Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence


Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence > Year 1959 > January 1959 Decisions > G.R. No. L-12623 January 27, 1959 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. NICASIO GUIAO Y DAVID

105 Phil 68:




PHILIPPINE SUPREME COURT DECISIONS

EN BANC

[G.R. No. L-12623. January 27, 1959.]

THE PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. NICASIO GUIAO Y DAVID, Defendant-Appellee.

Assistant Solicitor General Antonio A. Torres and Solicitor Camilo D. Quiason for Appellant.

Garcia & Layug for Appellee.


SYLLABUS


1. CRIMINAL LAW; FRAUDULENT IMPORTATION OF MERCHANDISE. — Any person who knowingly imports a merchandise contrary to law or conceals such merchandise knowing that it has been illegally imported, commits an offense which is punishable under the provision of Section 2702 of the Revised Administrative Code.

2. CRIMINAL LAW AND PROCEDURE; SEA STORE CIGARETTES; INFORMATION WHEN DEEMED SUFFICIENT. — Although it is true that" sea store cigarettes" are not generally imported in the course of commercial transaction because they are brought by a vessel for the use and consumption of the members of its crew and are not for sale to the public, yet the information alleges that said cigarettes are not only "sea store cigarettes" but were brought to the Philippines in a suspicious manner undoubtedly for profit; that the accused fraudulently or knowingly imported into the Philippines said "sea store cigarettes" concealed in the back compartment of his car "knowing the same to have been imported contrary to law," the information contains sufficient allegation to constitute an offense.


D E C I S I O N


BAUTISTA ANGELO, J.:


On September 1, 1956, Nicasio Guiao y David was charged in the Court of First Instance of Manila with having violated Section 2702 of the Revised Administrative Code, as amended by Section 1 of Republic Act No. 455, for having concealed in the back compartment of car which he was driving "Sea Store cigarettes" consisting of three cartoons of king size Chesterfield, three cartoons of Camel, eight cartoons of regular size Chesterfield, seventeen loose packages of Chesterfield and twenty loose packages of Lucky Strike cigarettes "after the same have been imported, knowing the same to have been imported contrary to law." On May 2, 1957, the accused filed a motion to quash on the ground that the facts alleged in the information do not constitute and offense, which was opposed by the City Fiscal. On July 2, 1957, the court granted the motion and dismissed the case. The City Fiscal has appealed.

Section 2702 of the Revised Administrative Code, as amended by Section 1 of Republic Act 455, provides:jgc:chanrobles.com.ph

"Any person who shall fraudulently or knowingly import of bring into the Philippines, or assist in so doing, any merchandise, contrary to law, or shall receive, conceal, buy, sell or in any manner facilitate the transportation, knowing the same to have been imported contrary to law, shall be punished by a fine of not less than six hundred pesos but not more than five thousand pesos and by imprisonment for not less than three months nor more than two years and, if he offender is and alien, he may be subject to deportation."cralaw virtua1aw library

It would appear that any person who knowingly imports a merchandise contrary to law, or conceals such merchandise knowing that it has been imported contrary to law, commits an offense which is punishable under the provision of law above quoted. The trial court reached the conclusion that the information filed against the accused does not allege an offense because in its opinion he did not import the cigarettes found in his possession because they are "Sea Store cigarettes" which were not imported within the meaning of the law, and the reason given by the court is as follows: "Such sea store cigarettes are for the use and consumption of the crew members of the vessels and not dutiable except the quantity in excess of the requirements for the vessel . . . . They could not have been illegally or fraudulently imported and therefore the concealment of such sea store cigarettes by the accused does not come within the penal sanction of Section 2702 of the Revised Administrative Code as amended by Section 1 of Republic Act No. 455."cralaw virtua1aw library

This reasoning is erroneous in the light of the facts alleged in the information. We agree with the statement that "Sea Store cigarettes" are not generally imported in the course of commercial transaction because they are brought by a vessel for the use and consumption of the members of its crew and are not for sale to the public, but the situation herein obtained is different; they are not only "Sea Store cigarettes" but were brought to the Philippines in a suspicious manner undoubtedly for profit and that is what appears in the information. Thus, it is there alleged that the accused fraudulently or knowingly imported into the Philippines said "Sea Store cigarettes" concealed on the back compartment of his car "knowing the same to have been imported contrary to law." This is enough to constitute an offense. At least the information contains sufficient allegations to constitute such offense. The rest is a matter of evidence which may be presented when the case is tried on the merits. Evidently, the dismissal of the case is premature.

In a similar case where the chief steward of a foreign vessel moored at the port of Manila took 30 cases of foreign cigarettes from the vessel’s store and unloaded them with-out paying the import taxes and sold them, and upon discovery of the sale the owner of the vessel was required to pay the import taxes due thereon, this Court, in rejecting the defense that those cigarettes were not imported within the meaning of the law, said:jgc:chanrobles.com.ph

"But Tabacalera argues that the merchandise (a) had not been imported and (b) had not been imported by the shipowner. In support of its first proposition it alleges that the shipowner was never engaged in the sale or distribution in the Philippines of cigarettes. That is immaterial. Its agents and officers brought or allowed to be brought into the country these cigarettes belonging to it. Consequently, it imported them. To ‘import’ is to bring into a country merchandise from abroad. (Customs Duties, sec. 4,25 C.J.S.) (See art. 2702 of the Revised Administrative Code as amended by Republic Act No. 455.) In fact its master, actually acknowledged its liability for the importation (Exhibit 1).

