Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence


Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence > Year 1961 > December 1961 Decisions > G.R. No. L-18054 December 22, 1961 - CITY OF BUTUAN v. HON. JUDGE MONTANO A. ORTIZ, ET AL:




PHILIPPINE SUPREME COURT DECISIONS

EN BANC

[G.R. No. L-18054. December 22, 1961.]

THE CITY OF BUTUAN, Petitioner, v. HON. JUDGE MONTANO A. ORTIZ, and JUSTINIANO SORIANO, Respondents.


SYLLABUS


1. OFFICERS; ORDER OF EXECUTION FOR REINSTATEMENT; LATER DECISION OF COMMISSIONER OF CIVIL SERVICE FOR DISMISSAL. — Administrative charges for physical injuries and electioneering having been filed by the Municipal Board of Butuan City against a police corporal by reason of which he was suspended by the Mayor and said Municipal Board found him guilty as charged, said corporal appealed to the Commissioner of Civil Service. After the expiration of 60 day period of suspension as he had not been reinstated, he filed a special civil action for mandamus in the Court of First Instance of Butuan City against the Mayor for his reinstatement and judgment was rendered in his favor. Thereafter the Commissioner of Civil Service affirmed the decision of the Municipal Board finding him guilty of the charges and separating him from the service. May the decision of the Court for reinstatement be enforced? Held: That the decision of the Civil Service Commissioner finding said police corporal guilty is a valid impediment to the execution of the court’s decision for reinstatement. As a supervening cause or reason that had arisen rendering the decision of the court ordering reinstatement no longer enforceable.


D E C I S I O N


LABRADOR, J.:


The amended petition in the above-entitled case seeks to annul an order of the Court of First Instance of Agusan, Hon. Montano Ortiz, presiding, dated January 13, 1960, ordering the execution of the court’s decision in Special Civil Action No. 16 of that court, entitled "Julieto Semine and Justiniano Soriano, Petitioners, v. Zacarias Pizarro, respondent", dated August 13, 1954, rendered by Judge Francisco Arca, in which decision the court ordered Zacarias Pizarro, respondent, to reinstate immediately as police corporal petitioner therein Soriano.

The record discloses that on March 9, 1954, administrative charges for physical injuries and electioneering were filed with the Municipal Board of Butuan City against Justiniano Soriano. On March 11, 1954, Soriano was suspended by Mayor Pizarro of Butuan City. The decision of the Board dated May 9, 1954 found Soriano guilty as charged. On the same date, appeal was brought by Soriano to the Commissioner of Civil Service.

Said Special Civil Action No. 16 was filed in the Court of First Instance of Agusan on June 1, 1954. In the petition it is alleged that the 60 day period of suspension provided for in Republic Act No. 557 had already elapsed and the case against Soriano had not been finally decided. So Soriano sought to compel Mayor Pizarro to reinstate him pursuant to said Act. Decision was rendered on August 13, 1954, favorable to petitioner Soriano, ordering Soriano reinstated pending termination of the administrative charges filed against him.

On November 27, 1954 the Commissioner of Civil Service to whom the decision of the Municipal Board had been appealed by petitioner Soriano, affirmed the decision of the Municipal Board, finding respondent Soriano guilty and separating him from the service. On January 12, 1960 (less than five years from the date of the judgment) attorney for Soriano filed an ex-parte motion to execute the judgment of Judge Arca for reinstatement. This motion was granted by the court. The court refused to reconsider said order of execution, hence the petition in this case was presented to set aside the order of execution, on the ground that the court committed a grave abuse of discretion in ordering the said execution of the judgment as the Commissioner of Civil Service has already affirmed the decision of the Municipal Board finding Soriano guilty of the charges and separating him from the service.

We find merit in the petition. When on January 12, 1960, Soriano demanded the execution of the judgment in Special Civil Action No. 16 of the Court of First Instance of Agusan, appeal by Soriano to the Civil Service Commission from the decision of the Municipal Board had long ago been decided against him by the Commissioner of Civil Service, said decision being dated November 29, 1954. It is to be noted that the right of action invoked by Soriano in Special Civil Action No. 16 in the Court of First Instance of Agusan was based on the failure of the Municipal Board to decide the case within 60 days as required by Republic Act No. 557. It is true that the judgment was correct because the suspension was ordered on March 11, 1954 and by June 1, 1954, when the petition for mandamus was filed in the Court of First Instance, more than 60 days have already expired without the case having been decided. It is also true that the decision of the Court of First Instance in said special civil action continued to be executory when the motion for execution was presented, because the 5-year period within which a decision of the court may be enforced by motion had not yet expired, but as it was alleged and shown in the motion for the reconsideration of the order granting execution, that the Commission of Civil Service had already affirmed the decision of the Municipal Board finding Soriano guilty on November 29, 1954, the right to reinstatement was barred by the decision of the Commissioner of Civil Service. This decision of the Civil Service Commission finding Soriano guilty was a valid impediment to the execution of the aforesaid decision for reinstatement. In other words, a supervening cause or reason had arisen which has rendered the decision of the court ordering reinstatement, no longer enforceable.

