Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence


Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence > Year 1946 > March 1946 Decisions > G.R. No. L-319 March 28, 1946 - GO TIAN SEK SANTOS v. ERIBERTO MISA

076 Phil 415:




PHILIPPINE SUPREME COURT DECISIONS

EN BANC

[G.R. No. L-319. March 28, 1946.]

GO TIAN SEK SANTOS, Petitioner, v. ERIBERTO MISA, Director of Prisons, Respondent.

Mariano Trinidad for Petitioner.

First Assistant Solicitor General Reyes and Solicitor De los Angeles for Respondent.

SYLLABUS


1. HABEAS CORPUS; DETENTION UNDER COMMONWEALTH ACT NO. 682; ESPIONAGE; CITIZENSHIP, IMMATERIAL. — The foreign status of a political detainee does not exclude him ipso facto from the scope of the provisions of section 19 of Commonwealth Act No. 682, because he may be prosecuted for espionage, a crime not conditioned by the citizenship of the offender, and considered as an offense against national security.


D E C I S I O N


BENGZON, J.:


The petitioner avers he is a Chinese citizen apprehended in February, 1945, by the Counter Intelligence Corps of the United States Army, turned over last September, to the Commonwealth Government, and since then detained by the respondent as a political prisoner. Such detention, he claims, is illegal, because he has not been charged before, not convicted by, the judge of a competent court, and because he may not be confined under Act. No. 682, as he owes allegiance neither to the United States nor to the Commonwealth of the Philippines.

The Solicitor General, for the respondent, admits the detention, for active collaboration with the Japanese, doubts the allegation of citizenship, and maintains that, conceding arguendo petitioner’s alienage, he may be charged for espionage, a crime against national security wherein allegiance is immaterial, and may, therefore, be held in custody under Commonwealth Act No. 682.

As the record stands, the petitioner must be deemed a Chinese subject. The commitment order No. 291 issued by the United States Army authorities describes him as such. But it does not follow that he is entitled to liberty now. But it does not follow that he is entitled to liberty now. He is included among those contemplated by Section 19 of Commonwealth Act No. 682, which reads partly:jgc:chanrobles.com.ph

"Upon delivery by the Commander-in-Chief of the Armed Forces of the United States in the Philippines of the persons detained by him as political prisoners, to Commonwealth Government, the Office of Special Prosecutors shall receive all records, documents, exhibits and such other things as the Government of the United States may have turned over in connection with and/or affecting said political prisoners, examine the aforesaid records, documents, exhibits, etc., and take, as speedily as possible, such action as may be proper: Provided, however, . . . And, provided, further, That, in the interest of public security, the provisions of article one hundred twenty-five of the Revised Penal Code, as amended, shall be deemed, as they are hereby, suspended, insofar as the aforesaid political prisoners are concerned , until the filing of the corresponding information with the People’s Court, but the period of suspension shall not be more than six (6) months from the formal delivery of said political prisoners by the Commander-in-Chief of the Armed Forces of the United States in the Philippines to the Commonwealth Government.

His foreign status does not exclude him ipso facto from the scope of the provisions. As stated by the Solicitor General, he might be prosecuted for espionage, (Commonwealth Act. No. 616) a crime not conditioned by citizenship of the offender, and considered as an offense against national security.

The contentions advanced during the oral argument, challenging the validity of said section 19, Commonwealth Act. No. 682, upon constitutional grounds must be overruled, in view of our decision in Laurel v. Director of Prisons (p. 372, ante), copy of which will be furnished to petitioner by the clerk of this court. The petition is denied, with costs.

Moran, C.J., Ozaeta, Jaranilla, Feria, De Joya, Pablo, Hilado, and Briones, J.J., concur.

Paras, J., concurs in the result.

Separate Opinions


PERFECTO, J., concurring and dissenting:chanrob1es virtual 1aw library

We concur with the majority’s pronouncement to the effect that petitioner is not excluded from the group of persons contemplated by section 19 of Commonwealth Act No. 682, notwithstanding his foreign status as a Chinese subject. We also agree that, if there are facts and evidence to justify it, he might be prosecuted for espionage, or any other crime not conditioned by the citizenship of the offender. But we disagree as to the denial of the petition, it appearing that the petitioner is being deprived of his personal liberty without any due and legal process of law, and as to this question, we refer to the stand we have taken in our dissenting opinion in case G.R. No. L-200. Laurel v. Director of Prisons (p. 372, ante), the contentions therein we reiterate here.




