Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence


Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence > Year 1929 > December 1929 Decisions > G.R. No. 31916 December 28, 1929 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. SANTIAGO SUÑGA

054 Phil 210:




PHILIPPINE SUPREME COURT DECISIONS

EN BANC

[G.R. No. 31916. December 28, 1929.]

THE PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINE ISLANDS, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. SANTIAGO SUÑGA (alias Pedro Quiambao, Santiago Santos, Emilio Reyes), Defendant-Appellant.

Macario M. Peralta, for Appellant.

Attorney-General Jaranilla, for Appellee.

SYLLABUS


1. CRIMINAL LAW; "ESTAFA," ELEMENTS OF. — In view of all the facts of the case, the act perpetrated by the accused constitutes the crime of estafa as alleged in the information. It appears from the record that the defendant only tried in vain to look for money after having used the automobile; therefore, he knew that he had no funds with which to pay for the trip, when he contracted for it, and succeeded in making the offended party believe that he paid his debts punctually, because he had done so a few days before. These circumstances indicate the fraud and deceit which constitute the elements of estafa.

2. ID.; SUFFICIENT EVIDENCE OF DEFENDANT’S HABITUAL CRIMINALITY. — Notwithstanding the fact that neither the original nor the certified copies of Exhibits N, O and P (which are the former judgments of conviction of the court below) have been forwarded to this court, there is sufficient evidence of record to accept the trial court’s findings in regard to the appellant’s habitual criminality.


D E C I S I O N


ROMUALDEZ, J.:


Information was filed for estafa of P100, with habitual criminality, in that the defendant had been previously convicted of sixteen similar crimes and once of qualified theft.

Charged and convicted in the municipal court of Manila, the accused appealed to the Court of First Instance which, after trial, found him guilty and sentenced him to four months and one day of arresto mayor under article 534 of the Penal Code, amended by section 2 of Act No. 3244, to indemnify Domingo Vital in the sum of P100 and costs, plus twenty-one years’ imprisonment for habitual criminality under subsection (d) of section 1, Act No. 3397.

The defendant again appeals and counsel now makes the following assignments of error:jgc:chanrobles.com.ph

"1. The trial court erred in finding and concluding that the accused-appellant is an habitual delinquent and in imposing upon the accused-appellant the additional penalty provided for in Act No. 3397 of the Philippine Legislature.

"2. The trial court erred in not holding that there is no evidence to prove beyond reasonable doubt that said accused-appellant is an habitual delinquent."cralaw virtua1aw library

We believe, taking into consideration all the facts of the case, that the act committed by the defendant constitutes the crime of estafa as alleged in the information. It appears of record that the defendant only tried in vain to look for money after having used the automobile; therefore he knew that he had no funds with which to pay for the trip when he contracted for it, and he succeeded in making the offended party believe that he paid his debts punctually, because he had done so a few days previous. These facts indicate the fraud and deceit which constitute the elements of estafa. Furthermore, the defendant’s guilt of the crime of estafa is not discussed in this instance.

What counsel contends is that the evidence of the defendant’s habitual criminality is insufficient, inasmuch as the documents marked B and from D to M, were not admitted in evidence by the trial court. It appears, however, that Exhibits N, O and P were also offered in evidence and were admitted, since the trial court, in rejecting Exhibits B, D to M stated that the rest could be admitted (page 15, parol evidence), and Exhibits N, O and P, which were admitted, consist, according to their presentation (pages 14 and 15, parol evidence), in the following:jgc:chanrobles.com.ph

"FISCAL. I present also as part of the evidence for the prosecution, the decisions rendered in criminal cases of this court: No. 21497, marking it Exhibit N; as Exhibit O, the decision rendered in criminal cases Nos. 24617, 24618, 24619, 24620, 24621, 24622, 24623, 24624 and 24625, all for the crime of estafa; as Exhibit P, the decision entered in criminal case No. 30803 of this court, reserving the right to substitute later for these, Exhibits N, O and P, which are certified copies thereof."cralaw virtua1aw library

Taking these documents into account, the trial court held in the decision appealed from that the defendant "has been convicted of and sentenced for the crime of estafa eleven times, having begun to serve the sentence of four years’ imprisonment on August 3, 1925." Notwithstanding the fact that neither the original nor the certified copies of Exhibits N, O and P have been forwarded to this court, there is sufficient evidence of record to accept the conclusions of the trial court in regard to the appellant’s habitual criminality.

