Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence


Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence > Year 1960 > September 1960 Decisions > G.R. No. L-10119 September 30, 1960 - RAFAEL LACSON v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

109 Phil 462:




PHILIPPINE SUPREME COURT DECISIONS

SECOND DIVISION

[G.R. No. L-10119. September 30, 1960.]

RAFAEL LACSON, Petitioner, v. THE COURT OF APPEALS and PACIFIC COMMERCIAL COMPANY, Respondents.

Carlos Hilado for Petitioner.

Simon R. Cruz for Respondent.


SYLLABUS


1. CONTRACTS; INTERPRETATION AND CONSTRUCTION; WHERE TERMS ARE CLEAR AND LEAVE NO DOUBT OF THE PARTIES, INTENTION; LITERAL MEANING OF STIPULATIONS CONTROL. — The body of the deed of sale in question clearly provides "that for and in consideration of the sum of Four Thousand Pesos (4,000.00) . . . the Pacific Commercial Company hereby sells, transfer, conveys and quitclaims unto RAMON B. LACSON . . . all its rights, title to and interests in the parcels of land described as follows: . . .", and its notarial acknowledgment speaks of a deed of sale of "all its rights, title and interest on two parcels of land and sugar quota, without in any way making mention of the judgment in Civil Case No. 11525. Besides, the principal amount of the judgment in Civil Case No. 11525 is P13,560.00, and if the intention of respondent company was to cede all its rights, title, and interests in said judgment, certainly, it would not have sold them only for the sum of P4,000.00. The terms of the contract in question are, therefore, clear and leave no doubt regarding the intention of the parties; hence, pursuant to Art. 1370 of the New Civil Code (Art. 1281, Old Civil Code), the literal meaning of its stipulations shall control. In other words, respondent is deemed not to have sold its judgment credit in Civil Case No. 11525.


D E C I S I O N


PAREDES, J.:


On May 27, 1938, in Civil Case No. 11137 and on August 23, 1939, in Civil Case No 11525, Court of First Instance of Iloilo, both entitled "Pacific Commercial Company, Plaintiff, v. Rafael Lacson, defendant," said plaintiff obtained judgments in its favor for various sums of money.

Pursuant to the judgment in Civil Case No. 11137, a writ of execution was issued and two parcels of land particularly described and covered by Transfer Certificate of Title No. 24865 issued by the Register of Deeds of Negros Occidental, in the name of Defendant Rafael Lacson, were levied upon and sold at public auction. At the auction, the judgment creditor (Pacific Commercial Company) bought said parcels, subject to the existing mortgage, and TCT No. 24865 in the name of Rafael Lacson was canceled, and in lieu thereof TCT No. 34885 was issued to the Pacific Commercial Company. Similarly, in case No. 11525, a writ of execution was issued and the same properties, designated in TCT No. 24865, together with the sugar quota allocation to Hacienda Sta. Maria, were levied upon to satisfy the judgment. They were not, however, sold at public auction.

On December 3, 1947, the Pacific Commercial Company executed a Deed of Sale (Exh. A, same as Exh. 1) in favor of Ramon B. Lacson, the pertinent portions of which are hereby reproduced:jgc:chanrobles.com.ph

"That for and in consideration of the sum of FOUR THOUSAND PESOS (P4,000.00) Philippine Currency, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, the Pacific Commercial Company hereby sells, transfer, conveys, and quitclaims unto RAMON B. LACSON of legal age, Filipino, married to Teresa Cuaycong and resident of the City of Bacolod, Negros Occidental, all its rights, title to and interests in the parcels of land described as follows:chanrob1es virtual 1aw library

‘1. — Una parcela de terreno catastro de Manapla con sus mejoras existentes en la misma situada en el Municipio de Manapla. Linda al NE. con una Manlar y Propiedad de la Sra. Casimera Parcon y Rio Balulan; al S. por la Carretera de Cadiz para Manapla; y al L. con la propiedad del Sr. Guillermo Benedicto. Contiene NUEVE CIENTOS TRES MIL SEISCIENTOS SESENTA Y UNO (903,661) metros cuadrados poco mas o menos.

