Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence


Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence > Year 1927 > December 1927 Decisions > G.R. No. 27822 December 24, 1927 - LUZON BROKERAGE CO., INC. v. JUAN POSADAS, JR.

051 Phil 305:




PHILIPPINE SUPREME COURT DECISIONS

EN BANC

[G.R. No. 27822. December 24, 1927.]

LUZON BROKERAGE CO., INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. JUAN POSADAS, JR., as Collector of Internal Revenue, Defendant-Appellee.

J. W. Ferrier, for Appellant.

Attorney-General Jaranilla, for Appellee.

SYLLABUS


1. INTERNAL REVENUE TAX; IMPORTATION; LAW APPLICABLE. — As it is in the will of the importer or the owner of imported goods to choose the moment for making payment of the internal-revenue tax, from its arrival at the port of Manila until immediately before its withdrawal from the customhouse, the law in force when the payment is made is the one that should prevail; for human voluntary acts are governed by the laws in force at the time of their performance, unless there is a legal provision to the contrary.


D E C I S I O N


VILLA-REAL, J.:


The present appeal was taken by the plaintiff, the Luzon Brokerage Co., Inc., from the judgment of the Court of First Instance of Manila which affirmed the decision of the Collector of Internal Revenue on the internal-revenue tax imposed on certain playing cards, upholding the action taken by him under the provisions of Act No. 3246, and dismissed the complaint, with the costs.

In support of its appeal the appellant assigns the following alleged errors as committed by the trial court in its decision, to wit: (l) The lower court erred in finding that the internal-revenue tax levied and collected in the present case was lawfully levied and collected upon the playing cards in question; (2) in finding that the date of the withdrawal of said playing cards from the customhouse determined the rate of internal-revenue tax to be paid thereon; (3) in failing to find that the internal-revenue tax rate applicable to the imported playing cards in question was the one in force on November 20,1925, the date of the arrival of the importing vessel; (4) in dismissing the plaintiff’s complaint; (5) in overruling plaintiff’s motion for a new trial.

Section 1251 of the Revised Administrative Code of 1917 reads as follows:jgc:chanrobles.com.ph

"SEC. 1251. When duties accrue on imported merchandise. — Unless otherwise specially provided by law, duties shall accrue upon imported merchandise upon the arrival of the importing vessel within the jurisdictional waters of the Philippine Islands with intent to unlade."cralaw virtua1aw library

And section 1248 of the same Code states the following:jgc:chanrobles.com.ph

"SEC. 1248. When importation by sea begins and ends. — Importation by sea begins when the importing vessel enters the jurisdictional waters of the Philippine Islands with intention to unlade therein, and is not completed until the duties due upon the merchandise have been paid or secured to be paid at a port of entry and the legal permit for withdrawal shall have been granted, or, in case said merchandise is free of duty, until it has legally left the jurisdiction of the customs."cralaw virtua1aw library

The pertinent part of section 1478 of the same Code provides:jgc:chanrobles.com.ph

"SEC. 1478. Articles subject to specific tax. — Specific internal-revenue taxes apply to things manufactured or produced in the Philippine Islands for domestic sale or consumption and to things imported from the United States or foreign countries, but not to any thing produced or manufactured here which shall be removed for exportation and is actually exported without returning to the Islands, whether so exported in its original state or as an ingredient or part of any manufactured article or product.

