Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence


Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence > Year 1957 > May 1957 Decisions > G.R. No. L-9912 May 23, 1957 - ROMULO CUYO v. CITY MAYOR, BAGUIO CITY, ET AL

101 Phil 558:




PHILIPPINE SUPREME COURT DECISIONS

EN BANC

[G.R. No. L-9912. May 23, 1957.]

ROMULO CUYO, Petitioner-Appellee, v. THE CITY MAYOR, BAGUIO CITY, ET. AL., Respondents-Appellants.

Pablo C. Sanidad and Herminegildo S. Cruz for Appellee.

Assistant City Attorney Santiago C. Gregorio for appellants.


SYLLABUS


1. PUBLIC OFFICERS; MEMBERS OF LOCAL POLICE FORCE; INVESTIGATION BY MUNICIPAL OR CITY BEFORE ONE OF ITS MEMBERS OR COMMITTEE. — The Supreme Court has repeatedly held that administrative charges against members of the local police force must, pursuant to Republic Act No. 557, be investigated by the Municipal or City Council, and that an investigation conducted by, either a member, or a committee thereof, is null and void, even if the Council shall have approved the action and recommendation of its investigating member or committee. (See Covacha v. Amante L-8358, May 25, 1956; Carmona v. Amante L-8790- 8797, August 14, 1956; Semarillos v. Hermosisima, L-10662, December 14, 1956).

2. ID.; REINSTATEMENT MAY NOT BE SECURED BY MANDAMUS OVER ONE YEAR AFTER DISMISSAL. — The reinstatement of an officer illegally dismissed may not be secured by mandamus, if the action therefor is filed over one (1) year after his dismissal.

3. ID.; ID.; REASON FOR THE RULES. — The reason for this rule is that the right to a public office may be lost by abandonment thereof, which may be deduced from his failure to seek reinstatement within said period of one (1) year (Florentino Jose Jr., v. Arsenio H. Lacson, L-10477, May 17, 1957; Unabia v. Hon. City Mayor, L-8759, May 25, 1956), and that "it is not proper that the title to public office should be subjected to continued uncertainty, and the people’s interest requires that, such right should be determined as speedily as practicable." (Tumulak v. Egay, 48 Off. Gaz., 3693, 3695).


D E C I S I O N


CONCEPCION, J.:


On June 5, 1951, petitioner Romulo Cuyo, a regular member of the Baguio Police Department since February 20, 1946, was suspended from office pending investigation, by councilor Luis Lardizabal of the City of Baguio, of the administrative charges preferred against him (Cuyo) by the then City Mayor, involving alleged irregularities in the performance of his duties and violation of law and duty, said to have been committed as follows:jgc:chanrobles.com.ph

"December 31, 1946, Administrative charge filed against him for Insubordination and Reprehensible Conduct;

"October 21, 1948, Conduct Unbecoming a Peace Officer, for which he was reprimanded and warned;

"April 16, 1951, Telling a Lie, for which he was severely reprimanded;

"May 13, 1951, Abandoning his Post Without Proper Relief and Authority; and

"May 16, 1951, Absent Without Leave (AWOL)." (Folder of Exhibits, p. 5.)

In line with the report of the investigation conducted by said councilor, who found Cuyo guilty of said charges, on July 20, 1951, the City Council of Baguio passed Resolution No. 204 ordering his dismissal effective on June 5, 1951. On appeal taken therefrom, the Civil Service Commissioner, in a decision dated December 20, 1951, held — after considering that Cuyo had already been punished for the individual offenses aforementioned, and that, being responsible for the maintenance of peace and order in the City of Baguio, the City Council and its Mayor should have some discretion in the choice of the members of its police forces — that said officers of the City were not guilty of abuse of discretion and that there was "nothing reversible" in said resolution of the City Council. The dispositive part of said decision, however, reads:jgc:chanrobles.com.ph

"Wherefore, and in line with the action taken by this Office in the case of Patrolman Quintin Bugasto of the same organization, respondent appellant Cuyo should be, as he is hereby transferred to another branch of the Baguio City Government. The decision ordering his dismissal from the service is thus modified." (Folder of Exhibits, p. 11.)

A reconsideration of this decision was denied by the Commissioner of Civil Service on March 13, 1952. On August 1, 1955, Cuyo instituted the present action, for mandamus and damages, in the Court of First Instance of Baguio, against its Mayor, Council and Treasurer. In his petition he prays:jgc:chanrobles.com.ph

"(1) that the investigation had, and the decision made in the administrative charge against the petitioner be declared illegal, null and void ab initio;

"(2) that the respondent City Mayor of Baguio be ordered to reinstate the petitioner as member of the Baguio City Police Department;

"(3) that the respondents be ordered to pay to the petitioner his salary from June 5, 1951, until actually reinstated;

"(4) that the respondents be condemned to pay to the petitioner the sum of P1,000.00 as attorney’s fees, plus the costs of this suit; and

"(5) that the petitioner be granted all reliefs and remedies deemed just and equitable in the premises.

In due course, said court rendered a decision, the dispositive part of which follows:jgc:chanrobles.com.ph

"Judgment is, therefore, rendered against Respondents, ordering them to place Petitioner in another branch of the City Government; Petitioner shall be entitled to his back pay as policeman from June 5, 1951; No attorney’s fees are awarded Petitioner as this is a case of good faith on the part of Respondents; No special pronouncement as to costs."cralaw virtua1aw library

The case is now before us on appeal taken by the respondents. Petitioner maintains that his dismissal by the City Council of Baguio is null and void, the administrative charges preferred against him having been investigated, not by said Council, but by one of its members, in violation of Republic Act No. 557, as construed in Festejo v. Municipal Mayor of Nabua (96 Phil., 286, 51 Off. Gaz., 121). Indeed, we have repeatedly held that administrative charges against members of the local police force must, pursuant to Republic Act No. 557, be investigated by the Municipal or City Council, and that an investigation conducted by, either a member, or a committee thereof, is null and void, even if the Council shall have approved the action and recommendation of its investigating member or committee (see Covacha v. Amante, L-8358, May 25, 1956; Carmona v. Amante, 99 Phil., 716; Senarillos v. Hermosisima, 100 Phil., 501, 53 Off. Gaz., [4] 1043).

It is, also, settled, however, that the reinstatement of an officer illegally dismissed may not be secured by mandamus, if the action therefor is filed over one (1) year after his dismissal. The reason for this rule is that the right to a public office may be lost by abandonment thereof, which may be deduced from his failure to seek reinstatement within said period of one (1) year (Florentino Jose, Jr., v. Arsenio H. Lacson, L-10477, May 17, 1957; Unabia v. Hon. City Mayor, 99 Phil., 253), and that "it is not proper that the title to public office should be subjected to continued uncertainty, and people’s interest requires that such right should be determined as speedily as practicable" (Tumulak v. Egay, 82 Phil., 828, 48 Off. Gaz., 3693, 3695).

In the case at bar, Cuyo’s motion for reconsideration of the decision of the Commissioner of Civil Service, substantially affirming the action taken by the City Council of Baguio, was denied by said officer on March 13, 1952. Although the resolution of said Council, dismissing Cuyo, was modified by the Commissioner of Civil Service, in the sense that petitioner "should be, as he is hereby transferred to another branch of the Baguio City Government," the latter, seemingly, understood the decision of said Commissioner as sustaining the removal of Cuyo from the police force. What is more, said decision, as well as the attitude or inaction of the City Government of Baguio, was similarly construed by the petitioner, for, in his petition herein, Cuyo alleges that he "should not have been separated as member of the police force of the City of Baguio, until and unless he is ‘transferred to another branch of the City Government of Baguio’ in accordance with the decision of the Commissioner of Civil Service" (paragraph VII), and that "respondents failed and still fail, neglected and still neglect, refused and still refuse to reinstate the petitioner to his position as member of the Baguio City Police Department" (paragraph VIII). In other words, Cuyo understood the aforementioned decision as authorizing his dismissal from said department, upon his transfer to another branch of the City Government, and regarded the action taken by the latter as amounting to his removal from the police force, prior to said transfer, and, yet, he did not bring this case until August 1, 1955, or about three (3) years and five (5) months after the denial of his aforesaid motion for reconsideration. Hence, regardless of the legality or illegality of the aforementioned resolution of the City Council of Baguio, Cuyo’s petition for mandamus is barred by the implied abandonment of his office and, also, by laches. As a consequence, his claims for backpay and damages must, also, fail.

Wherefore, the decision appealed from must be, as it is hereby reversed, and the petition dismissed, with costs against the petitioner. It is so ordered.

Bengzon, Padilla, Montemayor, Reyes, A., Bautista Angelo, Labrador, Reyes, J.B.L., Endencia and Felix, JJ., concur.




Back to Home | Back to Main




















chanrobles.com





ChanRobles On-Line Bar Review

ChanRobles Internet Bar Review : www.chanroblesbar.com

ChanRobles MCLE On-line

ChanRobles Lawnet Inc. - ChanRobles MCLE On-line : www.chanroblesmcleonline.com






May-1957 Jurisprudence                 

  • G.R. No. L-9439 May 17, 1957 - CANDIDO BUENA v. HON. JUDGE JOSE T. SURTIDA, ET AL

    101 Phil 455

  • G.R. No. L-10760 May 17, 1957 - LY GIOK HA, ET AL v. EMILIO L. GALANG, ET AL

    101 Phil 459

  • G.R. No. L-9080 May 18, 1957 - TAN SONG SIN v. REP. OF THE PHIL.

    101 Phil 465

  • G.R. No. L-9350 May 20, 1957 - CEBU PORT LABOR UNION v. STATES MARINE CORP. ET AL

    101 Phil 468

  • G.R. No. L-9736 May 20, 1957 - PANGASINAN TRANS., CO., ET AL v. COURT OF INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS, ET AL

    101 Phil 480

  • G.R. No. L-10759 May 20, 1957 - LEONARDO MONTES v. CIVIL SERVICE BOARD OF APPEALS, ET AL

    101 Phil 490

  • G.R. No. L-9353 May 21, 1957 - MANILA SURETY & FIDELITY CO. v. BATU CONSTRUCTION & CO.

    101 Phil 494

  • G.R. No. L-8886 May 22, 1957 - A. SORIANO Y CIA. v. COLLECTOR OF INTERNAL REVENUE

    101 Phil 504

  • G.R. No. L-9626 May 22, 1957 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. ARNULFO ALVAREZ

    101 Phil 516

  • G.R. No. L-9911 May 22, 1957 - PRISCILA DURANG-PARANG JIMENEZ v. REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL.

    101 Phil 518

  • G.R. No. L-9997 May 22, 1957 - RICARDO CUA v. BOARD OF IMMIGRATION COMMISSIONERS

    101 Phil 521

  • G.R. No. L-8721 May 23, 1957 - TRANQUILINO CACHERO v. MANILA YELLOW TAXICAB CO., INC.

    101 Phil 523

  • G.R. Nos. L-8848-58 May 23, 1957 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. JOHN CANSON, ET AL

    101 Phil 537

  • G.R. No. L-8987 May 23, 1957 - JAPANESE WAR NOTES CLAIMANTS ASSO. OF THE PHIL. v. SECURITIES & EXCHANGE COM.

    101 Phil 540

  • G.R. No. L-9448 May 23, 1957 - ASELIDES MARCELO, ET AL v. PHIL., NAT’L. RED CROSS, ET AL

    101 Phil 544

  • G.R. No. L-9656 May 23, 1957 - CHANG KIM TIMOTEO VERGEL DE DIOS v. REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL.

    101 Phil 555

  • G.R. No. L-9912 May 23, 1957 - ROMULO CUYO v. CITY MAYOR, BAGUIO CITY, ET AL

    101 Phil 558

  • G.R. No. L-9558 May 24, 1957 - LEONCIO MONGE, ET AL v. LINO ANGELES, ET AL

    101 Phil 563

  • G.R. No. L-9641 May 24, 1957 - WACK WACK GOLF & COUNTRY CLUB v. WORKMEN’S COMPENSATION COM., ET AL

    101 Phil 566

  • G.R. No. L-10793 May 24, 1957 - MANILA TERMINAL CO.INC. v. JESUS O. HIPONIA, ET AL

    101 Phil 569

  • G.R. No. L-9789 May 25, 1957 - FERNANDO E. RICAFORT v. HON. WENCESLAO L. FERNAN, ET AL

    101 Phil 575

  • G.R. No. L-9625 May 27, 1957 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. FRANCISCA CELIS

    101 Phil 586

  • G.R. No. L-10213 May 27, 1957 - PERFECTO DIMAYUGA, ET AL v. COURT OF INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS, ET AL

    101 Phil 590

  • G.R. No. L-10427 May 27, 1957 - EULOGIO MILL v. PEOPLE OF THE PHIL., ET AL

    101 Phil 599

  • G.R. No. L-10789 May 28, 1957 - AMADOR TAJANLANGIT, ET AL v. SOUTHERN MOTORS, INC., ET AL

    101 Phil 606

  • G.R. No. L-10823 May 28, 1957 - JUAN DE G. RODRIGUEZ, ET AL v. HON. ENRIQUE A. FERNANDEZ, ET AL

    101 Phil 612

  • G.R. No. L-8298 May 29, 1957 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. FRANCISCO GARCIA

    101 Phil 615

  • G.R. No. L-9007 May 29, 1957 - GREGORIO FURIA v. COURT OF APPEALS

    101 Phil 623

  • G.R. No. L-9193 May 29, 1957 - EUGENIO PEREZ v. COURT OF TAX APPEALS, ET AL

    101 Phil 630

  • G.R. No. L-9224 May 29, 1957 - DY SUAT HONG v. REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL.

    101 Phil 635

  • G.R. No. L-9659 May 29, 1957 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. VALERIANO M. VALENSOY

    101 Phil 642

  • G.R. No. L-9775 May 29, 1957 - CITY OF BACOLOD, ET AL v. HON. EDUARDO D. ENRIQUEZ, ET AL

    101 Phil 644

  • G.R. No. L-9858 May 29, 1957 - IN RE: ONG SON CUI v. REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL.

    101 Phil 649

  • G.R. No. L-9888 May 29, 1957 - GRADY EDWARD JOHNSON v. COMMISSIONER OF IMMIGRATION

    101 Phil 654

  • G.R. No. L-9960 May 29, 1957 - ROSITA ARCAS DE MARCAIDA v. THE PHILIPPINE EDUCATION CO.

    101 Phil 657

  • G.R. No. L-10150 May 29, 1957 - FIRESTONE TIRE & RUBBER CO. v. VICENTE TUPAS, ET AL.

    101 Phil 667

  • G.R. No. L-10594 May 29, 1957 - PONCIANO PRIMERO v. COURT OF AGRARIAN RELATIONS, ET AL.

    101 Phil 675

  • G.R. No. L-10664 May 29, 1957 - CRISTOBAL CAYABYAB v. LUIS T. CAYABYAB

    101 Phil 681

  • G.R. No. L-10710 May 29, 1957 - LUZON SURETY CO., INC. v. HON. JUDGE JOSE TEODORO, SR., ET AL.

    101 Phil 684

  • G.R. No. L-9683 May 30, 1957 - Ong Tan v. REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL.

    101 Phil 690

  • G.R. No. L-10807 May 30, 1957 - VITALIANO M. CRUZ v. CITY OF MANILA, ET AL.

    101 Phil 695

  • G.R. No. L-8894 May 31, 1957 - MARIA MATIAS DE BAUTISTA v. JOSE TEODORO, JR.

    101 Phil 701

  • G.R. No. L-9159 May 31, 1957 - FELIPE QUIRINO v. PHIL. NAT. BANK, ET AL.

    101 Phil 705

  • G.R. Nos. L-9738 & L-9771 May 31, 1957 - BLAS GUTIERREZ v. COURT OF TAX APPEALS, ET AL.

    101 Phil 713

  • G.R. No. L-10304 May 31, 1957 - SUN UN GIOK v. HERMOGENES MATUSA, ET AL.

    101 Phil 727

  • G.R. No. L-11201 May 31, 1957 - CIRILA NOCON v. HON. FRANCISCO GERONIMO

    101 Phil 735

  • G.R. No. L-7995 May 31, 1957 - LAO H. ICHONG, ET AL v. JAIME HERNANDEZ, ET AL

    101 Phil 1155