October 1955 - Philippine Supreme Court Decisions/Resolutions
Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence
Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence > Year 1955 > October 1955 Decisions >
G.R. No. L-9725 October 18, 1955 - FLORA CADIMAS v. DIRECTOR OF PRISONS
097 Phil 697:
097 Phil 697:
FIRST DIVISION
[G.R. No. L-9725. October 18, 1955.]
FLORA CADIMAS, Petitioner, v. THE DIRECTOR OF PRISONS, Respondent.
Villanueva & Associates for Petitioner.
Solicitor General Ambrosio Padilla and Florencio Villamor for Respondent.
SYLLABUS
1. CRIMINAL PROCEDURE; PLEA OF GUILTY; EFFECT OF. — A plea of guilty to the information constituted only an admission of the facts alleged therein, but was not an admission that the acts charged were unlawful, nor did it have the effect of curing the defect in the Court’s jurisdiction [People v. Santos Lopez, 45 Off. Gaz. (No. 5), 2089].
2. ID.; INFORMATION; CONVICTION, WHEN VOID. — A conviction under an information which did not charge any crime is void.
3. ILLEGAL POSSESSION OF FIREARMS AND AMMUNITIONS. — Under Republic Act No. 482, extending the period for surrender of unlicensed arms and ammunition to June 10, 1951, mere possession thereof prior to said date, without making use of the same or carrying them on the person, did not constitute a crime.
2. ID.; INFORMATION; CONVICTION, WHEN VOID. — A conviction under an information which did not charge any crime is void.
3. ILLEGAL POSSESSION OF FIREARMS AND AMMUNITIONS. — Under Republic Act No. 482, extending the period for surrender of unlicensed arms and ammunition to June 10, 1951, mere possession thereof prior to said date, without making use of the same or carrying them on the person, did not constitute a crime.
R E S O L U T I O N
REYES, J.B.L., J.:
It appearing that petitioner’s husband, Donato Cachola, is at present a prisoner at the Iwahig Penal Colony, under the control of respondent Director of Prisons, pursuant to a final decision of the Court of First Instance of Ilocos Sur dated January 18, 1955, sentencing him to five (5) years imprisonment and a fine of P1,000, with subsidiary imprisonment in case of insolvency, for the crime of illegal possession of military ammunition (hand grenade), committed on or about March 16, 1951, allegedly in violation of Republic Act No. 4;
Considering that in March of 1951, such unlicensed possession of firearms or ammunitions was not unlawful, for the reason that Republic Act No. 482 had extended the period for the surrender of unlicensed arms and ammunition to June 10, 1951; that during the extended period, only making use thereof, or carrying them on the person of the possessor, was made punishable; and neither of these acts was attributed to the accused Donato Cachola;
Considering, further, that while Donato Cachola pleaded guilty to the information, such plea, as pointed out in the return of the Solicitor General, constituted only an admission of the facts alleged in the information, but was not an admission that the acts charged were unlawful, nor did it have the effect of curing the defect in the Court’s jurisdiction (People v. Santos Lopez, 45 Off. Gaz., [No. 5] 2089);
Considering that the information against Donato Cachola did not charge any crime, and therefore, his conviction was void;
The writ of habeas corpus prayed for is granted, and in view of the admitted facts, the prisoner Donato Cachola is ordered released from custody. Without costs.
Bengzon, Acting C.J., Padilla, Montemayor, Reyes, A., Jugo, Bautista Angelo, Labrador and Concepcion, JJ., concur.
Considering that in March of 1951, such unlicensed possession of firearms or ammunitions was not unlawful, for the reason that Republic Act No. 482 had extended the period for the surrender of unlicensed arms and ammunition to June 10, 1951; that during the extended period, only making use thereof, or carrying them on the person of the possessor, was made punishable; and neither of these acts was attributed to the accused Donato Cachola;
Considering, further, that while Donato Cachola pleaded guilty to the information, such plea, as pointed out in the return of the Solicitor General, constituted only an admission of the facts alleged in the information, but was not an admission that the acts charged were unlawful, nor did it have the effect of curing the defect in the Court’s jurisdiction (People v. Santos Lopez, 45 Off. Gaz., [No. 5] 2089);
Considering that the information against Donato Cachola did not charge any crime, and therefore, his conviction was void;
The writ of habeas corpus prayed for is granted, and in view of the admitted facts, the prisoner Donato Cachola is ordered released from custody. Without costs.
Bengzon, Acting C.J., Padilla, Montemayor, Reyes, A., Jugo, Bautista Angelo, Labrador and Concepcion, JJ., concur.
