Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence


Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence > Year 1908 > October 1908 Decisions > G.R. No. 3356 October 21, 1908 - ROMAN CATHOLIC APOSTOLIC CHURCH, ET AL. v. MUN. OF LANGARAN, ET AL.

011 Phil 460:




PHILIPPINE SUPREME COURT DECISIONS

EN BANC

[G.R. No. 3356. October 21, 1908. ]

THE ROMAN CATHOLIC APOSTOLIC CHURCH, ET AL., Plaintiffs, v. THE MUNICIPALITY OF LANGARAN, ET AL., OF THE PROVINCE OF MISAMIS, Defendants.

Hartigan & Rohde for plaintiffs.

Attorney-General Araneta, Felipe Buencamino and Ramon Diokno for defendants.

SYLLABUS


1. CHURCH PROPERTY; RIGHT TO POSSESSION. — Roman Catholic Church v. Municipalities of Tarlac (9 Phil. Rep., 450) followed with respect to the right to the possession of church property.

2. CHURCH PROPERTY CONTROVERSIES; JURISDICTION. — In church-property controversies, the jurisdiction of the Supreme Court is limited to churches, convents, and cemeteries, and the real and personal property used in connection therewith. (Rom. Cath. Church v. Municipalities of Oriental Negros, 9 Phil. Rep., 691; Rom. Cath. Church v. Municipalities of Iloilo, 10 Phil. Rep., 8.)


D E C I S I O N


WILLARD, J. :


This is an original action brought in this court under the provisions of Act No. 1376. It is similar to the case of the Roman Catholic Apostolic Church The Municipalities of the Province of Tarlac (9 Phil. Rep., 450).

MUNICIPALITY OF LANGARAN.

It is hereby adjudged and decreed that the plaintiff church is the owner and is entitled to the immediate possession of the following-described property situated in the municipality of Langaran in the Province of Misamis, to wit —

"A church, a convent, a cemetery, and a plaza known as the church, convent, cemetery, and plaza of Langaran, and the chapels known as visitas of Baliangao, Monella, and Biaton —"

and that neither the said municipality, nor the defendant Gregorio Aglipay, as Obispo Maximo of the Independent Filipino Church, nor Jose de Luna has any right, title, or interest therein.

It is further adjudged and decreed that the property last hereinbefore mentioned be returned to the plaintiffs and that the said defendants be ousted from the possession thereof, and that such possession be awarded to the plaintiff’s.

It is further adjudged and decreed that a writ of possession issue out of this court against the defendants, the municipality of Langaran, Gregorio Aglipay, Obispo Maximo of the Independent Filipino Church, and Jose de Luna in the manner and form prescribed by Act No. 190.

MUNICIPALITY OF CAGAYAN

Among the properties described in the complaint as situated in the municipality of Cagayan is a tract of land in the barrio of Molugan. This tract of land contains cocoanut trees, and the evidence is that from the cocoanuts was obtained oil which was used in the church.

Our jurisdiction in this class of cases is limited to churches, convents, and cemeteries and the real and personal property used in connection therewith. We do not think that the evidence in this case shows that this tract of land is used in connection with the church. It must, therefore, be eliminated from the complaint, as we have no jurisdiction to determine the questions between the parties relating thereto. (Roman Catholic Church v. Municipalities of Oriental Negros, 9 Phil. Rep., 691; Roman Catholic Church v. Municipalities of Iloilo, 10 Phil. Rep., 8.)

It is therefore adjudged and decreed that the tract of land situated in the barrio of Molugan in the municipality of Cagayan be eliminated from the complaint, and this court makes no determination in regard to the rights of the parties to this action in relation thereto.

It is further adjudged and decreed that the plaintiff church is the owner, and is entitled to the immediate possession of the following-described property situated in the barrio of Gusa in the municipality of Cagayan, to wit —

"A church known as the church of Gusa —" and that neither the municipality of Cagayan nor the defendants Gregorio Aglipay, Obispo Maximo of the Independent Filipino Church, nor Bernardino Carboneros, nor Escolastico Carboñeros has any right, title, or interest therein.

