Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence


Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence > Year 1908 > February 1908 Decisions > G.R. No. L-4108 February 12, 1908 - UNITED STATES v. DOROTEO GALIT QUINTO

010 Phil 126:




PHILIPPINE SUPREME COURT DECISIONS

FIRST DIVISION

[G.R. No. L-4108. February 12, 1908. ]

THE UNITED STATES, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. DOROTEO GALIT QUINTO, Defendant-Appellant.

Crispin Oben, for Appellant.

Attorney-General Araneta, for Appellee.

SYLLABUS


1. JUDGMENT; CONVICTION; SUFFICIENCY OF PROOF. — Judgment of conviction can not be sustained unless every fact upon which such judgment rests is established beyond a reasonable doubt.


D E C I S I O N


CARSON, J. :


The appellant Doroteo Galit Quinto, was convicted of the crime of misappropriation of public funds, as defined and penalized in paragraph 2, article 390, of the Penal Code, upon an information charging the commission of the offense as follows:jgc:chanrobles.com.ph

"The said Doroteo Galit Quinto on or before the 11th day of July, 1906, in the municipality of San Pablo, Province of La Laguna, Philippine Islands, being at that time municipal treasurer and deputy of the provincial treasurer, in the said municipality of San Pablo, having in his charge, as such official, public funds, abstracted from the said municipal funds the sum of P1,000 pesos. This contrary to law."cralaw virtua1aw library

On the evening of the 10th day of July 1906, the treasurer of the Province of La Laguna arrived in the town of San Pablo, for the purpose of relieving the accused from his office as municipal treasurer and substituting in his place one Marcos Paulino. Late that evening, an inventory was made of the funds, supplies, stamps, etc., in the hands of the accused as municipal treasurer and the following provisional statements of the result of this inventory was prepared by the accused and signed by himself and the incoming treasurer:chanrob1es virtual 1aw library

Statement of amounts.

Silver P1,000.00

Silver 1,000.00

Silver 289.18

Silver 47.50

Silver 258.00

Paper 462.00

Paper 1,400.00

Paper 520.00

Paper 240.00

Paper 1,402.33

Paper 803.68

Deposit receipt (general) 5,307.77

Deposit receipt (school) 9,497.92

Check 40.30

Exchange for 44 pesos 33.84

Stamps (voucher not prepared) 10.22

Stamps (voucher prepared) 5.62

Memorandum receipt 6.60

Copper coins 2.30

————

Total 22,327.26

July collection 1,183.22

————

Total 23,510.48

SAN PABLO, July 10, 1906.

(JULY 1, 1906.)

Received by:chanrob1es virtual 1aw library

MARCOS PAULINO,

Incoming Treasurer.

Delivered by:chanrob1es virtual 1aw library

DOROTEO G. QUINTO,

Outgoing Treasurer.

Two of these items, one of P1,402.33 and the other of P803.68, were at the time of this count in the form of memorandum receipts signed by the provincial treasurer, and were treated as cash, it being understood that the provincial treasurer would take up these receipts before the outgoing municipal treasurer turned over the funds to his successor.

The actual transfer of the office and funds did not take place until the following morning, and the prosecution alleges that in the meantime the provincial treasurer paid over to the accused P2,206.01, being the total amount represented by these memorandum receipts, and the further sum of P2,430.13 being a balance found due the municipal treasury from the provincial treasury, as its share of certain municipal and school funds collected by the provincial treasurer. The provincial treasurer left San Pablo on his way to the hospital in Manila before the funds were finally turned over, and immediately upon his departure a recount was made of the funds, stamps, and deposit receipts, and a statement thereof, including a statement showing the amount due upon the face of the books of the outgoing treasurer, was prepared and signed by both these officials in the following form:jgc:chanrobles.com.ph

"In the count on this 11th day of July, 1906, a few moments after the departure of the provincial treasurer, the following amounts result:chanrob1es virtual 1aw library

Cash P2,602.39

Notes 6,252.00

Check, $20.15 40.30

Memorandum stamps 10.22

Memorandum stamps 5.62

Chits 6.60

Office supplies 12.61

School deposit 9,497.92

General deposit 5,307.77

Copper coins .73

————

Total 23,736.16

————

Collections from 1st to 10th July, 1906 1,183.22

————

Total 24,919.38

————

As per school cashbook 14,527.65

As per general book 10,208.51

July collections 1,183.22

————

25,919.38

BALANCE.

Total in cash P24,919.38

Total as per books 25,919.38

————

Difference 1,000.00

"The undersigned, as incoming and outgoing treasurers, declare that according to the liquidations verified on this day, on account of the delivery, the amounts above stated are correct.

"In testimony whereof we sign these presents before the witnesses Antonio Torres and Damian Magpantay.

"Dated San Pablo, 11th day of July, 1906. Doroteo G. Quinto, outgoing treasurer. Marcos Paulino, incoming treasurer. Antonio Torres, witness. Damian Magpantay, witness."cralaw virtua1aw library

If it be true, as alleged by the prosecution, that prior to the preparation of the second statement the provincial treasurer paid the accused the sum of P2,206.01, on account of the memorandum receipts, and the sum of P2,430.13, on account of the balance due from the provincial treasury to the municipal treasury, a comparison of those statements leaves no room for doubt that there was a shortage of P1,000 in the account of the accused at the time when the second statement was prepared, and that the shortage resulted from the obstruction of P1,000 from the funds in the hands of the accused on the night of the 10th or the morning of the 11th of July, 1906.

The accused admits having received the sum of P2,300, but denies the payment of the balance due; his statements are not satisfactory, but the burden of proof rests on the prosecution to establish the payment, as alleged, beyond a reasonable doubt. the only witnesses as to this point were the provincial treasurer and his deputy. The provincial treasurer was sick at the time when the alleged payment was made, and it is not impossible that under the circumstances a mistake might have been made; certain it is that he was in haste to get away, and he does not appear to have a very distinct recollection of the exact circumstances surrounding the payment. While he was quite positive as to the payment when he was on the witness stand, he does not seem to have been so positive when he first learned of the shortage some days after the event. Indeed, it would appear from his letters and telegrams hat he was then under the impression that there might have been a mistake, and that it was not until he had an opportunity to check up his books, and satisfy himself that they showed no unaccounted for surplus in his hands, that he finally convinced himself that there was no mistake in the transactions arising out of the settlement of the accounts of the accused, and that he had in fact paid the amount indicated. Its deputy swore that he was present when the balance of P2,430.13 was paid the accused, just before the provincial treasurer left for Manila. He stated that this amount was paid in P10 notes, and that he himself counted the P430 which, together with two bundles of notes, each amounting to P1,000, were placed by him on the table where the rest of the funds of the accused were spread out preparatory examination of his testimony, however, shows that while he was quite clear and positive as to the delivery of the P430.13 which he himself counted and delivered, he was not so certain and positive as to whether one, two, or three bundles of notes, each containing P1,000, were placed upon the table at the same time. This money does not appear to have been handed to the accused himself, and it would appear from the testimony of the deputy that the accused was not given an opportunity to verify the amount paid, as at the time of the alleged payment it was placed with the other funds upon the table, so that thereafter it was impossible to determine just what was the exact amount paid over at that time.

Under all the circumstances we think that the fact of payment of these funds is not established with that degree of certainty which would justify us in sustaining the judgment of conviction of the accused; the said judgment of conviction is therefore reversed with the costs of both instances de oficio, and the accused of the crime with which he is charged, and if in detention, he will be set at liberty forthwith, or if at liberty under bail, his bail bond is hereby exonerated. So ordered.

Arellano, C.J., Torres, Mapa, Johnson, Willard and Tracey, JJ., concur.




Back to Home | Back to Main




















chanrobles.com





ChanRobles On-Line Bar Review

ChanRobles Internet Bar Review : www.chanroblesbar.com

ChanRobles MCLE On-line

ChanRobles Lawnet Inc. - ChanRobles MCLE On-line : www.chanroblesmcleonline.com






February-1908 Jurisprudence                 

  • G.R. No. L-3720 February 3, 1908 - MARIA COSIO v. ANTONINO, ET AL.

    010 Phil 72

  • G.R. No. L-3971 February 3, 1908 - UNITED STATES v. HILARIO BRAGANZA, ET AL.

    010 Phil 79

  • G.R. No. L-4005 February 3, 1908 - UNITED STATES v. RUFO REYES

    010 Phil 83

  • G.R. No. L-3806 February 4, 1908 - MARIANO MADAMBA v. PELAGIA MAGNO

    010 Phil 86

  • G.R. No. L-3860 February 5, 1908 - UNITED STATES v. FAUSTINO TREMOYA

    010 Phil 89

  • G.R. No. L-3906 February 5, 1908 - UNITED STATES v. JACINTO PAGUIA

    010 Phil 90

  • G.R. No. L-4125 February 5, 1908 - FREDERICK GARFIELD WAITE v. F. THEODORE ROGERS

    010 Phil 94

  • G.R. No. L-4552 February 5, 1908 - ARTHUR F. YAMBERT v. J. MCMICKING

    010 Phil 95

  • G.R. No. L-4092 February 6, 1908 - UNITED STATES v. DANIEL CAMPO

    010 Phil 97

  • G.R. No. L-4165 February 8, 1908 - UNITED STATES v. SIMEON GAMALINDA, ET AL.

    010 Phil 100

  • G.R. No. L-3962 February 10, 1908 - UNITED STATES v. LING SU FAN

    010 Phil 104

  • G.R. No. L-4251 February 10, 1908 - CLEMENTE MANOTOC v. JOSE MCMICKING

    010 Phil 119

  • G.R. No. L-4193 February 11, 1908 - ISIDORO SANTOS v. MODESTO REYES

    010 Phil 123

  • G.R. No. L-4108 February 12, 1908 - UNITED STATES v. DOROTEO GALIT QUINTO

    010 Phil 126

  • G.R. No. L-4217 February 12, 1908 - UNITED STATES v. CEFERINO CAUAS

    010 Phil 131

  • G.R. No. L-4328 February 13, 1908 - UNITED STATES v. JOSE CRAME

    010 Phil 135

  • G.R. No. 3870 February 14, 1908 - LAZARO REMO ET AL. v. PASTOR ESPINOSA

    010 Phil 136

  • G.R. No. L-3974 February 14, 1908 - UNITED STATES v. ISIDRO JAMERO

    010 Phil 137

  • G.R. No. L-3770 February 17, 1908 - CARLOS PABIA SY CHUNG-QUIONG v. FELIPA SY-TIONG TAY CUANSI

    010 Phil 141

  • G.R. No. L-3939 February 17, 1908 - MENDEZONA & CO. v. MARIANO MORENO

    010 Phil 144

  • G.R. No. L-4043 February 17, 1908 - ROMAN DE LA ROSA v. GREGORIO REVITA SANTOS

    010 Phil 148

  • G.R. No. L-3898 February 18, 1908 - CITY OF MANILA v. TOMAS CABANGIS

    010 Phil 151

  • G.R. No. L-4014 February 18, 1908 - GENARO HEREDIA v. RAMON SALINAS

    010 Phil 157

  • G.R. No. L-4139 February 18, 1908 - UNITED STATES v. JUAN SAN LUIS

    010 Phil 163

  • G.R. No. L-4195 February 18, 1908 - ATLANTIC v. GOVERNMENT OF THE PHIL. ISLANDS

    010 Phil 166

  • G.R. No. L-3793 February 19, 1908 - CIRILO MAPA v. INSULAR GOVERNMENT

    010 Phil 175

  • G.R. No. L-3875 February 19, 1908 - UNITED STATES v. JANUARIO FRANCISCO

    010 Phil 185

  • G.R. No. L-3998 February 19, 1908 - UNITED STATES v. POMPOSO BURGUETA, ET AL.

    010 Phil 188

  • G.R. No. L-4319 February 19, 1908 - STRONG & TROWBRIDGE v. VAN BUSKIRK-CROOK CO.

    010 Phil 190

  • G.R. No. L-4335 February 19, 1908 - UNITED STATES v. PEDRO LINDIO

    010 Phil 192

  • G.R. No. L-3967 February 20, 1908 - UNITED STATES v. SANTIAGO MAQUILAN

    010 Phil 193

  • G.R. No. L-3751 February 21, 1908 - EDUARDA BENEDICTO v. JULIO JAVELLANA

    010 Phil 197

  • G.R. No. L-4402 February 21, 1908 - UNITED STATES v. FELIX YAPE, ET AL.

    010 Phil 204

  • G.R. No. L-3937 February 24, 1908 - UNITED STATES v. JUAN SALUD

    010 Phil 206

  • G.R. No. L-4138 February 25, 1908 - SY HONG ENG v. SY LIOC SUY

    010 Phil 209

  • G.R. No. L-4489 February 25, 1908 - RAMON HONTIVEROS v. JOSE C. ABREU

    010 Phil 213

  • G.R. No. L-4512 February 25, 1908 - GREGORIO ABENDAN v. MARTIN LLORENTE

    010 Phil 216

  • G.R. No. L-3960 February 27, 1908 - GIL HERMANOS v. JOHN S. HORD

    010 Phil 218

  • G.R. No. L-4159 February 27, 1908 - UNITED STATES v. JUAN GALLEGO

    010 Phil 222

  • G.R. No. L-4255 February 27, 1908 - UNITED STATES v. JULIO AUTIZ

    010 Phil 223

  • G.R. No. L-4576 February 27, 1908 - MAURO NAVARRO v. CASIANO GIMENEZ

    010 Phil 226

  • G.R. No. L-4189 February 28, 1908 - UNITED STATES v. SEYMOUR ADDISON

    010 Phil 230

  • G.R. No. L-4298 February 28, 1908 - UNITED STATES v. FRANCISCO MARAVILLA

    010 Phil 233

  • G.R. No. L-4366 February 28, 1908 - UNITED STATES v. JUAN GARCIA

    010 Phil 240

  • G.R. No. L-3471 February 28, 1908 - INT’L. BANKING CORP. v. FRANCISCO MARTINEZ

    010 Phil 242

  • G.R. No. L-3472 February 29, 1908 - INT’L. BANKING CORP. v. FRANCISCO MARTINEZ

    010 Phil 252

  • G.R. No. L-4067 February 29, 1908 - FREDERICK E. MOREY v. LAO LAYCO

    010 Phil 258

  • G.R. No. L-4346 February 29, 1908 - UNITED STATES v. MARIANO PESCADOR

    010 Phil 260

  • G.R. No. L-4469 February 29, 1908 - FELIPE G. CALDERON v. JOSE MCMICKING

    010 Phil 261