Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence


Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence > Year 1962 > April 1962 Decisions > G.R. No. L-14530 April 25, 1962 - LEONA AGLIBOT, ET AL. v. ANDREA ACAY MAÑALAC, ET AL. :




PHILIPPINE SUPREME COURT DECISIONS

EN BANC

[G.R. No. L-14530. April 25, 1962.]

LEONA AGLIBOT, ET AL., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. ANDREA ACAY MAÑALAC, ET AL., Defendants-Appellants.

Nemesio Balonso for Plaintiffs-Appellees.

Ruperto G. Martin & Associates, for Defendants-Appellants.


SYLLABUS


1. SUCCESSION; RESERVA TRONCAL; OBLIGATION TO RESERVE PROPERTY INHERITED FROM DAUGHTER IN FAVOR OF WIFE’S SISTERS. — A parcel of land belonged to the conjugal partnership of A.M. and M.A. . They had a daughter, J.M. M.A. died, leaving two sisters and her daughter. Her one-half portion of the conjugal property was inherited by her daughter. A.M. married A.A., with whom he had six children. J.M. died intestate without any descendant, thus leaving to her father, A.M., the property she inherited from her mother. Years later, A.M. died. All these incidents occurred before the effectivity of the New Civil Code. Query: Who is entitled to the land which A.M. inherited from his daughter, J.M., as between the sisters of M.A. first wife of A.M., on the one hand, and A.M.’s second wife. A.A., and their children, on the other? Held: That land is reservable property in accordance with the provisions of Article 811 of the Spanish Civil Code (Art. 891 of the New Civil Code). A.M. was obliged to reserve the portion he inherited from his daughter, J.M., for the benefit the sisters of M.A., aunts of J.M. on the maternal side and who are, therefore her relatives within the third degree belonging to the line from which said property came.


D E C I S I O N


DIZON, J.:


Leona and Evarista Aglibot commenced the present action (Civil Case No. 1482) in the Court of First Instance of Zambales on July 31, 1952 to recover from Andrea Acay Mañalac and her children — Ramona, Gregorio, Felix, Angela, Juanita and Purisima, all surnamed Mañalac — the ownership and possession of a parcel of land situated in barrio Namanaan, Municipality of San Antonio, Zambales, more particularly described in paragraph 2 of their complaint, and damages.

Briefly stated, the allegations of the complaint are that the Aglibots inherited the property subject matter thereof from their deceased niece Juliana Mañalac, that upon the death of Anacleto Mañalac, father of Juliana; the defendants took possession of said property, claimed it as their own and had since then appropriated for themselves all the palay annually harvested therefrom amounting to 30 cavanes; that notwithstanding demands made upon said defendants by the Aglibots, they had refused to surrender the property of the latter.

In their answer, after denying some material averments of the complaint, appellants alleged substantially the following as affirmative defense: that the land in question was purchased from Esteban Garcia by the spouses Anacleto Mañalac and Maria Aglibot for P1,000.00; that when Maria Aglibot died, only P300.00 of this amount had been paid; that the remaining P700.00 was paid to the vendor during the marriage of Anacleto Mañalac and appellant Andrea Acay; that Juliana Mañalac, the only daughter of Anacleto and his first wife, died in 1920, while Anacleto died in 1942; that upon his death, his widow, Andrea Acay, and their children acquired the property in question as his sole legal heirs. Their answer likewise claimed the sum of P1,000.00 as attorney’s fees by way of counterclaim.

After due trial upon the issue thus joined, the lower court rendered judgment as follows:jgc:chanrobles.com.ph

"IN VIEW OF THE FOREGOING CONSIDERATIONS, the Court hereby renders judgment declaring the plaintiffs owners pro-indiviso of one half (1/2) of the land covered by Original Certificate No. 10 described in paragraph 2 of the amended complaint; ordering the defendants to deliver to the plaintiffs the possession of the said one-half (1/2) of the property covered by said title; ordering the defendants jointly and severally to deliver to the plaintiffs 15 cavanes of palay yearly as the share of the plaintiffs from the produce of the land or its equivalent value at P10.00 a cavan from the date of the filing of the complaint until the said one-half (1/2) portion of the property described in Original Certificate No. 10 is delivered to the plaintiffs and ordering the defendants to pay the costs."cralaw virtua1aw library

From the above judgment Andrea Acay and her children took the present appeal.

