Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence


Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence > Year 1933 > December 1933 Decisions > G.R. No. 39864 December 8, 1933 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. ISLANDS v. MARCELINO VALENCIA, ET AL.

059 Phil 42:




PHILIPPINE SUPREME COURT DECISIONS

SECOND DIVISION

[G.R. No. 39864. December 8, 1933.]

THE PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINE ISLANDS, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. MARCELINO VALENCIA, MELCHOR QUIJANO, and SOCORRO QUIJANO, Defendants. MARCELINO VALENCIA and SOCORRO QUIJANO, Appellants.

B. Francisco for Appellants.

Solicitor-General Hilado for Appellee.

SYLLABUS


1. CRIMINAL LAW; ARRAIGNMENT; PLEA OF GUILTY. — In a criminal prosecution for forgery, the plea of guilty admits all the material allegations of the information, including that of connivance with the authors of the forgery, which characterizes the crime defined by article 166 of the Revised Penal Code.

2. ID.; ID.; ID.; TESTIMONY GIVEN IN FAVOR OF CO-ACCUSED. — Although the general rule is, that it is the prudent and advisable course to take additional evidence of the guilt of the accused who pleaded guilty to the information, his testimony given in behalf of his co-accused can not affect his criminal liability arising out of his plea.


D E C I S I O N


ABAD SANTOS, J.:


Appellants Marcelino Valencia and Socorro Quijano, together with Melchor Quijano, were prosecuted in the Court of First Instance of Pampanga under the following information:jgc:chanrobles.com.ph

"Que en o hacia el dia 21 de marzo de 1933, en el Municipio de Mabalacat, Provincia de Pampanga, Islas Filipinas, los referidos acusados, Marcelino Valencia, Melchor Quijano y Socorro Quijano, confabulandose entre si, de comun acuerdo, ayudandose mutuamente y en connivencia con los fabricantes de billetes de banco falsos, quienes hasta ahora no han sido identificados, voluntaria, ilegal y criminalmente, expendieron e hicieron pasar un billete de banco falsificado a sabiendas de que lo era, en la forma y manera siguiente: se presentaron en la tienda de la Sra. Maria Morales y compraron efectos de su tienda, cuyo valor es de P0.45 y para pagarlos entregaron un billete de banco falsificado de P10, No. D261487D del Banco de las Islas Filipinas, haciendolo pasar como legitimo y expedido por el Banco de las Islas Filipinas, cuando que a ellos les constaba y les consta positivamente de que era y es falsificado recibiendo de la citada Sra. Maria Morales como cambio la cantidad de P9.55."cralaw virtua1aw library

Upon arraignment, Marcelino Valencia pleaded guilty, while his two codefendants pleaded not guilty. After due trial, Melchor Quijano was acquitted. Marcelino Valencia was found guilty of a violation of article 166, of the Revised Penal Code, and sentenced to suffer ten years, eight months and one day of prision mayor, with the accessories of the law, to pay a fine of P100, with subsidiary imprisonment in case of insolvency, and to pay one-third of the costs. Socorro Quijano was found guilty of a violation of article 168 of the Revised Penal Code, and sentenced to four years, two months and one day of prision correccional, with the accessories of the law, and to pay one-third of the costs.

The evidence shows that on the morning of March 21, 1933, appellants stopped their car in front of a store belonging to Maria Morales and bought some cigarettes and corn beef, and gave the seller a ten-peso bill. After receiving the change in the sum of P9.55, they hurriedly left the store. This aroused the suspicion of the store owner who, upon examining the bill, found it to be a counterfeit. Whereupon her brother Pedro Morales went in pursuit of appellants. Meanwhile, appellants went to another store belonging to Eustaquia Suñga and bought cigars and some cans of salmon, giving, in payment, another ten-peso counterfeit bill. Upon receiving the change, they again hurriedly departed. They were, however, overtaken by Pedro Morales and, at his instance, were detained by the authorities.

On this appeal, two questions are raised, one relates to the qualification of the crime committed by Marcelino, while the other, to the sufficiency of evidence to sustain the conviction of Socorro.

As to the first question, counsel contends that article 168 of the Revised Penal Code should be applied, instead of article 166, alleging that no evidence was presented that appellant Marcelino was in connivance with the counterfeiters or forgers when he passed the counterfeit bills. This contention is groundless, since, by his plea of guilty, Marcelino admitted all the material allegations of the information, including that of connivance with the authors of the forgery, which characterizes the crime defined by article 166 of the Revised Penal Code. (U. S. v. Burlado, 42 Phil., 72, 74; U. S. v. Barba, 29 Phil., 206; U. S. v. Tamarra, 21 Phil., 143.) His testimony at the trial of, and as witness for his co-appellant, could not affect the legal consequences of his plea.

As to the second question, counsel contends that Socorro did not know anything about the counterfeit bills, but an examination of the evidence presented in this case convinces us to the contrary, and so we are not disposed to interfere with the finding of the trial court on this point.

