill of exceptions was improperly approved, for the reason that, in accordance with sections 101 and 123 of the Code of Civil Procedure, a bill of exceptions can only be considered after a final judgment, "for a review by the Supreme Court of all rulings, orders, and judgments made in the action to which the party has duly excepted at the time of making such ruling, order, or judgment." (Sec. 143.) Therefore the appeal is hereby dismissed, with costs. So ordered.

Torres, Johnson, Carson, Willard, and Tracey, JJ., concur.




Back to Home | Back to Main




















chanrobles.com





ChanRobles On-Line Bar Review

ChanRobles Internet Bar Review : www.chanroblesbar.com

ChanRobles MCLE On-line

ChanRobles Lawnet Inc. - ChanRobles MCLE On-line : www.chanroblesmcleonline.com






November-1907 Jurisprudence                 

  • G.R. No. L-3908 November 1, 1907 - ENRIQUE SERRANO v. LEANDRO SERRANO

    009 Phil 142

  • G.R. No. L-3732 November 2, 1907 - CLEMENCIA FELIX v. MATEO A FELIX

    009 Phil 144

  • G.R. No. L-3427 November 6, 1907 - CAPELLANIA DEL CONVENTO DE TAMBOBONG v. HIPOLITO CRUZ

    009 Phil 145

  • G.R. No. L-3623 November 6, 1907 - RUPERTO RELOVA v. ELENA LAVAREZ

    009 Phil 149

  • G.R. No. L-3661 November 6, 1907 - UNITED STATES v. LAUREANO RODRIGUEZ

    009 Phil 153

  • G.R. No. L-3985 November 6, 1907 - UNITED STATES v. ANANIAS CERVO, ET AL.

    009 Phil 158

  • G.R. No. L-3986 November 6, 1907 - UNITED STATES v. AMBROSIO GESMUNDO

    009 Phil 160

  • G.R. No. L-3996 November 6, 1907 - UNITED STATES v. JUAN BAILON

    009 Phil 161

  • G.R. No. L-3852 November 11, 1907 - UNITED STATES v. EDUARDO MONTIEL

    009 Phil 162

  • G.R. No. L-3779 November 13, 1907 - UNITED STATES v. OTIS G. FREEMAN

    009 Phil 168

  • G.R. No. L-3787 November 14, 1907 - TEODORICA ENDENCIA v. EDUARDO LOALHATI

    009 Phil 177

  • G.R. No. L-3754 November 15, 1907 - ANGELA OJINAGA v. ESTATE OF TOMAS R. PEREZ

    009 Phil 185

  • G.R. No. L-3516 November 16, 1907 - FELISA NEPOMUCENO v. CIRILO A. CARLOS

    009 Phil 194

  • G.R. No. L-3838 November 16, 1907 - UNITED STATES v. AGUSTIN FERNANDEZ

    009 Phil 199

  • G.R. No. L-3840 November 16, 1907 - UNITED STATES v. IGNACIO BORSED

    009 Phil 203

  • G.R. No. L-3878 November 16, 1907 - UNITED STATES v. ATANACIO MACASPAC

    009 Phil 207

  • G.R. No. L-4123 November 16, 1907 - LA YEBANA COMPANY v. TIMOTEO SEVILLA

    009 Phil 210

  • G.R. No. L-4018 November 18, 1907 - UNITED STATES v. DEMETRIO SALUDO

    009 Phil 213

  • G.R. No. L-3144 November 19, 1907 - CARMEN AYALA DE ROXAS, ET AL. v. CITY OF MANILA, ET AL.

    009 Phil 215

  • G.R. No. L-3638 November 19, 1907 - FAUSTINO GUERRA v. BLANCO SENDAGORTA, ET AL.

    009 Phil 222

  • G.R. No. L-3662 November 19, 1907 - VICENTA ACUÑA v. THE CITY OF MANILA

    009 Phil 225

  • G.R. No. L-3610 November 20, 1907 - JOSE CAMPS v. PEDRO A. PATERNO

    009 Phil 229

  • G.R. No. L-3774 November 20, 1907 - UNITED STATES v. VICENTE SOTTO

    009 Phil 231

  • G.R. No. L-4069 November 20, 1907 - JUAN JAUCIAN v. ROBERTO FLORANZA

    009 Phil 236

  • G.R. No. L-2786 November 21, 1907 - UNITED STATES v. VICTORIANO ASEBUQUE

    009 Phil 241

  • G.R. No. L-3900 November 21, 1907 - UNITED STATES v. CANUTO BUTARDO

    009 Phil 246

  • G.R. No. L-4357 November 21, 1907 - MIGUEL PAVON v. PHIL. ISLANDS TELEPHONE, ET AL.

    009 Phil 247

  • G.R. No. 3747 November 22, 1907 - YU CHENGCO v. ALFONSO TIAOQUI, ET AL.

    011 Phil 598

  • G.R. No. L-3755 November 23, 1907 - C. C. PYLE v. ROY W. JOHNSON

    009 Phil 249

  • G.R. No. L-3823 November 23, 1907 - PEDRO P. ROXAS v. MARIA DE LA PAZ MIJARES

    009 Phil 252

  • G.R. No. L-3750 November 26, 1907 - UNITED STATES v. JUSTO GAMIS

    009 Phil 259

  • G.R. No. L-3964 November 26, 1907 - UNITED STATES v. ESTEBAN MALABANAN

    009 Phil 262

  • G.R. No. L-3973 November 26, 1907 - UNITED STATES v. MARTIN SOL

    009 Phil 265

  • G.R. No. L-3741 November 27, 1907 - UNITED STATES v. AFRONIANO FERNANDEZ

    009 Phil 269

  • G.R. No. L-3702 November 29, 1907 - UNITED STATES v. ESCOLASTICO DE LA CRUZ

    009 Phil 276