It is further adjudged and decreed that the property last hereinbefore mentioned be returned to the plaintiffs and that the said defendants be ousted from the profession thereof, and that such possession be awarded to the plaintiffs.

It is further adjudged and decreed that a writ of possession issue out of this court against the defendants, the municipality of Cagayan, Gregorio Aglipay, Obispo Maximo of the Independent Filipino Church, Bernardino Carboñeros, and Escolastico Carboñeros, in the manner and form prescribed by Act No. 190.

MUNICIPALITY OF OROQUIETA.

It is further adjudged and decreed that the plaintiff church is the owner of and is entitled to the immediate possession of the following-described property situated in the municipality of Oroquieta in the Province of Misamis, to wit —

"A portion of the plaza belonging to the church of Oroquieta, commonly known as the plaza of the church of Oroquieta, and now in the possession of the defendant, Casimiro Dolalas, of the municipality of Oroquieta —" and that neither the municipality of Oroquieta nor the defendant Gregorio Aglipay, as Obispo Maximo of the Independent Filipino Church, nor Casimiro Dolalas has any right, title, or interest therein.

It is further adjudged and decreed that the property last hereinbefore mentioned be returned to the plaintiffs and that the said defendants be ousted from the possession thereof, and that such possession be awarded to the plaintiffs.

It is further adjudged and decreed that a writ of possession issue out of this court against the defendants, the municipality of Oroquieta, Gregorio Aglipay, as Obispo Maximo of the Independent Filipino Church, and Casimiro Dolalas, in the manner and form prescribed by Act No. 190.

MUNICIPALITY OF JIMENEZ.

It is further adjudged and decreed that the plaintiff church is the owner and is entitled to the immediate possession of the following-described property situated in the municipality of Jimenez in the Province of Misamis, to wit —

"A convent and a cemetery known as the convent and cemetery of Jimenez —" and that neither the municipality of Jimenez nor the defendant Gregorio Aglipay, as Obispo Maximo of the Independent Filipino Church, has any right, title, or interest therein.

It is further adjudged and decreed that the property last hereinbefore mentioned be returned to the plaintiffs and that the said defendants be ousted from the possession thereof and that such possession be awarded to the plaintiffs.

It is further adjudged and decreed that a writ of possession issue out of this court against the defendants, the municipality of Jimenez and Gregorio Aglipay, as Obispo Maximo of the Independent Filipino Church, in the manner and form prescribed by Act No. 190.

MUNICIPALITY OF INITAO.

It is further adjudged and decreed that the plaintiff church is the owner of and is entitled to the immediate possession of the following-described real and personal property situated in the municipality of Initao in the Province of Misamis, to wit —

"1. A church in course of construction and made of timber and nipa, situated on the site formerly occupied by the old church, together with a convent or parish house, both erected on a lot 60 ares in extent and bounded on the N. by a street without name, on the E. by Government lands, on the S. by a street without name, and on the W. by the plaza of the pueblo.

"2. A newly erected parish house, made of stone and mortar and nipa roof, and including an adjoining yard, altogether measuring approximately 50 ares, and being bounded on the N. by land of Rafael Zalos, on the E. by the thoroughfare which leads to the capital town of the province, on the S. by land belonging to Lopez Zalsos, and on the W. by the sea.

"3. All the ornaments and other things belonging to the church, as per the inventory attached: . . ."cralaw virtua1aw library

x       x       x


and that neither the municipality of Initao nor the defendant Gregorio Aglipay, as Obispo Maximo of the Independent Filipino Church, nor Ramon Dadole nor Anastasio Bagares has any right, title, or interest therein.

It is further adjudged and decreed that the property last hereinbefore mentioned be returned to the plaintiffs, and that the said defendants be ousted from the possession thereof and that such possession be awarded to the plaintiffs.

It is further adjudged and decreed that a writ of possession issue out of this court against the municipality of Initao, Gregorio Aglipay, as Obispo Maximo of the Independent Filipino Church, Ramon Dadole, and Anastasio Bagares in the manner and form prescribed by Act No. 190.