The evidence shows that, originally, the land in question belonged to the conjugal partnership of the spouses Anacleto Mañalac and Maria Aglibot, and was covered by Original Certificate of Title No. 10 of the Register of Deeds of Zambales in the name of Anacleto Mañalac, married to Maria Aglibot; that said spouses had an only child named Juliana Mañalac; that Maria Aglibot died on October 2, 1906; that on April 25, 1910, Anacleto Mañalac married appellant Andrea Acay with whom he has six children (the other appellants herein); that Juliana Mañalac died intestate on October 22, 1920, leaving no other relatives except her father, Anacleto Mañalac, and her half brothers and sisters already mentioned; that upon the death of Anacleto on June 2, 1942, his widow, Andrea Acay, and her six children took possession of the parcel of land in controversy and since then have refused to surrender the ownership and possession thereof to the appellees; that the land produces thirty cavanes of palay yearly.

On May 18, 1951 appellees Leona and Evarista Aglibot filed a verified petition in the Court of First Instance of Zambales for the summary partition or distribution of the properties left by the deceased Juliana Mañalac among her rightful heirs (Special Proceeding No. 594). The court, after proper proceedings, issued an order dated October 30, 1951, the dispositive part of which reads as follows:jgc:chanrobles.com.ph

"Wherefore, the Court declares that the applicant Leona Aglibot and Evarista Aglibot are the only heirs within the third degree of Juliana Mañalac, and belonging to the same line from which these properties originally belong, that is, from Maria Aglibot, being the sisters of the latter; that the value of these properties does not exceed six thousand pesos (P6,000); and that each of the applicants is entitled to receive and enter into possession of one-half of the first five parcels and one-fourth of the last two, after paying such debts of the estate — if there be any — and the proportionate expenses of this special proceedings, subject to the provisions of Rule 74 of the Rules of Court." (Page 10 Rec. on App.) .

After securing the decision above quoted appellees made the unsuccessful demands upon appellants for the surrender of the property in question to them, and subsequently filed the present action.

The main question to be resolved now is: Who is entitled to the land which Anacleto Mañalac inherited from his daughter, Juliana, as between appellees (sisters of Maria Aglibot, first wife of Anacleto Mañalac), on the one hand, and appellants (Anacleto’s second wife and their children), on the other?

It is clear from the facts of the case that the land in question is reservable property in accordance with the provisions of Article 811 of the Spanish Civil Code (Art. 891 of the New Civil Code). Both parties now admit that the entire parcel covered by Original Certificate of Title No. 10 belonged to the conjugal partnership of the spouses Anacleto Mañalac and Maria Aglibot; that upon the death of the latter on October 2, 1906, their only daughter, Juliana Mañalac, inherited one-half of the property, the other half pertaining to her father as his share in the conjugal partnership; that upon the death of Juliana Mañalac on October 22, 1920 without leaving any descendant, her father inherited her one-half portion of said property. In accordance with law, therefore, Anacleto Mañalac was obliged to reserve the portion he had thus inherited from his daughter, for the benefit of appellees, Leona and Evarista Aglibot, aunts of Juliana on the maternal side and who are, therefore, her relatives within the third degree belonging to the line from which said property came.

Appellant’s contention that the major portion of the purchase price of the land in question was paid to the original owner, Esteban Garcia, after the death of Maria Aglibot is rendered clearly untenable not only by the lack of sufficient evidence to this effect but also by the very significant circumstance that the property was titled in the name of Anacleto Mañalac "married to Maria Aglibot" — circumstance that strongly indicates that said spouses had acquired full ownership thereof during the lifetime of Maria Aglibot.

A secondary question raised by appellants is to the effect that the lower court erred in ordering them, jointly and severally, to deliver to appellees fifteen cavanes of palay yearly or pay their equivalent value of P10.00 a cavan, from the date of the filing of the complaint. Considering the belief of appellants that the property in controversy formed part of the estate of Anacleto Mañalac and that upon the latter’s death ownership thereof was transmitted to all his heirs, subject to the usufructuary rights of the surviving spouse, Maria Acay, their contention — not sufficiently rebutted — that only the latter enjoyed possession of the property since her husband’s death and received the annual share pertaining to the landlord seems to be reasonable and logical. She should be the only one, therefore, sentenced to pay the fifteen cavanes of palay yearly from the date of the filing of the complaint.

The remaining contention of appellants that the lower court should have ordered appellees to refund to them 50% of the annual realty tax paid on the property cannot be sustained, this matter having been raised by them for the first time on appeal.

WHEREFORE, modified as above indicated, the decision appealed from is affirmed, with costs.

Bengzon, C.J., Padilla, Bautista Angelo, Labrador, Concepcion, Reyes, J.B.L., Barrera and Paredes, JJ., concur.




