Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence


Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence > Year 1960 > September 1960 Decisions > G.R. No. L-15101 September 30, 1960 - IN RE: CHUA TIAN SANG v. REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL.

109 Phil 670:




PHILIPPINE SUPREME COURT DECISIONS

EN BANC

[G.R. No. L-15101. September 30, 1960.]

In The Matter to Correct Entry in Birth Certificate of George C. Uy. CHUA TIAN SANG alias JOHN UY and JULIANA YU, Petitioners-Appellees, v. REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES, Oppositor-Appellant.

Asst. Solicitor General F. Villamor and Acting Solicitor E. M. Reyes for Appellant.

Reynaldo C. Patawaran for Appellees.


SYLLABUS


1. CIVIL REGISTRY; BIRTH CERTIFICATES; CORRECTIONS IN ENTRIES; NECESSITY OF ACTION IF CORRECTION AFFECTS THE CIVIL STATUS. — Article 412 of the Civil Code of the Philippines which provides that "No entry in a civil register shall be changed or corrected, without a judicial order," contemplates the correction of mistakes that are merely clerical in nature, and not those which may affect the civil status or the nationality or citizenship of the persons involved. Where the correction affects the paternity and filiation of a child, and hence, its civil status, as when the names of the child’s parents, as set forth in the birth certificate, are sought to be changed with others, the matter should be threshed out in a proper action, depending upon the nature of the issue involved.


D E C I S I O N


CONCEPCION, J.:


An appeal taken by the Republic of the Philippines from a resolution of the Court of First Instance of Manila, dated January 15, 1959, the dispositive part of which reads:jgc:chanrobles.com.ph

"WHEREFORE, the Court hereby grants the amended petition and directs the Local Civil Registrar of Manila to change the entries in the birth certificate of George C. Uy in the following manner:chanrob1es virtual 1aw library

(1) Name of father, from Chua Kee Lin to Chua Tian Sang alias John Uy;

(2) Name of mother, from Helen Tan to Juliana Yu;

(3) Residence of both parents, from 410 San Fernando Street, Manila, to 629 Soler, Manila;

(4) Age of the father, from 23 to 37 years, and the age of the mother from 23 to 31 years;

(5) Birthplace of the father from Amoy, China to Chinkang, China, and the birthplace of the mother from Sta. Cruz, Manila to Manila;

(6) Religion of both parents from Roman Catholic to Confuscian;

(7) Number of children born to this mother including present birth, from 1 to 6; and

(8) Number of children born to this mother now living, from 1 to 5."cralaw virtua1aw library

On October 18, 1957, petitioners Chua Tian Sang, alias John Uy, and Juliana Yu filed, with the Court of First Instance of Manila, a petition, dated October 11, 1957, alleging that they are husband and wife residing at No. 410 San Fernando Street, Manila; that "on January 20, 1956, George C. Uy was born to the petitioners at St. Luke’s Hospital, Magdalena Street, Manila," that "due to an honest mistake, it was erroneously entered in the birth certificate of said George C. Uy that his parents are the spouses Chua Kee Lin and Helen Tan, who are only his God-parents," who wish to adopt the child; that "the error was recently discovered;" and that "to avoid confusion, it is very important and necessary" that the Local Civil Registrar of Manila be ordered "to amend and/or correct the entry in the birth certificate of George C. Uy, with respect to the alleged parents of said child, to the true and correct names and personal circumstances of the real parents of the said child, the petitioners herein."cralaw virtua1aw library

The Solicitor General moved to dismiss the petition, but the lower court decided to consider the merit of said motion upon presentation of the evidence for the petitioners. Under date of July 16, 1958, petitioners filed an amended petition, with specification of the particulars to be amended in the birth certificate of George C. Uy. The prayer in said amended petition reads as follows:jgc:chanrobles.com.ph

"Wherefore, your petitioners pray that, after due hearing, an order be issued, ordering the Local Civil Registrar of Manila to amend and/or correct the entry in the Birth Certificate of George C. Uy as follows:jgc:chanrobles.com.ph

"1. To change the name of the father Chua Kee Lin to Chua Tian Sang alias John Uy;

"2. To change the name of the mother Helen Tan to Juliana Yu;

"3. To change the residence of both parents from 410 San Fernando St., Manila to 629 Soler St., Manila;

"4. To change the age at the last birthday of the father from 25 years to 37 years;

"5. To change the age at the last birthday of the mother from 23 years to 31 years;

"6. To change the birthplace of the father from Amoy, China to Chinkang, China;