MUNICIPALITY OF MISAMIS.

The complaint seeks to recover the possession of two tracts of land in this municipality. The evidence shows that they are not used in connection with any church, convent, or cemetery. They must, therefore, be eliminated from the complaint.

It is therefore adjudged and decreed that the two tracts of land described in the complaint as being situated in the municipality of Misamis be eliminated therefrom and as to the property thus eliminated, this court makes no determination in regard to the rights of the parties to this action in relation thereto.

It is further adjudged and decreed that the plaintiff church is the owner of and is entitled to the immediate possession of the following-described property situated in the barrio of Tangob in the municipality of Misamis in the Province of Misamis, to wit —

"A chapel situated in the barrio of Tangob known as the visita de San Miguel Arcangel —" and that neither the municipality of Misamis nor the defendant Gregorio Aglipay, as Obispo Maximo of the Independent Filipino Church, has any right, title, or interest therein.

It is further adjudged and decreed that the property last hereinbefore mentioned be returned to the plaintiffs, and that the said defendants be ousted from the possession thereof and such possession be awarded to the plaintiffs.

It is further adjudged and decreed that a writ of possession issue out of this court against the municipality of Misamis and Gregorio Aglipay, as Obispo Maximo of the Independent Filipino Church, in the manner and form prescribed by Act No. 190.

It is further adjudged and decreed that this action be dismissed as to the defendants Apolinario Acol, Candido Baldehuesa, Alfonso Apduhang, Lucio Fabrica, and Cayetano Pacana.

No costs will be allowed to any party in this action. So ordered.

Arellano C.J. Torres, Mapa and Tracey, JJ., concur.




Back to Home | Back to Main




















chanrobles.com





ChanRobles On-Line Bar Review

ChanRobles Internet Bar Review : www.chanroblesbar.com

ChanRobles MCLE On-line

ChanRobles Lawnet Inc. - ChanRobles MCLE On-line : www.chanroblesmcleonline.com






October-1908 Jurisprudence                 

  • G.R. No. 2525 October 1, 1908 - MODESTO PARAS v. INSULAR GOV’T., ET AL.

    011 Phil 378

  • G.R. No. 2527 October 1, 1908 - LUCAS V. CARRILLO v. THE INSULAR GOV’T., ET AL.

    011 Phil 379

  • G.R. No. 4316 October 1, 1908 - FROELICH & KUTTNER v. COLLECTION OF CUSTOMS

    011 Phil 380

  • G.R. No. 4452 October 1, 1908 - JUANA PICHAY v. EULALIO QUEROL, ET AL.

    011 Phil 386

  • G.R. No. 4453 October 1, 1908 - IN THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE FLORA MARTINEZ

    011 Phil 389

  • G.R. No. 4893 October 1, 1908 - PASAY ESTATE CO. v. HON. SIMPLICIO DEL ROSARIO, ET AL.

    011 Phil 391

  • G.R. No. 4187 October 5, 1908 - VICENTA LIMJUCO v. MAURICIA GANARA

    011 Phil 393

  • G.R. No. 3551 October 6, 1908 - VICTOR SANCHEZ v. CIRILO PASCUAL

    011 Phil 395

  • G.R. No. 4066 October 6, 1908 - ALIPIA DUMLAO v. CANDIDO POBRE II

    011 Phil 400

  • G.R. No. 4463 October 6, 1908 - LUIS R. YANGCO v. ARSENIO CRUZ HERRERA, ET AL.

    011 Phil 402

  • G.R. No. 3354 October 8, 1908 - ROMAN CATHOLIC APOSTOLIC CHURCH v. MUN. OF CEBU

    011 Phil 405

  • G.R. No. 4033 October 8, 1908 - MIGUEL BOGA TAN CHIAO BOC, ET AL. v. GREGORIO SAJO VECINA

    011 Phil 409

  • G.R. No. 4267 October 9, 1908 - UNITED STATES v. GAUDENCIO CABUNCAL

    011 Phil 415

  • G.R. No. 4309 October 9, 1908 - DAVID CLETO v. JULIANA SALVADOR, ET AL.

