Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence


Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence > Year 1959 > March 1959 Decisions > G.R. No. L-11741 March 18, 1959 - EL AHORRO INSULAR, ET AL. v. VICTORINO T. AQUINO

105 Phil 307:




PHILIPPINE SUPREME COURT DECISIONS

EN BANC

[G.R. No. L-11741. March 18, 1959.]

EL AHORRO INSULAR and the SHERIFF OF MANILA, Petitioners, v. VICTORINO T. AQUINO, Respondent.

Gallego & Gallego Law Office, for Petitioners.

Alejo Mabanag and Jose Elegir for Respondent.


SYLLABUS


1. BUILDING AND LOAN ASSOCIATIONS; STOCKHOLDERS; STATUS; STOCKHOLDER-MORTGAGOR AND NOT AS BORROWER OR MORTGAGOR. — Under the terms of the contract entered into between defendant building and loan association and plaintiff, the latter was to be credited with the dividends on his share every year and such dividends, together with the monthly payments, were to accumulate until the same reached the par value of his share. HELD: Plaintiff was a stockholder-mortgagor and not a mere borrower or mortgagor. Such agreement, being in accordance with the Corporation Law and not contrary to morals or public policy should be enforced according to its terms.

2. ID.; RIGHT AND LIABILITY OF STOCKHOLDERS. --The very nature of a mutual building and loan association presupposes that all stock holders participate not only in the dividends but in the losses as well. A building and loan association is not a bank that gives loan, where the profits or losses are not shared by the debtor. Within a building and loan association such profits or losses are shared in by all stockholders, as it would be unjust and unfair for a stockholder to receive dividends but be free from losses.


D E C I S I O N


LABRADOR, J.:


This suit was initiated by a complaint in the Court of First Instance of Manila, filed by Victorino T. Aguino against El Ahorro Insular and the Sheriff on Manila, alleging: that on September 8, 1033, plaintiff obtained a loan of P1,000 from the defendant and to secure the payment of said loan, he mortgaged a house and lot at 900 Fernando Ma. Guerrero, covered by Transfer Certificate of Title No. 43302 of the Register of Deeds of Manila; that in accordance with the deed of mortgage he has paid the amount of P3,220 from September, 1933 to November, 1951, so that the amount borrowed has already been lawfully paid; that despite said payment the El Ahorro Insular refuses to release the mortgage above-mentioned and that, instead, it caused the property mortgage to be extrajudicially foreclosed; that the sheriff of Manila is about to foreclose extrajudicially the said mortgage and that this will cause a great injustice to plaintiff and an irreparable injury to his proprietary rights over the house and lot in question. He, therefore, prays that the mortgage loan be declared fully paid, that the defendant be ordered to execute a deed of cancellation of the mortgage, and that pending trial and decision of the suit, that the sheriff of Manila be enjoined from proceeding with the extrajudicial foreclosure.

Attached to the complaint is the contract marked Annex "A" which was executed by the plaintiff and the defendant El Ahorro Insular on September 8, 1933.

In its answer the El Ahorro Insular admits that the plaintiff obtained a loan from the defendant in the amount of P1,000 and the he executed a deed of mortgage over a house and lot belonging to him, which deed of mortgage over a house and lot belonging to him, which deed is Annex "A" of the plaintiff, but alleges that in accordance with the express provisions of said contract of mortgage, Annex "A", plaintiff became a mortgagor-stockholder of the defendant El Ahorro Insular, and as such he has all the obligations of a mortgagor and at the same time of a stockholder; that the monthly interest on the loan of P1,000 and P5 as quota or installment on 10 shares, Series D of the defendant corporation, which 10 shares, at the time of the action, had an actual book value of only P529.46; that because of the enormous losses amounting to 94.7% suffered by the defendant corporation during the war, as a result of the payment by its debtors of pre-war obligations in Japanese military notes that were deposited in the banks and which were later on expressly declared null and void, and of no value, the value of plaintiff’s share the liberation and as of the date of the opening of the defendant corporation on January 1, 1947 is only P44.63; that because of the false allegations of plaintiff that the mortgage in debtedness amounting to P1,000 had already been fully overpaid, defendant suffered moral damages in the amount of P20,000 and is entitled to attorney’s fees amounting to P1,000. Attached to the answer was a copy of the application for extrajudicial foreclosure of the mortgage. The Court of First Instance, after hearing the parties, issued a preliminary injunction prohibiting the extrajudicial sale on foreclosure, upon filing by the plaintiff of a bond of P1,000.