"7. To change the birthplace of the mother form Sta, Cruz, Manila to Manila;

"8. To change the religion of both parents from Roman Catholic to Confuscian;

"9. To change the number of children born to the mother including present birth from one (1) to six (6); and

"10. To change the number of children of the mother now living from one (1) to five (5)."cralaw virtua1aw library

After due hearing the lower court issued the order complained of, granting the relief prayed for in said amended petition, upon the authority of Article 412 of the Civil Code of the Philippines. Hence, this appeal by the Solicitor General, which is based mainly upon Ty Kong Ting v. Republic (54 Phil., 321; 50 Off. Gaz., 1077) Black v. Republic (104 Phil., 848; 56 Off. Gaz. [30] 4752), and Ansaldo v. Republic (102 Phil., 1046; 54 Off. Gaz. [22] 5886). Upon the other hand, petitioners-appellees maintain that the lower court was justified in issuing said order, upon the ground that the corrections therein directed are not substantial, but merely clerical, harmless and innocuous in character.

Appellees’ pretense is devoid of merit. The changes sought affect paternity and filiation, and, hence, the status of the child. What is more, it appears from the order appealed from that Chua Kee Lin and Helen Tan were reported to be the parents of George C. Uy, in pursuance of an agreement reached with petitioners herein, so that the alleged inaccuracy of the data appearing in his birth certificate was due, not to an error or mistake, but to a deliberate attempt to pervert the truth in a public document. Referring to Article 412 of the Civil Code of the Philippines reading:jgc:chanrobles.com.ph

"No entry in a civil register shall be changed or corrected, without a judicial order."cralaw virtua1aw library

we have already held that "what was contemplated therein are mere corrections of mistakes that are clerical in nature, and not those which may affect the civil status or the nationality or citizenship of the persons involved;" that, "if it refers to a substantial change which affects the status or citizenship of a party, the matter should be threshed out in a proper action depending upon the nature of the issue involved" (Ty Kong Ting v. Republic, 94 Phil., 321; 50 Off. Gaz., 1077); that, in order to be subject to correction under said provision the error involved must be "one that is visible to the eyes or obvious to the understanding. It is an error made by a clerk or transcriber a mistake in copying or writing" (Black v. Republic, supra; and that Article 412 authorizes no more than "harmless and innocuous changes, such as correction of a name that is clearly misspelled, occupation of the parents, etc." (Ansaldo v. Republic, supra.) Obviously, the case at bar does not come within the purview of said rulings.

Wherefore, the resolution appealed from is hereby reversed and set aside, and the petition herein dismissed, with costs against the petitioners. It is so ordered.

Paras, C.J., Bengzon, Bautista Angelo, Labrador, Reyes, J.B.L., Barrera, Gutierrez David, Paredes, and Dizon, JJ., concur.




Back to Home | Back to Main




















chanrobles.com





ChanRobles On-Line Bar Review

ChanRobles Internet Bar Review : www.chanroblesbar.com

ChanRobles MCLE On-line

ChanRobles Lawnet Inc. - ChanRobles MCLE On-line : www.chanroblesmcleonline.com






September-1960 Jurisprudence                 

  • G.R. No. L-12645 September 15, 1960 - JUANA PADRON VDA. DE VALENZUELA, ET AL. v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

    109 Phil 396

  • G.R. No. L-14179 September 15, 1960 - PERMANENT CONCRETE PRODUCTS, INC., ET AL. v. JUAN FRIVALDO

    109 Phil 404

  • G.R. No. L-13943 September 19, 1960 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. MARCELIANO ARRANCHADO, ET AL.

    109 Phil 410

  • G.R. No. L-13815 September 26, 1960 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. ELIAS OYCO

    109 Phil 415

  • G.R. No. L-14740 September 26, 1960 - ANDRES SANTOS, ET AL. v. HON. NUMERIANO G. ESTENZO, ETC.

    109 Phil 419

  • G.R. No. L-14939 September 26, 1960 - ELVIRA VIDAL TUASON DE RICKARDS v. ANDRES F. GONZALES

    109 Phil 423

  • G.R. No. L-12298 September 29, 1960 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. FEDERICO AGARIN

    109 Phil 430

  • G.R. No. L-12906 September 29, 1960 - DUMANGAY GUITING v. DIRECTOR OF LANDS, ET AL.

    109 Phil 436

  • G.R. No. L-13255 September 29, 1960 - COLLECTOR OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. JOSE COJUANGCO

    109 Phil 443

  • G.R. No. L-13475 September 29, 1960 - PHIL. SUGAR INSTITUTE v. COURT OF INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS, ET AL.

