Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence


Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence > Year 1946 > July 1946 Decisions > G.R. No. 668 July 13, 1946 - ZOSIMO L. ABANTO v. DIRECTOR OF PRISONS

076 Phil 754:




PHILIPPINE SUPREME COURT DECISIONS

EN BANC

[G.R. No. 668. July 13, 1946.]

ZOSIMO L. ABANTO (alias MAXIMO FERNANDEZ), Petitioner, v. THE DIRECTOR OF PRISONS, Respondent.

Zosimo L. Abanto in his own behalf.

First Assistant Solicitor General Reyes and Solicitor Reyes for Respondent.

SYLLABUS


1. HABEAS CORPUS; JUDGMENTS; NULLITY OF CONFINEMENT IN ABSENCE OF SENTENCE BY COMPETENT MILITARY TRIBUNAL OR COURT OF JUSTICE. — it appearing that no sentence has ever been rendered by any competent military tribunal or court of justice in case No. 130, the petitioner’s confinement in said case is null and void ab initio.


D E C I S I O N


PERFECTO, J.:


Zosimo L. Abanto filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus to seek the annulment of the sentence rendered in case No. 130 by the Japanese imperial military authorities on March 13, 1942, imposing upon him a penalty of thirteen (13) years, eight (8) months and one (1) day of imprisonment, plus an additional penalty of twelve (12) years and one (1) day for habitual delinquency, for which he was committed by Eugenio Dizon, Acting Chief of the Secret Service of Manila, to the New Bilibid Prison, where petitioner began serving said sentence on April 29, 1942.

The Solicitor General, on the strength of our decision rendered on April 25, 1946, in the case of Reyes v. Director of Prisons (p. 561, ante), answering the petition, concurred in petitioner’s prayer that the above-mentioned sentence be declared without any legal effect, but recommending that petitioner be declared subject to further detention until the indeterminate sentence of from four (4) months to four (4) years, nine (9) months and ten (10) days of imprisonment imposed upon him on September 10, 1942, by the Court of First Instance of Manila in case No. 65166, shall have been fully served, the legality of said sentence having been expressly recognized by petitioner and is upheld by a majority of this Court in Co Kim Cham v. Valdez Tan Keh and Dizon (75 Phil., 113).

It appearing that no sentence has ever been rendered by any competent military tribunal or court of justice in case No. 130, the petitioner’s confinement in said case No. 130 is null and void ab initio; but, conformably with the Solicitor General’s recommendation, petitioner shall have to serve the sentence imposed upon him by the Court of First Instance of Manila in case No. 65166. Service of his sentence should be understood to have commenced from September 10, 1942.

Moran, C.J., Paras, Feria, Pablo, Hilado, Bengzon, Briones, Padilla and Tuason, JJ., concur.




Back to Home | Back to Main




















chanrobles.com





ChanRobles On-Line Bar Review

ChanRobles Internet Bar Review : www.chanroblesbar.com

ChanRobles MCLE On-line

ChanRobles Lawnet Inc. - ChanRobles MCLE On-line : www.chanroblesmcleonline.com