    011 Phil 416

  • G.R. No. 4527 October 9, 1908 - UNITED STATES v. CLEMENTE ROQUE

    011 Phil 422

  • G.R. No. 4561 October 9, 1908 - UNITED STATES v. FORTUNATO MEÑEZ

    011 Phil 430

  • G.R. No. 4778 October 9, 1908 - UNITED STATES v. ANTONINO ESPIÑOSA

    011 Phil 432

  • G.R. No. 4541 October 12, 1908 - N. T. HASHIM CO. v. ESTATE OF JOHN KERNAN

    011 Phil 435

  • G.R. No. 4590 October 12, 1908 - MARIANO LIMJAP v. TOMASA VERA MOGUER

    011 Phil 439

  • G.R. No. 4483 October 14, 1908 - IGNACIO SAN JOSE, ET AL. v. PEDRO ORTEGA, ET AL.

    011 Phil 442

  • G.R. No. 4432 October 15, 1908 - UNITED STATES v. AGRIPINO MACASAET

    011 Phil 447

  • G.R. No. 4736 October 15, 1908 - JEREMIAH J. HARTY v. FRANCISCO SANDIN, ET AL.

    011 Phil 450

  • G.R. No. 4480 October 16, 1908 - KER & CO. v. ANASTASIA DE LA RAMA

    011 Phil 453

  • G.R. No. 4608 October 16, 1908 - MURPHY, MORRIS & CO. v. COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS

    011 Phil 456

  • G.R. No. 3356 October 21, 1908 - ROMAN CATHOLIC APOSTOLIC CHURCH, ET AL. v. MUN. OF LANGARAN, ET AL.

    011 Phil 460

  • G.R. No. 4772 October 21, 1908 - DAVID FRANK v. GEO. N. WOLFE

    011 Phil 466

  • G.R. No. 4781 October 21, 1908 - UNITED STATES v. BALTASAR SARMIENTO

    011 Phil 474

  • G.R. No. 4342 October 22, 1908 - UNITED STATES v. MERCEDES ALABANZA

    011 Phil 475

  • G.R. No. 4532 October 22, 1908 - B. H. MACKE v. JOSE RUBERT

    011 Phil 480

  • G.R. No. 4793 October 22, 1908 - UNITED STATES v. LIM SUCO

    011 Phil 484

  • G.R. No. 4801 October 22, 1908 - UNITED STATES v. MARTIN GABOYA

    011 Phil 489

  • G.R. No. 4406 October 23, 1908 - ANTONIA O. VALENCIA v. JUAN M. JIMENEZ, ET AL.

    011 Phil 492

  • G.R. No. 4571 October 24, 1908 - IRINEO DE GUZMAN v. PASCUAL BALARAG

    011 Phil 503

  • G.R. No. 4525 October 27, 1908 - FELICIANA BANTUG v. AMBROSIO DEL ROSARIO

    011 Phil 511

  • G.R. No. 4691 October 27, 1908 - REGOLETA ALTMAN v. COMMANDING OFFICER

    011 Phil 516

  • G.R. No. 4833 October 27, 1908 - RAFAEL LINSANGAN v. SIMEON LINSANGAN

    011 Phil 521

  • G.R. No. 4441 October 28, 1908 - UNITED STATES v. EUSEBIO BELLO

    011 Phil 526

  • G.R. No. 4539 October 28, 1908 - UNITED STATES v. NICOLAS ARCEO

    011 Phil 530

  • G.R. No. 4543 October 29, 1908 - MIGUEL SAMSON v. PAULINO DIONISIO, ET AL.

    011 Phil 538

  • G.R. No. 4812 October 30, 1908 - UNITED STATES v. ROMUALDO MENA

    011 Phil 543

  • G.R. No. 4687 October 31, 1908 - UNITED STATES v. CIRIACO MANLIMOS

    011 Phil 547