ChanRobles™ Virtual Law Library | chanrobles.com™  
Main Index Law Library Philippine Laws, Statutes & Codes Latest Legal Updates Philippine Legal Resources Significant Philippine Legal Resources Worldwide Legal Resources Philippine Supreme Court Decisions United States Jurisprudence
Prof. Joselito Guianan Chan's The Labor Code of the Philippines, Annotated Labor Standards & Social Legislation Volume I of a 3-Volume Series 2019 Edition (3rd Revised Edition)
 

 
Chan Robles Virtual Law Library
 









 

 
UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT JURISPRUDENCE
 

 
PHILIPPINE SUPREME COURT JURISPRUDENCE
 

   
December-1949 Jurisprudence                 

  • G.R. No. L-2502 December 1, 1949 - PROVINCIAL FISCAL OF ILOCOS NORTE v. CEFERINO DE LOS SANTOS, ET AL

    085 Phil 77

  • G.R. No. L-2836 December 6, 1949 - ENGRACIA G. DE PONCE v. ALICIA VASQUEZ SAGARIO, ET AL

    085 Phil 79

  • G.R. No. L-2466 December 7, 1949 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. ANTONIO TUAZON

    085 Phil 85

  • G.R. No. L-2580 December 7, 1949 - PABLO RICOHERMOSO v. JUAN P. ENRIQUEZ, ET AL

    085 Phil 88

  • G.R. No. L-2593 December 7, 1949 - FELIX AZOTES v. MANUEL BLANCO, ET AL

    085 Phil 90

  • G.R. No. L-2652 December 7, 1949 - JULIA LORENZO, ET AL v. MUNICIPAL COUNCIL OF NAIC, ET AL

    085 Phil 92

  • G.R. No. L-2758 December 7, 1949 - CLARO J. GIL, ET AL v. F. IMPERIAL REYES, ET AL

    085 Phil 97

  • G.R. No. L-3452 December 7, 1949 - NACIONALISTA PARTY v. FELIX ANGELO BAUTISTA

    085 Phil 101

  • G.R. No. L-3474 December 7, 1949 - NACIONALISTA PARTY v. VICENTE DE VERA

    085 Phil 126

  • G.R. No. L-2354 December 13, 1949 - ALFONSO ARANETA v. MARTA CUI VDA. DE SANSON

    085 Phil 142

  • G.R. No. L-2672 December 13, 1949 - UNIVERSITY OF SANTO TOMAS v. BUENAVENTURA OCAMPO, ET AL

    085 Phil 144

  • G.R. No. L-3521 December 13, 1949 - NACIONALISTA PARTY ET AL. v. COMELEC

    085 Phil 149

  • G.R. No. L-2722 December 15, 1949 - NICOLAS LIZARES & CO. v. BIENVENIDO TAN

    085 Phil 159

  • G.R. No. L-2802 December 23, 1949 - ROSA PASCUAL, ET AL v. BIENVENIDO A. TAN, ET AL

    085 Phil 164

  • G.R. No. L-2936 December 23, 1949 - TIDE WATER ASSOCIATED OIL CO. v. VICTORY EMPLOYEES, ET AL

    085 Phil 166

  • G.R. No. L-867 December 29, 1949 - ANTONIO DEL ROSARIO ET AL. v. CARLOS SANDICO ET AL.

    085 Phil 170

  • G.R. No. L-1349 December 29, 1949 - H. D. KNEEDLER v. SIMON PATERNO

    085 Phil 183

  • G.R. No. L-1773 December 29, 1949 - ALEJANDRO ANDRES, ET AL v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

    085 Phil 192

  • G.R. No. L-1811 December 29, 1949 - GREGORIO BALVERAN, ET AL v. COURT OF APPEALS

    085 Phil 199

  • G.R. No. L-1877 December 29, 1949 - H. P. HOSKYNS v. NAT’L. CITY BANK OF NEW YORK

    085 Phil 201

  • G.R. No. L-1965 December 29, 1949 - EDUARDO OSORIO v. MARINA OSORIO

    085 Phil 209

  • G.R. No. L-2020 December 29, 1949 - LA ORDEN DE PADRES BENEDICTINOS DE FILIPINAS v. PHIL. TRUST CO.

    085 Phil 217

  • G.R. No. L-2360 December 29, 1949 - GAVINO ALDAMIZ v. JUDGE OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE OF MINDORO, ET AL

    085 Phil 228

  • G.R. No. L-2404 December 29, 1949 - FABIAN B. S. ABELLERA v. FELICIANO GARCIA

    085 Phil 237

  • G.R. No. L-2634 December 29, 1949 - PACIFIC IMPORTING & EXPORTING CO. v. CATALINO TINIO, ET AL

    085 Phil 239

  • G.R. No. L-2570 December 29, 1949 - BACHRACH MOTOR CO. v. RURAL TRANSIT EMPLOYEES’ ASSO.

    085 Phil 242

  • G.R. No. L-2678 December 29, 1949 - ANTONIO C. ARAGON v. MARCOS JORGE

    085 Phil 246

  • G.R. No. L-2717 December 29, 1949 - IRINEO FACUNDO v. BIENVENIDO A. TAN ET AL.