"In case of importations the internal-revenue tax shall be in addition to the customs duties, if any."cralaw virtua1aw library

x       x       x


And section 1480 of the same Code says:jgc:chanrobles.com.ph

"SEC. 1480. Payment of specific tax on imported articles. — Internal-revenue taxes on imported articles shall be paid by the owner or importer to the customs officers, conformably with regulations of the Bureau of Internal Revenue and before the release of such articles from the customhouse."cralaw virtua1aw library

In the decision written by Mr. Justice Johnson in the case of Asiatic Petroleum Company v. Rafferty (38 Phil., 475), the following is stated:jgc:chanrobles.com.ph

". . . The theory of the law, with reference to the internal-revenue tax upon such merchandise, seems to be that the tax is not due and payable until it is about to be put into the commerce or trade of the country. The condition of the market at a particular time, or the situation in business generally, might cause the producer to withhold his merchandise and not allow it to be removed from the place of production for months, or even years; could he, under the above quoted provision of the law, be required to pay the internal-revenue taxes until he saw fit to place his product upon the market? While the law permits the producer of taxable merchandise to delay the payment of the internal-revenue tax until ’immediately before removal of the same from the place of production,’ the duly authorized and promulgated regulation of the defendant himself permits the importer of taxable merchandise to deposit the same in a bonded warehouse and to delay the payment of internal-revenue tax until the same is about to be removed therefrom. . . ."cralaw virtua1aw library

Consequently, merchandise imported to these Islands from foreign countries is subject to two taxes, namely: Customs and internal revenue. In accordance with section 1251 of the Administrative Code above quoted, duties shall accrue upon the arrival of the importing vessel within the jurisdictional waters of the Philippine Islands with intent to unlade; and, in accordance with section 1248 of the same Code, also quoted above, the importation of said merchandise is not completed until the duty to which it is subject has been paid, or, until it has legally left the jurisdiction of the customhouse in case it is exempt from the payment of duties. According to section 1480 of the same Code, above cited, internal-revenue taxes on imported articles must be satisfied before the release of such articles from the customhouse.

Now then; from what time is the importer or owner of the imported merchandise obliged to pay the internal-revenue tax? When the importation is completed by the payment of the customs duties? or, when the importer or owner withdraws it from the customhouse and places it on the market?

According to the doctrine above cited, imported merchandise is not subject to the payment of internal-revenue tax except just before it is withdrawn from the customhouse for the purpose of placing it on the market, being on the same footing with merchandise manufactured or produced in the country for its sale and consumption therein, which is not subject to the payment of internal-revenue tax, except just before its transfer from the place of production, in accordance with section 1479 of the Administrative Code, which reads as follows:jgc:chanrobles.com.ph

"SEC. 1479. Payment of specific tax on domestic products. — Specific taxes on domestic products shall be paid by the manufacturer, producer, owner, or person having possession of the same; and except as otherwise especially allowed such taxes shall be paid immediately before removal from the place of production."cralaw virtua1aw library

The time, then, that the imported merchandise becomes subject to the payment of the internal-revenue tax, depends upon the will of the importer or owner of said merchandise; because, while he has not decided to withdraw it from the customhouse and place it on the market, and has not requested permission to do so, he is not bound to pay said tax.

According to the stipulation of facts and the admissions made during the trial, the boxes of playing cards arrived in the port of Manila on November 20, 1925, at 8 o’clock in the morning, but were not declared for payment of the internal-revenue tax until December 1st of the same year, neither was the amount of the estimated tax deposited, nor was permission requested to withdraw said boxes from the customhouse, except on December 2, 1925.

The law in force for the payment of internal-revenue taxes on imported merchandise at the time of the arrival of the playing cards in question, was section 7, Act No. 2835, amending section 1498 of the Administrative Code, and the one in force on the date upon which the declaration for the payment of the internal-revenue tax on said imported merchandise was made, was Act No. 3246, which became effective December 1, 1925.

If the importer or owner of the imported merchandise may select the time in which he should pay the amount of the internal-revenue tax on the same from the time it arrives in the port of Manila until it is withdrawn from the customhouse, and the herein plaintiff-appellant not having taken advantage of the favorable provisions of section 1498 of the Revised Administrative Code as amended by section 7 of Act No. 2835, and not having paid the internal-revenue tax while said section was in force, but only after the new law, Act No. 3246, went into effect, it cannot now make claim for the recovery of the internal-revenue tax paid under the law in force at the time payment was made.