Back to Home | Back to Main




















chanrobles.com





ChanRobles On-Line Bar Review

ChanRobles Internet Bar Review : www.chanroblesbar.com

ChanRobles MCLE On-line

ChanRobles Lawnet Inc. - ChanRobles MCLE On-line : www.chanroblesmcleonline.com






March-1946 Jurisprudence                 

  • G.R. No. L-128 March 2, 194

    JOSE GUEKEKO v. TEOFILO C. SANTOS

    076 Phil 237

  • C.A. No. 20 March 12, 1946 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. BENEDICTO

    076 Phil 253

  • Adm. Case No. 174 March 12, 1946 - JOSE B. ESCUETA v. AQUILINO PANDO

    076 Phil 256

  • G.R. No. L-212 March 12, 1946 - NARCISA DE LA FUENTE, ET AL v. FERNANDO JUGO, ET AL

    076 Phil 262

  • G.R. No. L-121 March 14, 1946 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. RUFO DIZON, ET AL

    076 Phil 265

  • G.R. No. L-247 March 14, 1946 - MONSIG. CAMILO DIEL v. FELIX MARTINEZ, ET AL

    076 Phil 273

  • G.R. No. L-154 March 18, 1946 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. JESUS NUEVAS

    076 Phil 276

  • C.A. No. 299 March 18, 1946 - FELIX ADAN v. AGAPITO CASILI, ET AL

    076 Phil 279

  • C.A. No. 9848 March 18, 1946 - VICTORIANO VALDEZ, ET AL. v. ANGEL B. PINE, ET AL

    076 Phil 285

  • G.R. No. L-13 March 20, 1946 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. FRANCISCO A. QUEBRAL, ET AL

    076 Phil 294

  • Adm. Case No. 4 March 21, 1946 - TRINIDAD NEYRA v. TEODORA NEYRA, ET AL

    076 Phil 296

  • G.R. No. L-70 Mazo 22, 1946 - EMILIO GOMEZ v. PERFECTO ALEJO

    076 Phil 311

  • C.A. No. 601 March 22, 1946 - PETRA GATMAITAN v. MODESTO J. PASCUAL

    076 Phil 315

  • C.A. No. 8977 March 22, 1946 - TORIBIO P. PEREZ v. SCOTTISH UNION & NATIONAL INSURANCE CO.

    076 Phil 320

  • G.R. No. 49183 March 23, 1946 - SERGIA MENDOZA v. MODESTO CASTILLO, ET AL

    076 Phil 326

  • G.R. No. L-260 March 25, 1946 - FELIPE SAAVEDRA v. POTENCIANO PECSON

    076 Phil 330

  • Adm. Case No. 8075 March 25, 1946 - TRINIDAD NEYRA v. ENCARNACION NEYRA

    076 Phil 333

  • G.R. No. 49126 March 25, 1946 - E. T. YU CHENGCO v. YAP ENG CHONG

    076 Phil 344

  • C.A. No. 15 March 26, 1946 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. JACOB T. TANI

    076 Phil 346

  • G.R. No. L-306 March 26, 1946 - FERNANDO VILLEGAS v. ARSENIO C. ROLDAN

    076 Phil 349

  • G.R. No. L-53 March 27, 1946 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. MELANIO G. REYES

    076 Phil 354

  • G.R. No. L-246 March 27, 1946 - SILVERIO VALDEZ v. ANTONIO G. LUCERO

    076 Phil 356

  • Adm. Case No. 475 March 27, 1940

    LIM TEK GOAN v. JOSE AZORES

    076 Phil 363

  • G.R. No. L-132 March 28, 1946 - EL PUEBLO DE FILIPINAS v. PABLO CELIS

    076 Phil 369

  • G.R. No. L-200 March 28, 1946 - ANASTACIO LAUREL v. ERIBERTO MISA

    076 Phil 372

  • G.R. No. L-268 March 28, 1946 - NICASIO SALONGA Y RODRIGUEZ v. J. P. HOLLAND

    076 Phil 412

  • G.R. No. L-319 March 28, 1946 - GO TIAN SEK SANTOS v. ERIBERTO MISA

    076 Phil 415

  • G.R. No. 49108 March 28, 1946 - GONZALO D. DAVID v. CARLO SISON

    076 Phil 418

  • G.R. No. L-279 March 29, 1946 - ENRIQUE BRIAS v. PACIFICO VICTORIANO, ET AL

    076 Phil 425

  • G.R. No. L-286 March 29, 1946 - FREDESVINDO S. ALVERO v. M. L. DE LA ROSA

    076 Phil 428

  • G.R. No. 48483 March 29, 1946 - PHIL. MANUFACTURING COMPANY v. BIBIANO L. MEER

    076 Phil 436

  • G.R. No. L-131 March 30, 1946 - NARCISA DE LA FUENTE, ET AL v. LUIS BORROMEO

    076 Phil 442

  • G.R. No. L-252 March 30, 1946 - TRANQUILINO CALO, ET AL v. ARSENIO C. ROLDAN, ET AL

    076 Phil 445