Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence


Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence > Year 1963 > April 1963 Decisions > G.R. No. L-15581 April 29, 1963 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. MOROS TANJI AMBRAN, ET AL. :




PHILIPPINE SUPREME COURT DECISIONS

EN BANC

[G.R. No. L-15581. April 29, 1963.]

THE PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. MOROS TANJI AMBRAN, ET AL., Defendants, MOROS SAHIBUL, ISMAEL, MUKBAND, HATIB AJAK and ARABANI, Defendants-Appellants.

Hector C. Suarez, S. Jose Martinez and Francisco T. Koh for defendants-appellants

Solicitor General for Plaintiff-Appellee.


SYLLABUS


1. EVIDENCE; CREDIBILITY; DEFENDANTS’ CLAIM THAT DEATH WAS CAUSED BY ONLY ONE OF THEM NEGATED BY EXISTENCE OF NINETEEN WOUNDS. — The existence of nineteen wounds on the nape, back, shoulder and other parts of the body of the deceased shows that he was attacked from all sides by many persons, and negates the defendants’ claim that the mortal wounds were inflicted by only one of them.

2. ID.; ID.; CLAIM THAT DECEASED WAS KILLED NEAR ONE OF DEFENDANTS’ HOUSE BELIED BY THE EVIDENCE. — If it was true, as claimed by one of the defendants, that he surprised the deceased abusing his wife in his house, and pursued him down the house, eventually killing him with a spear, the body of the deceased would have been somewhere near the defendant’s house, and not at the intersection of two roads, which was quite far from the said house.

3. ID.; ID.; WEIGHT OF POSITIVE IDENTIFICATION BY THREE WITNESSES WHO PERSONALLY KNEW THE ACCUSED. — All the defendants were identified by three witnesses as having participated in the killing, and it is not possible that all three would have made a mistake as to their identity considering that they and the accused were known to one another.


D E C I S I O N


LABRADOR, J.:


Appeal from a decision of the Court of First Instance of Basilan City, Hon. Gregorio D. Montejo, presiding, finding Moros Tanji Ambran, Sahibul, Ismael, Mukband, Hatib Ajak and Arabani guilty of the crime of murder, sentencing each and everyone of them to suffer the penalty of reclusion perpetua and jointly and severally to pay the heirs of the deceased Moro Mangao the amount of P6,000, and to pay the costs proportionately.

The evidence for the prosecution shows that at around seven o’clock in the morning of December 29, 1957 the deceased Moro Mangao, his brother Moro Balais, 15, and his cousin Moro Awali, also 15, left their house in Bohe-Canas, Lamitan, Basilan City, to go to work in their field. While on their way the accused defendants-appellants, Tanji Ambran, Sahibul, Ismael, Mukband, Hatib Ajak and Arabani and others, all of them numbering eleven, intercepted and attacked Moro Mangao. Moro Balais and Moro Awali walked ahead of Moro Mangao, who was about five fathoms behind them. Moro Balais declared that he heard the shout of his brother Mangao and as he turned around he saw that his brother Mangao was being pierced with a spear by the defendant Tanji Moro, while the other eleven attacked and hacked his brother on all sides. Balais and Awali, for fear of their lives, ran away because the attackers of Mangao pursued them. They were able to reach the house of one Apa where they stayed until the attackers of Mangao had gone away. When they came back they found the body of Mangao lying dead near the intersection of the Marang-Marang road and the Canas road.

The testimony of Moros Balais and Awali was corroborated in all respects by Parat Yakan who declared that that morning at about five o’clock, he left his residence in Marang-Marang bound for Tuburan to buy fish. He reached Tuburan around six o’clock in the morning and was able to buy the fish that he wanted. After buying the fish he did not stay long but went back. On his way home and upon reaching the intersection of the Marang-Marang road and the Canas road he noticed some fifteen meters away from said intersection and standing by the roadside the accused Tanji Moro, Asam, Sandangan, Hasim, Mukband, Sama, Ismael, Arabani, Hatib Ajak, and one whose name he did not know. Six of them were on one side of the road and six on the other. He stopped and hid himself at the corner of the road. After Mangao and his companions had passed the intersection of the two roads, the twelve persons on both sides of the road began attacking the three, namely, Mangao, Balais and Awali. It was about seven o’clock when this attack took place. Tanji was the one who started the attack by thrusting his spear at the stomach of Mangao, who was carrying a kris on his side in the scabbard and a scythe. After Tanji had started the attack hitting Mangao with his spear, the other eleven began hacking Mangao on all sides.

