Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence


Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence > Year 1908 > September 1908 Decisions > G.R. No. 4764 September 18, 1908 - UNITED STATES v. TOMAS MOLINA, ET AL.

011 Phil 305:




PHILIPPINE SUPREME COURT DECISIONS

EN BANC

[G.R. No. 4764. September 18, 1908. ]

THE UNITED STATES, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. TOMAS MOLINA, ET AL, Defendants-Appellants.

Fernando de la Cantera for Appellants.

Attorney-General Villamor for Appellee.

SYLLABUS


1. THEFT; POSSESSION OF STOLEN PROPERTY; PRESUMPTION. — The presumption of guilt of the crime of theft, which arises from the unexplained possession of stolen goods soon after the time when the theft was committed, can not be legitimately extended beyond the person in whose possession and under whose control such property is found.


D E C I S I O N


CARSON, J. :


On or about the 6th day of May, 1907, several carabaos disappeared from the fields where they were at pasture, in the municipality of Solana, in the Province of Cagayan, two of which have never been found by their owner. Some days thereafter Calixto Balubal, the owner of the lost carabaos, discovered the head of one of the animals in the lot of the defendant, Tomas Molina, and swore out a search warrant, in the court of the justice of the peace, by virtue of which a search was made in Molina’s house, and a considerable portion of the carcass of one or more carabaos, divided into quarters, was discovered in and near his house. One of the witnesses testified that while the owner of the carabao was procuring the search warrant, he was left to keep watch on the head, meat, and bones, which were found in the yard of Tomas Molina, and that he saw the defendants, Tomas Molina, Sixto Beran, and one Cipriano de Asis, carrying a quantity of carabao meat from under the house into the yard where they left it.

The defendants did not go upon the witness stand nor offer any explanation as to why the head of the carabao belonging to the complaining witness was found in the yard of Tomas Molina, or why so large a quantity of carabao meat was found in and about his house.

We think the foregoing facts which were conclusively established by the testimony of record constitute prima facie proof of the fact that the lost carabaos of the complaining witness, valued at P300, were stolen by Tomas Molina, the owner of the house, in whose possession the eat was found, and no evidence having been offered in rebuttal of this, presumption of guilt, the court properly convicted the said Tomas Molina of the crime of theft with which he was charged. (U. S. v. Gimeno, 3 Phil. Rep., 233; U. S. v. Paguio, vs Phil. Rep., 436; U. S. v. Soriano, 9 Phil. Rep., 441.)

We do not think, however, that the guilt of the defendant, Sixto Beran, was proven beyond a reasonable doubt. The only evidence against him was the testimony of the witness who stated that he had seen this defendant and Tomas Molina carrying some of the carabao meat which was found upon Molina’s lot, from under the house. This defendant is a nephew of Tomas Molina, and while the fact that he was assisting Molina in carrying the meat out of the house was a very suspicious circumstance, and tends strongly to raise a suspicion of guilt’s to him, nevertheless as the meat was not found in his house or under his control, and as it does not appear that he had any knowledge of the origin of the meat or his uncle’s object in removing it from the house, we do not think that it can be said that he is guilty of the theft of the meat beyond a reasonable doubt. The presumption of guilt of the crime of theft, which arises from the unexplained possession of stolen goods soon after the time when the theft was committed, can not be legitimately extended beyond the person in whose possession and under whose control such property is found, and the mere fact that other persons may have assisted him, at his request, in dealing with such stolen property, does not necessarily imply that such persons rendered such assistance knowing the property to be stolen, or that they themselves were parties to the theft.

The judgment of conviction and the sentence of the trial court, in so far as they affect the defendant Sixto Beran, should be and are hereby reversed, and this defendant is hereby acquitted, with his one-half share of the cost of both instances de oficio and he will be set at liberty forthwith.

The judgment of conviction and the sentence of the trial court, in so far as they affect the defendant, Tomas Molina, should be and are hereby affirmed, with one-half the costs of this instance against this defendant. So ordered.

Arellano, C.J., Torres, Mapa, Willard and Tracey, JJ., concur.




Back to Home | Back to Main




















chanrobles.com





ChanRobles On-Line Bar Review

ChanRobles Internet Bar Review : www.chanroblesbar.com

ChanRobles MCLE On-line

ChanRobles Lawnet Inc. - ChanRobles MCLE On-line : www.chanroblesmcleonline.com






September-1908 Jurisprudence                 

  • G.R. No. 4379 September 1, 1908 - VICENTE GUASH v. JUANA ESPIRITU

    011 Phil 184

  • G.R. No. 4672 September 1, 1908 - UNITED STATES v. PEDRO MANANGAN, ET AL.

    011 Phil 186

  • G.R. No. 4094 September 3, 1908 - UNITED STATES v. MORO MATANUG

    011 Phil 188

  • G.R. No. 4367 September 3, 1908 - UNITED STATES v. SALVADOR VALLEJO, ET AL.

    011 Phil 193

  • G.R. No. 4444 September 3, 1908 - SALIH ADAD v. JAMES CRAIG TOW, ET AL.

    011 Phil 199

  • G.R. No. 4528 September 4, 1908 - GOV’T. OF THE PHIL. ISLANDS v. AMERICAN SURETY CO. OF NEW YORK, ET AL.