    085 Phil 249

  • G.R. No. L-2752 December 29, 1949 - URBANO OLAVARIO ET AL. v. JUAN T. VILLANUEVA

    085 Phil 254

  • G.R. No. L-2842 December 29, 1949 - JOSE T. VALMONTE, ET AL v. MARIANO NABLE, ET AL

    085 Phil 256

  • G.R. No. L-2850 December 29, 1949 - ONG KIM PAN, ET AL v. FRANCISCO GERONIMO, ET AL

    085 Phil 261

  • G.R. No. L-2942 December 29, 1949 - SILVESTRA COQUIA, ET AL v. RODOLFO BALTAZAR, ET AL

    085 Phil 265

  • G.R. No. L-3039 December 29, 1949 - VICTORIO REYNOSO, ET AL v. VICENTE SANTIAGO, ET AL

    085 Phil 268

  • G.R. No. L-3261 December 29, 1949 - HECTOR G. PALILEO v. FRED RUIZ CASTRO, ET AL

    085 Phil 272

  • G.R. No. L-2529 December 31, 1949 - J. A. SISON v. BOARD OF ACCOUNTANCY, EZT AL

    085 Phil 276

  • G.R. No. L-2720 December 31, 1949 - HEMANDAS UDHARAM v. RAFAEL DINGLASAN

    085 Phil 284

  • G.R. No. L-2893 December 31, 1949 - AGRIPINO JIMINEZ, ET AL v. EUSEBIO F. RAMOS

    085 Phil 286

  •  





     
     

    G.R. No. L-2752   December 29, 1949 - URBANO OLAVARIO ET AL. v. JUAN T. VILLANUEVA<br /><br />085 Phil 254

     
    PHILIPPINE SUPREME COURT DECISIONS

    FIRST DIVISION

    [G.R. No. L-2752. December 29, 1949.]

    URBANO OLAVARIO ET AL., Petitioners, v. JUAN T. VILLANUEVA, Respondent.

    Max. Borcelis, for Petitioners.

    Villareal & Valladolid for Respondent.

    SYLLABUS


    1. APPEAL TIME WITHIN WHICH TO APPEAL FROM JUDGMENT OF THE COURT OF INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS; LAW APPLICABLE. — The applicable provision, governing the period within which to appeal be certiorari from the decision of the Court of Industrial Relations to the Supreme Court is not section 1 of Rule 44, but Commonwealth Act No. 559, amending Commonwealth Act No. 103 and passed after the promulgation of the Rules of Court, which Act provides that petition to review on certiorari a decision of the Court of Industrial Relations shall be filed within ten days from notice of the decision.


    D E C I S I O N


    TUASON, J.:


    This is an appeal by certiorari from a decision of the Court of Industrial Relations reversing the decision of the Tenancy Law Enforcement Division of the Department of Justice and authorizing and sanctioning the ejectment or dismissal of the now petitioners and appellants from their landholdings. For answer the respondent alleges, besides several defenses on the merits, that the appeal was not "perfected within the fifteen-day period provided for by law," and asks for its dismissal.

    A perusal of the record of the Court of Industrial Relations and of the appellants’ memorandum shows that copy of the appealed decision was received by the petitioners on November 18, 1948; that a motion for reconsideration was mailed on November 18, 1948; that copy of the resolution of the Court of Industrial Relations denying that motion was delivered to the petitioners on January 18, 1949; that notice of appeal was filed on January 21, 1949; and that the petition for certiorari, docketed in the Supreme Court on February 1, 1949, was, according to the petitioners, registered for mailing on January 29, 1949. Computation of the period on the basis of the material dates gives this result: Between January 18, when the attorney for the petitioners was notified of the adverse resolution on his motion for reconsideration, and January 29, when counsel put his petition for certiorari in the mail, there was a complete interval of ten days. In other words, excluding January 18, the application for certiorari was mailed on the eleventh day, well beyond his ten days to appeal.

    The applicable provision is not section 1 of Rule 44 of the Rules of Court, as both parties seem to believe, but Commonwealth Act No. 559, amending Commonwealth Act No. 103 and passed after the promulgation of the Rules of Court, which Act provides that petition to review on certiorari a decision of the Court of Industrial Relations shall be filed within ten days from notice of the decision. (Manila Trading & Supply Co. v. Philippine Labor Union, 71 Phil., 578.)

    Without therefore deciding any of the questions on the merits raised in the pleadings, the petition for certiorari should be and is dismissed, with costs against the petitioners.

    Moran, C.J., Ozaeta, Paras, Pablo, Bengzon, Padilla, Reyes and Torres, JJ., concur.

    G.R. No. L-2752   December 29, 1949 - URBANO OLAVARIO ET AL. v. JUAN T. VILLANUEVA<br /><br />085 Phil 254


    Back to Home | Back to Main

     

    QUICK SEARCH

    cralaw

       

    cralaw



     
      Copyright © ChanRobles Publishing Company Disclaimer | E-mail Restrictions
    ChanRobles™ Virtual Law Library | chanrobles.com™
     
    RED