‘2. — Otra parcela de terreno catastro de Manapla con sus mejores existentes en la misma situada en el Municipio de Manapla. Linda al NO. y NE. con la carretera de Cadiz para Manapla; al SE. con el Rio Balulan; al SO. con la propiedad del Sr. Guillermo Benedicto. Contiene CIENTO OCHENTA Y CUATRO SEISCIENTOS TREINTA Y NUEVE (184,639) metros cuadrados poco mas o menos."

subject to all incumbrances existing thereon, with Transfer certificate of Title No. 34885, issued by the Register of Deeds of Negros Occidental in the name of the Pacific Commercial Company, and whatever right and interest the Pacific Commercial Company may in the future acquire in the aforesaid sugar quota of Hacienda Sta. Maria above described, if and when the Pacific Commercial Company acquires any, by virtue of the execution of its judgment in said Civil Case No. 11525 against Rafael Lacson."cralaw virtua1aw library

On May 3, 1949, the Pacific Factors, Inc. (same as Pacific Commercial Company) filed with the Court of First Instance of Manila, an action to revive the judgment in Civil Case No. 11526 of the Court of First Instance of Iloilo, praying that defendant therein Rafael Lacson be condemned to pay it the following:jgc:chanrobles.com.ph

"(1) The sum of One Thousand Five Hundred Pesos (P1,500.00) with interest thereon at the rate of 9% per annum from May 3, 1949, the date of the filing of this complaint;

(2) The sum of Twelve Thousand Pesos (P12,000.00) with legal interest thereon from the date of the filing of this complaint;

(3) The sum of Eight Thousand Four Hundred Ninety-five Pesos (P8,495.00) with legal interest thereon from the date of the filing of this complaint;

(4) The sum of Sixty Pesos (P60.00) with legal interest thereon from the date of the filing of the complaint."cralaw virtua1aw library

Rafael Lacson interposed the defense that his obligation to the plaintiff, if any, had already been extinguished through merger or confusion of rights because (a) on December 3, 1947, the Pacific Commercial Company, in a public instrument executed in the City of Manila, conveyed and transferred all its rights and interests in Civil Case No. 11525 in favor of Ramon B. Lacson for the sum of P4,000.00; (b) that as a result of such conveyance, said Ramon B. Lacson, instituted several cases against the herein defendant among which is Civil Case No. 1234 of the Court of First Instance of Negros Occidental, entitled "RAMON B. LACSON, plaintiff v. RAFAEL LACSON, defendant", in which the judgment in said Civil Case No. 11525, was made the subject of litigation by Ramon B. Lacson as successor in interest of all the rights, title and interests of the Pacific Commercial Company; (c) that on August 17, 1950, Ramon B. Lacson, as such successor in interest of the Pacific Commercial Company and defendant Rafael Lacson, entered into an agreement wherein said Ramon B. Lacson among other things, transferred and conveyed into Rafael Lacson, his heirs and assigns all the rights and interests which he had acquired from the Pacific Commercial Company in Civil Case Nos. 11137 and 11525, for the sum of P55,000.00.

After trial, the lower court rendered judgment, the more significant portions of which read:jgc:chanrobles.com.ph

"As it will be noted from the above-quoted provision of Exhibit 1, all the rights, title, interests, etc. of the Pacific Commercial Company, judgment creditor in Civil Case No. 11525, had already been sold, transferred, and conveyed to Ramon B. Lacson, for and in consideration of the sum of P4,000.00, and for this reason, the said Pacific Commercial Company had nothing more to sell or to assign to the plaintiff herein, formerly, the Pacific Factors, Inc., and the defendant Rafael Lacson, having acquired all the rights and interests of Ramon B. Lacson, the assignee in the above quoted document Exhibit 1, should be absolved from the complaint and should be reimbursed for his expenses and attorney’s fees in this litigation which is fixed at P1,000.00.

