Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence


Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence > Year 1960 > January 1960 Decisions > G.R. No. L-12476 January 29, 1960 - COLLECTOR OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. ANGLO CALIFORNIA NATIONAL BANK

106 Phil 903:




PHILIPPINE SUPREME COURT DECISIONS

EN BANC

[G.R. No. L-12476. January 29, 1960.]

COLLECTOR OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Petitioner, v. ANGLO CALIFORNIA NATIONAL BANK (CROCKER-ANGLO NATIONAL BANK), as Trustee for CALAMBA SUGAR ESTATE, INC., Respondent.

Assistant Solicitor General José P. Alejandro and Special Attorney Librada del Rosario-Natividad for Petitioner.

Ozaeta, Gibbs & Ozaeta for Respondent.


SYLLABUS


1. CORPORATION LAW; SHARES OF STOCK; CONSIDERED INTANGIBLE PERSONAL PROPERTIES. — Although shares of stock of a corporation represent equities that may consist of real as well a personal properties therein, they are considered under applicable law and jurisprudence as intangible personal properties

2. ID.; ID.; REGISTRATION OF TRANSFER NOT ESSENTIAL TO TEST TITLE ON VENDEE. — The provision in section 35 of the Corporation Law (Act No. 1459) which requires the transfer of shares of stock to be noted and entered upon the books of the corporation, does not invalidate the transfer between the parties nor is it essential to vest title upon the vendee. The capital gains sought to be taxed in the case at bar arose from the severance of gain from the investment occasioned by the transfer of title abroad and not on account of any registration that might be effected later.

3. TAXATION; INCOME TAX; CAPITAL GAINS FROM SALE OF SHARES OF STOCK; PLACE OF SALE DEEMED SOURCE OF INCOME. — Section 24 of the National Internal Revenue Code levies income taxes on foreign corporations only on income derived from sources within the Philippines. With respect to capital gains on the sale of personal property, section 37 (e) of the same Tax Code deems the place of sale as also the place or source of the capital gains.

4. ID.; ID.; ID.; INCOME DERIVED FROM SALE ABROAD NOT TAXABLE HERE. — Since in the case at bar the negotiation, perfection and consummation of the contract of sale of the shares of the capital stock in question were all effected in California, U.S.A., it follows that title to those shares passed from the vendor to the vendee at said place, from which time the incidents of ownership were vested on the buyer. Consequently, the income from that sale was derived from abroad, and is not subject to income tax.


D E C I S I O N


REYES, J. B. L., J.:


Respondent Calamba Sugar Estate Inc., herein represented by its trustee, the Anglo California National Bank, is a foreign corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of California, U.S.A., duly licensed (on May 18, 1946) to do business in the Philippines. It has consistently filed its income tax returns here through its resident attorney-in-fact. On May 14, 1956, the petitioner Collector of Internal Revenue notified the corporation of an assessment for alleged deficiency income taxes for the years 1953, 1954 and 1955 in the respective amounts of P138,855.00, P131,759.00 and P393,459.00, supposedly based upon capital gains derived from the respondent’s sale to the Pasumil Planters, Inc. of P250,000 shares of the capital stock of the Pampanga Sugar Mills (a domestic corporation) and of a promissory note, dated January 1, 1950, executed by the Pampanga Sugar Mills in the sum of $500,000.00. In an appeal by the respondent from the ruling of the Collector, the Court of Tax Appeals reversed said ruling and absolved the respondent from liability.

This is an appeal by the Collector from that decision.

The parties stipulated that (a) the negotiations leading to the execution and conclusion of the agreement of sale, dated January 16, 1953, between the respondent corporation and the Pasumil Planters, Inc., took place in San Francisco, California; (b) the payments on account of the sale were made by the Pasumil Planters, Inc. at the same foreign city; and (c) the sale was made under and in accordance with the laws of that State. From the evidence presented, it also appears that on December 16, 1955, the Securities and Exchange Commission cancelled respondent’s license to transact business in the Philippines, and on December 30, 1955, the corporation was dissolved in accordance with the California law.

The sole issue is whether the capital gains obtained from the sale constituted income from sources within or without the Philippines. It was the opinion of the Tax Court that they were income derived from abroad, and not subject to income tax.

