Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence


Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence > Year 1952 > February 1952 Decisions > G.R. No. L-4410 February 29, 1952 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. JUANITO C. PECAÑA

090 Phil 860:




PHILIPPINE SUPREME COURT DECISIONS

EN BANC

[G.R. No. L-4410. February 29, 1952.]

THE PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. JUANITO C. PECAÑA, Defendant-Appellant.

Assistant Solicitor General Ruperto Kapunan, Jr., and Solicitor Antonio A. Torres, for Appellee.

Justiniano S. Montano and Enrique Capistrano, for Appellant.

SYLLABUS


1. CRIMINAL LAW; MALVERSATION OF PUBLIC FUNDS; INDEMNITY, HOW REDUCED. — In a case of malversation of public funds of a municipality, the appellant municipal treasurer should be credited with a proportionate reduction of the indemnity, if he has already reimbursed a part of the sum malversed.

2. ID.; ID.; PENALTY. — For this crime the maximum term of imprisonment to be imposed should not be less than 8 years and 1 day of prision mayor.


D E C I S I O N


REYES, J.:


The accused Juanito C. Pecaña was charged with malversation of public funds in the Court of First Instance of Laguna for having misappropriated the sum of P6,860.03 belonging to the municipality of Bay, Laguna, and entrusted to his custody as treasurer thereof. Having pleaded guilty to the charge, he was sentenced to an indeterminate penalty of from 4 years, 1 month and 1 day to 8 years of imprisonment, to indemnify the municipality of Bay in the sum of P6,860.03, perpetual disqualification to hold public office, a fine of P3,430.01, and the costs. From this sentence he has appealed to this Court, alleging that the trial court erred in fixing the amount of indemnity and in imposing upon him a fine equivalent to one-half of the amount malversed.

As to the indemnity we agree with the Solicitor General and with counsel for the defense that appellant should be credited with the sum of P400.00 which he has already reimbursed, as shown by the receipt issued by the provincial treasurer and exhibited at the trial, so that the actual indemnity to be paid should be reduced to P6,460.03. But the fine imposed below is within the range prescribed by Article 217 of the Revised Penal Code, which is from one-half to the total value of the funds embezzled, and we see no reason for reducing its amount and much less for remitting it entirely. The fine is by no means excessive considering the nature of the offense committed, and the plea that it is "unreasonable" is one that should be addressed to the legislative branch of the Government. All we can do is to apply the law as it is and not as it should be.

We notice that the trial court did not correctly fix the maximum term of the imprisonment imposed, which, under the law, should not be less than 8 years and 1 days of prisión mayor.

Wherefore, with the only modification that the indemnity to be paid by the appellant be P6,460.03 and that the maximum term of imprisonment be 8 years and 1 day, the sentence appealed from is affirmed, without costs in this instance.

Paras, C.J., Feria Pablo, Bengzon, Padilla, Tuason, Montemayor and Jugo, JJ., concur.




Back to Home | Back to Main




















chanrobles.com





ChanRobles On-Line Bar Review

ChanRobles Internet Bar Review : www.chanroblesbar.com

ChanRobles MCLE On-line

ChanRobles Lawnet Inc. - ChanRobles MCLE On-line : www.chanroblesmcleonline.com






February-1952 Jurisprudence                 

  • G.R. No. L-2603 February 11, 1952 - GEORGE LITTON, ET AL. v. LUZON SURETY CO., INC., ET AL.

    090 Phil 783

  • G.R. No. L-3668 February 20, 1952 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. PEDRO MELODOLLAR, ET AL.

    090 Phil 794

  • G.R. No. L-4803 February 20, 1952 - PRESCILLA MENDOZA VDA. DE TENORIO v. BATANGAS TRANSPORTATION CO.

    090 Phil 804

  • G.R. No. L-4296 February 25, 1952 - NATIONAL COCONUT CORPORATION v. POTENCIANO PECSON, ET AL.

    090 Phil 809

  • G.R. No. L-4070 February 26, 1952 - SEE CHUAN v. MANUEL DE LA FUENTE

    090 Phil 813

  • G.R. No. L-4877 February 26, 1952 - LAND SETTLEMENT and DEVELOPMENT CORP. v. CALEDONIA PILE WORKERS’ UNION, ET AL.

    090 Phil 817

  • G.R. No. L-4448 February 27, 1952 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. JOSE CAPISTRANO

    090 Phil 823

  • G.R. No. L-4768 February 27, 1952 - COMPOSTELA LUMBER CO., INC. v. FILOMENA DATU, ET AL.

    090 Phil 826

  • G.R. No. L-4600 February 28, 1952 - PEDRO BABALA v. MAXIMINO ABAÑO, ET AL.

    090 Phil 827

  • G.R. No. L-3518 February 29, 1952 - URBANO LOTA v. BENIGNO TOLENTINO

    090 Phil 829

  • G.R. No. L-3678 February 29, 1952 - JOSE MENDOZA v. PHILIPPINE AIR LINES

    090 Phil 836

  • G.R. No. L-3871 February 29, 1952 - DAVAO STEVEDORES MUTUAL BENEFIT ASSOCIATION v. COMPAÑIA MARITIMA, ET AL.

    090 Phil 847

  • G.R. No. L-3932 February 29, 1952 - ELISA CUISON, ET AL. v. NICOLAS VILLANUEVA, ET AL.

    090 Phil 850

  • G.R. No. L-4136 February 29, 1952 - MONTANO VITAL v. FRANCISCO ANORE, ET AL.

    090 Phil 855

  • G.R. No. L-4410 February 29, 1952 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. JUANITO C. PECAÑA

    090 Phil 860

  • G.R. No. L-4782 February 29, 1952 - B. S. CHAINANI v. TIBURCIO TANCINCO, ETC, ET AL.

    090 Phil 862