Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence


Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence > Year 1962 > July 1962 Decisions > G.R. No. L-18175 July 31, 1962 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. SEBASTIAN LARGO:




PHILIPPINE SUPREME COURT DECISIONS

EN BANC

[G.R. No. L-18175. July 31, 1962.]

THE PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. SEBASTIAN LARGO, Defendant-Appellant.

Solicitor General for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Pio Celso Bendaña (Counsel de officio) for Appellant.


SYLLABUS


1. MURDER; EVIDENCE; CIRCUMSTANCES NEGATING INNOCENCE. — The refusal of the defendant to surrender the lethal weapon to a policeman on the pretense that he did not know the latter, who was then wearing his uniform, to be a peace officer, the identification by a witness of the weapon as the one he had seen the defendant carry several times prior to the occurrence, and the lack of motive on the part of the prosecution witness, who testified that he saw the defendant stab the deceased, to testify falsely against him, refute the defendant’s theory that he was innocent and that he merely picked up the weapon at the scene of the crime.

2. ID.; QUALIFYING CIRCUMSTANCE OF TREACHERY. — It appealing that the victim was stabbed from behind, while he was busy defending himself from the fist blows of appellant’s brother, it is clear that the crime committed is murder, qualified by treachery.


D E C I S I O N


CONCEPCION, J.:


Accused of murder in the Court of First Instance of Zamboanga City and convicted, as charged, by the same, which sentenced him to an indeterminate penalty ranging from eight (8) years and one (1) day of prisión mayor to fourteen (14) years and eight (8) months of reclusión temporal, with the accessory penalties prescribed by law, to indemnify the heirs of Martin Mundido in the sum of P6,000, and to pay the costs, defendant Sebastian Largo appealed to the Court of Appeals, which, being of the opinion that appellant should be sentenced to life imprisonment, forwarded the case to this Court, in pursuance of section 34 of Republic Act No. 296.

Testifying for the prosecution. Patrolman Abdulatip Abdurahim of the police department of Zamboanga City stated that, while he was on his beat, in the vicinity of the night market of said city, where "feria" games were being played, at about mid-night of December 2-3, 1957, his attention was attracted by a commotion and the scampering of people nearby. As he approached the place of the commotion, to ascertain its cause, he saw appellant Sebastian Largo holding the dagger Exhibit A in his right hand and its scabbard Exhibit B in his left; that Abdurahim inquired what the matter was, but Largo warned him not to approach; that, this notwithstanding, Abdurahim grabbed Largo’s right hand and tried to wrest the weapon from him; that while they were grappling therefor, another policeman, Patrolman Leandro Barredo, came and helped Abdurahim in disarming Largo; and that the policemen then noticed that the dagger was smeared with fresh blood and that, about eight (8) meters away, the lifeless body of Martin Mundido was lying on the ground, face downward, with several wounds in the right arm and a gaping wound in the back. This testimony was corroborated by Patrolman Barredo.

According to Dr. Felipe T. Laviña, of the Zamboanga General Hospital, who made an autopsy of said body, about ten (10) hours after the occurrence, "death was due to hemorrhage in the lungs, secondary to stab wounds" sustained "from behind."cralaw virtua1aw library

The prosecution introduced, also, the testimony of an uncle of the deceased, namely, Agustin Mundido, who declared that, as Martin Mundido ducked a fist blow given by appellant’s brother, Federico (Pedring) Largo — with whom the deceased seemingly had a fist fight — appellant appeared suddenly from behind the latter and stabbed him.

The theory of the defense, based mainly upon appellant’s testimony, is that, while he and his wife and two children were, on their way home, coming from his mother’s store, near the scene of the occurrence, in the evening of December 2, 1957, someone shouted "juramentado", whereupon the people started scampering away, with the corresponding commotion; that, as he looked around for a piece of wood with which to protect his wife and children, he saw a dagger which, after putting down a child he was carrying on his shoulders, he picked up, along with its scabbard; that he then saw a man coming to him, and, not knowing that he (the man) was a policeman, warned him not to approach; that the policeman grabbed his hand and took the dagger away from him; and that said policeman and another policeman, who came immediately, thereafter, then brought him to the police station, despite his assurances to them that he had merely picked up the weapon at the scene of the crime.

