Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence


Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence > Year 1960 > July 1960 Decisions > G.R. No. L-16464 July 26, 1960 - VICENTE MALINAO v. MARCOS RAVELES

108 Phil 1159:




PHILIPPINE SUPREME COURT DECISIONS

FIRST DIVISION

[G.R. No. L-16464. July 26, 1960.]

VICENTE MALINAO, BENITO ALDE, GREGORIO ARABE, AQUILINO BORDEOS, SALVADOR ADOR and MANUEL CELEDA, Petitioners, v. MARCOS RAVELES, Sub- Provincial Warden at Borongan, Samar, Respondent.

Rosales, Balite & Daza, for Petitioners.

Marcos Raveles in his own behalf.


SYLLABUS


HABEAS CORPUS; LACK OF JURISDICTION OF COURT ISSUING AN ORDER; ISSUANCE OF WRIT. — Where the petitioner is held upon a judicial order, the writ will lie where the order is void because the court issuing it had no jurisdiction over the crime charged, or of the person of the accused where the latter had challenged on time, as in the instant case, the jurisdiction of the court over his person. (Banayo v. President of San Pablo, 2 Phil., 413; Collins v. Wolfe, 4 Phil., 534; Carrington v. Peterson, 4 Phil. 134; Davis v. Director of Prisons, 17 Phil., 168.)


D E C I S I O N


BARRERA, J.:


This is a petition for the issuance of a writ of habeas corpus.

On November 22, 1959, the Commission on Elections, by telegram to the municipal treasurer of Borongan, Samar, issued a resolution, which (1) ordered the suspension of the 6 members 1 of the municipal board of canvassers of said municipality; (2) set aside the canvass and proclamation made by said board on November 12, 1959; (3) authorized its special attorney [Atty. Ernesto Tena] to appoint the substitute members of said board; and (4) ordered a new canvass of the votes cast for all municipal officers in all the precincts of said municipality (Annex C).

As authorized by the Commission, Special Attorney Tena, on November 27, 1959, appointed petitioners Vicente Malinao, Benito Alde, Gregorio Arabe, Aquilino Bordeos, Salvador Ador, and Manuel Celada, as members of the municipal board of canvassers of Borongan (Annexes D, D-1, D-2, D-3, D-4, and D-5).

On December 2, 1959, the Court of First Instance of Samar issued a series of orders, directing the board of canvassers to hold the canvass (a) on December 3, 1959 at 8:00 a.m. in the PC compound and under the supervision of the court [Annex E]; (b) at the session hall of the municipal building instead of the PC compound [Annex E-1]; (c) at the courtroom [Annex E-2] and (d) at the PC compound [Annex E-3]. In obedience to the orders of both the Commission on Elections and the court, petitioners met and started the canvass. During the course of the canvass, mayoralty candidate Victor Amasa protested and claimed that the election returns for Precincts Nos. 11-A and 20-A did not tally with the certificates issued to the watchers in the same precincts, and that the statements (election returns) had been tampered with. His Protest having been overruled, he rushed to the Court of First Instance, and filed an amended urgent motion 2 asking that, in view of the discrepancy, a recount be made. He prayed for the issuance of a preliminary writ of injunction restraining the municipal board of canvassers from continuing with the canvass (Annex F). Acting on said motion, the court, on the same date (December 3, 1959), issued an order directing the municipal board of canvassers to "absolutely desist and refrain from continuing the canvassing and from making any proclamation."cralaw virtua1aw library

Armed with this preliminary writ, Amasa, with the sheriff, returned to the place of the canvassing and served the same to the petitioners. But, at this time the canvassing was far ahead, 37 of the 41 precincts having been already canvassed, including Precincts Nos. 11-A and 20-A. Believing that they were not parties to the court proceeding, as the old members of the board were the original respondents, and thinking that they were also acting under the instructions of the Commission on Elections, the present petitioners proceeded to terminate the canvass and proclaim the winner. Amasa thereupon returned to the court and made complaint, in virtue of which, the court forthwith issued the following order:jgc:chanrobles.com.ph

"Having been informed by deputy clerk of Court, Conrado Abella, who served the writ of preliminary injunction in this case that the respondent members of the Board of Canvassers, namely: Vicente Malinao, Benito Alde, Manuel Celada, Aquilino Bordeos, Gregorio Arabe, and Salvador Ador, continued the recanvassing upon instructions of Attorney Pablo Añosa, it is hereby ordered that the above-named respondents (herein petitioners) be arrested and be brought before this Court immediately to explain why they should not be held for contempt of Court."cralaw virtua1aw library

Brought to the court in virtue of said order of arrest, petitioners were required to explain why they should not be dealt with in contempt, for disregarding the order of injunction. Not satisfied with their explanation, the court, on December 4, 1959, found petitioners guilty of contempt and sentenced each of them to suffer the penalty of 6 months imprisonment and to pay a fine of P1,000.00, with subsidiary imprisonment in case of insolvency.

