ChanRobles™ Virtual Law Library | chanrobles.com™  
Main Index Law Library Philippine Laws, Statutes & Codes Latest Legal Updates Philippine Legal Resources Significant Philippine Legal Resources Worldwide Legal Resources Philippine Supreme Court Decisions United States Jurisprudence
Prof. Joselito Guianan Chan's The Labor Code of the Philippines, Annotated Labor Standards & Social Legislation Volume I of a 3-Volume Series 2019 Edition (3rd Revised Edition)
 

 
Chan Robles Virtual Law Library
 









 

 
UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT JURISPRUDENCE
 

 
PHILIPPINE SUPREME COURT JURISPRUDENCE
 

   
September-1950 Jurisprudence                 

  • G.R. No. L-2134 September 1, 1950 - JUAN C. GEQUILLANA v. FELIPE BUENAVENTURA

    087 Phil 300

  • G.R. No. L-2180 September 1, 1950 - IN RE: JUAN P. PELLICER & CO., INC. v. PHILIPPINE REALTY CORPORATION

    087 Phil 302

  • G.R. No. L-1415 September 13, 1950 - EL PUEBLO DE FILIPINAS v. MAMERTO CORTEZ, ET AL.

    087 Phil 309

  • G.R. No. L-2684 September 14, 1950 - GENERAL CORPORATION OF THE PHIL., ET AL. v. UNION INSURANCE SOCIETY OF CANTON, ET AL.

    087 Phil 313

  • G.R. No. L-2071 September 19, 1950 - TIRSO DACANAY v. PEDRO V. FLORENDO, ET AL.

    087 Phil 324

  • G.R. No. L-2412 September 19, 1950 - JOSE MARQUEZ LIM v. JOHN G. NELSON, ET AL.

    087 Phil 328

  • G.R. No. L-2870 September 19, 1950 - CHUA NGO v. UNIVERSAL TRADING CO.

    087 Phil 331

  • G.R. No. L-3450 September 19, 1950 - IN RE: PURIFICACION M. JOSON, ET AL. v. MARIANO NABLE, ET AL.

    087 Phil 337

  • G.R. No. L-1944 September 20, 1950 - PHILIPPINE NATIONAL BANK v. JOHN RANDRUP

    087 Phil 341

  • G.R. No. L-2127 September 20, 1950 - VICENTA FELIX VDA. DE SALGADO, ET AL. v. MANUEL DE LA FUENTE, ET AL.

    087 Phil 343

  • G.R. No. L-1977 September 21, 1950 - KOPPEL (PHILIPPINES) INC. v. COLLECTOR OF INTERNAL REVENUE

    087 Phil 348

  • G.R. No. L-2374 September 21, 1950 - APOLINAR ABEL v. PILAR DE LIMA, ET AL.

    087 Phil 352

  • G.R. No. L-2475 September 21, 1950 - FRANCISCO OSORIO v. ESTEBAN SALUTILLO, ET AL.

    087 Phil 356

  • G.R. No. L-2526 September 21, 1950 - TOMAS MAPUA, ET AL. v. SUBURBAN THEATRES, INC.

    087 Phil 358

  • G.R. No. L-3581 September 21, 1950 - JAMES MCGUIRE v. MANUFACTURERS LIFE INSURANCE CO.

    087 Phil 370

  • G.R. No. L-4033 September 21, 1950 - MARCELO STEEL CORPORATION, ET AL. v. IMPORT CONTROL BOARD, ET AL.

    087 Phil 374

  • G.R. No. L-2995 September 22, 1950 - CRISPULO F. ARNALDO, ET AL. v. JOSE BERNABE, ET AL.

    087 Phil 379

  • G.R. No. L-2516 September 25, 1950 - ANG TEK LIAN v. COURT OF APPEALS

    087 Phil 383

  • G.R. No. L-3743 September 25, 1950 - PHIL. ASSO. OF MECHANICAL AND ELECTRICAL ENGINEERS v. PROSPERO SANIDAD, ET AL.

    087 Phil 387

  • G.R. No. L-2362 September 29, 1950 - ANISIA AQUINO, ET AL. v. SOTERO ESGUERRA, ET AL.

    087 Phil 396

  • G.R. No. L-2467 September 29, 1950 - C. N. HODGES v. MARIA GAY, ET AL.

