Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence


Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence > Year 1933 > September 1933 Decisions > G.R. No. 37310 September 19, 1933 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. DONATO DAZO, ET AL.

058 Phil 420:




PHILIPPINE SUPREME COURT DECISIONS

EN BANC

[G.R. No. 37310. September 19, 1933.]

THE PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINE ISLANDS, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. DONATO DAZO and FILOMENO TIANGZON, Defendants-Appellants.

Eriberto de Silva, for Appellants.

Attorney-General Jaranilla, for Appellee.

SYLLABUS


1. CRIMINAL LAW; EVIDENCE; IN GENERAL; CORROBORATION. — Rape may be established by the lone testimony of the injured, if not inherently improbable or contradictory.

2. ID.; AGGRAVATING CIRCUMSTANCE; NOCTURNITY. — Nocturnity will not aggravate the penalty for rape, unless it is shown that the culprit took advantage of the night-time to commit the offense.


D E C I S I O N


ABAD SANTOS, J.:


Appellants were prosecuted in the Court of First Instance of Leyte for rape. They were tried, found guilty and each sentenced to fourteen years, eight months and one day of reclusion temporal, with the accessory penalties provided by law, but with credit for one-half of the period of his preventive imprisonment, and to pay one-half of the costs. They were also sentenced to indemnity the offended party in the sum of P500, and to support the offspring should there he any.

In support of this appeal, the appellants contend that the trial court erred in accepting the testimony of the complaining witness and in disregarding the testimony of the witnesses for the defense. While it is true that, aside from the complaining witness, there were no other witnesses to the commission of the crime, yet the circumstances of the case fully corroborate the testimony of the complaining witness, which is clear and free from any serious contradiction. "Where the testimony of the prosecutrix is not inherently improbable or contradictory, it is not essential to a conviction that there be corroboration." (Day v. State, 232 Pac., 122; see also People v. Tanilloso, G. R. No. 33514, not reported, promulgated February 4, 1931; People v. King, 205 Pac., 703; State v. Jones, 245 Pac., 101.)

The crime committed falls under article 438 of the Penal Code, and the penalty prescribed is reclusion temporal. We are unable to agree with the Attorney-General that the aggravating circumstances of ignominy and of nocturnity were present in the commission of the crime. It does not appear that the defendants took advantage of the night-time to commit the offense; and as to the aggravating circumstance of ignominy, the facts of the present case are not so aggravated as those in United States v. Iglesia and Valdez (21 Phil., 55), cited by the Attorney-General in his brief. In that case the crime was committed against a married woman after separating her from her husband.

The judgment appealed from is, therefore, within the limits prescribed by law and must be affirmed with costs against the appellants. So ordered.

Avanceña, C.J., Street, Vickers and Imperial, JJ., concur.




Back to Home | Back to Main




















chanrobles.com





ChanRobles On-Line Bar Review

ChanRobles Internet Bar Review : www.chanroblesbar.com

ChanRobles MCLE On-line

ChanRobles Lawnet Inc. - ChanRobles MCLE On-line : www.chanroblesmcleonline.com






September-1933 Jurisprudence                 

  • C. E. PIATT v. PERFECTO ABORDO September 1, 1933 - 058 Phil 350

  • G.R. No. 38561 September 5, 1933 - FERNANDO ENRIQUEZ v. PAMPANGA BUS CO., INC.

    058 Phil 353

  • G.R. No. 37850 September 6, 1933 - MAN SHUNG LOONG CO., ET AL. v. MELECIO FABROS, ET AL.

    058 Phil 354

  • G.R. No. 40235 September 6, 1933 - MARIANO CU UNJIENG, ET AL. v. JUAN POSADAS, ET AL.

    058 Phil 360

  • JOSE R. PAÑGANIBAN v. ELIAS BORROMEO September 9, 1933 - 058 Phil 367

  • G.R. No. 40133 September 12, 1933 - ROBERT B. VAN STAVERN v. PEDRO MA. SISON, ET AL.

    058 Phil 370

  • G.R. No. 39925 September 14, 1933 - VALENTIN MONTOJO v. CEFERINO HILARIO, ET AL.

    058 Phil 373

  • G.R. No. 39929 September 14, 1933 - AGAPITO RAMOS v. COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE OF TAYABAS, ET AL.

    058 Phil 374

  • G.R. No. 40054 September 14, 1933 - LA GRANJA, INC. v. FELIX SAMSON, ET AL.