Parat explained the possible cause or reason for the attack. He declared that Tanji must have resented the fact that Parat searched for his lost carabao on the land of Tanji, with Mangao leading the way. Mangao and Parat were able to see the hoof prints of the lost carabao near the house of Tanji; Tanji got mad when they passed by his house looking for the lost carabao. Parat says that Tanji must have resented that because it was Mangao who had acted as a guide when Parat was looking for his lost carabao.

Tanji Moro admitted having killed Mangao but declared that he was alone when he killed Mangao; that he had surprised Mangao embracing or abusing his wife in his house early in the morning of the day in question, because of which he attacked Mangao with a spear, hit him on the face and later pursued him down the house as Mangao ran down. His wife Moro Apula corroborated his statement and declared that that morning of December 29, while she was alone in the house, Mangao came to the house and began embracing her with both hands while she was sitting down; that she called for help and her husband, who had just come from the well, came up without any arms, so he took his spear from the place where it was and hit Mangao with it, hitting him on the head; that they had a fight and they continued downstairs; that Tanji was able to kill Mangao and afterwards returned with a broken spear; that that same morning they went to the house of Imam Abdurajak to surrender; that Imam Abdurajak was sleeping when they arrived and when they disclosed to him that Tanji had killed Mangao, Abdurajak brought them to Tuburan and at Tuburan Hadji Yacub accompanied both of them to the police station at Lamitan.

The other defendants denied having participated in the killing and said that they were at different places buying fish or doing some other jobs.

There are various circumstances in the record, which are not disputed, which render the story of the defense incredible, and which tend to prove conclusively the truthfulness and certainty of the story given by the witnesses for the prosecution.

In the first place, the sanitary inspector who made a post-mortem examination of the body of the deceased Mangao found no less than nineteen wounds on the person of the latter in various parts of the body, on the face, on the shoulder, in the breast, on the stomach, at the nape, etc., as witness the following certificate, Exhibit "A" :jgc:chanrobles.com.ph

"1. Wound, stabbed, 1 inch long, upper eye lid, left.

2 Wound, stabbed, 3/4 inch long, upper eye lid, right.

3. Wound, incised, 1-1/2 inches long, face, right.

4. Wound, stabbed, 3/4 inch long, shoulder, right.

5. Wound, stabbed, 1-1/2 inches long, breast, right.

6. Wound, stabbed, 1 inch long, belly, right.

7. Wound, stabbed, 2 inches long, penetrating the abdominal cavity, left.

8. Wound, stabbed, 1-1/2 inches long, thru and thru, right hand.

9. Wound, incised, 5 inches long, nape.

10. Wound, incised, 4 inches long, nape.

11. Wound, stabbed, 1 inch long, back, left.

12. Wound, stabbed, 2 inches long, back, right.

13. Wound, stabbed, 2 inches long, back, right.

14. Wound, stabbed, 1 inch long, shoulder, right.

15. Wound, stabbed, 1 inch long, back, right.

16. Wound, stabbed, 2 inches long, back, right.

17. Wound, incised, 5 inches long, back left.

18. Wound, incised, 4 inches long, back, left.

19. Wound, incised, 3 inches long, back, left.

The cause of death of the above mentioned deceased was acute anemia, secondary hemorrhage, multiple wounds.

(Sgd.) LUVIMINO VALDEZ

Sanitary Inspector"

Note that the 7th wound penetrates the abdominal cavity, left. This corroborates the declarations of the witnesses for the prosecution that Mangao was speared in the stomach by Tanji Moro. If the fight was between Tanji and Mangao alone there would not have been so many wounds on the nape, at the back, on the shoulder, etc., of the deceased. The existence of these wounds in front and at the back, on the shoulder, etc., shows that Mangao was attacked from all sides by many persons — the fact testified to by the eyewitnesses Parat Yakan, Balais and Awali.