    087 Phil 401

  • G.R. No. L-2670 September 29, 1950 - JANE E. EDMANDS v. PHILIPPINE TRUST COMPANY

    087 Phil 405

  • G.R. No. L-2726 September 29, 1950 - GREGORIO ESTRADA v. PROCULO NOBLE

    087 Phil 408

  • G.R. No. L-2668 September 30, 1950 - NATIONAL LEATHER CO., INC. v. UNITED STATES LIFE INSURANCE CO.

    087 Phil 410

  •  





     
     

    G.R. No. L-3581   September 21, 1950 - JAMES MCGUIRE v. MANUFACTURERS LIFE INSURANCE CO. <br /><br />087 Phil 370

     
    PHILIPPINE SUPREME COURT DECISIONS

    EN BANC

    [G.R. No. L-3581. September 21, 1950.]

    JAMES MCGUIRE, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. THE MANUFACTURERS LIFE INSURANCE CO., Defendant-Appellant.

    Camus, Zavalla, Bautista & Nuevas, for Appellant.

    Vicente C. Santos, for Appellee.

    SYLLABUS


    1. REMEDIAL LAW; STIPULATION OF FACTS, RELIEF FROM. — It is error for the trial court to set aside a stipulation of fact made by the parties in the absence of any petition for relief therefrom on the ground of error or fraud.

    2. LIFE INSURANCE; REINSTATEMENT OF POLICY. — The stipulation in a life insurance policy giving the insured the privilege to reinstate it upon written application within three years from the date it lapses and upon of evidence of insurability satisfactory to the insurance company and the payment of all overdue premiums and any other indebtedness to the company, does not give the insured absolute right to such reinstatement by the mere filing of an application n therefor. The company has the right to deny the reinstatement if it is not satisfied as to the insurability of the insured and of the latter does not pay all overdue premiums and all other indebtedness to the company. After the death of the insured the insurance company cannot be compelled to entertain an application for reinstatement of the policy because the conditions precedent to reinstatement can no longer be determined and satisfied.

    3. ID.; NONPAYMENT OF PREMIUMS TERMINATES CONTRACT OF INSURANCE. — As held in Lopez de Constantino v. Asia Life Insurance Company, and Peralta v. Asia Life Insurance Company, G.R. No. L-1669 and L-1670, the payment of premiums on a life insurance policy is not suspended by war. The United States rule which declares that the contract of insurance is not merely suspended, but it is abrogated by reason of nonpayment of premiums, since the time of the payments is peculiarly of the essence of the contract, is adopted in this jurisdiction.


    D E C I S I O N


    OZAETA, J.:


    This case was submitted to and decided by the Court of First Instance of Samar upon a stipulation of facts, from which it appears that:chanrob1es virtual 1aw library

    On August 18, 1932, the defendant issued an insurance policy on the life of Jaime McGuire for the sum of $5,000, and an additional sum of $5,000 as double indemnity accident benefit, payable to the plaintiff as beneficiary. The insured paid the premiums on said policy up to and including that due on July 19, 1940. On June 22, 1940, the insured secured from the defendant a loan of $760 on said insurance policy. The insured failed to pay the loan with the interest thereon on January 1, 1941, when it became due, or on any other date thereafter. He likewise failed to pay the premiums which fell due on July 19, 1941, as well as those payable thereafter. Paragraphs 6, 7, and 8 of the stipulation of facts read as follows:jgc:chanrobles.com.ph

    "(6) That upon the default of the insured to pay the premiums due on July 19, 1941, and subsequent ones, the defendant insurance company applied the stipulation contained in clause 8 (Automatic Premium Loan) of the provisions of the policy Exhibit A and said policy was carried on under said nonforfeiture clause of the policy up to and including March 1, 1942, the date said policy lapsed, as shown in the letter of the defendant company of January 17, 1946, to plaintiff, a copy of which is hereto attached, marked Exhibit B and is made a part hereof;

    "(7) That the insured Jaime McGuire died on August 4, 1943, in a motorcycle accident at Borongan, Samar, Philippines;

    "(8) That during the interim period between March 1, 1942, the date the policy lapsed, to August 4, 1943, the date of the death of the insured, the insured attempted to reinstate the policy under the stipulation contained in clause 3 of the ’Provisions’ of the same but his attempts failed because of his inability to communicate with defendant’s branch office at Manila due to the then existence of war and the occupation of the Philippines by enemy forces from January 1, 1942, to February, 1945."cralaw virtua1aw library

    Upon those facts the trial court rendered judgment in favor of the plaintiff, adjudging the defendant to pay to him the sum of P20,000, minus the premiums due and unpaid up to the date of the death of the insured, with legal interest thereon from the date of the filing of the complaint, and the costs.