It is hardly disputable that although shares of stock of a corporation represent equities that may consist of real as well as personal properties therein, they are considered under applicable law and jurisprudence as intangible personal properties (see Art. 417 [2], Civil Code of the Philippines; Sec. 35, Act No. 1459). Section 24 of the National Internal Revenue Codes levies income taxes on foreign corporations only on income derived from sources within the Philippines; and with respect to capital gains on the sale of personal properties, section 37 (e) of the same Tax Code deems the place of sale as also that place or source of the capital gain:jgc:chanrobles.com.ph

". . . Gains, profit, and income derived from the purchase of personal property within and its sale without the Philippines or from the purchase of personal property without and its sale within the Philippines, shall be treated as derived entirely from sources within the country in which sold." (Italics supplied)

Construing the same provision of law (which is section 119 (e) of the 1934 Act, U.S. I.R.C.) , United States courts are in accord in disallowing the imposition of income taxes by its government on capital gains where the sale takes place outside its territorial jurisdiction. It is likewise the prevailing view that in ascertaining the place of sale, the determination of when and where title to the goods passes from the seller to the buyer is decisive (East Coast Oil Co. v. Comm., 31 B.T.A. 588, aff’d 85 F. [2d] 322, cer. den-299 U.S. 608, 81 L.Ed. 449, 57 S.Ct. 234; also DiscontoGaesellcraft v. U.S. Steel Corporation, 267 U.S. 22; Compañia General de Tabacos de Filipinas v. Collector, 279 U.S. 306, 73 L.Ed. 704, 49 S.Ct. 304).

In this case, it is admitted that the negotiation, perfection and consummation of the contract of sale were all done in California, U.S.A. It follows that title to the shares of stock passed from the vendor to the vendee at said place, from which time the incidents of ownership were vested on the buyer.

The Collector argues that the situs of shares of stock of a corporation is considered to be at the domicile of the latter, as held in some cases cited by him; but in the instant problem, we are not concerned with imposition of taxes upon the shares themselves, but on a sale effected abroad that resulted in capital gains, for which there is a specific provision of law (Sec. 37 [e] N.I.R.C.) . As stated by the Tax Court, there is a distinction between the situs of personal properties and the situs of the income derived from the sale or exchange of such properties.

As to the contention that section 35 of the Corporation Law (Act No. 1459) requires the transfer to be noted and entered upon the books of the corporation, such requirement does not invalidate the transfer between the parties nor is it essential to vest title upon the vendee. The capital gains, now sought to be taxed, arose from the severance of gain, from the investment occasioned by the transfer of title abroad and not on account of any registration that might be effected later.

Wherefore, the judgment under review is hereby affirmed. No costs.

Paras, C.J., Bengzon, Padilla, Montemayor, Bautista Angelo, Labrador, Concepción, Endencia, Barrera, and Gutiérrez David, JJ., concur.




Back to Home | Back to Main




















chanrobles.com





ChanRobles On-Line Bar Review

ChanRobles Internet Bar Review : www.chanroblesbar.com

ChanRobles MCLE On-line

ChanRobles Lawnet Inc. - ChanRobles MCLE On-line : www.chanroblesmcleonline.com






January-1960 Jurisprudence                 

  • G.R. No. L-16413 January 26, 1960 - EMILIO C. SANTOS v. COMMISSION ON ELECTIONS

    106 Phil 877

  • G.R. No. L-10854 January 27, 1960 - MANILA POLO CLUB v. BIBIANO L. MEER

    106 Phil 885

  • G.R. Nos. L-12091 & L-12092 January 28, 1960 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. LIM HO

    106 Phil 887

  • G.R. No. L-9075 January 29, 1960 - S. V. S. PICTURES, INC. v. COURT OF APPEALS

    106 Phil 897

  • G.R. No. L-12476 January 29, 1960 - COLLECTOR OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. ANGLO CALIFORNIA NATIONAL BANK

    106 Phil 903

  • G.R. No. L-12573 January 29, 1960 - PAULINA DURAN v. BERNARDINO PAGARIGAN

    106 Phil 907

  • G.R. Nos. L-12614 & L-12615. January 29, 1960 - JUAN ESTELLA, ET., AL. v. REGISTER OF DEEDS OF RIZAL

    106 Phil 911

  • G.R. No. L-12981 January 29, 1960 - IN RE: MARCIANO DEETUANKA v. REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL.

    106 Phil 916

  • G.R. No. L-13194 January 29, 1960 - BUENAVENTURA T. SALDAÑA v. PHILIPPINE GUARANTY CO., INC.

    106 Phil 919

  • G.R. No. L-13489 January 29, 1960 - BANK OF THE PHILIPPINE ISLANDS v. JOSE J. GONZALES

    106 Phil 925

  • G.R. No. L-13536 January 29, 1960 - ADRIANO VALDEZ v. RODRIGO OCUMEN

    106 Phil 929

  • G.R. No. L-13956 January 29, 1960 - ROMULO C. NICOLAS v. FULGENCIO DACARA

    106 Phil 934

  • G.R. No. L-14027 January 29, 1960 - LIBERTAD ALTAVAS CONLU v. COURT OF APPEALS

    106 Phil 940

  • G.R. No. L-14306 January 29, 1960 - PABLO CALION v. PEOPLE OF THE PHIL.

    106 Phil 943

  • G.R. No. L-14341 January 29, 1960 - MARCIANO SONGAHID v. BENITO CINCO

    106 Phil 946

  • G.R. No. L-14359 January 29, 1960 - IN RE: SALVADORA ONG v. REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL.