Fortunato Quiñones and Alfredo Demaronsing tried to corroborate appellant’s testimony, but, the same and that of his corroborating witnesses were given no credence by the lower court. In the light of the attending circumstances, we can not disturb the findings of said court with respect to the veracity of the opposing witnesses. In addition to the decided advantage of His Honor, the trial Judge, who observed their behavior during the trial, in gauging their veracity, the refusal of appellant to surrender the lethal weapon to policeman Abdurahim, refutes the theory of the defense. Appellant’s testimony to the effect that he did not know that Abdurahim was a peace officer merely makes the artificiality of the former’s version more apparent, for Abdurahim was then wearing his uniform as a policeman. Moreover, Agustin Mundido identified Exhibit A as the dagger he had seen appellant carry with him several times prior to the occurrence. Lastly, it is not even intimated that either Agustin Mundido, or the aforementioned policemen had any possible motive to falsely incriminate appellant. On the contrary, the record shows that Agustin Mundido was his friend.

It appearing that Martin Mundido was stabbed from behind, while he was busy defending himself from the fist blows of Federico (Pedring) Largo, it is clear that the crime committed is murder, qualified by treachery, and that, no modifying circumstance having attended the commission of the offense, the penalty therefor should be imposed in its medium period, namely, life imprisonment.

Thus modified as to the penalty, the decision appealed from is hereby affirmed, therefore, in all other respects, with costs against the appellant. It is so ordered.

Bengzon, C.J., Padilla, Labrador, Paredes, Dizon, Regala and Makalintal, JJ., concur.

Bautista Angelo, J., took no part.

Reyes, J.B.L., J., is on leave.




Back to Home | Back to Main




















chanrobles.com





ChanRobles On-Line Bar Review

ChanRobles Internet Bar Review : www.chanroblesbar.com

ChanRobles MCLE On-line

ChanRobles Lawnet Inc. - ChanRobles MCLE On-line : www.chanroblesmcleonline.com






July-1962 Jurisprudence                 

  • A.C. No. 512 July 7, 1962 - ESTEBAN DEGAMO v. TRANQUILlNO O. CALO, JR.

  • G.R. Nos. L-17858-9 July 13, 1962 - MANUEL S. CAMUS v. PRICE, INC.

  • G.R. No. L-16176 July 19, 1962 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. ISMAEL LAMPITOC, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-17146 July 20, 1962 - IN RE: KHO ENG POE v. REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL.

  • G.R. No. L-13341 July 21, 1962 - IN RE: JUSTINO DEE CU v. REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL.

  • G.R. No. L-16925 July 24, 1962 - FABIAN PUGEDA v. RAFAEL TRIAS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-16959 July 24, 1962 - DONATA MONTEMAYOR v. EDUARDO D. GUTIERREZ

  • G.R. No. L-17024 July 24, 1962 - GAPAN FARMER’S COOPERATIVE MARKETING ASSOCIATION, INC. v. FE PARIAL, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-17990 July 24, 1962 - MUNICIPALITY OF SAN CARLOS, PANGASINAN v. JESUS P. MORFE, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-13045 July 30, 1962 - IN RE: HAO SU SIONG v. REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL.

  • G.R. No. L-13654 July 30, 1962 - PROVINCIAL TREASURER, ET AL. v. JOSE AZCONA, ETC., ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-17191 July 30, 1962 - JOSE PEREZ CARDENAS v. PEDRO CAMUS

  • G.R. No. L-17295 July 30, 1962 - ANG PUE & COMPANY, ET AL. v. SECRETARY OF COMMERCE AND INDUSTRY

  • G.R. No. L-17508 July 30, 1962 - ROMEO ALMODIEL v. RAMON BLANCO, ET, AL.

  • G.R. No. L-17735 July 30, 1962 - CONRADO VICTORINO, ET AL. v. PRIMITIVO ESPIRITU

  • G.R. No. L-18496 July 30, 1962 - JOSE L. GONZALES v. SECRETARY OF EDUCATION, ET AL.

  • A.C. No. L-363 July 31, 1962 - IN RE: DIOSDADO Q. GUTIERREZ

  • G.R. No. L-10431 July 31, 1962 - COLLECTOR OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. LA TONDEÑA INC., ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-12687 July 31, 1962 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. EMITERIO VILLANUEVA, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-13717 31 July 31, 1962 - KOA GUI v. REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL.