Back to Home | Back to Main




















chanrobles.com





ChanRobles On-Line Bar Review

ChanRobles Internet Bar Review : www.chanroblesbar.com

ChanRobles MCLE On-line

ChanRobles Lawnet Inc. - ChanRobles MCLE On-line : www.chanroblesmcleonline.com






April-1962 Jurisprudence                 

  • G.R. No. L-18462 April 13, 1962 - MENELEO B. BERNARDEZ v. FRANCISCO T. VALERA

  • G.R. No. L-13704 April 18, 1962 - BENJAMIN T. ASUNCION v. LUZ DE ASIS DE AQUINO, ETC. ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-15162 April 18, 1962 - PHILIPPINE AMERICAN DRUG CO. v. COURT OF INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-16642 April 18, 1962 - ANTONIO RAGUDO, ET AL. v. EMELITA R. PASNO

  • G.R. No. L-16864 April 18, 1962 - VALDERRAMA LUMBER MANUFACTURERS’ CO. INC. v. VICENTE N. CUSI, JR., ET AL.

  • G.R. Nos. L-19440 and L-19447 April 18, 1962 - CESAR CLIMACO, ET AL. v. HIGINIO B. MACADAEG, ET AL.

  • A.C. No. 518 April 23, 1962 - DOMINADOR CARLOS v. BENIGNO PALAGANAS

  • G.R. No. L-11816 April 23, 1962 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. OSCAR CASTELO, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-14716 April 23, 1962 - TERESA REALTY, INC. v. JOSE SISON

  • G.R. No. L-15499 April 23, 1962 - ANGELA M. BUTTE v. MANUEL UY & SONS, INC.

  • G.R. No. L-15634 April 23, 1962 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. JUANITO LLANTO

  • G.R. No. L-15714 April 23, 1962 - LORENZA FABIAN, ET AL. v. EULOGIO MENCIAS, ETC., ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-15778 April 23, 1962 - TAN TIONG BIO, ET AL. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE

  • G.R. No. L-15892 April 23, 1962 - FERNANDO LACSON, ET AL. v. BACOLOD CITY, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-16665 April 23, 1962 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. IRINEO SANTELLA, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-17344 April 23, 1962 - TALISAY-SILAY MILLING CO., INC. v. COURT OF INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-17349 April 23, 1962 - NATIONAL SHIPYARDS AND STEEL CORPORATION v. MARTIN ARTOZ, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-12219 April 25, 1962 - FRANCISCO PASCUAL v. COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS

  • G.R. No. L-13918 April 25, 1962 - CALTEX (PHILIPPINES) INC. v. KATIPUNAN LABOR UNION

  • G.R. No. L-14530 April 25, 1962 - LEONA AGLIBOT, ET AL. v. ANDREA ACAY MAÑALAC, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-14591 April 25, 1962 - PINDAÑGAN AGRICULTURAL COMPANY, INC. v. JOSE P. DANS, ETC., ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-15080 April 25, 1962 - IN RE: RICARDO R. CARABALLO v. REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL.

  • G.R. No. L-15404 April 25, 1962 - ILDEFONSO SUZARA v. HERMONES CALUAG, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-16066 April 25, 1962 - ENCARNACION BACANI, ET AL. v. FELICISIMA PAZ SAMIA GALAURAN, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-16856 April 25, 1962 - OLIVO G. RUIZ v. CEDAR V. PASTOR

  • G.R. No. L-16954 April 25, 1962 - ARMINIO RIVERA v. LITAM & COMPANY, INC., ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-16997 April 25, 1962 - RAMCAR INCORPORATED v. DOMINGO GARCIA

  • G.R. No. L-17016 April 25, 1962 - WORLDWIDE PAPER MILLS, INC. v. LABOR STANDARDS COMMISSION, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-12174 April 26, 1962 - MARIA B. CASTRO v. COLLECTOR OF INTERNAL REVENUE

  • G.R. No. L-14455 April 26, 1962 - LINO GUTIERREZ v. LUCIANO L. MEDEL, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-15369 April 26, 1962 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. TIMOTEO CRUZ, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-15427 April 26, 1962 - SAN MIGUEL BREWERY, INC. v. ELPIDIO FLORESCA, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-15638 April 26, 1962 - HERMOGENES CONCEPCION, JR. v. FRANCISCO F. GONZALES IV

  • G.R. No. L-16384 April 26, 1962 - IN RE: JAYME S. TAN v. REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL.

