Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence


Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence > Year 1951 > October 1951 Decisions > G.R. No. L-3709 October 25, 1951 - ENGRACIO DE ASIS v. JOSE V. AGDAMAG, ET. AL.

090 Phil 249:




PHILIPPINE SUPREME COURT DECISIONS

EN BANC

[G.R. No. L-3709. October 25, 1951.]

ENGRACIO DE ASIS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. JOSE V. AGDAMAG, ET. AL., Defendants-Appellees.

Leocadio de Asis,, for Plaintiff-Appellant.

Castañeda & Castañeda, for Defendants-Appellees.

SYLLABUS


1. OBLIGATIONS AND CONTRACTS; LOAN IN 1944 PAYABLE ON OR BEFORE 1947; BALLANTYNE SCALE OF VALUES APPLIED. — As the loan in this case, obtained on August 15, 1944, was payable on or before August 15, 1947, the Ballantyne scale of values should be applied, the reason being that said loan would have been paid in war notes during the Japanese occupation, and the debtor’s failure to do so is not a justification for requiring him to pay the full amount of the loan in the currency on the date of payment.


D E C I S I O N


PARAS, C.J. :


On August 19, 1949, the plaintiff filed an action in the Court of First Instance of Manila to recover from the defendants a loan of P10,000, secured by a mortgage, and evidenced by a promissory note executed by the defendants on August 15, 1944, providing that the loan was payable on or before August 15, 1947, with interest at seven per cent per annum, compounded and payable semi-annually, and that, in case of non-payment on the date of maturity, the sum of P1,000 would be paid by the defendants for costs, attorney’s fees and other collection expenses. The defendants admitted the existence of the loan, but invoked the Debt Moratorium and expressed their willingness to pay the debt in an amount adjusted under the Ballantyne scale of values. After trial, judgment was rendered against the defendants for the sum of P400, without interest and attorney’s fees. The court applied the Ballantyne scale which fixes twenty-five pesos in Japanese war notes as the equivalent of one Philippine peso in August, 1944. From the judgment of the Court of First Instance of Manila, the plaintiff has appealed.

Contrary to appellant’s principal contention, the trial court correctly applied the Ballantyne scale. The stipulation of the parties being that the loan was payable on or before August 15, 1947, the same could be paid at any time during the Japanese military occupation. Appellees’ failure to do so is not a justification for requiring them to pay the full amount of the loan in the currency on the date of payment. In Hilado v. De la Costa, 46 Off. Gaz. 5472 1 we allowed only recovery under the Ballantyne scale for "contracts stipulating for payments presumably in Japanese war notes." In Soriano v. Abalos, 47 Off. Gaz., 168 2 we held: "Petitioner is not liable to pay now in Philippine Currency the same value of pesos in Japanese war notes to which he was sentenced in December, 1944. He is liable only to pay the equivalent which may be determined by means of the Ballantyne scale of values."cralaw virtua1aw library

The cases of Roño v. Gomez, 46 Off. Gaz., Supp. 11, 339 3 and Gomez v. Tabia, 47 Off. Gaz., 641 4 invoked by the appellant, are not in point, because the obligations therein involved were payable after the liberation. The rules laid down by Mr. Justice Feria in his concurring opinion in the Gomez v. Tabia case, also cited by the appellant, far from aiding his side, fully support the appealed judgment, because Mr. Justice Feria stated that "if the parties had stipulated that the obligation shall be payable within a certain period of time, that is, at any time within that period, and the whole or a part of the period coincides with the Japanese occupation and, therefore, the debtor might have paid his obligation in Japanese war notes during the occupation, the above-stated rule (a) [payment according to the Ballantyne scale of values] shall be applied; because the debtor had the right to pay his obligation in Japanese war notes at the time it became payable, and his mere failure to pay it would not, as above stated, make him liable to pay, as damages or penalty, the difference between the value of the Japanese war notes at the time the obligation became payable and of the Philippine Currency at the date of the payment."cralaw virtua1aw library

We note that the trial court adopted the value of the Japanese war notes in Philippine pesos in August, 1944, and not in the month immediately preceding the liberation when the war notes were almost worthless, and this action of the trial court was decidedly in favor of the appellant. In view whereof, we are inclined to overrule appellant’s insistence in recovering interest.

The claim for stipulated attorney’s fees cannot also be allowed. The appellees properly set up the defense of moratorium, and although the trial court failed to rule thereon and no appeal was taken by the defendants, because the latter are willing to pay the amount of the judgment at anytime, they cannot be said to have failed to pay their indebtedness on time, in view of said moratorium.

The appealed judgment is, therefore, affirmed, and it is so ordered with costs against the appellants.

Feria, Pablo, Bengzon, Tuason, Reyes, Jugo and Bautista Angelo, JJ., concur.

Padilla, J., concurs in the result.

