Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence


Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence > Year 1948 > April 1948 Decisions > G.R. No. L-348 April 30, 1948 - FLORENTINO PASCUA v. JOSE TALENS

080 Phil 792:




PHILIPPINE SUPREME COURT DECISIONS

SECOND DIVISION

[G.R. No. L-348. April 30, 1948.]

FLORENTINO PASCUA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. JOSE TALENS, Defendant-Appellant.

Juan M. Ladaw and J. Mauricio Pimentel, for Appellant.

Benedicto Q. Bringas, for Appellee.

SYLLABUS


PUBLIC LAND LAW; HOMESTEAD; SALE AND REPURCHASE BY HOMESTEADERS’S WIDOW OR HEIRS. — Under section 117 of Act No. 2874, the right to repurchase exists not only when the original homesteader makes the conveyance, but also when it is made by his widow or heirs.


D E C I S I O N


BENGZON, J.:


This litigation calls for application or interpretation of section 117 of Act No. 2874, which for convenience is herein quoted:jgc:chanrobles.com.ph

"Every conveyance of land acquired under the free patent or homestead provisions, when proper, shall be subject to repurchase by the applicant, his widow, or legal heirs, for a period of five years from the date of the conveyance."cralaw virtua1aw library

When a legal heir of the homesteader acquires title to the homestead, and subsequently sells it, may the said heir invoke the above section to establish his right to repurchase such homestead? That is the question squarely raised in this expediente.

The facts are these: (1) Under the provisions of Act No. 2874, Sinforoso Pascua obtained ownership of a homestead of about twenty-two hectares in Bongabon, Nueva Ecija by Patent No. 32910 dated June 3, 1935, duly registered in the provincial register of deeds as original certificate of title No. 2736. (2) On March 23, 1936, Florentino Pascua acquired said homestead by inheritance, a transfer certificate of title No. 11253 having been issued to him. (3) On August 2, 1940, Florentino Pascua (herein plaintiff) sold the above-mentioned land to Jose Talens (the defendant) for the sum of P1,180.00. (4) In 1943, plaintiff demanded reconveyance of the land pursuant to section 117 of Act No. 2874. The defendant having refused, this action was interposed in the Court of First Instance of Nueva Ecija. (5) That court found for the plaintiff and rendered appropriate orders. Hence this appeal by defendant, who has all the time maintained that section 117 is not applicable to the situation.

We are not advised of any previous ruling of this Court on the matter. However, the solution of the question is not hard to seek, if the section is carefully analyzed in the light of the purposes of the Public Land Act.

It is well-known that the homestead laws were designed to distribute disposable agricultural lots of the State to land-destitute citizens for their home and cultivation. Pursuant to such benevolent intention the State prohibits the sale or encumbrance of the homestead (Section 116) within five years after the grant of the patent. After that five-year period the law impliedly permits alienation of the homestead; but in line with the primordial purpose to favor the homesteader and his family the statute provides that such alienation or conveyance (Section 117) shall be subject to the right of repurchase by the homesteader, his widow or heirs within five years. This section 117 is undoubtedly a complement of section 116. It aims to preserve and keep in the family of the homesteader that portion of public land which the State had gratuitously given to him. It would, therefore, be in keeping with this fundamental idea to hold, as we hold, that the right to repurchase exists not only when the original homesteader makes the conveyance, but also when it is made by his widow or heirs. This construction is clearly deducible from the terms of the statute.

Wherefore, the appealed decision will be affirmed, with costs against the appellant. So ordered.

Feria, Pablo, Perfecto and Tuason, JJ., concur.




Back to Home | Back to Main




















chanrobles.com





ChanRobles On-Line Bar Review

ChanRobles Internet Bar Review : www.chanroblesbar.com

ChanRobles MCLE On-line

ChanRobles Lawnet Inc. - ChanRobles MCLE On-line : www.chanroblesmcleonline.com






April-1948 Jurisprudence                 

  • G.R. No. L-1762 April 1, 1948 - JOSE FUENTEBELLA v. BUENAVENTURA OCAMPO

    080 Phil 552

  • G.R. No. L-1584 April 2, 1948 - EMILIA TEOXON contra. FELIX B. PANIS

    080 Phil 554

  • G.R. No. L-612 April 3, 1948 - JOSEFA AGUSTINES v. JUDGE OF COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE OF BULACAN

    080 Phil 558

  • G.R. No. L-1213 April 6, 1948 - PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES v. JUANITO LABITAN VINDUA

    080 Phil 570

  • G.R. No. L-2092 April 6, 1948 - JUSTO CAMAT v. DIRECTOR OF PRISONS

    080 Phil 575

  • G.R. No. L-301 April 7, 1948 - CARLOS PALANCA v. REPUBLIC OF THE PHILS.

    080 Phil 578

  • G.R. No. L-554 April 9, 1948 - HAW PIA v. CHINA BANKING CORP.

    080 Phil 604

  • G.R. No. L-2010 April 9, 1948 - CIPRIANO RAYMUNDO v. PRIMITIVO L. GONZALES

    080 Phil 719

  • G.R. No. L-1882 April 10, 1948 - MATEO RAMOS v. COMELEC

    080 Phil 722

  • G.R. No. L-1414 April 16, 1948 - EL PUEBLO DE FILIPINAS contra. JOSE DE JESUS

    080 Phil 748

  • G.R. No. L-1904 April 16, 1948 - C. N. HODGES v. CONRADO BARRIOS

    080 Phil 751

  • G.R. No. L-1598 April 19, 1948 - NICOLASA SALVO DE PERNIA v. MEYNARDO M. FAROL

    080 Phil 756

  • G.R. No. L-1939 April 19, 1948 - SIXTO CASIN v. HERMOGENES CALUAG

    080 Phil 758

  • G.R. No. L-1220 April 21, 1948 - MATEA RESTAURO v. DOMINGO FABRICA

    080 Phil 762

  • G.R. No. L-1493 April 21, 1948 - ANTONIA ESPINA v. CATALINA COLINA, ET AL.

    080 Phil 764

  • G.R. No. L-1664 April 21, 1948 - MARIA BONGALA, ET AL. v. JOSE BARBAZA

    080 Phil 767

  • G.R. No. L-1486 April 26, 1948 - ARIAS MAGONCIA contra. PERFECTO R. PALACIO

    080 Phil 770

  • G.R. No. L-770 April 27, 1948 - ANGEL T. LIMJOCO v. PEDRO O. FRAGANTE

    080 Phil 776

  • G.R. No. L-254 April 30, 1948 - Carlos Gil v. ROBERTO TOLEDO Y GIL III

    080 Phil 790

  • G.R. No. L-348 April 30, 1948 - FLORENTINO PASCUA v. JOSE TALENS

    080 Phil 792

  • G.R. No. L-416 April 30, 1948 - GREGORIO MIGUEL v. VICENTE TOSE

    080 Phil 794

  • G.R. No. L-578 April 30, 1948 - PRIMITIVO RIVERO v. VICTORIANO RIVERO, ET AL.

    080 Phil 802

  • G.R. No. L-1115 April 30, 1948 - PEOPLE OF THE PHILS. v. FRANCISCO SEPILLO

    080 Phil 805

  • G.R. No. L-1248 April 30, 1948 - EL PUEBLO DE FILIPINAS contra. DATU ALIMPANG MANTAWAR

    080 Phil 817

  • G.R. No. L-1276 April 30, 1948 - ROSARIO VALERA v. MARIANO TUASON

    080 Phil 823

  • G.R. No. L-1543 April 30, 1948 - JULIAN SOGUECO v. FELIPE NATIVIDAD

    080 Phil 829