Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence


Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence > Year 1935 > December 1935 Decisions > G.R. No. 42933 December 10, 1935 - PAZ NABONG v. ELIGIO ALONSO

062 Phil 580:




PHILIPPINE SUPREME COURT DECISIONS

SECOND DIVISION

[G.R. No. 42933. December 10, 1935.]

PAZ NABONG, as guardian ad litem of the minors Valentino Jesus Alonso and Eugenio Alonso, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. ELIGIO ALONSO, Defendant-Appellant.

Jose D. Cortes for Appellant.

Cirilo Lim for Appellee.

SYLLABUS


PARENT AND CHILD; UNINTERRUPTED POSSESSION OF THE STATUS OF A NATURAL CHILD; ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF NATURAL CHILDREN. — The birth certificates Exhibits A and B of the minors V and E, wherein the defendant- appellant states being their father, in connection with this conduct toward them, conclusively establish that said children have been interrupted possession of the status of natural children of the defendant-appellant E. A., during the said period, justified by his direct acts; and, under case 2, article 135 of the Civil Code, said defendant-appellant may be compelled to acknowledge them as his natural children.


D E C I S I O N


VILLA-REAL, J.:


The defendant Eligio Alonso appeals to this court from the judgment of the Court of First Instance of Manila, the dispositive part of which reads:jgc:chanrobles.com.ph

"Wherefore, after taking into considerations all the circumstances of this case, the court hereby rendered judgment ordering the defendant to maintain his two children Valentino Jesus Alonso and Eugenio Alonso by giving them both at least P20 per month until the said children shall have become of age or until such time as they will be able to support themselves while under age, and declaring that the said children Valentino Jesus Alonso and Eugenio Alonso as the recognized natural children of the defendant Eligio Alonso, with all the rights and privileges appertaining thereto. It is further ordered that the defendant pay the costs of this case. It is so ordered."cralaw virtua1aw library

In support of his appeal, the appellant assigns four alleged errors in the decision of the trial court which will presently be discussed.

The pertinent facts which have been established by a preponderance of the evidence and which are necessary to resolve the questions raised in the instant appeal are the following:chanrob1es virtual 1aw library

The plaintiff-appellee Paz Nabong, single, and the defendant-appellant Eligio Alonso, single, lived together as man and wife from 1930 until September, 1932, when the said defendant-appellant Eligio Alonso abandoned the said plaintiff-appellee Paz Nabong to contract marriage with his present wife. During the period they lived together, two children were born: Valentino Jesus Alonso on April 16, 1931, and Eugenio Alonso on June 2, 1932. On April 25, 1931, the defendant- appellee Eligio Alonso subscribed the birth certificate Exhibit A, showing that the illegitimate child therein mentioned, Valentino Jesus Alonso, was born on April 16, 1931, his father and mother being Eligio Alonso and Paz Nabong respectively. Eligio Alonso himself had the child Valentino baptized, selected the child’s godparents and Christian name, and gave him his own surname.

He did the same thing with the child Eugenio, who was born on June 2, 1932 (Exhibit B).

The defendant-appellant treated both children and presented them to his parents as his own, and provided for their support as well as that of their mother.

The birth certificates Exhibits A and B of the minors Valentino and Eugenio, wherein the defendant-appellant states being their father, in connection with the latter’s conduct in having them baptized, selecting their grandparents and their Christian names, giving them his own surname, presenting them to his parents as his own children, providing for their support since they were born up to September, 1932, when he married another woman, and likewise supporting the mother of said minors, the herein plaintiff-appellee Paz Nabong, conclusively establish that the said children have been in the uninterrupted possession of the status of natural children of the defendant-appellee Eligio Alonso, during the said period, justified by his direst acts; and, under case 2, article 135 of the Civil Code, said defendant-appellant may be compelled to acknowledge them as his natural children.

In the case for the acknowledgment of a natural child instituted by Leticia Ledesma, represented by her mother Carmen Leonardo, against Nicolas Ledesma (G. R. No. 34624, 1 promulgated on March 16, 1932), this court, through Justice Villamor, concurred in by Chief Justice Avanceña and Justices Johnson, Ostrand, and Villa-Real, said:jgc:chanrobles.com.ph

"In the light of the foregoing facts and the jurisprudence of this court on the acknowledgment of natural children, we are of the opinion and so hold that the circumstances that the defendant personally stated to the attending physician at the childbirth of Carmen Leonardo in the General Hospital that he is the father of the newborn child, the herein plaintiff Leticia Ledesma, which statement was embodied in the birth certificate Exhibit B which forwarded to the Bureau of Health to be filed; that he lived maritally with his paramour Carmen, together with their child Leticia, in a house rented by him; that he took said mother and child to Batangas in a house of one of his relatives to whom he presented said Carmen as his paramour Leticia as his own child; that he provided for the support and other needs for the substance of the mother and the child, writing frequently the letters of record, lavishing the closest affection upon the child, and solicitous about her health and care, genuine acts of a real father, unequivocally show that the minor Leticia Ledesma, who now seeks the acknowledgment of the father who gave her life, was in truth in the uninterrupted possession of the status of a natural child of the defendant."cralaw virtua1aw library

As to the amount of the allowance which the lower court granted to the minors Valentino Jesus Alonso and Eugenio Alonso, we find the same reasonable.