Wherefore, the Court renders judgment dismissing the complaint with costs against the plaintiff, and the latter is further ordered to pay the defendant in the amount of P1,000 for his expenses and attorney’s fees."cralaw virtua1aw library

The above decision was appealed by the Pacific Commercial Company (CA-G.R. No. 13675 R.) and on September 30, 1955, the Court of Appeals reversed the decision of the lower court, declaring that what the Pacific Commercial Company sold, transferred and conveyed to Ramon B. Lacson were the rights, title and interests of said company in the land and not rights, title or interest in the judgment in Civil Case No. 11525 of the Court of First Instance of Iloilo, decreed the revival of the judgment and ordered the defendant Rafael Lacson to pay the various sums of money adjudged in said case to the plaintiff- appellant Pacific Commercial Company. The decision of the Court of Appeals is now the subject of the present appeal on certiorari.

The execution of the document which plays an important role in this controversy, is admitted by the parties. The conflict lies in their respective contentions, for whereas petitioner Rafael Lacson claims that what the respondent Pacific Commercial Company assigned to Ramon Lacson, his predecessor in interest, are the rights, title and interests which it (Pacific Commercial Company) had, not only in the parcels of land but on the judgment as a whole in Civil Case No. 11525, respondents counter by alleging that what it transferred and/or assigned to said Ramon B. Lacson is only its rights, title and interest in the two parcels and nothing more. The law provides that if the terms of a contract are clear and leave no doubt regarding the intention of the contracting parties, the literal meaning of its stipulations shall control. (Art. 1370 new Civil Code; 1281 old Civil Code). The contract executed by respondent Pacific Commercial Company, provides: "That for and in consideration of the sum of Four Thousand Pesos (P4,000.00) . . ., the Pacific Commercial Company hereby sells, transfers, conveys, and quitclaims unto Ramon Lacson, . . ., all its rights, title to and interests in the parcels of land described as follows . . . ." Petitioner, however, argues that the insertion in the deed of sale of the clause "That on or about August 23, 1939, the Pacific Commercial Company obtained a judgment in its favor and against Rafael Lacson . . . in Civil Case No. 11525 of the Court of First Instance of Iloilo . . . and that by virtue of the judgment in Civil Case No. 11525 aforesaid writ of execution was issued and the Provincial Sheriff levied upon the parcels of land and on the sugar quota allocated to Hda. Sta. Maria . . ." all that the judgment had decreed in favor of respondent company in said Civil Case No. 11525 was included in said transfer. We do not share the view taken by petitioner. The above clause was merely inserted in the deed to trace the source of the rights, title to and interest in the parcels of land.

A cursory examination of the judgment in Civil Case No. 11525 will yield the fact that petitioner Rafael Lacson was ordered to pay respondent company P1,500.00 with interest of 9% per annum from January 1, 1939; the further sum of P12,000.00 with legal rate of interest of 6% from June 22, 1939, and P60.00 for the costs. If the intention of respondent was to cede all its rights, title, and interests in the said judgment it would not have sold them for the sum of P4,000.00 only. It will be noted that the principal amount, exclusive of interest in the judgment alone is P13,560.00.

The penultimate paragraph of Exhibit A reads:jgc:chanrobles.com.ph

"It is further a condition of this sale that Ramon P. Lacson . . . admits having full knowledge of the nature and extent of the rights, title and interest of the Pacific Commercial Company in the properties herein sold to him."cralaw virtua1aw library

If the intention was to include the judgment in the sale, then the last portion of said paragraph would have been worded thus "in the properties and judgment herein sold to him."