    109 Phil 452

  • G.R. No. L-15226 September 29, 1960 - LEE GUAN v. REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL.

    109 Phil 460

  • G.R. No. L-10119 September 30, 1960 - RAFAEL LACSON v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

    109 Phil 462

  • G.R. Nos. L-10352-53 September 30, 1960 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. GAUDENCIO MANlGBAS, ET AL.

    109 Phil 469

  • G.R. No. L-11329 September 30, 1960 - CIPRIANO B. MOTOS v. ROBERTO SOLER, ET AL.

    109 Phil 481

  • G.R. No. L-11440 September 30, 1960 - SERGIO F. DEL CASTILLO v. EDUARDO D. ENRIQUEZ, ET AL.

    109 Phil 491

  • G.R. No. L-12030 September 30, 1960 - JOSE J. ROTEA v. FORTUNATO F. HALILI

    109 Phil 495

  • G.R. No. L-12149 September 30, 1960 - HEIRS OF EMILIO CANDELARIA, ETC. v. LUISA ROMERO, ET AL.

    109 Phil 500

  • G.R. No. L-12328 September 30, 1960 - CARLOS J. RIVERA v. TOMAS T. TIRONA, ET AL.

    109 Phil 505

  • G.R. No. L-12353 September 30, 1960 - NORTH CAMARINES LUMBER CO., INC. v. COLLECTOR OF INTERNAL REVENUE

    109 Phil 511

  • G.R. No. L-12641 September 30, 1960 - EMILIANA C. ESTRELLA v. PUBLIC SERVICE COM., ET AL.

    109 Phil 514

  • G.R. Nos. L-12664-65 September 30, 1960 - ANTONINO LAZARO, ET AL. v. FIDELA R. GOMEZ, ET AL.

    109 Phil 518

  • G.R. No. L-12894 September 30, 1960 - LILIA JUANA BARLES, ET AL. v. DON ALFONSO PONCE ENRILE

    109 Phil 522

  • G.R. No. L-13023 September 30, 1960 - INSULAR LIFE ASSURANCE CO., LTD. v. TERESA DUAT VDA. DE FERNANDEZ, ET AL.

    109 Phil 530

  • G.R. No. L-13283 September 30, 1960 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. SERAPIO CARUNUNGAN, ET AL.

    109 Phil 534

  • G.R. No. L-13349 September 30, 1960 - MIGUEL GAMAO, ET AL. v. DOMINADOR C. CALAMBA, ET AL.

    109 Phil 542

  • G.R. Nos. L-13389-90 September 30, 1960 - CAPITOL SUBD., INC., ET AL. v. ALFREDO LOPEZ MONTELIBANO, ET AL.

    109 Phil 546

  • G.R. No. L-13417 September 30, 1960 - JOSE B. VILLACORTA, ETC. v. HON. FERNANDO VILLAROSA, ET AL.

    109 Phil 551

  • G.R. No. L-13426 September 30, 1960 - INT’L. OIL FACTORY v. TOMASA MARTINEZ VDA. DE DORIA, ET AL.

    109 Phil 553

  • G.R. No. L-13446 September 30, 1960 - MAXIMO SISON v. HON. FROILAN BAYONA, ET AL.

    109 Phil 557

  • G.R. No. L-13467 September 30, 1960 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. JUAN NECESITO, ET AL.

    109 Phil 563

  • G.R. No. L-13546 September 30, 1960 - GREGORIO VERZOSA v. CITY OF BAGUIO, ET AL.

    109 Phil 571

  • G.R. Nos. L-13567-68 September 30, 1960 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. ROSARIO B. DE LEON

    109 Phil 574

  • G.R. No. L-13582 September 30, 1960 - REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL. v. CIRILO P. BAYLOSIS, ET AL.

    109 Phil 580

  • G.R. No. L-13686 September 30, 1960 - HEIRS OF JUSTO MALFORE v. DlR. OF FORESTRY

    109 Phil 586

  • G.R. No. L-13912 September 30, 1960 - COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. CONSUELO L. VDA. DE PRIETO

    109 Phil 592

  • G.R. No. L-13941 September 30, 1960 - ANTONIO A. RODRIGUEZ, ETC. v. S. BLAQUERA, ETC.

    109 Phil 598

  • G.R. Nos. L-13992 & L-14035 September 30, 1960 - MANILA ELECTRIC CO. v. PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION, ET AL.