Briefly, then, the time for the payment of the internal-revenue tax on merchandise, from the date of arrival in port until just before it is withdrawn from the customhouse, depending upon the will of the importer or owner, the law in force at the time the payment is made must prevail; because, voluntary human acts are governed by the laws in force at the time they are done, unless there is a legal provision to the contrary.

In view of the foregoing, we find no error in the judgment appealed from and the same is affirmed in all its parts, with the costs against the appellant. So ordered.

Avanceña, C.J., Johnson, Street, Malcolm, Villamor, Ostrand and Johns, JJ., concur.




Back to Home | Back to Main




















chanrobles.com





ChanRobles On-Line Bar Review

ChanRobles Internet Bar Review : www.chanroblesbar.com

ChanRobles MCLE On-line

ChanRobles Lawnet Inc. - ChanRobles MCLE On-line : www.chanroblesmcleonline.com






December-1927 Jurisprudence                 

  • G.R. No. 27859 December 1, 1927 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. AMANDO DAYO

    051 Phil 102

  • G.R. No. 27633 December 2, 1927 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. JUAN DE GUZMAN

    051 Phil 105

  • G.R. No. 27897 December 2, 1927 - WESTERN EQUIPMENT AND SUPPLY COMPANY v. FIDEL A. REYES, ET AL.

    051 Phil 115

  • G.R. No. 27761 December 6, 1927 - PHILIPPINE SUGAR CENTRALS AGENCY v. INSULAR COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS

    051 Phil 131

  • G.R. No. 27766 December 6, 1927 - LA COMPAÑIA GENERAL DE TABACOS DE FILIPINAS v. COLLECTOR OF INTERNAL REVENUE

    051 Phil 154

  • G.R. No. 27877 December 6, 1927 - W. F. STEVENSON & CO. v. COLLECTOR OF INTERNAL REVENUE

    051 Phil 178

  • G.R. No. 27045 December 7, 1927 - BANK OF THE PHILIPPINE ISLANDS v. OLUTANGA LUMBER COMPANY

    051 Phil 184

  • G.R. No. 28072 December 10, 1927 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. FRANCISCO DE OTERO, ET AL.

    051 Phil 201

  • G.R. No. 27874 December 12, 1927 - TAN IT v. SUN INSURANCE OFFICE

    051 Phil 212

  • G.R. No. 26545 December 16, 1927 - PERFECTO GABRIEL v. RITA R. MATEO, ET AL.

    051 Phil 216

  • G.R. No. 26640 December 16, 1927 - ELEUTERIO L. SANTOS v. MARIA MACAPINLAC

    051 Phil 224

  • G.R. No. 26689 December 16, 1927 - LEON TEMPORAL v. FERNANDO MATEO, ET AL.

    051 Phil 228

  • G.R. No. 27778 December 16, 1927 - UY HU & CO. v. PRUDENTIAL ASSURANCE CO., LTD.

    051 Phil 231

  • G.R. No. 27781 December 16, 1927 - ANTONIO MEDINA v. MADERERA DEL NORTE DE CATANDUANES

    051 Phil 240

  • G.R. No. 27300 December 17, 1927 - SERAFIN DE LA RIVA v. MARIA ESCOBAR VIUDA DE LIMJAP

    051 Phil 243

  • G.R. No. 28725 December 17, 1927 - JUAN SUMULONG v. CARLOS A. IMPERIAL

    051 Phil 251

  • G.R. No. 27404 December 24, 1927 - M. SINGH v. TAN CHAY

    051 Phil 259

  • G.R. No. 27531 December 24, 1927 - MACARIO MACROHON ONG HAM v. JUAN SAAVEDRA, ET AL.

    051 Phil 267

  • G.R. Nos. 27565-27566 December 24, 1927 - PETRONILO VALENZUELA, ET AL. v. VICENTE LOPEZ, ET AL.

    051 Phil 279

  • G.R. No. 27650 December 24, 1927 - SEGUNDO DIEZ v. TOMAS SERRA

    051 Phil 283

  • G.R. No. 27685 December 24, 1927 - SEBASTIANA MARTINEZ, ET AL. v. CLEMENCIA GRAÑO, ET AL.

    051 Phil 287

  • G.R. No. 27818 December 24, 1927 - ROALES BROTHERS AND COUSINS v. DIRECTOR OF LANDS

    051 Phil 302

  • G.R. No. 27822 December 24, 1927 - LUZON BROKERAGE CO., INC. v. JUAN POSADAS, JR.

    051 Phil 305

  • G.R. No. 27850 December 24, 1927 - NATIONAL EXCHANGE COMPANY, LTD. v. JOSE S. RAMOS

    051 Phil 310

  • G.R. No. 27991 December 24, 1927 - PHILIPPINE NATIONAL BANK v. TAN ONG ZSE

    051 Phil 317

  • G.R. No. 28151 December 24, 1927 - DIRECTOR OF LANDS, ET AL. v. EDUARDO GUTIERREZ

    051 Phil 324

  • G.R. No. 28205 December 24, 1927 - TIMOTEO UNSON, ET AL. v. URQUIJO, ET AL.

    051 Phil 329

  • G.R. No. 26786 December 31, 1927 - CATALINO SEVILLA, ET AL. v. GAUDENCIO TOLENTINO

    051 Phil 333

  • G.R. No. 27084 December 31, 1927 - AMBROSIO T. ALOJADO v. M. J. LIM SIONGCO, ET AL.

    051 Phil 339

  • G.R. No. 27245 December 31, 1927 - LEONA RAMOS, ET AL. v. FRANCISCO ICASIANO

    051 Phil 343

  • G.R. No. 27491 December 31, 1927 - TEODORO R. YANGCO v. VICENTE ALDANESE

    051 Phil 348

  • G.R. No. 27588 December 31, 1927 - ROMAN CATHOLIC BISHOP OF NUEVA SEGOVIA v. PROVINCIAL BOARD OF ILOCOS NORTE

    051 Phil 352

  • G.R. No. 27878 December 31, 1927 - CLARA GONZALEZ v. GIL CALIMBAS, ET AL.

    051 Phil 355

  • G.R. No. 27890 December 31, 1927 - PONCIANO MEDEL v. CARLOS N. FRANCISCO

    051 Phil 367

  • G.R. No. 28243 December 12, 1927 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. SAWAJAN ET AL.

    053 Phil 689

  • G.R. No. 27856 December 16, 1927 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. LAZARO RABADAN, ET AL.,

    053 Phil 594

  • G.R. No. 25951 December 24, 1927 - MODESTA BELTRAN v. JUAN VALBUENA ET AL.

    053 Phil 697

  • G.R. No. 27436 December 24, 1927 - JOSE DE LA VIÑA Y CRUZ v. SING JUCO

    053 Phil 701

  • G.R. No. 27440 December 24, 1927 - JOSE VILLAFLOR v. DEOGRACIAS TOBIAS ET AL.

    053 Phil 714

  • G.R. No. 27206 December 31, 1927 - RUFINA NAÑAGAS v. MUNICIPALITY OF SAN NARCISO

    053 Phil 719

  • G.R. No. 27207 December 31, 1927 - HEREDEROS DE FILOMENO ESQUIERES v. DIRECTOR OF LANDS ET AL.

    053 Phil 727

  • G.R. No. 27480 December 31, 1927 - MARTIN GONZALEZ v. PONCIANO MAURICIO

    053 Phil 729

  • G.R. No. 27764 December 31, 1927 - JOSE M. NAVA ET AL., v. PRESENTACION HOFILEÑA ET AL.

    053 Phil 738

  • G.R. No. 27770 December 31, 1927 - FRANK B. INGERSOLL v. MALABON SUGAR CO.

    053 Phil 745