"Obviously a prevailing party in a civil action is entitled to a writ of execution of the final judgment obtained by him within five years from its entry (section 443, Code of Civil Procedure). But it has been repeatedly held, and it is now well-settled in this jurisdiction, that when after judgment has been rendered and the latter has become final, facts and circumstances transpire which render its execution impossible or unjust, the interested party may ask the court to modify or alter the judgment to harmonize the same with justice and the facts (Molina v. De la Riva, 8 Phil., 569; Behn, Meyer & Co., v. McMicking, 11 Phil., 276; Warner, Barnes & Co., v. Jaucian, 13 Phil., 4; Espiritu v. Crossfield and Guash, 14 Phil., 588; Flor Mata v. Lichauco and Salinas, 36 Phil., 809). In the instant case the respondent Cleofas alleged that subsequent to the judgment obtained by Sto. Domingo, they entered into an agreement which showed that he was no longer indebted in the amount claimed of P995, but in a lesser amount. Sto. Domingo had no right to an execution for the amount claimed by him." (De la Costa v. Cleofas, 67 Phil., 686-693).

For the foregoing considerations the writ prayed for is hereby granted, and the order for the execution of the judgment of the Court of First Instance in Special Civil Action No. 16 "Soriano v. Pizarro" is hereby set aside. With costs against respondent Justiniano Soriano.

Bengzon, C.J., Padilla, Bautista Angelo, Concepcion, Reyes, J.B.L., Barrera, Paredes, Dizon and De Leon, JJ., concur.




Back to Home | Back to Main




















chanrobles.com





ChanRobles On-Line Bar Review

ChanRobles Internet Bar Review : www.chanroblesbar.com

ChanRobles MCLE On-line

ChanRobles Lawnet Inc. - ChanRobles MCLE On-line : www.chanroblesmcleonline.com






December-1961 Jurisprudence                 

  • G.R. No. L-15264 December 22, 1961 - GARCIA SAMSON v. RAMON ENRIQUEZ, ET AL

  • G.R. No. L-15763 December 22, 1961 - NATIONAL POWER CORP. v. HON. JESUS DE VEYRA, ET AL

  • G.R. No. L-16806 December 22, 1961 - SERGIO DEL ROSARIO v. PEOPLE OF THE PHIL.

  • G.R. No. L-16825 December 22, 1961 - IN RE: CHUA PUN v. REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL.

  • G.R. No. L-16950 December 22, 1961 - SIMEON T. GARCIA v. ARTURO B. PASCUAL

  • G.R. No. L-18054 December 22, 1961 - CITY OF BUTUAN v. HON. JUDGE MONTANO A. ORTIZ, ET AL

  • G.R. No. L-19168 December 22, 1961 - ANSBERTO P. PAREDES v. ROSALIND B. ANTILLON

  • G.R. No. L-16173 December 23, 1961 - PASCUALA R. VITO v. HON. ARSENIO H. LACSON, ETC., ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-16992 December 23, 1961 - ATLANTIC GULF & PACIFIC CO. OF MLA., INC. v. COURT OF INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS, ET AL

  • G.R. No. L-8748 December 26, 1961 - ISABEL B. VDA. DE PADILLA v. CONCEPCION PATERNO

  • G.R. No. L-15365 December 26, 1961 - ASUNCION FRANCISCO, ET AL v. HON. HERMOGENES CALUAG, ET AL

  • G.R. No. L-18128 December 26, 1961 - J. M. TUASON & CO., INC., ET AL v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL

  • G.R. No. L-16600 December 27, 1961 - ILOILO CHINESE COMMERCIAL SCHOOL v. LEONORA FABRIGAR, ET AL

  • G.R. No. L-12996 December 28, 1961 - REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL. v. ANTONIO ALBERT

  • G.R. No. L-14337 December 28, 1961 - AGAPITO TRIA, ET AL v. PEDRO ZABALLA, ET AL

  • G.R. No. L-14823 December 28, 1961 - ANACLETA BARILLO v. REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL.

  • G.R. No. L-15013 December 28, 1961 - COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. ASTURIAS SUGAR CENTRAL, INC.