The crime committed by Marcelino Valencia falls within the purview of article 166, case 2, of the Revised Penal Code. The penalty prescribed is prision mayor in its maximum degree and a fine not to exceed P5,000. There being present the mitigating circumstance of plea of guilty, without any aggravating circumstance to offset it, the penalty should be imposed in its minimum period. Under the provisions of Act No. 4103 of the Philippine Legislature, otherwise known as the Indeterminate Sentence Law, he should be sentenced to a term of imprisonment the minimum of which shall not be less than the minimum of the penalty next lower in degree to that prescribed by the Revised Penal Code, and the maximum shall be that which may be properly imposed, in view of the attending circumstances. Consequently, the appellant Marcelino Valencia is hereby sentenced to suffer a term of imprisonment of from eight years and one ten years and eight months. The fine imposed by the lower court should be without any subsidiary imprisonment pursuant to article 39, rule 3, of the Revised Penal Code.

The crime committed by Socorro Quijano falls under article 168 of the Revised Penal Code, and the penalty prescribed is prision mayor in its medium degree, which should be applied in its medium period, in the absence of any mitigating or aggravating circumstance in the commission of the crime. Pursuant to the provisions of said Act No. 4103, she is hereby sentenced to suffer a term of imprisonment of from six years and one day to nine years and four months. She is also sentenced to pay a fine of P100, without any subsidiary imprisonment. (Article 168, in relation with article 166, case 2, and article 39, rule 3, of the Revised Penal Code.) .

Modified as above indicated, the judgment is affirmed with costs against the appellants. So ordered.

Street, Vickers, Butte, and Diaz, JJ., concur.




Back to Home | Back to Main




















chanrobles.com





ChanRobles On-Line Bar Review

ChanRobles Internet Bar Review : www.chanroblesbar.com

ChanRobles MCLE On-line

ChanRobles Lawnet Inc. - ChanRobles MCLE On-line : www.chanroblesmcleonline.com






December-1933 Jurisprudence                 

  • G.R. No. 38989 December 1, 1933 - ALEJO BASCO v. MANUEL ERNESTO GONZALEZ

    059 Phil 1

  • G.R. No. 39298 December 1, 1933 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. ISLANDS v. SANTIAGO RAMOS, ET AL.

    059 Phil 7

  • G.R. No. 38499 December 6, 1933 - FAUSTINA UDARBE, ET AL. v. MARCIANA JURADO, ET AL.

    059 Phil 11

  • G.R. No. 38572 December 6, 1933 - EUSEBIO RIVERO v. MARIANO RIVERO

    059 Phil 15

  • G.R. No. 37792 December 7, 1933 - QUINTIN DE BORJA v. FRANCISCO DE BORJA

    059 Phil 19

  • G.R. No. 38097 December 7, 1933 - ASIATIC PETROLEUM CO., LTD. v. ORLANES & BANAAG TRANS. CO.

    059 Phil 24

  • G.R. No. 38552 December 7, 1933 - ENRIQUE SOMES v. VICENTE SOMES, ET AL.

    059 Phil 28

  • G.R. No. 38398 December 8, 1933 - PHIL. TRUST CO., ET AL. v. L. P. MITCHELL, ET AL.

    059 Phil 30

  • G.R. No. 39864 December 8, 1933 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. ISLANDS v. MARCELINO VALENCIA, ET AL.

    059 Phil 42

  • G.R. No. 40492 December 8, 1933 - TIMOTEO EVANGELISTA v. CFI OF BULACAN, ET AL.

    059 Phil 45

  • G.R. No. 40494 December 8, 1933 - GREGORIO PASCUA, ET AL. v. BUENAVENTURA OCAMPO, ET AL.

    059 Phil 48

  • G.R. No. 37105 December 9, 1933 - GUI PING HUI v. ACTING INSULAR COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS

    059 Phil 52

  • G.R. No. 38298 December 9, 1933 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. ISLANDS v. JESUS TOLENTINO

    059 Phil 56

  • G.R. No. 37467 December 11, 1933 - SAN CARLOS MILLING CO. v. BPI, ET AL.

    059 Phil 59

  • G.R. No. 38850 December 11, 1933 - ANTONIO ESTIVA, ET AL. v. GONZALO CAWIL, ET AL.

    059 Phil 67

  • G.R. No. 39034 December 11, 1933 - INT’L. BANKING CORP. v. GEORGE A. YARED

    059 Phil 72

  • G.R. No. 39456 December 11, 1933 - PASTOR V. VALERA v. RURAL TRANSIT CO.

    059 Phil 93

  • G.R. No. 39470 December 11, 1933 - NORTH LUZON TRANS. CO., INC., ET AL. v. PASTOR V. VALERA

    059 Phil 96

  • G.R. No. 39008 December 12, 1933 - NIEVES E. SAÑGA v. SEGUNDO ZABALLERO, ET AL.

    059 Phil 101

  • G.R. No. 37185 December 13, 1933 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. ISLANDS v. CHUA BUAN, ET AL.

    059 Phil 106

  • G.R. No. 38332 December 14, 1933 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. ISLANDS v. VALERIANO DUCOSIN

    059 Phil 109

  • G.R. No. 38709 December 14, 1933 - SY TIANGCO v. HIPOLITO PABLO, ET AL.

