Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence


Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence > Year 1961 > August 1961 Decisions > G.R. No. L-10774 August 24, 1961 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. OSCAR CASTELO, ET AL. :




PHILIPPINE SUPREME COURT DECISIONS

EN BANC

[G.R. No. L-10774. August 24, 1961.]

PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. OSCAR CASTELO, ET AL., Accused-Appellant.

Solicitor General for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Liwag & Vivo for accused-appellant Oscar Castelo.

M.H. de Joya, E.A. Fernandez, Feliciano Ocampo, A. V. Tolentino and A. de Santos for all other Accused-Appellants.


SYLLABUS


1. EVIDENCE; TESTIMONY OF ORIGINAL WITNESSES; SUBSTANTIAL RECONSIDERATION; WHEN PROPER. — If the entire record is complete save only for the missing portion of the testimony of witnesses, who are still available, then Article 43 of Act No. 3110 which provides that "In case of the partial loss or destruction of a judicial record, the destroyed portion may be reconstituted in accordance with the provisions of this Act" applies.

2. ID.; EFFECT OF LOSS OR UNAVAILABILITY OF ENTIRE TESTIMONIAL EVIDENCE. — The requirement of a new trial and a new decision is applicable in cases where the entire testimonial evidence has been lost or become unavailable.


R E S O L U T I O N


BARRERA, J.:


Pursuant to our resolution of February 16, 1961, this case was ordered remanded to the court of origin "solely for the purpose of reconstructing the testimony of the witnesses the stenographic notes of whose original testimony had been lost, by retaking the testimony of those original witnesses still available and, if desired and necessary, of some other witness who had personal knowledge of the facts testified to by the first witness who had already died." (Emphasis supplied.)

In an order dated May 15, 1961, Her Honor, Cecilia Muñoz-Palma, acting as vacation Judge of the Court of First Instance of Rizal, Pasay City (Branch II), returned the case to this Court "for new instructions as the task of reconstructing the original testimony of the witnesses concerned has become legally and physically impossible of accomplishment." (Emphasis supplied.)

The position taken by Her Honor, it is believed, must have been based on a misinterpretation or miscomprehension of our said directive. This is evident from her use of the phrase "original testimony of the witnesses", instead of the term "testimony of those original witnesses." By the very nature of things, it is of course physically impossible to reproduce word for word the original testimony of the witnesses. What is required is the reconstruction, substantial as much as possible, of the testimony given by the original witnesses on the matter originally testified to by them. And this is permissible under the law and jurisprudence on the matter.

The requirement of a new trial and a new decision is applicable in cases where the entire testimonial evidence has been lost or become unavailable. In the present case, the entire record is complete save only for the missing portion of the testimony of Edgar Bond (now deceased) and that of Mariano Almeda, Raymundo Tal Villareal, Matias Soriano, and Francisco Espiritu, who are still available. Article 43 of Act No. 3110 provides that "In case of the partial loss or destruction of a judicial record, the destroyed portion may be reconstituted in accordance with the provisions of this Act." It is, therefore, unnecessary for us to make further instructions other than those already prescribed in our Resolution of February 16, 1961.

Let this case be again remanded to the Court of First Instance of Rizal (Pasay Branch) where it was originally heard, for compliance with the Resolution of this Court of February 16, 1961. So ordered.

Bengzon, C.J., Padilla, Labrador, Concepcion, Reyes, J.B.L., Paredes, Dizon, De Leon and Natividad, JJ., concur.

Bautista Angelo, J., on leave, took no part.




Back to Home | Back to Main




















chanrobles.com





ChanRobles On-Line Bar Review

ChanRobles Internet Bar Review : www.chanroblesbar.com

ChanRobles MCLE On-line

ChanRobles Lawnet Inc. - ChanRobles MCLE On-line : www.chanroblesmcleonline.com






August-1961 Jurisprudence                 

  • UNAV August 15, 1961 - IN RE: PETITION OF ARTURO EFREN GARCIA for admission to the Philippine Bar without taking the examination

  • G.R. Nos. L-17481 and L-17537 to 17559 August 15, 1961 - LIBERATA ANTONIO ESTRADA, ET AL. v. COURT OF AGRARIAN RELATIONS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-16779 August 16, 1961 - NATIONAL ABACA AND OTHER FIBERS CORP. v. APOLONIA PORE