  • G.R. No. L-15091 December 28, 1961 - GENOVEVA CATALAN PAULINO, ET AL v. PAZ H. PAULINO, ET AL

  • G.R. No. L-15798 December 28, 1961 - JOSE P. TECSON v. SOCIAL SECURITY SYSTEM

  • G.R. No. L-16359 December 28, 1961 - INSULAR LIFE ASSURANCE CO., LTD. v. SSS

  • G.R. No. L-16563 December 28, 1961 - Z. E. LOTHO, INC. v. ICE & COLD STORAGE INDUSTRIES OF THE PHIL., INC., ET AL

  • G.R. No. L-17066 December 28, 1961 - IN RE: CARMEN PADILLA VDA. DE BENGSON v. PHIL. NAT’L., BANK

  • G.R. No. L-17135 December 28, 1961 - MANILA CORDAGE CO. v. HON. MAGNO GATMAITAN, ETC., ET AL

  • G.R. No. L-17196 December 28, 1961 - TEODORICO B. SANTOS v. COURT OF INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-17237 December 28, 1961 - GREGORIA BARTOLO v. PRIMO G. MALIWANAG, ET AL

  • G.R. No. L-17535 December 28, 1961 - H. G. HENARES & SONS v. NATIONAL LABOR UNION

  • G.R. No. L-17661 December 28, 1961 - MANUEL TIBERIO v. MANILA PILOTS ASSO.

  • G.R. No. L-17687 December 28, 1961 - JANUARIO L. JISON, SR. v. IGNACIO DEBUQUE, ET AL

  • G.R. No. L-17690 December 28, 1961 - MANUEL DIVINAGRACIA v. COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE OF MLA., ET AL

  • G.R. No. L-17934 December 28, 1961 - ALLIED FREE WORKERS’ UNION v. HON. JUDGE MANUEL ESTIPONA, ETC., ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-17937 December 28, 1961 - COMMUNITY SAWMILL CO. v. WORKMEN’S COMPENSATION COM., ET AL

  • G.R. No. L-13254 December 30, 1961 - CALIFORNIA LINES INC. v. AMPARO DE LOS SANTOS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-13415 December 30, 1961 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. DOROTEO BOLLENA, ET AL

  • G.R. No. L-14814 December 30, 1961 - EARNSHAWS DOCKS & HONOLULU IRON WORKS v. PEDRO GIMENEZ

  • G.R. No. 1-14999 December 30, 1961 - NARIC WORKERS’ UNION v. COURT OF INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS, ET AL

  • G.R. No. L-15436 December 30, 1961 - EUSEBIO G. DIMAANO v. AUDITOR GENERAL, ET AL

  • G.R. No. L-15759 December 30, 1961 - PAMPANGA BUS COMPANY, INC., ET AL v. MUNICIPALITY OF TARLAC

  • G.R. No. L-15812 December 30, 1961 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. PEDRO RACCA, ET AL

  • G.R. No. L-15901 December 30, 1961 - ALIPIO GONZALES v. Hon. SERGIO OSMEÑA, JR., ET AL

  • G.R. No. L-16106 December 30, 1961 - REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL. v. PNB, ET AL

  • G.R. No. L-16124 December 30, 1961 - ESPERANZA FERNANDEZ v. HON. HERMOGENES CALUAG, ET AL

  • G.R. No. L-16381 December 30, 1961 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. ANTONIO FAUSTO Y TOMAS

  • G.R. No. L-16486 December 30, 1961 - SHIU SHUN MAN v. EMILIO L. GALANG

  • G.R. No. L-16746 December 30, 1961 - REXWELL CORP. v. DOMINADOR P. CANLAS

  • G.R. No. L-16988 December 30, 1961 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. LUCIO RADA, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-17061 December 30, 1961 - LUNETA MOTOR COMPANY v. ANGEL DIMAGIBA, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-17068 December 30, 1961 - NATIONAL SHIPYARDS AND STEEL CORP. v. COURT OF INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-17400 December 30, 1961 - EPIFANIA M. CUENCA v. SUPERINTENDENT OF THE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION FOR WOMEN

  • G.R. No. L-17477 December 30, 1961 - POLO FIANZA, ET AL. v. NATIONAL POWER CORPORATION, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-17669 December 30, 1961 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. LONGENOS PEÑAFIEL, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-17883 December 30, 1961 - RODOLFO B. SANTIAGO, ETC. v. AMADO DIMAYUGA, ETC.

  • G.R. No. L-18734 December 30, 1961 - GSIS EMPLOYEES ASSOC., ET AL. v. COURT OF INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS, ET AL.