Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence


Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence > Year 1955 > October 1955 Decisions > G.R. No. L-7545 October 25, 1955 - SY CHIUCO v. REPUBLIC OF THE PHILS.

097 Phil 742:




PHILIPPINE SUPREME COURT DECISIONS

FIRST DIVISION

[G.R. No. L-7545. October 25, 1955.]

SY CHIUCO alias SY CHIU, Petitioner-Appellant, v. REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES, Oppositor-Appellee.

Jose Desiderio, Jr. for Appellant.

Solicitor General Ambrosio Padilla and Solicitor Antonio A. Torres for Appellee.


SYLLABUS


1. CITIZENSHIP; NATURALIZATION; CIRCUMSTANCES WHICH COULD NOT OFFSET QUALIFICATIONS OF AN APPLICANT. — An applicant for naturalization would not be an undesirable citizen of the Philippines just because he is running a cabaret. The cabaret business is not illegal and is licensed by the government. The private personal opinion of the judge regarding this business cannot control or govern the qualifications of the applicant. Many Filipinos of good standing are operating cabarets without violating any law.

2. ID.; ID.; ID. — A title hardness of hearing is not a disqualification. It is a common defect of old people.

3. ID.; ID.; TIME FOR FILING THE APPLICATION. — There is no law requiring the applicant of file this application before a certain age or after a minimum period of residence in the Philippines. The fact that he resided for so many years in this country is in his favor as he may even be exempted from the requisite of declaring his intention one year before his application. His long residence would show that he is more familiar with Filipino customs and the principle of the Philippine Government than a person of shorter residence.

4. ID.; ID.; DISCRETION OF COURT TO GRANT FILIPINO CITIZENSHIP MUST BE EXERCISED WITHIN THE LIMITS OF LAW. — It is true that the court has certain discretion in granting Filipino citizenship but that discretion must be exercised within the clear limits of the law.


D E C I S I O N


JUGO, J.:


This is an appeal from a decision of the Court of First Instance of Quezon City, denying the petition for naturalization of Sy Chiuco, alias Sy Chiu.

The appellant makes the following assignment of errors:jgc:chanrobles.com.ph

"I. The trial court erred in denying appellant’s petition for naturalization on the ground that his business (cabaret) does not speak well for an alien applying for citizenship and that appellant should have engaged in a business which is conducive to the economic progress and development of the nation.

"II. The trial court erred in denying appellant’s petition for naturalization on the ground that the appellant is deaf.

"III. The trial court erred in denying appellant’s petition for naturalization on the ground that the appellant could not speak and write Spanish in a manner as to be understandable.

"IV. The trial court erred in denying appellant’s petition for naturalization on the ground that appellant should have filed his petition sooner, considering that he is now already nearing his grave and that he has resided in the Philippines for 56 years prior to the filing of his application.

"V. The trial court erred in denying appellant’s petition for naturalization on the ground that because appellant did not file his petition sooner it has therefore sufficient reason to doubt the sincerity of appellant as to his intention to become a Filipino citizen."cralaw virtua1aw library

Sy Chiuco was seventy years old at the time of the hearing of his petition on September 30, 1953. He is a native of Amoy, China, where he was born on May 26, 1881. He arrived in the Philippines, at the port of Manila, in May, 1894 on board the ship Don Juan and has resided continuously in this country since then. He has been granted by the authorities of the Philippine Government an Immigration Certificate of Registration and an Alien Certificate of Registration. He is legally married to a Chinese national by the name of Go Pio, with whom he has five children, to wit: Sy Bon Ping, Marciano Sy, Vicente Sy, Felisa Sy and O Siong Sy, the last two being minors who are studying in the Sacred Heart Academy at La Loma, Quezon City, a private school recognized by the Government where Philippine History, and Government and civics are taught as part of the school curriculum. He and his whole family are at present residing at 172 Iba Street, La Loma, Quezon City.

