Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence


Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence > Year 1932 > November 1932 Decisions > G.R. No. 36756 November 4, 1932 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. ISLANDS v. GERARDO S. RAMOS

057 Phil 462:




PHILIPPINE SUPREME COURT DECISIONS

EN BANC

[G.R. No. 36756. November 4, 1932.]

THE PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINE ISLANDS, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. GERARDO S. RAMOS, Defendant-Appellant.

A.P. Seva, Ernesto J. Seva and Emilio R. Severino for Appellant.

Attorney-General Jaranilla for Appellee.

SYLLABUS


1. ASSAULTS ON PERSONS IN AUTHORITY AND THEIR AGENTS. — The appellant was convicted of assault upon a person in authority, having buffeted a municipal treasurer. Held: That the municipal treasurer is, for the purpose of the Penal Code, an agent of authority, and not a person in authority, and that the offense committed by the appellant is that penalized by article 250 in connection with article 249 of the Penal Code; and the penalty prescribed in article 148 of the Revised Penal Code, being more favorable, should be applied.


D E C I S I O N


IMPERIAL, J.:


This is an appeal taken by the accused Gerardo S. Ramos from the judgment of the Court of First Instance of Occidental Negros, convicting him of assault upon a person in authority and sentencing him four years, two months, and one day of prision correccional, the corresponding accessory penalties, to pay a fine of 625 pesetas, with subsidiary imprisonment in case of insolvency, and the costs.

The prosecution commenced with the filing of an information, alleging:jgc:chanrobles.com.ph

"That on or about the 7th day of August, 1931, in the municipality of Saravia, Province of Occidental Negros, Philippine Islands, the accused herein did then and there willfully, unlawfully and criminally assault, attack and use personal violence upon one Delfin T. Perez, a municipal treasurer of the above-mentioned municipality by then and there striking him with his fist on the shoulder while said Delfin T. Perez was in due performance of his official duties as such municipal treasurer of the above-mentioned municipality and on the occasion of the same."cralaw virtua1aw library

The appellant was chief of police of the municipality of Saravia, Province of Occidental Negros, and the offended party the municipal treasurer. On the morning of August 7, 1931, while the offended party was seated in front of the door of his office, policeman Julio Nicovera, went up to him, presenting a voucher for the appellant’s salary from August 1st to 6th, telling him that the said appellant wanted him to pay that salary. The offended party returned the voucher saying that he could not pay in advance the portion of the salary asked for by the appellant, because he had a circular from the auditor and the provincial treasurer prohibiting such payments, and that according to instructions, the employees could not receive their salaries except at the middle and the end of each month.

The appellant took offense at the treasurer’s refusal, and seeing him again on the street on the way to the house of the municipal president with whom he had to consult with reference to the preparation of the municipal budget, followed him. He accosted with a demand for explanation, after which, he buffeted the other, hitting him once on the left shoulder and causing him to fall into the gutter near by.

The appellant makes the following assignment of errors:jgc:chanrobles.com.ph

"1. The lower court erred in giving greater credit to the testimony of the witnesses for the prosecution than to that of the witnesses for the defense, and in not acquitting the accused.

"2. The lower court erred in sentencing the accused to four years, two months, and one day of prision correccional, plus a fine of 625 pesetas, or to suffer, in case of insolvency, the corresponding subsidiary imprisonment, with the accessory penalties of the law, and to pay the costs of the trial."cralaw virtua1aw library

Both assignments may be considered together.

The facts proved leave no room for doubt that the appellant performed the acts above set out. It affirmatively appears that he assaulted the offended party without justification, using his fists, while the latter was discharging his duties as municipal treasurer; and it could not be otherwise since the direct and immediate cause of the assault was the offended party’s refusal to pay him the salary he demanded.

The question now arises, whether the offended party was then exercising his function as a person in authority, or merely as an agent thereof. The relevant provisions of law shedding some light upon the question are the following:chanrob1es virtual 1aw library

The Penal Code defines a person in authority in these terms:jgc:chanrobles.com.ph

"ART. 264. In applying the articles contained in the three next preceding chapters, any person directly vested with jurisdiction, whether individual or as a member of some court or public corporation, shall be deemed a person in authority.

"Officers of the department of public prosecution shall also be deemed persons in authority."cralaw virtua1aw library

The Revised Administrative Code, in referring to the provincial treasurer, provides:jgc:chanrobles.com.ph

"SEC. 2069. Chief officials of provincial government. — The chief officials of the provincial government are the provincial governor, the provincial treasurer, and the members of the provincial board."cralaw virtua1aw library

"SEC. 2088. Provincial treasurer. — The provincial treasurer shall be the chief financial officer of the province. His compensation shall be as fixed below:"

The same Code, with reference to the municipal treasurer, provides:jgc:chanrobles.com.ph

"SEC. 2169. Chief officials of municipal government. — The chief official of the municipal government are the president, the vice- president, the treasurer, and the councilors.

"With the exception of the treasurer, these officers shall be elected by the qualified voters of the municipality."cralaw virtua1aw library

"SEC. 2208. Duties of municipal treasurer. — The municipal treasurer shall be the financial officer of the municipality and with respect to the collection of revenue shall be ex officio deputy of the provincial treasurer."cralaw virtua1aw library

There is no definition of an agent of authority in either the Penal Code or the Revised Penal Code.

From the above-quoted provisions of law we believe it may be deduced that the provincial treasurer is a person in authority within the province where he exercises his jurisdiction, and that the municipal treasurer, being his deputy ex officio, is an agent of authority, and not a person in authority, as this word is employed in the Penal Code under which the information against the appellant was filed.