On December 8, 1959, this Court in G. R. No. L-16319 3 issued a preliminary writ of injunction, restraining the lower court "from enforcing the decision and/or amended decision both dated November 20, 1959, in Special Proceedings No. 1092 and from hearing said case and from taking any other action therein."cralaw virtua1aw library

On December 15, 1959, petitioners filed with the lower court a notice of appeal (Annex B), and offered to post the necessary bail bond for their release. The court, however refused to act on said notice of appeal, in view of said preliminary writ of injunction against it. On December 21, 1959, petitioners filed a motion to withdraw the appeal.

On January 5, 1960, petitioners filed with this Court the present petition for a writ of habeas corpus alleging, inter alia, that they are being illegally imprisoned and detained by respondent Marcos Raveles, warden of the sub-provincial jail of Borongan, and praying of the issuance of said writ directed to respondent, or to whoever acts in his place and stead, commanding him to produce the bodies of petitioners before us, at a time and place to be specified, that they may be restored to their liberty. In our resolution of January 11, 1960, we required respondent to answer the petition, and authorized petitioners’ temporary release, upon their filing a bond of P200.00 each. Having filed the necessary bond, petitioners were temporarily released, on January 15, 1960, after their detention for 1 month and 11 days in the sub-provincial jail at Borongan.

It is not disputed that the preliminary writ of injunction (Annex G) in question was issued by the lower court, as a consequence of a prayer contained in the amended urgent motion for recount (Annex F) filed by mayoralty candidate Victor Amasa, in Case No. 1092 of said court, in view of the alleged discrepancy, between the election returns in precincts Nos. 11-A and 20-A and the certificates issued to the watchers and tally sheets.

We already held in the case of Municipal Board of Canvassers of Borongan, Et. Al. v. Hon. Emilio Benitez, Et. Al. (G. R. No. L-16319, prom. June 30, 1960) that the petition for recounting filed by said mayoralty candidate Victor Amasa (in Case No. 1092), based upon the discrepancy between the election return and the certificate given to the watcher "did not, under the doctrine of the Parlade case, 4 give jurisdiction to the court (Court of First Instance of Samar) to order the opening of the ballot boxes for the purpose of recounting under Sections 163 and 168 of the Revised Election Code and, consequently to annul the proclamation made on December 3, 1959" of the municipal officers-elect of Borongan, Samar.

Such being the case, it follows that the lower court had no jurisdiction to issue the preliminary writ of injunction (Annex G) in question. As a necessary corollary, it neither had jurisdiction to render the judgment of December 4, 1959 finding petitioners guilty of contempt and sentencing them accordingly. As a rule, where the court has no jurisdiction to impose the sentence, the writ of habeas corpus will lie. (2 Moran, Comments on the Rules of Court [1952 Ed. ] 553.) Where the petitioner is held upon a judicial order, the writ will lie where the order is void because the court issuing it had no jurisdiction over the crime charged, or of the person of the accused where the latter had challenged on time, as in the instant case, the jurisdiction of the court over his person. (Banayo v. President of San Pablo, 2 Phil., 413; Collins v. Wolfe, 4 Phil., 534; Carrington v. Peterson, 4 Phil. 134; Davis v. Director of Prisons, 17 Phil., 168.)

Wherefore, the writ prayed for is hereby granted; the judgment of the lower court of December 4, 1959 is revoked; and the bond filed by petitioners for their temporary liberty is cancelled. So ordered.

Paras, C.J., Bengzon, Padilla, Montemayor, Bautista Angelo, Labrador, Reyes, J. B. L., Endencia and Gutiérrez David, JJ., concur.