The applicant is a businessman by profession, engaged in the operation of a cabaret for recreative purposes situated at La Loma, Quezon City, a tocua factory for the production of tocua food from soy beans, and other salted food products, located at No. 43 Soler Street, Manila. He is an up-to-date taxpayer owning real property composed of a house and lot at 172 Iba Street, La Loma, Quezon City, worth P18,000. He was formerly the owner of a paint store on Echague Street, Manila, which was burned during the last war. He speaks Tagalog and has a working knowledge of the Spanish language. He is familiar with Philippine social life and Constitution. He adheres to the principles underlying the democratic form of government and is absolutely against communism. He does not believe in the use of force in achieving a change of government, nor is in favor of revolution. He is not a polygamist nor a believer in the practice of polygamy. He is strong and healthy and suffers no contagious disease, although he is somewhat hard of hearing. During all his life in the Philippines he has been a law abiding resident, and has never been convicted of any crime by any court. He is ready to renounce his allegiance to the Government of China.

Two prominent persons vouchsafed and testified for his good moral character, and as a believer in the principles underlying the Philippine Constitution, having conducted himself in a proper and irreproachable manner during his residence in the Philippines.

With regard to the first assignment of error, the lower court held that the applicant would not be a desirable citizen of the Philippines because he is running a cabaret. The cabaret business is not illegal and is licensed by the government. The private personal opinion of the judge regarding this business cannot control or govern the qualifications of the applicant. Many Filipinos of good standing are operating cabarets, without violating any law.

With regard to the second assignment of error, the lower court stated that the applicant is hard of hearing, but he heard the questions addressed to him and answered them intelligently. A little hardness of hearing is not a disqualification. It is a common defect of old people.

With regard to the third assignment of error, the lower court declared that the applicant does not speak or write Spanish, but the record shows that the applicant testified in Spanish in an intelligent manner. We have examined exhibit "1" which is a sample of his writing in Spanish of the words dictated by the lower court and we found them to be perfectly legible.

With regard to the fourth assignment of error, the lower court held that, having lived in the Philippines for fifty-six years, he should have filed his application for Philippine citizenship sooner for that would have shown his sincerity in desiring to be a Filipino. There is no law requiring the applicant to file his application before a certain age or after a maximum period of residence in the Philippines. The applicant has complied with the law and has the necessary qualifications. On the contrary, the fact that he has resided for so many years in this country is in his favor as he may even be exempted from the requisite of declaring his intention one year before his application. His long residence would show that he is more familiar with Filipino customs and the principles of the Philippine Government than a person of shorter residence.

The fifth assignment of error is only a consequence of the former assignments.

It is true, as contended by the appellee, that the court has certain discretion in granting Filipino citizenship but that discretion must be exercised within the clear limits of the law.

In view of the foregoing, the decision appealed from is reversed and the applicant is allowed to become a Filipino citizen, without pronouncement as to costs. It is so ordered.

Paras, C.J., Bengzon, Padilla, Montemayor, Reyes, A., Bautista Angelo, Labrador, Concepcion and Reyes, J.B.L., JJ., concur.




Back to Home | Back to Main




















chanrobles.com





ChanRobles On-Line Bar Review

ChanRobles Internet Bar Review : www.chanroblesbar.com

ChanRobles MCLE On-line

ChanRobles Lawnet Inc. - ChanRobles MCLE On-line : www.chanroblesmcleonline.com






October-1955 Jurisprudence                 

  • G.R. Nos. L-8174 & L-8280-8286 October 8, 1955 - AGAPITO ALAJAR, ET AL. v. COURT OF INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS, ET AL.

    097 Phil 675

  • G.R. No. L-6833 October 10, 1955 - ANSELMO H. SHOTWELL v. AMALIA URQUICO DE LAZATIN, ET AL.

    097 Phil 677

  • G.R. No. L-7521 October 18, 1955 - VERONICA SANCHEZ v. COLL. OF INTERNAL REVENUE

    097 Phil 687

  • G.R. No. L-7964 October 18, 1955 - SUN-RIPE COCONUT PRODUCTS, INC. v. NATIONAL LABOR UNION

    097 Phil 691

  • G.R. No. L-9725 October 18, 1955 - FLORA CADIMAS v. DIRECTOR OF PRISONS

    097 Phil 697

  • G.R. No. L-7442 October 24, 1955 - PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES v. VALENTIN CUSTODIO, ET AL.

    097 Phil 698

  • G.R. No. L-7464 October 24, 1955 - MERCEDES CASTRO, ET AL. v. LUIS CASTRO

    097 Phil 705

  • G.R. No. L-7479 October 24, 1955 - FELICISIMA PADILLA v. JUANA MATELA

    097 Phil 709

  • G.R. No. L-8139 October 24, 1955 - BELEN UY TAYAG, ET AL. v. ROSARIO YUSECO, ET AL.