The notarial acknowledgment of the said document Exhibit A, states "Personally appear before me Mr. Elmer Madsen in his capacity as Treasurer of the Pacific Commercial Company, known to me and by me known to be the same person who executed the foregoing document of deed of sale of all its rights, title and interest on two parcels of land and sugar quota and he acknowledged to me that the same is his own free and voluntary act and deed and the free and voluntary act and deed of the Pacific Commercial Company which he represents", without in any way making mention of the judgment in Civil Case No. 11525.

The very complaint filed by Ramon B. Lacson against Rafael Lacson in the Court of First Instance of Negros Occidental, (Exhibit B), does not make reference whatsoever of Civil Case No. 11525, but solely of the two parcels of land acquired by Ramon B. Lacson from the Pacific Commercial Company, which also belies petitioner’s assertion in his brief that by reason of the deed of sale Exhibit 1, the judgment in Civil Case No. 11525 of the Court of First Instance of Iloilo was made the subject of litigation by Ramon B. Lacson as successor in interest of the Pacific Commercial Company against Rafael Lacson.

In view of the foregoing, the decision appealed from is hereby affirmed, without costs.

Bengzon, Bautista Angelo, Labrador, Concepción, Reyes, J.B.L., Barrera, Gutierrez David, and Dizon, JJ., concur.




Back to Home | Back to Main




















chanrobles.com





ChanRobles On-Line Bar Review

ChanRobles Internet Bar Review : www.chanroblesbar.com

ChanRobles MCLE On-line

ChanRobles Lawnet Inc. - ChanRobles MCLE On-line : www.chanroblesmcleonline.com






September-1960 Jurisprudence                 

  • G.R. No. L-12645 September 15, 1960 - JUANA PADRON VDA. DE VALENZUELA, ET AL. v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

    109 Phil 396

  • G.R. No. L-14179 September 15, 1960 - PERMANENT CONCRETE PRODUCTS, INC., ET AL. v. JUAN FRIVALDO

    109 Phil 404

  • G.R. No. L-13943 September 19, 1960 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. MARCELIANO ARRANCHADO, ET AL.

    109 Phil 410

  • G.R. No. L-13815 September 26, 1960 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. ELIAS OYCO

    109 Phil 415

  • G.R. No. L-14740 September 26, 1960 - ANDRES SANTOS, ET AL. v. HON. NUMERIANO G. ESTENZO, ETC.

    109 Phil 419

  • G.R. No. L-14939 September 26, 1960 - ELVIRA VIDAL TUASON DE RICKARDS v. ANDRES F. GONZALES

    109 Phil 423

  • G.R. No. L-12298 September 29, 1960 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. FEDERICO AGARIN

    109 Phil 430

  • G.R. No. L-12906 September 29, 1960 - DUMANGAY GUITING v. DIRECTOR OF LANDS, ET AL.

    109 Phil 436

  • G.R. No. L-13255 September 29, 1960 - COLLECTOR OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. JOSE COJUANGCO

    109 Phil 443

  • G.R. No. L-13475 September 29, 1960 - PHIL. SUGAR INSTITUTE v. COURT OF INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS, ET AL.

    109 Phil 452

  • G.R. No. L-15226 September 29, 1960 - LEE GUAN v. REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL.

    109 Phil 460

  • G.R. No. L-10119 September 30, 1960 - RAFAEL LACSON v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

    109 Phil 462

  • G.R. Nos. L-10352-53 September 30, 1960 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. GAUDENCIO MANlGBAS, ET AL.

    109 Phil 469

  • G.R. No. L-11329 September 30, 1960 - CIPRIANO B. MOTOS v. ROBERTO SOLER, ET AL.

    109 Phil 481

  • G.R. No. L-11440 September 30, 1960 - SERGIO F. DEL CASTILLO v. EDUARDO D. ENRIQUEZ, ET AL.

    109 Phil 491

  • G.R. No. L-12030 September 30, 1960 - JOSE J. ROTEA v. FORTUNATO F. HALILI

    109 Phil 495

  • G.R. No. L-12149 September 30, 1960 - HEIRS OF EMILIO CANDELARIA, ETC. v. LUISA ROMERO, ET AL.