Endnotes:



1. Donato Cardona, Pablo Añosa, Dominador Limon, Medardo Barcena, Socrates Alar, and Felipe Dala.

2. Motion for Recount (Case No. 1092 [Annex F].

3. Municipal Board of Canvassers of Borongan, Et Al., v. Hon. Emilio Benitez, Et Al., prom. June 30, 1960.

4. Parlade, Jr., Et. Al. v. Quicho, Et Al., G.R. No. L-16259, prom. December 29, 1959; see also Samson v. Estenzo, Et Al., 106 Phil., 1140; Lardizabal v. De Veyra, Et Al., G.R. No. L-16267, res. of December 29, 1959.




Back to Home | Back to Main




















chanrobles.com





ChanRobles On-Line Bar Review

ChanRobles Internet Bar Review : www.chanroblesbar.com

ChanRobles MCLE On-line

ChanRobles Lawnet Inc. - ChanRobles MCLE On-line : www.chanroblesmcleonline.com






July-1960 Jurisprudence                 

  • G.R. No. L-12998 July 25, 1960 - BIENVENIDA JOCSON, ET AL. v. MANUEL P. SILOS

    108 Phil 923

  • G.R. No. L-13299 July 25, 1960 - PERFECTO ADRID, ET AL. v. ROSARIO MORGA, ETC.

    108 Phil 927

  • G.R. No. L-14934 July 25, 1960 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. BUENAVENTURA BULAN, ET AL.

    108 Phil 932

  • G.R. No. L-11241 July 26, 1960 - VALENTIN ILO, ET AL. v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

    108 Phil 938

  • G.R. No. L-11834 July 26, 1960 - DIRECTOR OF LANDS v. GREGORIO ABIERA, ET AL.

    108 Phil 943

  • G.R. No. L-11840 July 26, 1960 - ANTONIO C. GOQUIOLAY, ET AL. v. WASHINGTON Z. SYCIP, ET AL.

    108 Phil 947

  • G.R. No. L-11994 July 26, 1960 - LUISA A. VDA. DE DEL CASTILLO v. RAFAEL P. GUERRERO

    108 Phil 989

  • G.R. No. L-12495 July 26, 1960 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. DIONISIO LIDRES

    108 Phil 995

  • G.R. No. L-12628 July 26, 1960 - IN RE: YU KAY GUAN v. REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL.

    108 Phil 1001

  • G.R. No. L-12984 July 26, 1960 - WARNER, BARNES & CO., LTD. v. EDMUNDO YASAY, ET AL.

    108 Phil 1005

  • G.R. No. L-12999 July 26, 1960 - PAFLU v. HON. JUAN P. ENRIQUEZ, ET AL.

    108 Phil 1010

  • G.R. No. L-13267 July 26, 1960 - SALVADOR CRESPO v. MARIA BOLANDOS, ET AL.

    108 Phil 1023

  • G.R. No. L-13364 July 26, 1960 - HIND SUGAR CO., INC. v. HON. COURT OF INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS, ET AL.

    108 Phil 1026

  • G.R. No. L-13373 July 26, 1960 - LUNETA MOTOR CO. v. MAXIMINO SALVADOR, ET AL.

    108 Phil 1037

  • G.R. No. L-13646 July 26, 1960 - BENITO MANALANSAN v. LUIS MANALANG, ET AL.

    108 Phil 1041

  • G.R. No. L-13684 July 26, 1960 - REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL. v. FRANCISCO YAPTINCHAY, ET AL.

    108 Phil 1046

  • G.R. No. L-13953 July 26, 1960 - MONS. CARLOS INQUIMBOY v. MARIA CONCEPCION PAEZ VDA. DE CRUZ

    108 Phil 1054

  • G.R. No. L-14096 July 26, 1960 - CITY OF MANILA v. FORTUNE ENTERPRISES, INC.

    108 Phil 1058

  • G.R. No. L-14229 July 26, 1960 - CEBU PORTLAND CEMENT CO. v. CITY OF MANILA, ET AL.

    108 Phil 1063

  • G.R. No. L-14258 July 26, 1960 - NATIONAL DEV’T CO. v. JUAN ARALAR, ET AL.

    108 Phil 1068

  • G.R. No. L-14313 July 26, 1960 - DIONISIO ESGUERRA v. PEOPLE OF THE PHIL.

    108 Phil 1078

  • G.R. No. L-14428 July 26, 1960 - AGATON SEGARRA v. FELIX MARONILLA, JR.