In the second place, the scene of the killing as brought out by the cross-examination made by counsel for the defense, is at the intersection of two roads. The place does not appear to be close to the house of Tanji Moro. If the declaration of Tanji Moro that he surprised Mangao in his house the body of Mangao would have been found somewhere near the house of Tanji Moro, which is not a fact. The place where the body was found according to Exhibit "1" is a hundred meters away from the house of Apa, thus corroborating the testimony of Moros Balais and Awali that upon being pursued by the attackers of Mangao they ran away to the house of Apa. The instruments found in the place, like the broken spear, the scythe (of Mangao), etc., also corroborate the story of the witnesses for the prosecution.

The appellants declared that some of them were at home resting, one declared that he was fishing until morning. It may be true that they had gone fishing or had gone to buy fish early in the morning, but these circumstances would not prevent them from being present at the place where Mangao was ambushed and killed which appears to be around a kilometer or more from the place where the fish is caught or bought or from the place where defendants resided. It is to be noted that not all of the twelve assailants of Mangao were present at the time of the trial. Those who were identified as present and who were convicted and found guilty by the court as having participated in the killing or ambush are Tanji Ambran, Sahibul, Ismael, Mukband, Hatib Ajak and Arabani. All these defendants, in addition to Tanji Moro were identified by the three witnesses for the prosecution. It is not possible that three persons would have made a mistake as to their identity considering that the witnesses and the accused appear to be known to each other. We therefore find, in view of the wounds and the arms found, as well as the testimony of the witnesses for the prosecution, who fully identified the appellants, that the latter had taken part in the assault on the person of the deceased Mangao.

This appeal concern the defendants other than Moro Tanji, who did not appeal from the decision. We affirm the finding of the court below that the accused had committed the crime of murder, all having conspired to attack and kill the deceased. Therefore everyone of them must be declared guilty of the crime committed. The crime is qualified by alevosia and aggravated by the circumstance of superior strength. Considering that the Solicitor General has recommended that the sentence imposed be affirmed, and considering further that the crime of physical injuries and homicide are not considered so grave a crime among the accused, who are moros, we believe that the sentence imposed is justified.

WHEREFORE, the decision appealed from is hereby affirmed, with costs against the defendants-appellants proportionately.

Bengzon, C.J., Padilla, Bautista Angelo, Concepcion, Reyes, J.B.L., Barrera, Paredes, Dizon, Regala and Makalintal, JJ., concur.




Back to Home | Back to Main




















chanrobles.com





ChanRobles On-Line Bar Review

ChanRobles Internet Bar Review : www.chanroblesbar.com

ChanRobles MCLE On-line

ChanRobles Lawnet Inc. - ChanRobles MCLE On-line : www.chanroblesmcleonline.com






April-1963 Jurisprudence                 

  • G.R. No. L-15699 April 22, 1963 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. PROCOPIO CADERAO, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-15807 April 22, 1963 - INES SANTOS, ET AL. v. MUNICIPAL GOVERNMENT OF CALOOCAN, RIZAL, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-16357 April 22, 1963 - MAGDALENA ESTATE, INC., ET AL. v. FRANCISCO BANGILAN, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-17324 April 22, 1963 - REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL. v. CLASICO TAJANLAÑGIT

  • G.R. No. L-17610 April 22, 1963 - JESUS R. FRANCO, ET AL. v. MONTE DE PIEDAD AND SAVINGS BANK

  • G.R. No. L-17738 April 22, 1963 - LUPO L. DIÑOSO v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-18080 April 22, 1963 - TAN KIM KEE v. COURT OF TAX APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-18198 April 22, 1963 - LUZ BARRANTA v. INTERNATIONAL HARVESTER COMPANY OF THE PHILIPPINES

  • G.R. No. L-18610 April 22, 1963 - ANGEL BERMUDEZ, ET AL. v. MARGARITA FERNANDO

  • G.R. No. L-14853 April 23, 1963 - SANTIAGO LOPEZ, ET AL. v. JUAN MAGALLANES

  • G.R. No. L-15808 April 23, 1963 - FAUSTA AGCANAS, ET AL. v. BRUNO MERCADO, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-17467 April 23, 1963 - NATIONAL DEVELOPMENT COMPANY v. JOSE YULO TOBIAS

  • G.R. No. L-17840 April 23, 1963 - MARIA ELENA ARAULLO v. MONTE DE PIEDAD SAVINGS BANK, ET AL.