    058 Phil 378

  • G.R. No. 38190 September 15, 1933 - MANILA YELLOW TAXICAB CO., INC. v. FRANCISCO JAVIER

    058 Phil 381

  • G.R. No. 38286 September 15, 1933 - MANILA YELLOW TAXICAB CO., INC. v. FAUSTO BARREDO

    058 Phil 385

  • G.R. No. 38621 September 15, 1933 - EULALIO POSAS v. TOLEDO TRANSPORTATION CO., INC.

    058 Phil 390

  • G.R. No. 38715 September 15, 1933 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. MARTIN NOYNAY, ET AL.

    058 Phil 393

  • G.R. No. 38814 September 15, 1933 - METROPOLITAN WATER DISTRICT v. PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION, ET AL.

    058 Phil 397

  • G.R. No. 39453 September 15, 1933 - METROPOLITAN WATER DISTRICT v. PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION, ET AL.

    058 Phil 402

  • G.R. No. 37265 September 18, 1933 - CHINA BANKING CORPORATION v. CHAN QUAN PANG, ET AL.

    058 Phil 404

  • G.R. No. 38614 September 18, 1933 - MIGUEL R. MATEO v. MANILA ELECTRIC COMPANY

    058 Phil 409

  • G.R. No. 39955 September 18, 1933 - ANGELES TAPIA VIUDA DE JONES v. FRANCISCO ZANDUETA, ET AL.

    058 Phil 411

  • G.R. No. 37046 September 19, 1933 - IÑIGO S. DAZA v. FELISA TOMACRUZ, ET AL.

    058 Phil 414

  • G.R. No. 37310 September 19, 1933 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. DONATO DAZO, ET AL.

    058 Phil 420

  • G.R. No. 37386 September 19, 1933 - ANDRES JAYME v. BUALAN

    058 Phil 422

  • G.R. No. 38435 September 19, 1933 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. EMILIO ORONGAN, ET AL.

    058 Phil 426

  • G.R. Nos. 39609 & 39643-39649 September 20, 1933 - MANILA ELECTRIC COMPANY v. CATALINO BALAGTAS

    058 Phil 429

  • G.R. No. 36602 September 22, 1933 - CARMEN PARDO DE TAVERA v. PAZ repuLOPEZ MANZANO VIUDA DE PARDO DE TAVERA

    058 Phil 436

  • G.R. No. 37206 September 22, 1933 - CU UNJIENG E HIJOS v. MABALACAT SUGAR COMPANY, ET AL.

    058 Phil 439

  • G.R. No. 37874 September 22, 1933 - BRAULIO BALAGTAS ET AL. v. CIRIACA ARGUELLES

    058 Phil 445

  • G.R. No. 38050 September 22, 1933 - TIBURCIA MANAHAN v. ENGRACIA MANAHAN

    058 Phil 448

  • G.R. No. 39260 September 23, 1933 - JOSE P. BANZON, ET AL. v. GEORGE C. SELLNER

    058 Phil 453

  • G.R. No. 40368 September 23, 1933 - ANACLETO PIIT v. VICENTE B. DE LARA

    058 Phil 457

  • G.R. No. 36911 September 25, 1933 - AURELIA CONTUAN v. FORTUNATA RAMIREZ

    058 Phil 458

  • G.R. No. 38884 September 26, 1933 - PACIFICO ABAD ET AL. v. JUAN N. EVANGELISTA

    058 Phil 461

  • G.R. No. 37078 September 27, 1933 - ENRIQUE MONSERRAT v. CARLOS G. CERON, ET AL.

    058 Phil 469

  • G.R. No. 37706 September 27, 1933 - CU UNJIENG E HIJOS v. L. P. MITCHELL

    058 Phil 476

  • G.R. No. 38284 September 27, 1933 - GUILLERMO A. CU UNJIENG, ET AL. v. LEONARD S. GODDARD, ET AL.

    058 Phil 482

  • G.R. No. 38316 September 27, 1933 - GUILLERMO A. CU UNJIENG, ET AL. v. MARIANO A. ALBERT, ET AL.

    058 Phil 495

  • G.R. No. 39085 September 27, 1933 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. ANTONIO YABUT

    058 Phil 499

  • G.R. No. 39562 September 27, 1933 - JUAN L. ORBETA v. FILEMON SOTTO, ET AL.

    058 Phil 505

  • G.R. No. 37125 September 30, 1933 - MARIA ARRIETE v. DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS, ET AL.

    058 Phil 507