Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence


Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence > Year 1918 > October 1918 Decisions > G.R. No. 13251 October 8, 1918 - UNITED STATES v. BUTAG

038 Phil 746:




PHILIPPINE SUPREME COURT DECISIONS

EN BANC

[G.R. No. 13251. October 8, 1918. ]

THE UNITED STATES, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. BUTAG, EREC, CUSIDON, DUMAUA, BANGAYAN, GURENGAD, GALADI, LEGUE, BEGUING, ET AL., Defendants-Appellants.

Roberto Moreno, for Appellants.

Attorney-General Paredes, for Appellee.

SYLLABUS


1. MURDER. — A considerable band of Kalingas out on a head-hunting expedition, set upon and decapitated two women, a man, and a boy. The crime was committed by the defendants with evident premeditation. There also concurred two aggravating circumstances offset by one mitigating circumstance. Held: That the defendants are guilty of the crime of murder.

2. ID.; PREMEDITATION. — In order that evident premeditation may exist it is not necessary that the accused premeditate the killing of a particular individual. (U. S. v. Manalinde [1909], 14 Phil., 77; U. S., v. Rodriguez [1911], 19 Phil., 150, followed and approved.)


D E C I S I O N


MALCOLM, J. :


A considerable band of Kalingas, out on a head-hunting expedition, set upon and decapitated two women, a man, and a boy. Eighteen persons in all were charged with the crime. Action was suppressed, on motion of the defense during the course of the trial, as to seven of the defendants. Three others were acquitted. The remaining eight, named Erec, Cusidon, Dumaua, Bangayan, Gurengad, Galadi, Legue and Beguing, were found guilty of the crime of murder, and each was sentenced to life imprisonment with the accessory penalties of the Penal Code, and to pay one-eighteenth part of the costs, while all were jointly and severally made liable to the heirs of the four deceased in the amount of P4,000.

The assignments of error relate in different form to the sufficiency of the evidence. We find on review that the guilt of the defendants is proved beyond a reasonable doubt by their own voluntary confessions and admissions, corroborated by other competent witnesses. The crime is murder because committed by the defendants with evident premeditation. In order that evident premeditation may exist, it is not necessary that the accused premeditate the killing of a particular individual. (U. S. v. Manalinde [1909], 14 Phil., 77; U. S. v. Rodriguez [1911], 19 Phil., 150.) There also concur the aggravating circumstances that the crime was committed by a band of more than three armed men, and in disregard of the age and sex of the deceased, one being a boy of twelve years of age, and two, women. The trial court found present the mitigating circumstance provided by article 11 of the Penal Code, as superseded by Act No. 2142. The penalty imposed by the trial court is accordingly correct.

Judgment is affirmed with one-eighth part of the costs of this instance against each appellant. So ordered.

Torres, Johnson, Street, Avanceña and Fisher, JJ., concur.




Back to Home | Back to Main




















chanrobles.com





ChanRobles On-Line Bar Review

ChanRobles Internet Bar Review : www.chanroblesbar.com

ChanRobles MCLE On-line

ChanRobles Lawnet Inc. - ChanRobles MCLE On-line : www.chanroblesmcleonline.com






October-1918 Jurisprudence                 

  • G.R. No. 13052 October 4, 1918 - UNITED STATES v. ALABOT

    038 Phil 698

  • G.R. No. 11307 October 5, 1918 - ROMAN JAUCIAN v. FRANCISCO QUEROL

    038 Phil 707

  • G.R. No. 9958 October 7, 1918 - LEONARDA CONCEPCION v. JULIAN UNTARAN

    038 Phil 736

  • G.R. No. 13623 October 7, 1918 - UNITED STATES v. MAXIMO LATIDO

    038 Phil 741

  • G.R. No. 13251 October 8, 1918 - UNITED STATES v. BUTAG

    038 Phil 746

  • G.R. No. 13641 October 8, 1918 - UNITED STATES v. VICENTE MOLINA, ET AL.

    038 Phil 747

  • G.R. No. 13785 October 8, 1918 - UNITED STATES v. TOMAS ADIAO

    038 Phil 754

  • G.R. No. 13788 October 8, 1918 - UNITED STATES v. VICENT GARCIA GAVIERES

    038 Phil 757

  • G.R. Nos. 13352-13355 October 11, 1918 - UNITED STATES v. SANDALIO J. RODRIGUEZ

    038 Phil 759

  • G.R. No. 12191 October 14, 1918 - JOSE CANGCO v. MANILA RAILROAD CO.

    038 Phil 768

  • G.R. No. 12794 October 14, 1918 - ELADIO ALPUERTO v. JOSE PEREZ PASTOR, ET AL.

    038 Phil 785

  • G.R. No. 13826 October 14, 1918 - UNITED STATES v. DONATO FLORES, ET AL.

    038 Phil 800

  • G.R. No. 14550 October 15, 1918 - CESAREO CABABAN v. JOHN P. WEISSENHAGEN, ET AL.

    038 Phil 804

  • G.R. No. 13461 October 17, 1918 - UNITED STATES v. SIMON K. TEATRO

    038 Phil 805

  • G.R. No. 13809 October 18, 1918 - EMILIO D. CAMPOMANES v. CANUTO BARTOLOME, ET AL.

    038 Phil 808

  • G.R. No. 13236 October 21, 1918 - CHUN CHIONG v. INSULAR COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS

    038 Phil 815

  • G.R. No. 12306 October 22, 1918 - SIMONA MANZANARES v. RAFAEL MORETA

    038 Phil 821

  • G.R. No. 13510 October 23, 1918 - HENRY W. PEABODY & COMPANY v. J. F. BROMFIELD, ET AL.

    038 Phil 841

  • G.R. No. 13540 October 24, 1918 - UNITED STATES v. SALVADOR A. EGUA, ET AL.

    038 Phil 857

  • G.R. No. 13669 October 25, 1918 - RAM SINGH, ET AL. v. INSULAR COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS

    038 Phil 867

  • G.R. No. 11318 October 26, 1918 - MANILA RAILROAD CO. v. LA COMPAÑIA TRASATLANTICA

    038 Phil 875

  • G.R. No. 11403 October 28, 1918 - SANTIAGO CODESAL, ET AL. v. ROMANA ASCUE

    038 Phil 902

  • G.R. No. 12993 October 28, 1918 - RAFAEL J. FERRER v. JOAQUIN J. DE INCHAUSTI, ET AL.

    038 Phil 905

  • G.R. No. 12957 October 29, 1918 - UNITED STATES v. PONCIANO NAMIT

    038 Phil 926

  • G.R. No. 13626 October 29, 1918 - UNITED STATES v. ELIAS CUETO

    038 Phil 935