  • Nos. L-17325 and L-16594 April 26, 1962


  • SYLLABUS


    1. TAXATION; PERCENTAGE TAXES; FORFEITURE OF BOND WITHIN TEN YEARS. — Upon the execution of a bond to guarantee the payment of an internal revenue tax, the tax-payer, as principal, and the bondsman, as surety, assumed an obligation entirely distinct from the tax and became subject to an entirely different kind of liability. A bond being a written contract imposing rights and liabilities, the government, pursuant to article 1144 of the new Civil Code, has the right to take court action for its forfeiture within 10 years from the accrual of the right of action.

    2. ID.; ID.; ID.; SECTION 332 (c) OF REVENUE CODE NOT APPLICABLE. — Section 332 (c) of the Revenue Code, is not applicable to actions for forfeiture of bonds. The period of limitation provided in this section is evidently confined to actions for the collection of taxes.

    3. ID.; ID.; ID.; PRESCRIPTIVE PERIOD FOR PAYMENT OF TAX INTERRUPTED BY EXECUTION OF BOND. — Obligations contracted in a bond by a tax-payer constitute written acknowledgments of the debt and interrupt the 5-year period of prescription for the payment of tax.

    G.R. No. L-15265 April 27, 1962 - BAGUIO GOLD MINING COMPANY v. BENJAMIN TABISOLA, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-16467 April 27, 1962 - FLORENTINA MATA DE STUART v. NICASIO YATCO

  • G.R. No. L-11964 April 28, 1962 - REGISTER OF DEEDS OF MANILA v. CHINA BANKING CORPORATION

  • G.R. No. L-12116 April 28, 1962 - MACARIA TINIO DE DOMINGO v. COURT OF AGRARIAN RELATIONS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-12570 April 28, 1962 - VICENTE PAZ, ETC., ET AL. v. COURT OF AGRARIAN RELATIONS, ET AL.

  • G.R. Nos. L-14166 & L-14320 April 28, 1962 - FINLEY J. GIBBS, ET AL. v. COLLECTOR OF INTERNAL REVENUE, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-14231 April 28, 1962 - CATALINO BALBECINO, ET AL. v. WENCESLAO M. ORTEGA, ETC., ET AL.

  • G.R. Nos. L-14546-47 April 28, 1962 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. BASILIO PADUA, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-14833 April 28, 1962 - OROMECA LUMBER CO., INC. v. SOCIAL SECURITY COMMISSION, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-15089 April 28, 1962 - TEODULO DOMINGUEZ, ET AL. v. ROMAN B. DE JESUS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-15338 April 28, 1962 - CALTEX REFINERY EMPLOYEES ASSOCIATION-PAFLU v. ANTONIO LUCERO, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-16005 April 28, 1962 - MANILA ELECTRIC COMPANY v. PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION

  • G.R. No. L-16172 April 28, 1962 - ARSENIO SUMILANG v. GUALBERTO CASTILLO, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-16219 April 28, 1962 - NATIVIDAD VERNUS-SANGCIANGCO v. DIOSDADO SANGCIANGCO, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-16716 April 28, 1962 - PEDRO R. JAO, ET AL. v. ROYAL FINANCING CORPORATION, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-16804 April 28, 1962 - FRANCO J. ALTOMONTE v. PHILIPPINE AMERICAN DRUG COMPANY

  • G.R. No. L-17044 April 28, 1962 - EUSTAQUIO JUAN, ET AL. v. VICENTE ZUÑIGA ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-17047 April 28, 1962 - ATLANTIC MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY v. MANILA PORT TERMINAL, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-17247 April 28, 1962 - C. N. HODGES v. ELPIDIO JAVELLANA, ET AL.

  • G.R. Nos. L-17481 & L-17537-59 April 28, 1962 - LIBERATA ANTONIO ESTRADA, ET AL. v. COURT OF AGRARIAN RELATIONS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-17887 April 28, 1962 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. RODOLFO SANTOS

  • G.R. No. L-18751 April 28, 1962 - A. C. ESGUERRA & SONS v. DOMINADOR R. AYTONA, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-10909 April 30, 1962 - ADELAIDA TABOTABO, ET AL. v. AGUEDO TABOTABO, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-16843 April 30, 1962 - GONZALO PUYAT & SONS INC. v. PHILIPPINE NATIONAL BANK

  • G.R. No. L-17082 April 30, 1962 - MERCEDES RAFFIÑAN v. FELIPE L. ABEL

  • G.R. No. L-17378 April 30, 1962 - NORTHWEST AIRLINES, INC. v. NORTHWEST AIRLINES PHILIPPINES EMPLOYEES ASSOCIATION, ET AL.