    109 Phil 603

  • G.R. No. L-14008 September 30, 1960 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. TRIZON REMOLLINO

    109 Phil 607

  • G.R. No. L-14348 September 30, 1960 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. CIRIACO YEBRA

    109 Phil 613

  • G.R. No. L-14395 September 30, 1960 - MALAYAN INSURANCE CO., INC. v. CATALINA V. YANDOC, ET AL.

    109 Phil 616

  • G.R. No. L-14497 September 30, 1960 - FELIX PAULINO, SR., ET AL. v. HON. JOSE T. SURTIDA, ET AL.

    109 Phil 621

  • G.R. No. L-14628 September 30, 1960 - FRANCISCO HERMOSISIMA v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

    109 Phil 629

  • G.R. No. L-14630 September 30, 1960 - LY HONG v. REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL.

    109 Phil 635

  • G.R. No. L-14733 September 30, 1960 - ERLINDA ESTOPA v. LORETO PIANSAY, JR.

    109 Phil 640

  • G.R. No. L-14737 September 30, 1960 - LEONCIA VELASCO v. COURT OF AGRARIAN RELATIONS, ET AL.

    109 Phil 642

  • G.R. No. L-14817 September 30, 1960 - ANDRES G. SANCHEZ, ET AL. v. NORTHERN LUZON TRANS. CO. INC.

    109 Phil 647

  • G.R. No. L-14822 September 30, 1960 - KHAW DY, ET AL. v. PEOPLE OF THE PHIL., ET AL.

    109 Phil 649

  • G.R. No. L-14874 September 30, 1960 - ANTONIO PEREZ v. ANGELA TUASON DE PEREZ

    109 Phil 654

  • G.R. No. L-14914 September 30, 1960 - JOHN TAN CHIN ENG v. REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL.

    109 Phil 660

  • G.R. No. L-14930 September 30, 1960 - MARLI PLYWOOD & VENEER CORP. v. JOSE ARAÑAS, ET AL.

    109 Phil 664

  • G.R. No. L-15021 September 30, 1960 - REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL. v. COURT OF TAX APPEALS, ET AL.

    109 Phil 667

  • G.R. No. L-15101 September 30, 1960 - IN RE: CHUA TIAN SANG v. REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL.

    109 Phil 670

  • G.R. No. L-15158 September 30, 1960 - JESUS S. DIZON v. HON. NECIAS O. MENDOZA, ET AL.

    109 Phil 674

  • G.R. No. L-15179 September 30, 1960 - TEODORA AMAR v. JESUS ODIAMAN

    109 Phil 681

  • G.R. No. L-15208 September 30, 1960 - ALIPIO N. CASILAN, ET AL. v. SANTIAGO GANGCAYCO, ET AL.

    109 Phil 686

  • G.R. No. L-15266 September 30, 1960 - TAN HOI v. REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL.

    109 Phil 689

  • G.R. No. L-15274 September 30, 1960 - DOMINGO ALMONTE UY v. REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL.

    109 Phil 694

  • G.R. No. L-15305 September 30, 1960 - CITY OF MANILA v. ARCADIO PALLUGNA

    109 Phil 698

  • G.R. No. L-15327 September 30, 1960 - FIDEL FERNANDEZ, ET AL. v. HON. GREGORIO D. MONTEJO

    109 Phil 701

  • G.R. No. L-15380 September 30, 1960 - CHAN WAN v. TAN KIM, ET AL.

    109 Phil 706

  • G.R. No. L-15392 September 30, 1960 - REX TAXlCAB CO., INC. v. JOSE BAUTISTA, ET AL.

    109 Phil 712

  • G.R. No. L-15454 September 30, 1960 - MANILA RAILROAD CO. v. EMILIANA FERRER, ET AL.

    109 Phil 716

  • G.R. No. L-15802 September 30, 1960 - REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL. v. ENRIQUE MAGALONA, JR., ET AL.

    109 Phil 723

  • G.R. Nos. L-15928-33 September 30, 1960 - DIOSDADO C. TY v. FILIPINAS CIA. DE SEGUROS, ET AL.

    109 Phil 730

  • G.R. No. L-16088 September 30, 1960 - LUZON SURETY CO., INC. v. FIDELA MORIN DE MARBELLA, ET AL.

    109 Phil 734

  • G.R. No. L-16226 September 30, 1960 - GUILLERMO REÑOSA v. HON. NICASIO YATCO, ET AL.

    109 Phil 740