    106 Phil 950

  • G.R. No. L-16360 January 29, 1960 - FILEMON SALCEDO, JR. v. COMMISSION ON ELECTIONS

    106 Phil 953

  • G.R. No. L-6406 January 30, 1960 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. KUSAIN SAIK

    106 Phil 957

  • G.R. No. L-9483 January 30, 1960 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. ELIAS NANA

    106 Phil 966

  • G.R. No. L-11215 January 30, 1960 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. QUIRINO BALOYO

    106 Phil 972

  • G.R. No. L-11430 January 30, 1960 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. TOMAS ESTACIO

    106 Phil 981

  • G.R. No. L-11756 January 30, 1960 - JOSE B. GAMBOA v. MA- AO SUGAR CENTRAL CO., INC.

    106 Phil 989

  • G.R. No. L-11908 January 30, 1960 - FLORA CAMPANERO v. APOLONIO T. COLOMA

    106 Phil 993

  • G.R. No. L-12105 January 30, 1960 - TESTATE ESTATE OF C. O. BOHANAN v. MAGDALENA C. BOHANAN

    106 Phil 997

  • G.R. No. L-12280 January 30, 1960 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. PIO TEMPLONUEVO

    106 Phil 1003

  • G.R. No. L-12661 January 30, 1960 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. FRANCISCO ARANDA

    106 Phil 1008

  • G.R. No. L-12692 January 30, 1960 - COSMIC LUMBER COMPANY, INC. v. AGAPITA MANAOIS

    106 Phil 1015

  • G.R. No. L-12754 January 30, 1960 - ESTANISLAO ALFONSO v. PASAY CITY

    106 Phil 1017

  • G.R. No. L-13146 January 30, 1960 - VALENTIN CASTILLO v. ARTURO SAMONTE

    106 Phil 1023

  • G.R. No. L-13160 January 30, 1960 - BIENVENIDO NERA v. PAULINO GARCIA

    106 Phil 1031

  • G.R. No. L-13274 January 30, 1960 - REMEDIOS SACLOLO v. COURT OF AGRARIAN RELATIONS

    106 Phil 1038

  • G.R. No. L-13399 January 30, 1960 - ALBERTA VICENCIO v. GAVINO TUMALAD

    106 Phil 1042

  • G.R. No. L-13456 January 30, 1960 - IRINEO C. HAMOY v. SECRETARY OF AGRICULTURE

    106 Phil 1046

  • G.R. No. L-13488 January 30, 1960 - MAURO PRIETO v. HIGINIO B. MACADAEG

    106 Phil 1055

  • G.R. No. L-13551 January 30, 1960 - CONSTANCIO JOAQUIN v. ABUNDIO MADRID

    106 Phil 1060

  • G.R. No. L-13564 January 30, 1960 - ANDRES CENTENERA v. NICASIO YATCO

    106 Phil 1064

  • G.R. No. L-13764 January 30, 1960 - RAFAEL RUEDA v. MARCELO JUAN

    106 Phil 1069

  • G.R. No. L-13781 January 30, 1960 - Testate Estate of JOSE J. JAVELLANA v. JOSE JAVELLANA

    106 Phil 1073

  • G.R. No. L-14016 January 30, 1960 - ALFREDO FORMOSO v. DELFIN S. FLORES

    106 Phil 1079

  • G.R. Nos. L-14023 & L-14135 January 30, 1960 - TALISAY-SILAY MILLING CO., INC. v. COURT OF INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS

    106 Phil 1081

  • G.R. No. L-14047 January 30, 1960 - PRIMO PANTI v. PROVINCIAL BOARD OF CATANDUANES

    106 Phil 1093

  • G.R. No. L-14109 January 30, 1960 - NATIONAL LUMBER & HARDWARE CO. v. PEDRO J. VELASCO

    106 Phil 1099

  • G.R. No. L-14310 January 30, 1960 - MAURO PRIETO v. JUAN P. ENRIQUEZ

    106 Phil 1103

  • G.R. No. L-14327 January 30, 1960 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. BERNARDO BORJA

    106 Phil 1111

  • G.R. No. L-14373 January 30, 1960 - GENERAL INSURANCE & SURETY CORP. v. NG HUA

    106 Phil 1117

  • G.R. No. L-14375 January 30, 1960 - ANDRES CASTILLO v. FROILAN BAYONA

    106 Phil 1121

  • G.R. No. L-14535 January 30, 1960 - BENITO SYMACO v. PATERIO AQUINO

    106 Phil 1130

  • G.R. No. L-14674 January 30, 1960 - MELECIO R. DOMINGO v. JUDGE S. C. MOSCOSO

    106 Phil 1138

  • G.R. No. L-16286 January 30, 1960 - CESAR SAMSON v. NUMERIANO G. ESTENZO

    106 Phil 1140