    The trial court considered erroneous paragraph 6 of the stipulation of facts above quoted to the effect that the policy in question lapsed on March 1, 1942, for failure to pay the premiums due thereafter on account of the war, the trial court being of the opinion that the war legally suspended the obligation of the insured to pay the premiums up to the time of the death of the insured, which occurred during said war, citing the decision of the Court of Appeals to that effect in Gubagaras v. West Coast Life Insurance Company, CA- G. R. No. 1628, January 6, 1949.

    According to the complaint, plaintiff’s theory is that, although the policy lapsed on March 1, 1942, the insured had the privilege of reinstating it so as to keep it in force up to the time of his death upon a written application within three years from the date of lapse and upon production of evidence of insurability satisfactory to the company and the payment of all overdue premiums and any other indebtedness to the company, but that the insured was unable to exercise that privilege because of the war. Adopting another theory, the trial court held that it was unnecessary for the plaintiff to invoke the reinstatement clause of the policy because it had not lapsed inasmuch as the failure to pay the premiums was due to the war.

    Plaintiff’s theory is untenable. Even if the insured had applied for reinstatement within three years after the policy had lapsed, his right thereto was not absolute under the terms of the policy but discretionary on the part of the insurance company, which had the right to deny the reinstatement if it was not satisfied as to the insurability of the insured and if the latter did not pay all overdue premiums and all other indebtedness to the company. After the death of the insured the insurance company could not be compelled to entertain an application for reinstatement of the policy because the conditions precedent to reinstatement could no longer be determined and satisfied.

    Aside from the error of the trial court in motu proprio setting aside the stipulation of fact that the policy had lapsed on March 1, 1942, its theory that the payment of premiums was legally suspended during the war is contrary to the decision of this court of August 31, 1950, in Lopez de Constantino v. Asia Life Insurance Company, and Peralta v. Asia Life Insurance Company, G. R. Nos. L-1669 and L-1670, supra, p. 248. In those cases we rejected the New York rule which holds that war between states in which the parties reside suspends the contract of life insurance and that, upon tender of all premiums due by the insured or his representative after the war was terminated, the contract revives and becomes fully operative; and adopted the United States rule which declares that the contract is not merely suspended, but is abrogated by reason of nonpayment of premiums, since the time of the payments is peculiarly of the essence of the contract. Speaking through Mr. Justice Bengzon, this court, after a review of various pertinent cases, further said:jgc:chanrobles.com.ph

    "After pursuing the Insurance Act, we are firmly persuaded that the nonpayment of premiums is such a vital defense of insurance companies that since the very beginning, said Act 2427 expressly preserved it, by providing that after the policy shall have been in force for two years, it shall become incontestable (i. e., the insurer shall have no defense) except for fraud, nonpayment of premiums, and military or naval service in time of war (sec. 184 [b], Insurance Act). And when Congress recently amended this section (Rep. Act 171), the defense of fraud was eliminated, while the defense of nonpayment of premiums was preserved. Thus the fundamental character of the undertaking to pay premiums and the high importance of the defense of nonpayment thereof, was specifically recognized."cralaw virtua1aw library

    We reiterate the doctrine laid down in the Asia Life Insurance Company cases above cited.

    It appears that the insured in the present case has used up all the reserve value of the policy in question thru loans in cash and the application of the nonforfeiture clause by keeping the policy subsisting until March 1, 1942.

    Reversing the judgment appealed from, we absolve the defendant- appellant from the complaint, with costs.

    Moran, C.J., Paras, Pablo, Bengzon, Tuason, Montemayor and Reyes, JJ., concur.

    G.R. No. L-3581   September 21, 1950 - JAMES MCGUIRE v. MANUFACTURERS LIFE INSURANCE CO. <br /><br />087 Phil 370


    Back to Home | Back to Main

     

    QUICK SEARCH

    cralaw

       

    cralaw



     
      Copyright © ChanRobles Publishing Company Disclaimer | E-mail Restrictions
    ChanRobles™ Virtual Law Library | chanrobles.com™
     
    RED