On August 6, 1952, defendant filed a supplementary counterclaim alleging that by reason of the suspension of the extrajudicial foreclosure of the mortgage, defendant has suffered damages in the amount of P155.90, representing the costs of publication and the sheriff denied the allegation of this supplemental counterclaim on the ground of lack of knowledge of the facts alleged therein.

On July 11, 1954, after trial, the Court of First Instance, Hon. Alejandro J. Panlilio presiding, rendered judgment finding that the personality of the plaintiff as mortgagor is distinct from his personality as subscriber to defendant’s stock; that plaintiff without contradiction testified that he did not understand the Spanish language and said contract was never explained to him; and held that the defendant is under obligation to release and cancel the mortgage, and that, therefore, notwithstanding the terms of the agreement plaintiff did not become a stockholder; and therefore it ordered the cancellation of the mortgage. It also enjoined the sheriff of Manila from enforcing the extrajudicial sale of foreclosure. The defendant corporation appealed to the Court of Appeals, but in the latter court the judgment of the Court of First Instance was affirmed. So the case was prosecuted to this Court by a petition for certiorari.

The defendant El Ahorro Insular is a mutual building and loan association. Its nature and the form and manner in which it conducts its business is expressly outlined in the Corporation Law (now embodied in the General Banking Act), particularly sections 171, paragraph (1), 182, and 188, which reads as follows:jgc:chanrobles.com.ph

"SEC. 171. All corporations whose capital stock is required or is permitted to be paid in by the stockholders in regular, equal, periodical payments and whose purpose is to accumulate the savings of its stockholders, to repay to said stockholders their accumulated savings and profits upon surrender of their stock, to encourage industry, frugality, and home building among its stockholders, and to loan its funds and funds borrowed for the purpose to stockholders on the security of unencumbered real estate and the pledge of shares of capital stock owned by the stockholders as collateral security, shall be know as building and loan associations, and the words "mutual building and loan association shall" form part of the name of every such corporation . . . ."cralaw virtua1aw library

"SEC. 182. Every loan made by the association must be property evidenced by a note or other instrument in writing and must be secured by a first mortgage or deed of trust on unencumbered real estate and also by the pledge to the association of shares of stock of the association the matured value of which shall at least equal the amount loaned . . . ."cralaw virtua1aw library

"SEC. 188. At least once a year the profits on all business transacted shall be determined by the board of directors and apportioned to all the shares in each series outstanding at the time of such apportionment on the basis of the actual value of such shares as distinguished from their withdrawal value, but in determining the profits which may be so apportioned, there shall be deducted from the gross earning of the association the expenses and losses incurred in conducting its business and from the net earnings so obtained there shall be deducted a sum equal to five per centum of such net earnings which sum shall be credited to a reserve account. The said percentage of net earnings shall be credited to the said reserve account until such time as the reserve equals five per centum of the total assets of the association, and the reserve shall be maintained at five per centum of the total assets, and shall be available for meeting losses incurred by the association. The net earning which remain after making the foregoing deductions shall constitute the profits of the association available for apportionment among the shareholders. In the event of the liquidation of a building and loan association there shall escheat off all losses and defraying all expenses of liquidation. (As amended by Act No. 3610).

