Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence


Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence > Year 1962 > November 1962 Decisions > G.R. No. L-17305 November 28, 1962 - DOMINADOR DANAN, ET AL. v. A. H. ASPILLERA, ET AL. :




PHILIPPINE SUPREME COURT DECISIONS

EN BANC

[G.R. No. L-17305. November 28, 1962.]

DOMINADOR DANAN and ADORACION FERNANDEZ, Petitioners, v. HON. A. H. ASPILLERA and HON. ALEJANDRO A. GALANG, Commissioners of PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION and CORTISAN & COMPANY, INC., Respondents.

Emiliano V. Malit, for Petitioners.

Gonzalo G. Albay and Pablo O. Ysip for respondent Cortisan & Company, Inc.


SYLLABUS


1. PUBLIC SERVICE; COMMISSION; APPEAL FROM DECISION AND ORDER; TIME WITHIN WHICH TO FILE PETITION FOR REVIEW. — A petition for review of the order of the Public Service Commission filed with the Supreme Court thirty-two (32) days after the petitioner received a copy of the order, denying his motion for reconsideration and reopening, should be denied for having been filed beyond the reglementary period, which is thirty (30) days.

2. ID.; ID.; Ex Parte REVOCATION CERTIFICATES ILLEGAL. — The practice of the Public Service Commission of revoking certificates without giving the operator previous notice and opportunity to explain his side, violates the due process clause of the Constitution, the express provisions of section 16 (n) of the Public Service Act, and the doctrines of the Supreme Court (Bohol Land Trans. v. Jureidini, 53 Phil., 560; Pangasinan Trans, v. Halili, 95 Phil., 694; Collector v. Buan, G. R. No. L-11438, 31 July 1958).


D E C I S I O N


REYES, J.B.J., J.:


Petitioner spouses were holders of a certificate of public convenience for the installation, maintenance, and operation of a 4- ton ice plant in Orion, Bataan, issued to them by the Public Service Commission in 1958, which ice plant was acquired by purchase from third persons.

However, for abandonment or non-operation, the said certificate was cancelled and revoked on 2 February 1960, in an order in Case No. 107481, quoted hereunder, to wit:jgc:chanrobles.com.ph

"It appearing from the report, dated February 1, 1960, of the engineer of this Commission who inspected applicants’ ice plant in the municipality of Orion, Bataan, on January 29, 1960, that applicants stopped the operation of their ice plant since October 1956, and have not resumed operation of the plant up to the time of inspection, so that there has been abandonment of service for almost three (3) years, it is ordered that the certificate of public convenience for the installation, maintenance, and operation of a 4-ton ice plant in Orion, Bataan, issued to applicants by virtue of the decision rendered in this case on January 17, 1958, be, as it is hereby, CANCELLED and REVOKED for abandonment of service."cralaw virtua1aw library

Two days thereafter, or on 4 February 1960, the Commission, in Case No. 129277, granted to respondent Cortisan & Co., Inc., a certificate of public convenience to install and operate a 10-ton ice plant in the same municipality of Orion, Bataan, after trial and with due notice to herein petitioners. The latter failed to appear during the hearing on 4 February 1960 due to an alleged accident they met on their way to Manila. In this connection, petitioners’ motion for reconsideration was denied on 12 February 1960, for which reason the permit granted to Cortisan & Co., Inc., remained in full force and effect.

Again petitioners filed a joint motion (1) for reconsideration of the aforequoted order dated 2 February 1960 and (2) for the reopening of Case No. 129277, which motion was set for formal hearing on 29 March 1960. Counsels for both parties appeared, and the motion was heard.

Thereafter, the petitioners’ joint motion for the reconsideration of the Commissioner’s order dated 2 February 1960, in Case No. 107481, as well as their motion for the reopening of Case 129277, were both denied in received by petitioners on 21 July 1960.