Accepting the Attorney-General’s correct recommendation that the judgment appealed from be modified so that the indemnity of the amount of the estafa be given to Felipe Vital instead of to Domingo Vital, and that the accessory penalties be added to the arresto mayor, said judgment is hereby affirmed, with costs against the appellant. So ordered.

Avanceña, C.J., Johnson, Street, Malcolm, Villamor, Ostrand, Johns and Villa-Real, JJ., concur.




Back to Home | Back to Main




















chanrobles.com





ChanRobles On-Line Bar Review

ChanRobles Internet Bar Review : www.chanroblesbar.com

ChanRobles MCLE On-line

ChanRobles Lawnet Inc. - ChanRobles MCLE On-line : www.chanroblesmcleonline.com






December-1929 Jurisprudence                 

  • G.R. No. 30993 December 2, 1929 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. PIO VIVAS

    054 Phil 85

  • G.R. No. 31397 December 2, 1929 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. LIM QUINGSY

    054 Phil 88

  • G.R. No. 31088 December 3, 1929 - MIGUEL J. OSSORIO v. JUAN POSADAS

    056 Phil 748

  • G.R. No. 29959 December 3, 1929 - AURELIA DADIVAS DE VILLANUEVA v. RAFAEL VILLANUEVA

    054 Phil 92

  • G.R. No. 31320 December 3, 1929 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. CRISPO LARA E ILANO

    054 Phil 96

  • G.R. No. 31883 December 3, 1929 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. DEMETRIO CASTRO

    054 Phil 100

  • G.R. No. 30587 December 4, 1929 - SABINA REYES, ET AL. v. E. C. WELLS, ET AL.

    054 Phil 102

  • G.R. No. 31770 December 5, 1929 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. ANTONINO HERNANDEZ

    054 Phil 122

  • G.R. No. 31686 December 14, 1929 - JAO YAN v. INSULAR COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS

    054 Phil 125

  • G.R. No. 31953 December 16, 1929 - TEH HUAN v. INSULAR COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS

    054 Phil 129

  • G.R. No. 30641 December 18, 1929 - GOVERNMENT OF THE PHIL. v. J. O. WAGNER, ET AL.

    054 Phil 132

  • G.R. No. 30874 December 26, 1929 - GOVERNMENT OF THE PHIL. v. ESTEBAN DEL ROSARIO, ET AL.

    054 Phil 138

  • G.R. No. 30048 December 27, 1929 - LO BUN CHAY v. ALBINO PAULINO, ET AL.

    054 Phil 144

  • G.R. No. 31155 December 27, 1929 - HIJOS DE I. DE LA RAMA v. SALVADOR BETIA, ET AL.

    054 Phil 149

  • G.R. No. 31287 December 27, 1929 - ANNA HARTSKE v. FRED FRANKEL, ET AL.

    054 Phil 156

  • G.R. No. 31338 December 27, 1929 - CECILIA ORTIZ, ET AL. v. ALEJANDRO BALGOS

    054 Phil 171

  • G.R. No. 31508 December 27, 1929 - SAN JUAN DE DIOS HOSPITAL v. METROPOLITAN WATER DISTRICT

    054 Phil 174

  • G.R. No. 31763 December 27, 1929 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. H. JANSSEN

    054 Phil 176

  • G.R. No. 31768 December 27, 1929 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. NICOLAS P. PAYUMO

    054 Phil 181

  • G.R. No. 30823 December 28, 1929 - ANGELO ANGELES, ET AL. v. ANATALIA LOZADA, ET AL.

    054 Phil 184

  • G.R. No. 31316 December 28, 1929 - LIM CHU LAN v. LIM CHU KUN

    054 Phil 190

  • G.R. No. 31346 December 28, 1929 - PO SUN TUN v. W. S. PRICE, ET AL.

    054 Phil 192

  • G.R. No. 31454 December 28, 1929 - ISIDRA GAAS, ET AL. v. PILAR FORTICH

    054 Phil 196

  • G.R. No. 31905 December 28, 1929 - CHUA QUIP v. INSULAR COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS

    054 Phil 206

  • G.R. No. 31916 December 28, 1929 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. SANTIAGO SUÑGA

    054 Phil 210