The acts performed by the appellant constitute the offense defined and penalized by article 250, in connection with article 249 of the Penal Code, inasmuch as the appellant was a public officer when the assault was committed. But the penalty of prision correccional in the minimum and medium degrees prescribed in article 148 of the Revised Penal Code, being more favorable to the appellant, should applied, in harmony with article 22 of said Code.

The sentence appealed from is modified and the appellant sentenced to three years, six months, and twenty-one days of prision correccional, to pay a fine of P125, with the corresponding subsidiary imprisonment in case of insolvency, the accessory penalties of the law applicable to the case and to pay the costs of both instances. So ordered.

Avanceña, C.J., Street, Malcolm, Ostrand, Villa-Real, Abad Santos, Vickers and Butte, JJ., concur.




Back to Home | Back to Main




















chanrobles.com





ChanRobles On-Line Bar Review

ChanRobles Internet Bar Review : www.chanroblesbar.com

ChanRobles MCLE On-line

ChanRobles Lawnet Inc. - ChanRobles MCLE On-line : www.chanroblesmcleonline.com






November-1932 Jurisprudence                 

  • G.R. No. 35414 November 1, 1932 - CARMEN GUERRERO, ET AL. v. ANDREA GUERRERO, ET AL.

    057 Phil 442

  • G.R. No. 35584 November 3, 1932 - GLORIA ENCISO v. MARIANO DY-LIACCO

    057 Phil 446

  • G.R. No. 36429 November 3, 1932 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL, ISLANDS v. JUAN FELEO

    057 Phil 451

  • G.R. No. 36426 November 3, 1932 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. ISLANDS v. IGNACIO NABONG

    057 Phil 455

  • G.R. No. 36756 November 4, 1932 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. ISLANDS v. GERARDO S. RAMOS

    057 Phil 462

  • G.R. No. 36770 November 4, 1932 - LUIS W. DISON v. JUAN POSADAS

    057 Phil 465

  • G.R. No. 35280 November 5, 1932 - CACHO & HIDALGO v. MANILA ELECTRIC CO.

    057 Phil 470

  • G.R. No. 35283 November 5, 1932 - JULIAN DEL ROSARIO v. MANILA ELECTRIC CO.

    057 Phil 478

  • G.R. No. 35474 November 5, 1932 - TIRTH DHARMDAS, ET AL. v. MARCELO BUENAFLOR, ET AL.

    057 Phil 483

  • G.R. No. 35925 November 10, 1932 - RICARDO SIKAT v. QUITERIA VIUDA DE VILLANUEVA

    057 Phil 486

  • G.R. No. 36321 November 10, 1932 - GOV’T. OF THE PHIL. ISLANDS v. JOSE FERNANDEZ ESPEJO

    057 Phil 496

  • G.R. No. 37852 November 10, 1932 - GOV’T. OF THE PHIL. ISLANDS v. JUDGE OF THE CFI OF OCC. NEGROS, ET AL.

    057 Phil 500

  • G.R. No. 35398 November 16, 1932 - RAFAEL FERNANDEZ v. PAZ V. DEL ROSARIO

    057 Phil 501

  • G.R. No. 35859 November 16, 1932 - CORNELIO CRUZ v. PABLO REYES

    057 Phil 509

  • G.R. No. 36026 November 16, 1932 - ASTURIAS SUGAR CENTRAL v. PURE CANE MOLASSES CO.

    057 Phil 517

  • G.R. No. 36026A November 16, 1932 - ASTURIAS SUGAR CENTRAL v. PURE CANE MOLASSES CO.

    057 Phil 519

  • G.R. No. 37661 November 16, 1932 - LUZON BROKERAGE CO. v. PUBLIC SERVICE COM., ET AL.

    057 Phil 536

  • G.R. No. 38291 November 16, 1932 - FLAVIA LAZARO v. PASTOR M. ENDENCIA, ET AL.

    057 Phil 552

  • G.R. No. 35926 November 17, 1932 - JESUS DE LA RAMA v. ANTONIO RIVERO, ET AL.

    057 Phil 554

  • G.R. No. 36006 November 19, 1932 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. ISLANDS v. ANG HOK HIN

    057 Phil 567

  • G.R. No. 36627 November 19, 1932 - EL HOGAR FILIPINO v. A.P. SEVA

    057 Phil 573

  • G.R. No. 35848 November 22, 1932 - EAST FURNITURE INC. v. GLOBE & RUTGERS FIRE INS. CO. OF NEW YORK

    057 Phil 576

  • G.R. No. 36979 November 23, 1932 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. ISLANDS v. MIGUEL BENITO

    057 Phil 587

  • G.R. No. 38553 November 23, 1932 - TOLEDO TRANS. CO., INC. v. EULALIO POSAS

    057 Phil 592

  • G.R. No. 36173 November 25, 1932 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. ISLANDS v. MARIA ORIFON

    057 Phil 594

  • G.R. No. 36345 November 25, 1932 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. ISLANDS v. PEDRO MONTANO, ET AL.

    057 Phil 598

  • G.R. No. 37878 November 25, 1932 - MLA. ELECTRIC CO. v. PASAY TRANS. CO.

    057 Phil 600

  • G.R. No. 37682 November 26, 1932 - CLAUDE NEON LIGHTS v. PHIL. ADVERTISING CORP., ET AL.

    057 Phil 607

  • G.R. No. 36595 November 28, 1932 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. ISLANDS v. LEON ACIERTO

    057 Phil 614