  • G.R. No. L-15658 August 21, 1961 - CALTEX (PHILIPPINES) INC. v. CRISTETA VILLANUEVA

  • G.R. No. L-10774 August 24, 1961 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. OSCAR CASTELO, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-11976 August 29, 1961 - COLLECTOR OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. ANTONIO PRIETO, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-12760 August 29, 1961 - IN RE: MARIANO D. SEVERO TUASON, ET AL. v. REGISTER OF DEEDS OF QUEZON CITY

  • G.R. No. L-13114 August 29, 1961 - ELENITA LEDESMA SILVA, ET AL. v. ESTHER PERALTA

  • G.R. No. L-14305 August 29, 1961 - GAUDENCIO T. MENDOZA v. MAXIMO M. ALCALA

  • G.R. No. L-15417 August 29, 1961 - FELIX MONTE v. SANTIAGO G. ORTEGA, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-16115 August 29, 1961 - BENITO SY HUAN v. JOSE P. BAUTISTA, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-16182 August 29, 1961 - ZAMBALES CHROMITE MINING COMPANY v. JOSE ROBLES

  • G.R. No. L-16494 August 29, 1961 - PRISCILLA FERNANDEZ-SUBIDO v. ARSENIO LACSON

  • G.R. No. L-17219 August 29, 1961 - SOUTHWESTERN SUGAR & MOLASSES (Far East), INC. v. COURT OF INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-15809 August 30, 1961 - ATLAS CONSOLIDATED MINING AND DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION v. JOSE M. MENDOZA

  • G.R. No. L-12481 August 31, 1961 - CO TUAN v. CITY OF MANILA

  • G.R. No. L-12599 August 31, 1961 - PHILIPPINE IRON MINES, INC. v. PEDRO A. VENlDA, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-12682 August 31, 1961 - SAN MIGUEL BREWERY, INC., ET AL. v. PETER C. SANTOS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-13347 August 31, 1961 - IN RE: KENG GIOK v. REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL.

  • G.R. No. L-13757 August 31, 1961 - SEBASTIAN COSCOLLUELA v. TRANQUILINO H. VALDERRAMA

  • G.R. No. L-13817 August 31, 1961 - MACONDRAY & COMPANY, INC. v. PERFECTO PIÑON, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-13974 August 31, 1961 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. ROLANDO DE LA CRUZ

  • G.R. No. L-14173 August 31, 1961 - TOMAS RAMOS v. GENESIS L. DELIZO

  • G.R. No. L-14851 August 31, 1961 - MARCELO DE BORJA, ET AL. v. JOSE DE BORJA

  • G.R. No. L-14965 August 31, 1961 - DAVID FUENTES v. ISABELO V. BINAMIRA

  • G.R. No. L-15013 August 31, 1961 - COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. ASTURIAS SUGAR CENTRAL, INC.

  • G.R. No. L-15799 August 31, 1961 - ANGEL VILLARICA, ET AL. v. CONCEPCION PALMA GIL, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-15869 August 31, 1961 - AMANDA TRIGAL, ET AL. v. SABINA TOBIAS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-16017 August 31, 1961 - PHILIPPINES TOBACCO FLUE-CURING & REDRYING CORPORATION v. MANUEL SABUGO, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-16039 August 31, 1961 - CENTURY INSURANCE COMPANY, INC. v. F. A. FUENTES, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-16258 August 31, 1961 - BARTOLOME E. SAN DIEGO v. ELIGIO SAYSON

  • G.R. No. L-16301 August 31, 1961 - DIMITRY SUGANOFF v. REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL.

  • G.R. No. L-16478 August 31, 1961 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. MODESTO A. MALABANAN

  • G.R. No. L-16566 August 31, 1961 - JOSE I. LIM v. ENRIQUE MAGLANOC, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-17621 August 31, 1961 - TOMAS MALLORCA v. NICOLAS C. ADOLFO

  • G.R. No. L-18755 August 31, 1961 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL., ET AL. v. ANGEL MOJICA, ETC., ET AL.