  • G.R. No. L-14717 July 31, 1962 - TERESA REALTY, INC. v. CARMEN PREYSLER VDA. DE GARRIZ

  • G.R. No. L-14735 July 31, 1962 - LAO TECK SING v. REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL.

  • G.R. No. L-14753 July 31, 1962 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. CUSTODIO REGAL, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-14986 July 31, 1962 - CORNELIO AMARO, ET AL. v. AMBROCIO SUMANGUIT

  • G.R. No. L-14990 July 31, 1962 - FLORENCIA PICCIO VDA. DE YUSAY, ET AL. v. LILIA POLI YUSAY-GONZALES

  • G.R. No. L-15241 July 31, 1962 - SOLEDAD TAN v. CARLOS DIMAYUGA, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-15749 July 31, 1962 - JOSEPHINE COTTON, ET AL. v. EUGENIO S. BALTAO

  • G.R. No. L-15498 July 31, 1962 - LUCAS ROQUE, ET AL. v. SAN MIGUEL BREWERY, INC.

  • G.R. No. L-16050 July 31, 1962 - MANUEL GRIÑEN v. FILEMON R. CONSOLACION, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-16306 July 31, 1962 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. FAUSTO CARLOS

  • G.R. No. L-16917 July 31, 1962 - PLARIDEL SOTTO v. QUINTILLANA SAMSON

  • G.R. No. L-16946 July 31, 1962 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. GUILLERMO I. VENTURA

  • G.R. No. L-16968 July 31, 1962 - PHILIPPINE NATIONAL BANK v. CONCEPCION MINING COMPANY, INC., ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-17083 July 31, 1962 - TEODORICA REINARES v. JOSE ARRASTIA, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-17165 July 31, 1962 - EMMA R. GENIZA, ET AL. v. HENRY SY, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-17175 July 31, 1962 - RICARDO M. GUTIERREZ v. MILAGROS BARRETO-DATU

  • G.R. No. L-17229 July 31, 1962 - TOMAS TY TION, ET AL. v. MARSMAN & COMPANY, INC., ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-17283 July 31, 1962 - ILOILO DOCK & ENGINEERING CO. v. WORKMEN’S COMPENSATION COMMISSION, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-17366 July 31, 1962 - ALFREDO FRIAS, ET AL. v. SANTIAGO ESQUIVEL, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-17427 July 31, 1962 - RODRIGO ACOSTA v. PEOPLE OF THE PHIL.

  • G.R. No. L-17441 July 31, 1962 - WELGO DICHOSO, ET AL. v. LAURA ROXAS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-17483 July 31, 1962 - JOSE AGBULOS v. JOSE C. ALBERTO

  • G.R. No. L-17529 July 31, 1962 - JOSE V. NERI v. LIBRADO C. LIM

  • G.R. Nos. L-17608-09 July 31, 1962 - VICTORIANA SAGUCIO v. ADRIANO BULOS

  • G.R. No. L-17683 July 31, 1962 - WILLIAM C. PFLEIDER v. C.N. HODGES

  • G.R. No. L-17716 July 31, 1962 - LUNETA MOTOR COMPANY v. A. D. SANTOS, INC., ET AL.

  • G.R. Nos. L-18099 and L-18136 July 31, 1962 - MARIANO CORPUZ v. BENJAMIN PADILLA

  • G.R. No. L-18175 July 31, 1962 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. SEBASTIAN LARGO

  • G.R. No. L-18412 July 31, 1962 - JOSE SANTOS v. CECILlA LOPEZ VDA. DE CERDENOLA, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-18733 July 31, 1962 - FELIPE B. PAREJA v. AMADOR E. GOMEZ, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-18814 July 31, 1962 - ANACLETO P. NAVARRO v. DIRECTOR OF LANDS

  • G.R. No. L-19022 July 31, 1962 - BENJAMIN P. PALOMIQUE v. PERFECTO R. PALACIO, ETC., ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-19440 July 31, 1962 - CESAR CLIMACO, ET AL. v. HIGINIO B. MACADAEG, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-19597 July 31, 1962 - CESAR CLIMACO, ET AL. v. MANUEL P. BARCELONA, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-14129 July 31, 1962 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. GUILLERMO MANANTAN

  • G.R. No. L-15858 July 31, 1962 - DY LAM GO v. REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL.