Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence


Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence > Year 1908 > October 1908 Decisions > G.R. No. 4463 October 6, 1908 - LUIS R. YANGCO v. ARSENIO CRUZ HERRERA, ET AL.

011 Phil 402:




PHILIPPINE SUPREME COURT DECISIONS

EN BANC

[G.R. No. 4463. October 6, 1908. ]

LUIS R. YANGCO, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. ARSENIO CRUZ HERRERA and SERAFIN WY PIACO, Defendants-Appellants.

Arsenio Cruz Herrera in his own behalf.

Ortigas & Fisher for Appellee.

SYLLABUS


1. MORTGAGE; FORECLOSURE; SALE TO HIGHEST BIDDER. — Even though a clause be inserted in a mortgage fixing a tipo or upset price to become operative in the event of foreclosure, nevertheless, .the sale must take place and the property must be awarded to the highest bidder. Parties can not by agreement contravene the statutes and interfere with the lawful procedure of the courts. (Banco Español-Filipino v. Donaldson Sim & Co., 5 Phil. Rep., 418.)


D E C I S I O N


TRACEY, J. :


On March 16, 1904, the defendant Herrera borrowed from the plaintiff P10,000, which was by two subsequent loans increased to P25,000, as security for which he mortgaged two parcels of real estate in the district of Ermita, in the city of Manila, P23,000 being charged upon the larger property and P2,000 upon the smaller. These mortgages contained the following clause:jgc:chanrobles.com.ph

"By agreement with the agent of the creditor I fix as the value of the aforesaid property the sum of 45,000 Philippine pesos, which sum shall serve as tipo (upset price) at the only auction which shall be held, in case the creditor is obliged to enforce his claim, hereby waiving any other valuation and any action which might be available to me to that end."cralaw virtua1aw library

The judge of First Instance of the city of Manila ordered the foreclosure of the mortgages and the sale of the real estate without reference to the clause above quoted. The defendant Serafin Wy Piaco was included in the foreclosure as a subsequent purchaser of the smaller parcel.

The debated question here is the effect of the clause fixing the tipo, that is to say, the basis of sale or upset price. In the case of El Banco Español-Filipino v. Donaldson Sim & Co. et al (5 Phil. Rep., 418), we held such a clause in regard to chattels ineffective, and directed a sale, under the provisions of the Code of Civil Procedure. The pledge in that instance had been created before the new code went into effect. The mortgage now before us was executed while that code was in force, and it is contended that, for this reason, its provisions must be regarded as referring to the existing law embodied in that code, so that upon elementary principles for the construction of contracts, the parties thereto being held to have contracted with a knowledge of the law, their stipulations shall be construed so as to give them effect rather than so as to destroy them by holding them in conflict with it.

We are of the opinion that the principle of the Donaldson Sim & Co. case applies to this action. The clause quoted from the mortgage operates to essentially vary the procedure laid down in the code: first, it apparently provides that there shall be no more than one auction, whereas under the existing practice, the court may, in its discretion, for a variety of reasons, vacate a sale and order a resale of a mortgaged property; second, the provision for an upset price for less than which the property could not be sold contravenes the peremptory direction of the statute that the property shall be sold to the highest bidder; third, inasmuch as the mortgagee did not covenant to bid up to the tipo fixed in the mortgage and was under no obligation to do so, the result of an auction at which he failed to so bid would be either one of three consequences: (a) a resale under the new practice, in violation of the rights of other bidders and which must needs prove futile, because the rights and obligations thereat would not be varied from those of the first auction; or (b) a resale with an abatement of the price, thereby reducing the tipo in accordance with certain provisions of the Spanish code and regulations, now repealed; or (c) a blockade of procedure, leaving the rights of the parties unadjusted with no apparent method of enforcing them. None of these consequences is compatible with the scheme of the Code of Civil Procedure which positively requires a final disposition of the property offered for sale, and admits of a resale not in the regular order of procedure, but only for special reasons satisfactory to the court. It is evident, therefore, that such a stipulation can not be enforced without substituting a procedure agreed upon by the parties, for the one prescribed by law. This it is not in the power of private individuals to do. Their agreements as to their substantive rights will be given effect but not their covenants as to adjective rights or methods of procedure in the courts, which are already regulated by law and lie beyond their control.

This conclusion renders it unnecessary for us to determine what is the precise interpretation of this clause which itself is substantially a repetition of certain clauses of articles 127 and 128 of the Spanish Mortgage Law and of the one hundred and sixty-eighth and one hundred and seventy-second regulations for its enforcement. Suffice it to say that the provision of the mortgage is subject to the objection above pointed out.

From this decision it does not follow that the parties to a mortgage may not agree that the mortgagee shall make good to the mortgagor and difference between an agreed valuation and what the property brings at a sale under foreclosure, nor that he can not personally obligate himself to bid at the sale a stipulated price. We only hold that such a contract on the part of individuals can not interfere with the procedure of the courts.

The judgment of the Court of First Instance is hereby affirmed, with costs. So ordered.

Arellano, C.J., Torres, Mapa, Carson and Willard, JJ., concur.




Back to Home | Back to Main




















chanrobles.com





ChanRobles On-Line Bar Review

ChanRobles Internet Bar Review : www.chanroblesbar.com

ChanRobles MCLE On-line

ChanRobles Lawnet Inc. - ChanRobles MCLE On-line : www.chanroblesmcleonline.com






October-1908 Jurisprudence                 

  • G.R. No. 2525 October 1, 1908 - MODESTO PARAS v. INSULAR GOV’T., ET AL.

    011 Phil 378

  • G.R. No. 2527 October 1, 1908 - LUCAS V. CARRILLO v. THE INSULAR GOV’T., ET AL.

    011 Phil 379

  • G.R. No. 4316 October 1, 1908 - FROELICH & KUTTNER v. COLLECTION OF CUSTOMS

    011 Phil 380

  • G.R. No. 4452 October 1, 1908 - JUANA PICHAY v. EULALIO QUEROL, ET AL.

    011 Phil 386

  • G.R. No. 4453 October 1, 1908 - IN THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE FLORA MARTINEZ

    011 Phil 389

  • G.R. No. 4893 October 1, 1908 - PASAY ESTATE CO. v. HON. SIMPLICIO DEL ROSARIO, ET AL.

    011 Phil 391

  • G.R. No. 4187 October 5, 1908 - VICENTA LIMJUCO v. MAURICIA GANARA

    011 Phil 393

  • G.R. No. 3551 October 6, 1908 - VICTOR SANCHEZ v. CIRILO PASCUAL

    011 Phil 395

  • G.R. No. 4066 October 6, 1908 - ALIPIA DUMLAO v. CANDIDO POBRE II

    011 Phil 400

  • G.R. No. 4463 October 6, 1908 - LUIS R. YANGCO v. ARSENIO CRUZ HERRERA, ET AL.

    011 Phil 402

  • G.R. No. 3354 October 8, 1908 - ROMAN CATHOLIC APOSTOLIC CHURCH v. MUN. OF CEBU

    011 Phil 405

  • G.R. No. 4033 October 8, 1908 - MIGUEL BOGA TAN CHIAO BOC, ET AL. v. GREGORIO SAJO VECINA

    011 Phil 409

  • G.R. No. 4267 October 9, 1908 - UNITED STATES v. GAUDENCIO CABUNCAL

    011 Phil 415

  • G.R. No. 4309 October 9, 1908 - DAVID CLETO v. JULIANA SALVADOR, ET AL.

    011 Phil 416

  • G.R. No. 4527 October 9, 1908 - UNITED STATES v. CLEMENTE ROQUE

    011 Phil 422

  • G.R. No. 4561 October 9, 1908 - UNITED STATES v. FORTUNATO MEÑEZ

    011 Phil 430

  • G.R. No. 4778 October 9, 1908 - UNITED STATES v. ANTONINO ESPIÑOSA

    011 Phil 432

  • G.R. No. 4541 October 12, 1908 - N. T. HASHIM CO. v. ESTATE OF JOHN KERNAN

    011 Phil 435

  • G.R. No. 4590 October 12, 1908 - MARIANO LIMJAP v. TOMASA VERA MOGUER

    011 Phil 439

  • G.R. No. 4483 October 14, 1908 - IGNACIO SAN JOSE, ET AL. v. PEDRO ORTEGA, ET AL.

    011 Phil 442

  • G.R. No. 4432 October 15, 1908 - UNITED STATES v. AGRIPINO MACASAET

    011 Phil 447

  • G.R. No. 4736 October 15, 1908 - JEREMIAH J. HARTY v. FRANCISCO SANDIN, ET AL.

    011 Phil 450

  • G.R. No. 4480 October 16, 1908 - KER & CO. v. ANASTASIA DE LA RAMA

    011 Phil 453

  • G.R. No. 4608 October 16, 1908 - MURPHY, MORRIS & CO. v. COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS

    011 Phil 456

  • G.R. No. 3356 October 21, 1908 - ROMAN CATHOLIC APOSTOLIC CHURCH, ET AL. v. MUN. OF LANGARAN, ET AL.

    011 Phil 460

  • G.R. No. 4772 October 21, 1908 - DAVID FRANK v. GEO. N. WOLFE

    011 Phil 466

  • G.R. No. 4781 October 21, 1908 - UNITED STATES v. BALTASAR SARMIENTO

    011 Phil 474

  • G.R. No. 4342 October 22, 1908 - UNITED STATES v. MERCEDES ALABANZA

    011 Phil 475

  • G.R. No. 4532 October 22, 1908 - B. H. MACKE v. JOSE RUBERT

    011 Phil 480

  • G.R. No. 4793 October 22, 1908 - UNITED STATES v. LIM SUCO

    011 Phil 484

  • G.R. No. 4801 October 22, 1908 - UNITED STATES v. MARTIN GABOYA

    011 Phil 489

  • G.R. No. 4406 October 23, 1908 - ANTONIA O. VALENCIA v. JUAN M. JIMENEZ, ET AL.

    011 Phil 492

  • G.R. No. 4571 October 24, 1908 - IRINEO DE GUZMAN v. PASCUAL BALARAG

    011 Phil 503

  • G.R. No. 4525 October 27, 1908 - FELICIANA BANTUG v. AMBROSIO DEL ROSARIO

    011 Phil 511

  • G.R. No. 4691 October 27, 1908 - REGOLETA ALTMAN v. COMMANDING OFFICER

    011 Phil 516

  • G.R. No. 4833 October 27, 1908 - RAFAEL LINSANGAN v. SIMEON LINSANGAN

    011 Phil 521

  • G.R. No. 4441 October 28, 1908 - UNITED STATES v. EUSEBIO BELLO

    011 Phil 526

  • G.R. No. 4539 October 28, 1908 - UNITED STATES v. NICOLAS ARCEO

    011 Phil 530

  • G.R. No. 4543 October 29, 1908 - MIGUEL SAMSON v. PAULINO DIONISIO, ET AL.

    011 Phil 538

  • G.R. No. 4812 October 30, 1908 - UNITED STATES v. ROMUALDO MENA

    011 Phil 543

  • G.R. No. 4687 October 31, 1908 - UNITED STATES v. CIRIACO MANLIMOS

    011 Phil 547