The instant "Petition For Review", docketed as G. R. No. L-17305, was filed before this Tribunal at 11:07 a. m. on 22 August 1960 or thirty-two (32) days after petitioners admittedly received a copy of the said order denying their joint motion for reconsideration and reopening previously adverted to. Section 36 of Commonwealth Act No. 146, which reorganized the Public Service Commission, provides:jgc:chanrobles.com.ph

"SEC. 36. Any order, ruling or decision of the Commission may be reviewed on the application of any person or public service affected thereby, by certiorari in appropriate cases, or by petition, to be known as Petition for Review, which shall be filed within thirty days from the notification of such order, ruling, or decision or, in case a petition for the reconsideration of such order, ruling, or decision is filed in accordance with the preceding section and the same is denied, it shall be filed within fifteen days after notice of the order denying reconsideration. Said petition shall be placed on file in the office of the Clerk of the Supreme Court who shall furnish copies thereof to the Secretary of the Commission and other parties interested." (Emphasis supplied)

Section 1, Rule 43, of the Rules of Court states:jgc:chanrobles.com.ph

"SEC. 1. Petition for Review. — Within thirty (30) days from notice of an order or decision issued by the Public Service Commission . . . any party aggrieved thereby may file, in the Supreme Court, a written petition for the review of such order or decision."cralaw virtua1aw library

It goes without saying that both the orders of the Public Service Commission, dated 2 February 1960, cancelling and revoking the certificate of public convenience of herein petitioners to operate a 4-ton ice plant and the subsequent certificate of public convenience granted to Cortisan & Company, Inc., in case No. 129277 of the Commission have already become final, irrevocable, and executory, inasmuch as the herein "Petition for Review", G. R. No. L-17305, was filed beyond the reglementary period.

This Court, however, can not help expressing its concern for the Commission’s ex parte revocation of Certificates without giving the operator previous notice and opportunity to explain their side. This practice violates the due process clause of the Constitution, the express provisions of section 16 (n) of the Public Services Act, and the doctrines of this Court (Bohol Land Trans. v. Jureidini, 53 Phil. 560; Pangasinan Trans. v. Halili 95 Phil. 694; Collector v. Buan, L- 11438, 31 July 1958). The Public Service Commission is an agency of the government, and should, at all times, maintain a due regard for the constitutional rights of parties litigant. Also, the Commissioners (who are not judges in the true sense) would do well to ponder the implications of Article 32, No. 6, of the New Civil Code on the individual responsibility of public officers and employees who impair a person’s right against deprivation of property without due process of law.

The petition for review is hereby denied for having been filed beyond the reglementary period, the orders complained of having thereby become final. Costs against petitioners.

Padilla, Bautista Angelo, Labrador, Concepcion, Barrera, Paredes, Dizon, Regala and Makalintal, JJ., concur.

Bengzon, C.J., took no part.




Back to Home | Back to Main




















chanrobles.com





ChanRobles On-Line Bar Review

ChanRobles Internet Bar Review : www.chanroblesbar.com

ChanRobles MCLE On-line

ChanRobles Lawnet Inc. - ChanRobles MCLE On-line : www.chanroblesmcleonline.com






November-1962 Jurisprudence                 

  • G.R. No. L-13342 November 28, 1962 - GO CHI GUN v. GO CHO, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-17305 November 28, 1962 - DOMINADOR DANAN, ET AL. v. A. H. ASPILLERA, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-17393 November 28, 1962 - ERNESTO PALMA, ET AL. v. JOSE MANDOCDOC, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-17748 November 28, 1962 - IN RE: MANUEL YU v. REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL.

  • G.R. No. L-17863 November 28, 1962 - MANUEL H. BARREDO, ET AL. v. COURT OF APPEALS ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-17918 November 28, 1962 - TE ENG LING v. REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL.

  • G.R. No. L-18270 November 28, 1962 - SAN PABLO OIL FACTORY, INC. and WER, ET AL. v. COURT OF INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-18708 November 28, 1962 - HACIENDA ESPERANZA, ET AL. v. COURT OF INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS, ET AL.

  • A.C. No. 289 November 29, 1962 - MERCEDES AGDOMA, ET AL. v. ISAIAS A. CELESTINO

  • G.R. No. L-11641 November 29, 1962 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. VIVENCIO CATLI

  • G.R. No. L-16218 November 29, 1962 - ANTONIA BICERRA, ET AL. v. TOMASA TENEZA, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-16491 November 29, 1962 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. SIMEON PAULIN, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-16916 November 29, 1962 - FRANCISCO Q. DUQUE, ET AL. v. AMADO S. SANTIAGO, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-16947 November 29, 1962 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. VIVENCIO DE ROXAS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-17054 November 29, 1962 - FRANCISCO LAO v. REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL.

  • G.R. No. L-17316 November 29, 1962 - UY CHIN HUA v. REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL.

  • G.R. No. L-17391 November 29, 1962 - IN RE: CHUNG HONG v. REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL.