  • G.R. Nos. L-17880 and L-17881 April 23, 1963 - MALAYA WORKERS UNION, ET AL. v. COURT OF INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-17908 April 23, 1963 - FLORENCIO MORENO v. HIGINIO MACADAEG

  • G.R. No. L-18206 April 23, 1963 - CIRIACO NOBEL v. VICENTE CABIJE, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-18263 April 23, 1963 - APOLINARIO DACANAY, ET AL. v. JAVIER PABALAN, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-18371 April 23, 1963 - FIL-HISPANO LABOR UNION, ET AL. v. AGUSTIN P. MONTESA, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-18587 April 23, 1963 - APOLINARIO VALERIO v. SECRETARY OF AGRICULTURE & NATURAL RESOURCES, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-18810 April 23, 1963 - MD TRANSIT & TAXI CO., INC., ET AL. v. BIENVENIDO DE GUZMAN, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-18848 April 23, 1963 - ACOJE WORKERS’ UNION v. NATIONAL MINES AND ALLIED WORKERS’ UNION, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-18957 April 23, 1963 - VILLA-REY TRANSIT, INC. v. ELOY B. BELLO, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-20522 April 23, 1963 - APOLONIO GONZAGA v. CONRADO D. SENO

  • G.R. No. L-16998 April 24, 1963 - DANIEL ROMERO, ET AL. v. PALAWAN MANGANESE MINE, INC., ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-17820 April 24, 1963 - LAND SETTLEMENT AND DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION v. GARCIA PLANTATION CO., INC.

  • G.R. No. L-18969 April 24, 1963 - KAPISANAN NG MGA MANGGAGAWA SA MANILA RAILROAD CO., ET AL. v. COURT OF INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS

  • A.C. No. 266 April 27, 1963 - PAZ ARELLANO TOLEDO v. JESUS B. TOLEDO

  • G.R. No. L-15731 April 27, 1963 - TAYTAY METHODIST COMMUNITY CHURCH, INC. v. ELADIO M. REYES, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-17501 April 27, 1963 - MEAD JOHNSON & COMPANY v. N. V. J. VAN DORP, LTD., ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-18117 April 27, 1963 - ROMAN GUERRERO v. JUAN AGUSTIN ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-18258 April 27, 1963 - GUILLERMO COMEDA v. E. Q. CAJILOG, ETC., ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-18401 April 27, 1963 - PERFECTO JABALDE v. PHILIPPINE NATIONAL BANK

  • G.R. No. L-18513 April 27, 1963 - SY HA, ET AL. v. EMILIO L. GALANG

  • G.R. No. L-18563 April 27, 1963 - RADIOWEALTH, INC. v. JOSE LAVIN, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-18815 April 27, 1963 - J. M. TUASON & CO., INC. v. FEDERICO CADAMPOG

  • G.R. No. L-19343 April 27, 1963 - CRISPULO D. BELMI, ET AL. v. COURT OF AGRARIAN RELATIONS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-12320 April 29, 1963 - VICENTA CORPUS, ET AL. v. JOSE A. V. CORPUS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-15581 April 29, 1963 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. MOROS TANJI AMBRAN, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-15927 April 29, 1963 - VICENTE MARTELINO v. MAXIMO ESTRELLA

  • G.R. No. L-16924 April 29, 1963 - ANTONIA A. YEE v. DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC SCHOOL

  • G.R. No. L-17361 April 29, 1963 - FRANKLIN BAKER COMPANY OF THE PHILIPPINES v. SOCIAL SECURITY SYSTEM

  • G.R. No. L-17846 April 29, 1963 - EDUARDA DUELLOME v. BONIFACIO GOTICO, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-18716 April 29, 1963 - CLEMENTE SUMCAD v. COURT OF INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-18835 April 29, 1963 - GASPAR DUMLAO v. MARCELO T. DOMINGO

  • G.R. No. L-19019 April 29, 1963 - MALAN BROTHERS WATCHMAN AGENCY v. MAGDALENO CONANAN, ET AL.