Endnotes:



1. 83 Phil., 471

2. 84 Phil., 206

3. 83 Phil., 890

4. 84 Phil., 269




Back to Home | Back to Main




















chanrobles.com





ChanRobles On-Line Bar Review

ChanRobles Internet Bar Review : www.chanroblesbar.com

ChanRobles MCLE On-line

ChanRobles Lawnet Inc. - ChanRobles MCLE On-line : www.chanroblesmcleonline.com






October-1951 Jurisprudence                 

  • G.R. No. L-3926 October 10, 1951 - CLARO CORTES v. CO BUN KIM

    090 Phil 167

  • G.R. No. L-4855 October 11, 1951 - JOSE M. NAVA, ET AL. v. MAGNO GATMAITAN

    090 Phil 172

  • G.R. No. L-4178 October 18, 1951 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. ALFONSO PABLO

    090 Phil 222

  • G.R. No. L-4009 October 19, 1951 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. IRINEO C. IBASCO

    090 Phil 225

  • G.R. No. L-3857 October 22, 1951 - HILARION SARCEPUEDES v. PEOPLE OF THE PHIL.

    090 Phil 228

  • G.R. No. L-4201 October 22, 1951 - ALEJANDRO D. ALMENDRAS v. ROMULO V. RAMOS

    090 Phil 231

  • G.R. No. L-4059 October 23, 1951 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. TEOFILO OGBAC

    090 Phil 235

  • G.R. No. L-3095 October 25, 1951 - MATILDE GUERRA, ET AL. v. EULALIO TOLENTINO, ET AL.

    090 Phil 240

  • G.R. No. L-3465 October 25, 1951 - FORTUNATO F. HALILI v. JORGE R. FLORO

    090 Phil 245

  • G.R. No. L-3709 October 25, 1951 - ENGRACIO DE ASIS v. JOSE V. AGDAMAG, ET. AL.

    090 Phil 249

  • G.R. No. L-4120 October 25, 1951 - AMANDA DE GUZMAN v. FELINO CH. FERNANDO, ET AL.

    090 Phil 251

  • G.R. No. L-4134 October 25, 1951 - C. N. HODGES v. MANUEL R. VILLANUEVA

    090 Phil 255

  • G.R. No. L-3802 October 26, 1951 - VADIM N. CHIRSKOFF v. COMMISSIONER OF IMMIGRATION, ET AL.

    090 Phil 256

  • G.R. No. L-3369 October 26, 1951 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. ALFONSO ABALOS, ET AL.

    090 Phil 261

  • G.R. No. L-4183 October 26, 1951 - NATIONAL DENTAL SUPPLY CO. v. BIBIANO MEER

    090 Phil 265

  • G.R. No. L-3458 October 29, 1951 - EL PUEBLO DE FILIPINAS v. FLORENTINO ANTONIO

    090 Phil 269

  • G.R. No. L-3619 October 29, 1951 - BERNARDO TIGLAO v. ENGRACIO BOTONES

    090 Phil 275

  • G.R. No. L-4006 October 29, 1951 - LUIS LUCIANO v. BIENVENIDO TAN, ET AL.

    090 Phil 282

  • G.R. No. L-4015 October 30, 1951 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. LUCIANO GARCIOLA

    090 Phil 285

  • G.R. No. L-4369 October 30, 1951 - LUCIA JAVIER v. J. ANTONIO ARANETA

    090 Phil 287

  • G.R. No. L-4396 October 30, 1951 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. SERGIO DAGATAN, ET AL.

    090 Phil 294

  • G.R. No. L-4408 October 30, 1951 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. FRANCISCO CASTILLO

    090 Phil 298

  • G.R. Nos. L-2875 and L-3114 to L-3208 October 31, 1951 - MANILA YELLOW TAXICAB, ET AL. v. PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION, ET AL.

    090 Phil 301

  • G.R. No. L-3316 October 31, 1951 - JOSE PONCE DE LEON v. SANTIAGO SYJUCO

    090 Phil 311

  • G.R. No. L-3457 October 31, 1951 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. IGMEDIO SAMSON, ET AL.

    090 Phil 334

  • G.R. No. L-3777 October 31, 1951 - VALENTINA ZAMORA, ET AL. v. TOMAS MEDRAN, ET AL.

    090 Phil 339

  • G.R. No. L-3905 October 31, 1951 - GONZALO P. NAVA, ET AL. v. RAMON R. SAN JOSE, ET AL.

    090 Phil 341

  • G.R. No. L-4253 October 31, 1951 - CHARLES K. ANDREU v. COMMISSIONER OF IMMIGRATION, ET AL.

    090 Phil 347

  • G.R. No. L-4300 October 31, 1951 - SATURNINO DAVID v. SIMEON RAMOS, ET AL.

    090 Phil 351

  • G.R. No. 4917-R October 31, 1951 - IRENEO M. SANTOS v. MANUEL S. RUSTIA

    090 Phil 358