It is in accordance with the above provisions of the Corporation Law that the contract mortgage was executed by plaintiff and the defendant with the following provisions:chanrob1es virtual 1aw library

I — "La SOCIEDAD" entrega en este acto al "ACCIONISTA PRESTATARIO" y este declara haber recibido de "LA SOCIEDAD" en calidad de prestamo la cantidad de MIL Pesos (P1,000.00), moneda filipina, por el tiempo y bajo las condiciones que a continuacion se establecen;

II — "EL ACCIONISTA PRESTATARIO" SE obliga a pagar a "LA SOCIEDAD" "UNA prima anual igual al 1.716% sobre el importe de capital prestado que se pagara por mensualidades anticipadas, juntamente con los intereses del 11.605% sobre el mismo capital y la cuota mensual que mas abajo se estipula;

III — La duracion de este prestamo sera por el tiempo que sea necesario para que las diez (10) acciones acumulativas de la Serie "C", que el "ACCIONISTA PRESTATARIO" en consideracion al prestamo que se le hace, suscribe en este acto, y cuyo importe se obliga y compromete a pagar en la forma que dispone la Clausula IV de este contrato hasta que con los pagos de cuotas mas los dividendos que se vayan acumulando anualmente, lleguen a su valo par de DOSCIENTOS PESO (P200.00), moneda filipina, cada una;

IV — El "ACCIONISTA PRESTATARIO" se obliga solamente a pagar a "LA SOCIEDAD" en el domicilio de la misma en concepto de cuota por las diez (10) acciones accumulativas de la Serie "C" que ha suscrito, la cantdad de CINCO pesos (5.00) moneda filipina, mensualmente, comensando desde el mes de DEPTIEMBRE de 1933, y hasta que dichas acciones, con el importe de las cuotas y con los dividendos que se les vayan accumulando a fin di cad ano, lleguen a su valor nominal de DOS CIENTOS PESOS (p200.00), moneda filipina, cada una Mientras dure este prestamo el "ACCIONISTA PRESTATARIO" se obliga igualmente a pagar "LA SOCIENDAD" la cantidad de ONCE PESOS CON 10/100 (P11.10) moneda filipina, cada mes, en concepto de intereses y prima del capital prestado, los cuales intereses y prima se habran de pagra en las mismas fechas que las cuotas correspondientes a las acciones por el suscritas, y juntamente con ellas no pudiendo hacer ninguno de los gago por separdos;

V — Una vez que is importe de las acciones suscritas por el" ACCIONITA PRESTATARIO" llegue a cubrir con las cuotas y dividendos, como mas arriba se estipula, el valor par di las mismas, "LA SOCIENDAD" se hara cobro del prestamo que en virtud de la presente ha hecho, con el importe de las CINCO (5) acciones, quedando con ello total mente extinguida la deuda del "ACCIONISTA PRESTATARIO" :chanrob1es virtual 1aw library

VI — Una vez pagado el prestamo con el importe las CINCO (5) acciones accumulativas de la Serie "C" como se dispone en el parrafo V de este contrato, "LA SOCIEDAD" se obliga a entregar al "ACCIONISTA PRESTATARIO" es importe de las otras CINCO (5) acciones que forman el FONDO DE AHORRO, el cual importe sera entregado por la "SOCIEDAD" en efectivo metalico al "ACCIONISTA PRESTATARIO" ;

IX — Para garantizar el fiel y puntual cumplimiento de todas la obligaciones, sin perjuicio de la responsabilida personal, que contrae en virtud de la presente escritura, el "ACCIONISTA PRESTATARIO" por la presente cede y traspasa en calidad de primera hipoteca a favor de "LA SOCIEDAD", el inmueble de su propiedad que a continuacion se describe, a saber:chanrob1es virtual 1aw library

A PARCEL OF LAND (Lot No. 17, Sub-block No. 6 of the consolidation and subdivision plan Pcs-133, being a portion of Lot No. 5, described on the Consolidation and subdivision plan Pcs-89, G.L.R.O. Cadastral Record No. 192), situated in the District of Tondo, City of Manila. Bounded on the N. by Lot No. 15, sub-Block No. 6; on the E. by Lot No. 18, sub-Block No. 6, on the S. by Lot No. 19, sub-Block No. 6 and on the W. by Street Lot No. 3 . . . containing an area of 200 SQUARE METERS more or less.