Wherefore, finding no error in the appealed decision, it is hereby affirmed in toto, with the costs to the appellant. So ordered.

Malcolm, Imperial, Butte, and Goddard, JJ., concur.

Endnotes:



1. 56 Phil., 849.




Back to Home | Back to Main




















chanrobles.com





ChanRobles On-Line Bar Review

ChanRobles Internet Bar Review : www.chanroblesbar.com

ChanRobles MCLE On-line

ChanRobles Lawnet Inc. - ChanRobles MCLE On-line : www.chanroblesmcleonline.com






December-1935 Jurisprudence                 

  • G.R. No. 44750 December 3, 1935 - SERAFIN GAMBOA v. JOSE LOPEZ VITO

    062 Phil 550

  • G.R. No. 43178 December 4, 1935 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. ISLANDS v. SWAME CLAUDETT SCOTT

    062 Phil 553

  • G.R. No. 43137 December 5, 1935 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. vs JOSE TAYABA

    062 Phil 559

  • G.R. No. 43761 December 6, 1935 - DOMINGO CACHO v. JOSE ABAD

    062 Phil 564

  • G.R. No. 42557 December 7, 1935 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. ISLANDS v. LORENZO REODICA, ET AL.

    062 Phil 567

  • G.R. No. 43053 December 9, 1935 - IN RE FERNANDO ARCE v. PHIL. NAT’L BANK

    062 Phil 569

  • G.R. No. 43913 December 9, 1935 - MANILA ELECTRIC CO. v. PASAY TRANSPORTATION CO.

    062 Phil 571

  • G.R. No. 44476 December 9, 1935 - MARCELINA CASAS VIUDA DE RIOSA v. JUAN G. LESACA

    062 Phil 575

  • G.R. No. 42933 December 10, 1935 - PAZ NABONG v. ELIGIO ALONSO

    062 Phil 580

  • G.R. No. 44627 December 11, 1935 - FELIPE SALCEDO v. FRANCISCO HERNANDEZ

    062 Phil 584

  • G.R. No. 42574 December 12, 1935 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. ISLANDS v. NGAN TE

    062 Phil 588

  • G.R. No. 44281 December 13, 1935 - AH YOUNG v. VICENTE ALDANESE

    062 Phil 591

  • G.R. No. 41200 December 17, 1935 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. MARIANO CU UNJIENG

    061 Phil 906

  • G.R. No. 41768 December 17, 1935 - VIUDA E HIJOS DE PIO BARRETTO Y CIA. v. ALBO & SEVILLA

    062 Phil 593

  • G.R. No. 43556 December 18, 1935 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. ISLANDS v. HONORATO ESPINA Y REAL

    062 Phil 607

  • G.R. Nos. 42128 & 42129 December 19, 1935 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. ISLANDS v. VICENTE CO ARQUIZA

    062 Phil 611

  • G.R. No. 43043 December 19, 1935 - FELIX V. KATIPUNAN v. JULIO A. ANTIPORDA

    062 Phil 616

  • G.R. No. 43314 December 19, 1935 - A. L. VELILLA v. JUAN POSADAS

    062 Phil 624

  • G.R. No. 43475 December 20, 1935 - GREGORIO C. YARCIA v. PHIL. EDUCATION CO.

    062 Phil 634

  • G.R. No. 42435 December 21, 1935 - FLORA CASTILLO v. MELECIO BOLAÑOS

    062 Phil 640

  • G.R. No. 43290 December 21, 1935 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. ISLANDS v. AMBROSIO LINSAÑGAN

    062 Phil 646

  • G.R. No. 43973 December 21, 1935 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. ISLANDS v. PONCIANO CARBALLO

    062 Phil 651

  • G.R. No. 44112 December 21, 1935 - ELISA DE LA CRUZ v. HIJOS DE I. DE LA RAMA & CO.

    062 Phil 635

  • G.R. No. 41731 December 21, 1935 - MARGARITA ROXAS Y AYALA VIUDA DE SORIANO ET AL. v. JUAN POSADAS

    062 Phil 656

  • G.R. No. 42454 December 21, 1935 - GEORGE CASTRO v. CONSUELO CARRATALA VIUDA DE VELOSO

    062 Phil 667

  • G.R. No. 42510 December 21, 1935 - IN RE NATALIA AREVALO v. CARMEN ADRIANO

    062 Phil 671

  • G.R. No. 42626 December 21, 1935 - EUDARDO MATUTE v. ANTONIO MATUTE Y AMASA

    062 Phil 677

  • G.R. No. 42779 December 21, 1935 - ASIATIC PETROLEUM CO. (P. I.) v. BUENAVENTURA M. VELOSO

    062 Phil 683

  • G.R. No. 43719 December 21, 1935 - AURELIO CECILIO v. JACINTO TOMACRUZ

    062 Phil 689