    059 Phil 119

  • In the matter of the complaint against Attorney Gregorio O. Santos. December 16, 1933 - INES VENTURA v. GREGORIO O. SANTOS

    059 Phil 123

  • G.R. No. 38256 December 16, 1933 - PHIL. COOP. LIVESTOCK ASSO. v. TOMAS EARNSHAW, ET AL.

    059 Phil 129

  • G.R. No. 38417 December 16, 1933 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. ISLANDS v. MARCIANO MEDINA

    059 Phil 134

  • G.R. No. 39003 December 16, 1933 - LAUREANO ELEGADO, ET AL. v. NICANOR TAVORA

    059 Phil 140

  • G.R. No. 39403 December 16, 1933 - LEE SING v. INSULAR COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS

    059 Phil 147

  • G.R. No. 38773 December 19, 1933 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. ISLANDS v. GINES S. ALBURQUERQUE

    059 Phil 150

  • G.R. No. 39913 December 19, 1933 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. ISLANDS v. RICARDO N. MELENDREZ

    059 Phil 154

  • G.R. No. 39181 December 20, 1933 - MANILA RAILROAD CO. v. M. P. TRANCO, INC.

    059 Phil 158

  • G.R. No. 39217 December 20, 1933 - MANILA RAILROAD CO. v. M. P. TRANCO, INC.

    059 Phil 160

  • G.R. No. 39275 December 20, 1933 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. ISLANDS v. RICARDO MENDOZA

    059 Phil 163

  • G.R. No. 40637 December 20, 1933 - M.P. TRANS. CO. v. PUBLIC SERVICE COM., ET AL.

    059 Phil 173

  • G.R. No. 40759 December 20, 1933 - LIME CORP. OF THE PHIL., ET AL. v. MANUEL V. MORAN, ET AL.

    059 Phil 175

  • G.R. No. 36890 December 21, 1933 - BPI v. PASCUAL ACUÑA, ET AL.

    059 Phil 183

  • G.R. No. 37590 December 21, 1933 - JOSE FERNANDO RODRIGO v. CONCEPCION CABIGAO, ET AL.

    059 Phil 187

  • G.R. No. 37640 December 21, 1933 - GOV’T. OF THE PHIL. ISLANDS v. EL AHORRO INSULAR

    059 Phil 199

  • G.R. No. 38010 December 21, 1933 - PATRICK HENRY FRANK, ET AL. v. G. KOSUYAMA

    059 Phil 206

  • G.R. No. 38084 December 21, 1933 - DOLORES M. VIUDA DE BARRETTO ET AL. v. LA PREVISORA FILIPINA

    059 Phil 212

  • G.R. No. 38131 December 21, 1933 - BEHN, MEYER & CO., ET AL. v. COLLECTOR OF INTERNAL REVENUE

    059 Phil 227

  • G.R. No. 38684 December 21, 1933 - CYRUS PADGETT v. BABCOCK & TEMPLETON, INC., ET AL.

    059 Phil 232

  • G.R. Nos. 38215 & 38216 December 22, 1933 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. ISLANDS v. FAUSTINO RIVERA

    059 Phil 236

  • G.R. No. 38375 December 22, 1933 - JOSE SY JONG CHUY v. PABLO C. REYES

    059 Phil 244

  • G.R. No. 39078 December 22, 1933 - NICASIA BATALLONES v. PUBLEO BATALLONES, ET AL.

    059 Phil 265

  • G.R. No. 39839 December 22, 1933 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. ISLANDS v. GABRIEL HERNANDEZ

    059 Phil 272

  • G.R. No. 40659 December 22, 1933 - PASAY TRANS. CO., INC. v. PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION, ET AL.

    059 Phil 278

  • G.R. No. 40889 December 22, 1933 - ISIDORO YBOLEON v. PEDRO MA. SISON, ET AL.

    059 Phil 281

  • G.R. No. 35694 December 23, 1933 - ALLISON D. GIBBS v. GOV’T. OF THE PHIL. ISLANDS

    059 Phil 293

  • G.R. No. 37090 December 23, 1933 - CRISANTA SUAREZ, ET AL. v. PRUDENCIO TIRAMBULO, ET AL.

    059 Phil 303

  • G.R. No. 37345 December 23, 1933 - ALEJANDRA REPOLLO, ET AL. v. BERNABE BALECHA

    059 Phil 308

  • G.R. No. 37452 December 23, 1933 - FERMIN SUPIA, ET AL. v. JOSE M. QUINTERO, ET AL.

    059 Phil 312

  • G.R. No. 38052 December 23, 1933 - CONCEPCION ABELLA DE DIAZ v. ERLANGER & GALINGER, INC., ET AL.

    059 Phil 326

  • G.R. No. 38434 December 23, 1933 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. ISLANDS v. MARCIANO D. MEDINA

    059 Phil 330

  • G.R. No. 38774 December 23, 1933 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. ISLANDS v. ALEKO LILIUS

    059 Phil 339

  • G.R. Nos. 39840 & 39841 December 23, 1933 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. ISLANDS v. GABRIEL HERNANDEZ

    059 Phil 343