    108 Phil 1086

  • G.R. No. L-14432 July 26, 1960 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. LEONCIO LIM

    108 Phil 1091

  • G.R. No. L-14505 July 26, 1960 - MIGUEL KAIRUZ v. ELENA S. PACIO, ET AL.

    108 Phil 1097

  • G.R. No. L-14519 July 26, 1960 - REPUBLIC OF THE PHILS. v. LUIS G. ABLAZA

    108 Phil 1105

  • G.R. No. L-14550 July 26, 1960 - IN RE: ONG KUE v. REPUBLIC OF THE PHILS.

    108 Phil 1109

  • G.R. No. L-14689 July 26, 1960 - GENERAL MARITIME STEVEDORES’ UNION OF THE PHILS, ET AL. v. SOUTH SEA SHIPPING LINE, ET AL.

    108 Phil 1112

  • G.R. No. L-14743 July 26, 1960 - GLORIA ABRERA v. LUDOLFO V. MUÑOZ

    108 Phil 1124

  • G.R. No. L-15544 July 26, 1960 - PHILIPPINE AIR LINES INC. v. PHILIPPINE AIR LINES EMPLOYEES ASSOCIATION

    108 Phil 1129

  • G.R. No. L-15743 July 26, 1960 - OMBE v. VICENTE DIGA

    108 Phil 1137

  • G.R. No. L-16011 July 26, 1960 - DOMINGO T. PARRAS v. LAND REGISTRATION COMMISSION

    108 Phil 1142

  • G.R. No. L-16263 July 26, 1960 - DR. JOSE CUYEGKENG v. DR. PEDRO M. CRUZ

    108 Phil 1147

  • G.R. No. L-16464 July 26, 1960 - VICENTE MALINAO v. MARCOS RAVELES

    108 Phil 1159

  • G.R. No. L-16835 July 26, 1960 - FILEMON SALCEDO, JR. v. COMMISSION ON ELECTIONS

    108 Phil 1164

  • G.R. No. L-13435 July 27, 1960 - EUSEBIO MANUEL v. EULOGIO RODRIGUEZ, SR., ET AL.

    109 Phil 1

  • G.R. No. L-13632 July 27, 1960 - FEDERICO DE LOS ANGELES, ET AL. v. HON. GUSTAVO VICTORIANO, ET AL.

    109 Phil 12

  • G.R. No. L-13851 July 27, 1960 - DEOGRACIAS F. MALONZO v. GREGORIA T. GALANG, ET AL.

    109 Phil 16

  • G.R. No. L-15853 July 27, 1960 - FERNANDO AQUINO v. CONCHITA DELIZO

    109 Phil 21

  • G.R. No. L-13369 July 28, 1960 - RICARDO PALMA v. HON. ENRIQUE A. FERNANDEZ, ETC.

    109 Phil 26

  • G.R. No. L-11151 July 30, 1960 - COLLECTOR OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. COMPAÑIA GENERAL DE TABACOS DE FILIPINAS, ET AL.

    109 Phil 32

  • G.R. No. L-12747 July 30, 1960 - RIZAL CEMENT CO., INC. v. RIZAL CEMENT WORKERS’ UNION (FFW), ET AL.

    109 Phil 34

  • G.R. No. L-13268 July 30, 1960 - LUCIANA SASES, ET AL. v. HON. PASTOR P. REYES, ET AL.

    109 Phil 38

  • G.R. No. L-13760 July 30, 1960 - FILEMON MARIBAO v. LUCIO ORTIZ, ET AL.

    109 Phil 43

  • G.R. No. L-13767 July 30, 1960 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. PAQUITO PRIAS, ET AL.

    109 Phil 48

  • G.R. No. L-14806 July 30, 1960 - ZAMBOANGA COPRA PROCUREMENT CORP. v. CITY OF ZAMBOANGA

    109 Phil 58

  • G.R. No. L-14936 July 30, 1960 - GENERAL SHIPPING CO., INC. v. WORKMEN’S COMPENSATION COM., ET AL.

    109 Phil 60

  • G.R. No. L-14970 July 30, 1960 - MARIA B. CASTRO v. GERONIMO DE LOS REYES

    109 Phil 64

  • G.R. No. L-15093 July 30, 1960 - NARIC v. CELSO HENSON, ET AL.

    109 Phil 81