Este inmueble consta en el CERTIFICADO DE TRANSFERENCE DE TITULO NO. 43302, Libro No. T-132, Pagina No. 42 de la Oficiana del Registrador de Titulos de la Ciudad de Manila, I. F.,

The question that presents itself for resolution by us is, What is the consideration of plaintiff under the contract Annex "A" executed by him and the defendant; is he a mere borrower or mortgagor, or a stockholder-mortgagor at the same time? The resolution of this question is necessary because if he were a mere mortgagor, then plaintiff may not be held responsible for the losses incurred by the corporation. But the contract itself expressly states that the plaintiff is an accionista prestatario or a stockholder-mortgagor. Under the terms of the Law and under the terms of the agreement Annex "A", plaintiff was to be credited with the dividends on his share every year and such dividends, together with the monthly payment of P5, are to accumulate until the same reaches the par value of his share. The claim of the plaintiff that he was a mere mortgagor is refuted by the very contract that he executed. If he did not understand the terms of the agreement it is his fault; besides, the nature of a building and loan association is fixed in the law and these provisions of law the plaintiff could not be excused from knowing.

Both the contract and the law expressly provide that the indebtedness shall be paid with the installment paid on the shares, together with the dividends, and that the loan given shall be paid only when the installments paid on said shares and the dividends thereon had reached their par value. So long, therefore, as the shares do not reach their par value the payment of the indebtedness cannot be considered as made, and whatever losses may be suffered must be borne by any stockholder in proportion to his subscription. The very nature of a mutual building and loan association presupposes that the stockholders, all of them, participate not only in the dividends but also in the losses. A building and loan association is not a bank are not shared by the debtor. Within a building and loan association such profits or losses are shared in by all stockholders, as it would be unjust and unfair for a stockholder to receive the dividends but be free from losses.

The agreement Annex "A" executed in accordance with the terms of the Corporation Law can not be held illegal and must be enforced against the plaintiff stockholder-mortgagor according to its terms. There is nothing contrary to morals or public policy in the contract or in the law. Its purpose is to secure mutual help between members. There would be no mutuality unless all stockholders share in losses as well as in the profits.

For the foregoing considerations, the judgment rendered by the Court of Appeals should be, as it is hereby, set aside and another entered, dismissing the complaint of the plaintiff, declaring that he has only paid on account of his share the sum of P507.75 as of November, 1951. The counterclaim of the defendant is also dismissed, except that for the sum of P155.90, which the plaintiff is hereby ordered to pay to the defendant El Ahorro Insular. No costs.

Bengzon, Padilla, Reyes, A., Bautista Angelo, Concepcion, Reyes, J.B.L. and Endencia, JJ., concur.




Back to Home | Back to Main




















chanrobles.com





ChanRobles On-Line Bar Review

ChanRobles Internet Bar Review : www.chanroblesbar.com

ChanRobles MCLE On-line

ChanRobles Lawnet Inc. - ChanRobles MCLE On-line : www.chanroblesmcleonline.com






March-1959 Jurisprudence                 

  • G.R. No. L-12163 March 4, 1959 - PAZ FORES v. IRENEO MIRANDA

    105 Phil 267

  • G.R. No. L-10460 March 11, 1959 - REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL. v. JUANA B. VDA. DE DEL ROSARIO

    105 Phil 277

  • G.R. No. L-10611 March 13, 1959 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. VIRGILIO DIVINAGRACIA

    105 Phil 281

  • G.R. No. L-11223 March 16, 1959 - PABLO C. VENTURA v. JUDGE NICASIO YATCO

    105 Phil 287

  • G.R. No. L-11596 March 16, 1959 - ALTO SURETY & INSURANCE CO. INC. v. ELEUTERIO LIMCACO, ET AL.