    109 Phil 500

  • G.R. No. L-12328 September 30, 1960 - CARLOS J. RIVERA v. TOMAS T. TIRONA, ET AL.

    109 Phil 505

  • G.R. No. L-12353 September 30, 1960 - NORTH CAMARINES LUMBER CO., INC. v. COLLECTOR OF INTERNAL REVENUE

    109 Phil 511

  • G.R. No. L-12641 September 30, 1960 - EMILIANA C. ESTRELLA v. PUBLIC SERVICE COM., ET AL.

    109 Phil 514

  • G.R. Nos. L-12664-65 September 30, 1960 - ANTONINO LAZARO, ET AL. v. FIDELA R. GOMEZ, ET AL.

    109 Phil 518

  • G.R. No. L-12894 September 30, 1960 - LILIA JUANA BARLES, ET AL. v. DON ALFONSO PONCE ENRILE

    109 Phil 522

  • G.R. No. L-13023 September 30, 1960 - INSULAR LIFE ASSURANCE CO., LTD. v. TERESA DUAT VDA. DE FERNANDEZ, ET AL.

    109 Phil 530

  • G.R. No. L-13283 September 30, 1960 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. SERAPIO CARUNUNGAN, ET AL.

    109 Phil 534

  • G.R. No. L-13349 September 30, 1960 - MIGUEL GAMAO, ET AL. v. DOMINADOR C. CALAMBA, ET AL.

    109 Phil 542

  • G.R. Nos. L-13389-90 September 30, 1960 - CAPITOL SUBD., INC., ET AL. v. ALFREDO LOPEZ MONTELIBANO, ET AL.

    109 Phil 546

  • G.R. No. L-13417 September 30, 1960 - JOSE B. VILLACORTA, ETC. v. HON. FERNANDO VILLAROSA, ET AL.

    109 Phil 551

  • G.R. No. L-13426 September 30, 1960 - INT’L. OIL FACTORY v. TOMASA MARTINEZ VDA. DE DORIA, ET AL.

    109 Phil 553

  • G.R. No. L-13446 September 30, 1960 - MAXIMO SISON v. HON. FROILAN BAYONA, ET AL.

    109 Phil 557

  • G.R. No. L-13467 September 30, 1960 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. JUAN NECESITO, ET AL.

    109 Phil 563

  • G.R. No. L-13546 September 30, 1960 - GREGORIO VERZOSA v. CITY OF BAGUIO, ET AL.

    109 Phil 571

  • G.R. Nos. L-13567-68 September 30, 1960 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. ROSARIO B. DE LEON

    109 Phil 574

  • G.R. No. L-13582 September 30, 1960 - REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL. v. CIRILO P. BAYLOSIS, ET AL.

    109 Phil 580

  • G.R. No. L-13686 September 30, 1960 - HEIRS OF JUSTO MALFORE v. DlR. OF FORESTRY

    109 Phil 586

  • G.R. No. L-13912 September 30, 1960 - COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. CONSUELO L. VDA. DE PRIETO

    109 Phil 592

  • G.R. No. L-13941 September 30, 1960 - ANTONIO A. RODRIGUEZ, ETC. v. S. BLAQUERA, ETC.

    109 Phil 598

  • G.R. Nos. L-13992 & L-14035 September 30, 1960 - MANILA ELECTRIC CO. v. PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION, ET AL.

    109 Phil 603

  • G.R. No. L-14008 September 30, 1960 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. TRIZON REMOLLINO

    109 Phil 607

  • G.R. No. L-14348 September 30, 1960 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. CIRIACO YEBRA

    109 Phil 613

  • G.R. No. L-14395 September 30, 1960 - MALAYAN INSURANCE CO., INC. v. CATALINA V. YANDOC, ET AL.

    109 Phil 616

  • G.R. No. L-14497 September 30, 1960 - FELIX PAULINO, SR., ET AL. v. HON. JOSE T. SURTIDA, ET AL.