    011 Phil 203

  • G.R. No. 3869 September 7, 1908 - ALEJANDRO AGONOY, ET AL. v. ESTANISLAO RUIZ, ET AL.

    011 Phil 204

  • G.R. No. 3945 September 7, 1908 - JOSE Y. LOPEZ v. IGNACIO MENDEZONA, ET AL.

    011 Phil 209

  • G.R. No. 4134 September 7, 1908 - UNITED STATES v. LUCAS CANLEON

    011 Phil 215

  • G.R. No. 4414 September 7, 1908 - CHUA CHIENCO v. ANGEL VARGAS

    011 Phil 219

  • G.R. No. 4486 September 7, 1908 - UNITED STATES v. ALFREDO REYES, ET AL.

    011 Phil 225

  • G.R. No. 4487 September 7, 1908 - UNITED STATES v. ALFONSO MELEGRITO, ET AL.

    011 Phil 229

  • G.R. No. 4558 September 7, 1908 - UNITED STATES v. MARCELO LORIA

    011 Phil 232

  • G.R. No. 4580 September 7, 1908 - UNITED STATES v. SANTIAGO FONTANILLA

    011 Phil 233

  • G.R. No. 4638 September 7, 1908 - UNITED STATES v. MARCELINO AQUINO, ET AL.

    011 Phil 236

  • G.R. No. 4683 September 7, 1908 - UNITED STATES v. JOSE KERR

    011 Phil 238

  • G.R. No. 4919 September 7, 1908 - IN RE: JOSEPH J. CAPURRO

    011 Phil 241

  • G.R. No. 4500 September 8, 1908 - UNITED STATES v. MARCELO AQUINO, ET AL.

    011 Phil 244

  • G.R. No. 4585 September 8, 1908 - LEOCADIO JOAQUIN v. LAMBERTO AVELLANA

    011 Phil 249

  • G.R. No. 4395 September 9, 1908 - BEHN, MEYER & CO. v. EL BANCO ESPAÑOL-FILIPINO

    011 Phil 253

  • G.R. No. 4465 September 10, 1908 - MARCELA ALVARAN v. BERNARDO MARQUEZ

    011 Phil 263

  • G.R. No. 4613 September 10, 1908 - UNITED STATES v. INOCENCIO LAT

    011 Phil 269

  • G.R. No. 4073 September 12, 1908 - TAN CONG v. M. L. STEWART

    011 Phil 271

  • G.R. No. 4536 September 17, 1908 - BEHN, MEYER & CO. v. J. MC MICKING, ET AL.

    011 Phil 276

  • G.R. No. 4588 September 17, 1908 - EASTERN EXTENSION AUSTRALASIA, ET AL v. JOHN S. HORD

    011 Phil 280

  • G.R. No. 4640 September 17, 1908 - CLARA MARCELO v. EL CHINO VELASCO

    011 Phil 287

  • G.R. No. 4685 September 17, 1908 - UNITED STATES v. ENG-JUA, ET AL.

    011 Phil 293

  • G.R. No. 3763 September 18, 1908 - RAMON N. OROZCO v. JUAN XAVIER

    011 Phil 295

  • G.R. No. 3868 September 18, 1908 - FRANCISCO MARTINEZ v. PEDRO MARTINEZ

    011 Phil 298

  • G.R. No. 4021 September 18, 1908 - FRANCISCO ROSCO, ET AL. v. MARIANO REBUENO

    011 Phil 300

  • G.R. No. 4764 September 18, 1908 - UNITED STATES v. TOMAS MOLINA, ET AL.

    011 Phil 305

  • G.R. No. 4031 September 22, 1908 - ARCADIO REMIGIO v. FAUSTO RIGATA

    011 Phil 307

  • G.R. No. 4701 September 22, 1908 - ROMAN CATHOLIC APOSTOLIC CHURCH, ET AL. v. ISABEL FAMILIAR, ET AL.

    011 Phil 310

  • G.R. No. 4741 September 22, 1908 - UNITED STATES v. ISIDORO MATA

    011 Phil 313

  • G.R. No. 3490 September 23, 1908 - ROMAN CATHOLIC APOSTOLIC CHURCH v. MUN. OF PLACER

    011 Phil 315

  • G.R. No. 4323 September 23, 1908 - UNITED STATES v. DOROTEO PARCON

    011 Phil 323

  • G.R. No. 4349 September 24, 1908 - UNITED STATES v. ANICETO BARRIAS

    011 Phil 327

  • G.R. No. 4359 September 24, 1908 - EMILIO B. ESCUIN v. FRANCISCO ESCUIN, ET AL.

    011 Phil 332

  • G.R. No. 1435 September 28, 1908 - G. S. WEIGALL v. W. MORGAN SHUSTER

    011 Phil 340

  • G.R. No. 4003 September 29, 1908 - FELICIANO RUPEREZ v. BUENAVENTURA DIMAGUILA, ET AL.

    011 Phil 358

  • G.R. No. 4401 September 29, 1908 - UNITED STATES v. FELISA BRONDIAL, ET AL.

    011 Phil 363

  • G.R. No. 4417 September 29, 1908 - UNITED STATES v. ALEJANDRO QUIJANO, ET AL.

    011 Phil 368

  • G.R. No. 4542 September 29, 1908 - UNITED STATES v. ISMAEL TABOTABO

    011 Phil 372