    105 Phil 295

  • G.R. No. L-11981 March 17, 1959 - CIRIACO SANTIAGO v. MANUEL CONDE

    105 Phil 298

  • G.R. No. L-11315 March 18, 1959 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. EUSTAQUIO HINAUT

    105 Phil 303

  • G.R. No. L-11741 March 18, 1959 - EL AHORRO INSULAR, ET AL. v. VICTORINO T. AQUINO

    105 Phil 307

  • G.R. No. L-14891 March 19, 1959 - ALFREDO B. SAULO v. PELAGIO CRUZ

    105 Phil 315

  • G.R. No. L-13204 March 20, 1959 - ENRIQUE C. SERVO v. MARIANO ALCANABA, ET AL.

    105 Phil 322

  • G.R. No. L-9724 March 23, 1959 - TOMAS B. BERVA v. THE CITY MAYOR AND CITY TREASURER OF NAGA CITY

    105 Phil 325

  • G.R. No. L-12343 March 23, 1959 - LUNETA MOTOR COMPANY v. ALFONSO LOPEZ

    105 Phil 327

  • G.R. No. L-12497 March 23, 1959 - PRIMITIVO A. MACARAIG v. VICENTE DY SUN

    105 Phil 332

  • G.R. No. L-12695 March 23, 1959 - CITY OF ILOILO v. REMEDIOS SIAN VILLANUEVA, ET AL.

    105 Phil 337

  • G.R. No. L-12698 March 23, 1959 - PHIL. NATIONAL BANK v. PHIL. SURETY & INSURANCE COMPANY

    105 Phil 344

  • G.R. Nos. 11928-11930 March 24, 1959 - VEDASTO JESALVA, ET AL. v. JOSE S. BAUTISTA, ET AL.

    105 Phil 348

  • G.R. No. L-10883 March 25, 1959 - TERESA REALTY v. STATE CONSTRUCTION AND SUPPLY CO., ET AL.

    105 Phil 353

  • G.R. Nos. L- 12078-79 March 25, 1959 - MATIAS BELARMINO v. PANTALEON F. ALIHAN

    105 Phil 358

  • G.R. No. L-12703 March 25, 1959 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. MAXIMA ORPILLA-MOLINA

    105 Phil 362

  • G.R. No. L-11472 March 30, 1959 - OBDULIA ARAGON, ET AL. v. FRANCISCO ARAGON, ET AL.

    105 Phil 365

  • G.R. No. L-11569 March 30, 1959 - ROGERIO GENDRALA v. TEOFISTO CORDOVA

    105 Phil 370

  • G.R. No. L-12729 March 30, 1959 - ARSENIO R. REYES v. MARCIAL DE LA CRUZ, ET AL.

    105 Phil 372

  • G.R. No. L-12944 March 30, 1959 - MARIA NATIVIDAD VDA. DE TAN v. VETERANS BACKPAY COMMISSION

    105 Phil 377

  • G.R. No. L-13298 March 30, 1959 - JOSE U. OCHATE v. DIEGO H. TY DELING, ET AL.

    105 Phil 384

  • G.R. No. L-7954 March 31, 1959 - B. A. CRUMB v. MARGARITO RODRIGUEZ

    105 Phil 391

  • G.R. No. L-10884 March 31, 1959 - PHILIPPINE NATIONAL BANK v. PHILIPPINE LEATHER CO. INC.

    105 Phil 400

  • G.R. No. L-11785 March 31, 1959 - GABINO BACHOCO v. IGNACIA ESPERANCILLA

    105 Phil 404

  • G.R. No. L-12064 March 31, 1959 - REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL. v. ROBERTO ZURBANO

    105 Phil 409

  • G.R. No. L-12104 March 31, 1959 - CASIMIRO GARGANTA, ET AL. v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

    105 Phil 412

  • G.R. No. L-12128 March 31, 1959 - BANK OF THE PHILIPPINE ISLANDS v. ANTONIO NOBLEJAS

    105 Phil 418

  • G.R. No. L-12282 March 31, 1959 - BOARD OF DIRECTORS v. BIENVENIDO A. TAN

    105 Phil 426

  • G.R. No. L-12592 March 31, 1959 - TIBURCIO SOMERA, ET AL. v. AGRIPINO GALMAN, ET AL.

    105 Phil 431