    097 Phil 712

  • G.R. No. L-8273 October 24, 1955 - ATANACIA PERALTA, ET AL. v. FRANCISCO ALIPIO

    097 Phil 719

  • G.R. No. L-8326 October 24, 1955 - HILARIO S. NAGRAMPA v. MULVANEY MCMILLAN & CO., INC.

    097 Phil 724

  • G.R. No. L-5976 October 25, 1955 - BERNABE B. AQUINO v. MACONDRAY & CO., INC., ET AL.

    097 Phil 731

  • G.R. No. L-7545 October 25, 1955 - SY CHIUCO v. REPUBLIC OF THE PHILS.

    097 Phil 742

  • G.R. No. L-7836 October 25, 1955 - GERVACIO CABRALES CU v. REPUBLIC OF THE PHILS.

    097 Phil 746

  • G.R. No. L-8325 October 25, 1955 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. AVELINO PANTIG

    097 Phil 748

  • G.R. No. L-7767 October 25, 1955 - JEAN V. PLUMELET v. MORALES SHIPPING CO., INC.

    097 Phil 750

  • G.R. No. L-7858 October 26, 1955 - FRANCISCO L. DAYRIT v. NORBERTO L. DAYRIT, ET AL.

    097 Phil 758

  • G.R. No. L-8018 October 26, 1955 - GIL ATUN, ET AL. v. EUSEBIO NUÑEZ, ET AL.

    097 Phil 762

  • G.R. No. L-7402 October 27, 1955 - DOMINGO NICOLAS v. ULYSES PRE, ET AL.

    097 Phil 766

  • G.R. No. L-7487 October 27, 1955 - PAULINA CORPUZ, ET AL. v. LEOPOLDO L. BELTRAN, ET AL.

    097 Phil 772

  • G.R. No. L-8164 October 27, 1955 - RAMON HERRERA, ET AL. v. FRANCISCO ARELLANO, ET AL.

    097 Phil 776

  • G.R. No. L-7612 October 29, 1955 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. BENJAMIN NAPAGAO, ET AL.

    097 Phil 785

  • G.R. No. L-7649 October 29, 1955 - SAN BEDA COLLEGE v. COURT OF INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS, ET AL.

    097 Phil 787

  • G.R. No. L-7871 October 29, 1955 - IN RE: LEON PE v. REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL.

    097 Phil 792

  • G.R. No. L-8093 October 29, 1955 - DOMINADOR NICOLAS, ET AL. v. VICENTA MATIAS, ET AL.

    097 Phil 795

  • G.R. No. L-8220 October 29, 1955 - SALVACION MIRANDA v. ESTEBAN FADULLON, ET AL.

    097 Phil 801

  • G.R. No. L-5279 October 31, 1955 - PHIL. ASSN. OF COLLEGES & UNIV. v. SEC. OF EDUC., ET AL.

    097 Phil 806

  • G.R. No. L-6923 October 31, 1955 - CHUA LAMKO v. ALFREDO DIOSO, ET AL.

    097 Phil 821

  • G.R. No. L-7529 October 31, 1955 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. FELIX KHO, ET AL.

    097 Phil 825

  • G.R. No. L-7713 October 31, 1955 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. ESTEBAN CADABIS

    097 Phil 829

  • G.R. No. L-7777 October 31, 1955 - M. E. GREY v. INSULAR LUMBER CO.

    097 Phil 833

  • G.R. No. L-7813 October 31, 1955 - REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL. v. PEDRO DIAMONON, ET AL.

    097 Phil 838

  • G.R. No. L-7870 October 31, 1955 - AGUSTIN RAMOS v. RAFAEL ALVAREZ

    097 Phil 844

  • G.R. No. L-7913 October 31, 1955 - MARIA P. DE AZAJAR v. FRANCISCO ARDALLES, ET AL.

    097 Phil 851

  • G.R. No. L-7925 October 31, 1955 - ROSENDO MENESES, ET AL. v. ARSENIO H. LACSON

    097 Phil 857

  • G.R. No. L-8224 October 31, 1955 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. BENJAMIN LIGGAYU, ET AL.

    097 Phil 865