    109 Phil 621

  • G.R. No. L-14628 September 30, 1960 - FRANCISCO HERMOSISIMA v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

    109 Phil 629

  • G.R. No. L-14630 September 30, 1960 - LY HONG v. REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL.

    109 Phil 635

  • G.R. No. L-14733 September 30, 1960 - ERLINDA ESTOPA v. LORETO PIANSAY, JR.

    109 Phil 640

  • G.R. No. L-14737 September 30, 1960 - LEONCIA VELASCO v. COURT OF AGRARIAN RELATIONS, ET AL.

    109 Phil 642

  • G.R. No. L-14817 September 30, 1960 - ANDRES G. SANCHEZ, ET AL. v. NORTHERN LUZON TRANS. CO. INC.

    109 Phil 647

  • G.R. No. L-14822 September 30, 1960 - KHAW DY, ET AL. v. PEOPLE OF THE PHIL., ET AL.

    109 Phil 649

  • G.R. No. L-14874 September 30, 1960 - ANTONIO PEREZ v. ANGELA TUASON DE PEREZ

    109 Phil 654

  • G.R. No. L-14914 September 30, 1960 - JOHN TAN CHIN ENG v. REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL.

    109 Phil 660

  • G.R. No. L-14930 September 30, 1960 - MARLI PLYWOOD & VENEER CORP. v. JOSE ARAÑAS, ET AL.

    109 Phil 664

  • G.R. No. L-15021 September 30, 1960 - REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL. v. COURT OF TAX APPEALS, ET AL.

    109 Phil 667

  • G.R. No. L-15101 September 30, 1960 - IN RE: CHUA TIAN SANG v. REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL.

    109 Phil 670

  • G.R. No. L-15158 September 30, 1960 - JESUS S. DIZON v. HON. NECIAS O. MENDOZA, ET AL.

    109 Phil 674

  • G.R. No. L-15179 September 30, 1960 - TEODORA AMAR v. JESUS ODIAMAN

    109 Phil 681

  • G.R. No. L-15208 September 30, 1960 - ALIPIO N. CASILAN, ET AL. v. SANTIAGO GANGCAYCO, ET AL.

    109 Phil 686

  • G.R. No. L-15266 September 30, 1960 - TAN HOI v. REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL.

    109 Phil 689

  • G.R. No. L-15274 September 30, 1960 - DOMINGO ALMONTE UY v. REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL.

    109 Phil 694

  • G.R. No. L-15305 September 30, 1960 - CITY OF MANILA v. ARCADIO PALLUGNA

    109 Phil 698

  • G.R. No. L-15327 September 30, 1960 - FIDEL FERNANDEZ, ET AL. v. HON. GREGORIO D. MONTEJO

    109 Phil 701

  • G.R. No. L-15380 September 30, 1960 - CHAN WAN v. TAN KIM, ET AL.

    109 Phil 706

  • G.R. No. L-15392 September 30, 1960 - REX TAXlCAB CO., INC. v. JOSE BAUTISTA, ET AL.

    109 Phil 712

  • G.R. No. L-15454 September 30, 1960 - MANILA RAILROAD CO. v. EMILIANA FERRER, ET AL.

    109 Phil 716

  • G.R. No. L-15802 September 30, 1960 - REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL. v. ENRIQUE MAGALONA, JR., ET AL.

    109 Phil 723

  • G.R. Nos. L-15928-33 September 30, 1960 - DIOSDADO C. TY v. FILIPINAS CIA. DE SEGUROS, ET AL.

    109 Phil 730

  • G.R. No. L-16088 September 30, 1960 - LUZON SURETY CO., INC. v. FIDELA MORIN DE MARBELLA, ET AL.

    109 Phil 734

  • G.R. No. L-16226 September 30, 1960 - GUILLERMO REÑOSA v. HON. NICASIO YATCO, ET AL.

    109 Phil 740