  • G.R. No. L-17590 & L-17627 November 29, 1962 - PATRICIO MAGTIBAY v. FEDERICO C. ALIKPALA, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-17771 November 29, 1962 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. SERGIO OÑAS

  • G.R. No. L-18372 November 29, 1962 - DIRECTOR OF LANDS v. ESTEBAN ABAD

  • G.R. No. L-18397 November 29, 1962 - GERONIMO T. SUVA v. CECILIO CORPUZ, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-18400 November 29, 1962 - ALFREDO HILARIO v. MARCIANO D. BAUTISTA, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-18402 November 29, 1962 - CANDIDO BUENA v. ELVIRA SAPNAY, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-18418-19 November 29, 1962 - MINDANAO MOTOR LINE, INC., ET AL. v. COURT OF INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-18737 November 29, 1962 - FLORENCIO REDOBOS v. WORKMEN’S COMPENSATION COMMISSION, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-19183 November 29, 1962 - FILOMENA RAMIREZ, ET AL. v. ABUNDIO Z. ARRIETA, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-13525 November 30, 1962 - FAR EAST INTERNATIONAL IMPORT, ET AL. v. NANKAI KOGYO CO., LTD., ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-13728 November 30, 1962 - PHILIPPINE ACETYLENE CO. v. SILVERIO BLAQUERA

  • G.R. No. L-14329 November 30, 1962 - JOSE ARSENAL GO v. GO TUANA, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-14613 November 30, 1962 - PRICE STABILIZATION CORPORATION v. COURT OF INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-14789 November 30, 1962 - REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL. v. DEMETRIO MANJARES, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-15350 November 30, 1962 - MARIANO G. PINEDA, ET AL. v. GREGORIO T. LANTIN, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-15422 November 30, 1962 - NATIONAL DEVELOPMENT COMPANY v. COURT OF INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-15554 November 30, 1962 - IN RE: YU KIU TIAN v. REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL.

  • G.R. No. L-15659 November 30, 1962 - DE LA RAMA STEAMSHIP COMPANY, INC. v. NATIONAL DEVELOPMENT COMPANY

  • G.R. No. L-15882 November 30, 1962 - EULOGIA MINAY, ET AL. v. BARTOLOME BUENAVENTURA, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-16084 November 30, 1962 - JOHN O. YU v. MAXIMO DE LARA, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-16304 November 30, 1962 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. EMILIO DE LOS SANTOS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-16412 November 30, 1962 - ERNESTO A. BELEN v. CONRADO M. DE LEON

  • G.R. No. L-16568 November 30, 1962 - GREGORIO DE GUZMAN v. GUILLERMO E. SANTOS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-16772 November 30, 1962 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. JULIAN MONTON, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-17115 November 30, 1962 - GUILLERMO B. GUEVARRA v. PEDRO M. GIMENEZ, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-17152 November 30, 1962 - MINDANAO REALTY CORPORATION v. FILOMENO KINTANAR, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-17210 November 30, 1962 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. TEODORICO DACO, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-17414 November 30, 1962 - VICTORIAS MILLING CO., INC. v. AUDITOR GENERAL OF THE PHIL.

  • G.R. No. L-17430 November 30, 1962 - DOMINGO IMPERIAL, ET AL. v. MANILA TIMES PUBLISHING CO. INC., ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-17531 November 30, 1962 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. NORBERTO ROGALES

  • G.R. No. L-17778 November 30, 1962 - IN RE: JESUS L. CARMELO v. ARMANDO RAMOS

  • G.R. No. L-18442 November 30, 1962 - RIZAL CEMENT WORKERS UNION v. COURT OF INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-18565 November 30, 1962 - CHINESE COMMERCIAL PROPERTY COMPANY v. ESPERANZA P. MARTINEZ, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-18926 November 30, 1962 - ANASTACIO P. PANGONTAO v. FLORES M. ALUNAN, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-18942 November 30, 1962 - REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL. v. MAMBULAO LUMBER COMPANY, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-19356 November 30, 1962 - CONSUELO V. CALO v. CRISANTO ARAGON, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-19517 November 30, 1962 - CARIDAD CABARROGUIS v. LOURDES P. SAN DIEGO, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-19930-35 November 30, 1962 - ESTANISLAO ABAGA, ET AL. v. PASTOR L. DE GUZMAN, ET AL.