"Again, it is alleged, there is no proof the cigarettes had been landed for purposes of sale or consumption’. Surely they were not clandestinely introduced in Manila merely to be destroyed or dumped into the sea. The buyers paid good money for them either for resale or for their own consumption." (Compania General de Tabacos de Filipinas, Et. Al. v. The Collector of Internal Revenue G. R. No. L-9071, January 31, 1957)

Wherefore, the order appealed from is set aside. The case is remanded to the lower court for further proceedings. No costs.

Paras, C.J., Bengzon, Padilla, Montemayor, Labrador, Concepcion, Reyes, J.B.L. and Endencia, JJ., concur.




Back to Home | Back to Main




















chanrobles.com





ChanRobles On-Line Bar Review

ChanRobles Internet Bar Review : www.chanroblesbar.com

ChanRobles MCLE On-line

ChanRobles Lawnet Inc. - ChanRobles MCLE On-line : www.chanroblesmcleonline.com






January-1959 Jurisprudence                 

  • G.R. No. L-10701 January 16, 1959 - MARIA CANO v. DIRECTOR OF LANDS, ET AL.

    105 Phil 1

  • G.R. No. 10910 January 16, 1959 - BACHRACH MOTOR CO., INC. v. ANTONIO LEJANO

    105 Phil 6

  • G.R. Nos. L-11298, L-11586 & L-11603 January 19, 1959 - RICARDO GUTIERREZ v. BACHRACH MOTOR CO., INC.

    105 Phil 9

  • G.R. No. L-10802 January 22, 1959 - PROVINCE OF RIZAL v. BARTOLOME SAN DIEGO

    105 Phil 33

  • G.R. No. 12448 January 22, 1959 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. ALEJANDRO SANTOS, ET AL.

    105 Phil 40

  • G.R. No. L-11575 January 24, 1959 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. LINDA PADILLA

    105 Phil 45

  • G.R. No. L-12056 January 24, 1959 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. PEDRO GONZALES

    105 Phil 47

  • G.R. No. L-12194 January 24, 1959 - COLLECTOR OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. ANNA HARRIET CLEMENT, ET AL.

    105 Phil 51

  • G.R. No. L-12772 January 24, 1959 - SUSANA MACAZO, ET AL. v. BENILDO NUÑEZ

    105 Phil 55

  • G.R. No. L-9146 January 27, 1959 - TERESA VDA. DE FERNANDEZ v. NATIONAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF THE PHIL.

    105 Phil 59

  • G.R. No. 11598 January 27, 1959 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. FEDERICO BUSTAMANTE

    105 Phil 64

  • G.R. No. L-12623 January 27, 1959 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. NICASIO GUIAO Y DAVID

    105 Phil 68

  • G.R. No. L-12731 January 27, 1959 - FAUSTO CATAGONA v. SEGUNDO DIONISIO

    105 Phil 72

  • G.R. No. L-11831 January 29, 1959 - ISIDORA AUREO v. FUNDADOR AUREO

    105 Phil 77

  • G.R. No. L-9585 January 30, 1959 - PETRITA PASCUAL, ET AL. v. RUDYARDO SANTIAGO, ET AL.

    105 Phil 82

  • G.R. No. L-11169 January 30, 1959 - FELIPE HORTILLOSA v. RODOLFO GANZON

    105 Phil 105

  • G.R. No. L-11263 January 30, 1959 - OSMUNDO C. RAMOS v. R. C. DEANE, ET AL.

    105 Phil 110

  • G.R. No. L-11486 January 30, 1959 - JESUS ALVAREZ v. DIRECTOR of LANDS

    105 Phil 115

  • G.R. No. L-11836 January 30, 1959 - MANUEL M. COSTA v. GENOVEVA V. BALMES

    105 Phil 119

  • G.R. No. L-11932 January 30, 1959 - ASSOCIATED INSURANCE & SURETY CO. v. REGISTER OF DEEDS OF PAMPANGA

    105 Phil 123

  • G.R. No. L-13709 January 30, 1959 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. ARTURO TOGLE

    105 Phil 126

  • G.R. No. L-11090 January 31, 1959 - VICENTE E. GROSPE v. SECRETARY OF PUBLIC WORKS AND COMMUNICATIONS, ET AL.

    105 Phil 129

  • G.R. No. L-11764 January 31, 1959 - ENRIQUE CUISON, ET AL. v. ISIDRO G. FERNANDEZ, ET AL.

    105 Phil 135

  • G.R. No. L-12054 January 31, 1959 - JOSE ESCAY v. JOSE TEODORO, SR. ., ETC., ET AL.

    105 Phil 141

  • G.R. No. L-12111 January 31, 1959 - AGATONA GERONIMO, ET AL. v. JOSE NAVA, ET AL.

    105 Phil 145

  • G.R. No. L-12520 January 31, 1959 - SEISMUNDO RAMOS v. MUNICIPAL COUNCIL OF DAET, ET AL.

    105 Phil 154

  • G.R. No. L-12271 January 31, 1959 - JOSEPH ABELOW v. JOSE DE LA RIVA

    105 Phil 159

  • G.R. No. L-13059 January 31, 1959 - TIMOTEO VALENCIA, JR. v. FELIPE MABILANGAN

    105 Phil 162