  • A.C. No. 376 April 30, 1963 - JOSEFINA ROYONG v. ARISTON OBLENA

  • G.R. No. L-10963 April 30, 1963 - COLLECTOR OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. AMERICAN RUBBER COMPANY, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-13739 April 30, 1963 - COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. CARLOS MORAN SISON, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-14264 April 30, 1963 - RAYMUNDO B. TAN, ET AL. v. MUNICIPALITY OF PAGBILAO, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-14302 April 30, 1963 - JOSE MARGATE v. JULIA RABACAL

  • G.R. No. L-14752 April 30, 1963 - FRANCISCO R. CARIÑO v. PEOPLE OF THE PHIL., ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-15639 April 30, 1963 - INDUSTRIAL COMMERCIAL AGRICULTURAL WORKERS ORGANIZATION v. JOSE S. BAUTISTA, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-15698 April 30, 1963 - IN RE: ALEJANDRO SOMOZA v. ALICIA S. BANOGAN, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-15876 April 30, 1963 - MANUEL R. SOLIVIO v. FRANCISCO ARELLANO

  • G.R. No. L-16307 April 30, 1963 - FEDERICA ABALLE v. FORTUNATO SANTIAGO

  • G.R. No. L-16428 April 30, 1963 - LEALDA ELECTRIC CO., INC. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-16620 April 30, 1963 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. ALEJANDRO BUMATAY, ET AL.

  • G.R. Nos. L-16688-90 April 30, 1963 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. PACITA MADRIGAL-GONZALES

  • G.R. No. L-16790 April 30, 1963 - URBANO MAGBOO, ET AL. v. DELFIN BERNARDO

  • G.R. No. L-16880 April 30, 1963 - LUNETA MOTOR COMPANY v. ANTONIO MENENDEZ, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-16922 April 30, 1963 - IN RE: ROSE C. ELLIS v. REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL.

  • G.R. No. L-17173 April 30, 1963 - REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL. v. THEODORE (TED) LEWIN

  • G.R. No. L-17431 April 30, 1963 - IN RE: REMEDIO SAN LUIS DE CASTRO v. REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL.

  • G.R. No. L-17447 April 30, 1963 - GONZALO PUYAT & SONS, INC. v. CITY OF MANILA, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-17527 April 30, 1963 - SUN BROTHERS APPLIANCES, INC. v. DAMASO P. PEREZ

  • G.R. No. L-17791 April 30, 1963 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. JOSE TAN

  • G.R. No. L-17813 April 30, 1963 - REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL. v. WORKMEN’S COMPENSATION COMMISSION

  • G.R. No. L-17916 April 30, 1963 - MAXIMO GOMEZ v. FOOKIEN TIMES COMPANY, INC.

  • G.R. No. L-17928 April 30, 1963 - SERVILLANO DE LA CRUZ, JR., ET AL. v. ASUNCION D. STA. MARIA

  • G.R. No. L-17938 April 30, 1963 - ESPERIDION TOLENTINO v. ADELA ONGSIAKO, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-17946 April 30, 1963 - REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL. v. ANTONIO PRIETO, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-18081 April 30, 1963 - SOCIAL SECURITY SYSTEM EMPLOYEES ASSOCIATION v. E. SORIANO, ETC., ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-18044 April 30, 1963 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. AMBROSIA VALLE, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-18174 April 30, 1963 - FELIX LACSON v. FELINA LOZADA ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-18220 April 30, 1963 - IN RE: ROBERT MCCULLOCH DICK v. HELEN C. DICK, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-18270 April 30, 1963 - SAN PABLO OIL FACTORY, INC., ET AL. v. COURT OF INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-18284 April 30, 1963 - IN RE: ANA ISABEL HENRIETTE ANTONIA CONCEPCION GEORGIANA v. REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL.

  • G.R. No. L-18332 April 30, 1963 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. ESTANISLAO M. IGNACIO, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-18481 April 30, 1963 - JOSE B. ESCUETA v. CITY MAYOR, ET AL.