Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence


Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence > Year 1963 > January 1963 Decisions > G.R. No. L-18178 January 31, 1963 - REGISTER OF DEEDS OF ILOILO v. C. N. HODGES:




PHILIPPINE SUPREME COURT DECISIONS

EN BANC

[G.R. No. L-18178. January 31, 1963.]

THE REGISTER OF DEEDS OF ILOILO, Petitioner-Appellee, v. C. N. HODGES, oppositor-appellant, FERMIN JALOVER, Intervenor-Appellee.

Leon P. Gellada for Oppositor-Appellant.

Romeo J. Hibionada for Intervenor-Appellee.

The Register of Deeds of Iloilo City for and in her own behalf as Petitioner-Appellee.


SYLLABUS


1. TORRENS REGISTRATION; JURISDICTION OF COURTS OF FIRST INSTANCE; PETITION FOR CANCELLATION OF ENTRIES IN CERTIFICATES OF TITLE; WHEN COURT CANNOT ACT IN ITS CAPACITY AS COURT OF LAND REGISTRATION. — A court of first instance cannot act in its capacity as a court of first instance cannot act in its capacity as a court of land registration on a petition for the cancellation of entries from a transfer certificate of title if there is an opposition to the petition which raises a legal issue that cannot be determined under Section 112 of Act 496.

2. REHABILITATION FINANCE CORPORATION; TRANSFER OF POWERS FROM AGRICULTURAL AND INDUSTRIAL BANK; TO WHAT TRANSITORY PROVISIONS OF SECTION 9, REPUBLIC ACT 85, REFER. — The transitory provisions of Section 9 of Republic Act 85 which refer to the transfer of the powers and duties formerly conferred upon the Agricultural and Industrial Bank to the Rehabilitation Finance Corporation, merely have reference to transactions contracted with the former, the latter having been charged merely with the duty of dealing with them as trustee until they are liquidated or terminated.


D E C I S I O N


BAUTISTA ANGELO, J.:


Fermin Jalover was the owner of Lot No. 986 of the Iloilo cadastre which is covered by Transfer Certificate of Title No. T-2125. On March 25, 1953, Jalover mortgaged the lot to the Rehabilitation Finance Corporation to guarantee a loan of P6,500.00, which was registered on the same date.

On May 31, 1957, the said lot, together with another of the same cadastre, was sold at public auction by the sheriff by virtue of a writ of execution issued in Civil Case No. 3316 in favor of C. N. Hodges as the highest bidder, the same sale having been repeated in connection with Civil Case No. 3520, with the result that the sheriff executed two separate certificates of sale in favor of Hodges covering the amounts adjudicated in said cases. These two certificates of sale were registered in the office of the register of deeds, having been annotated on the back of Transfer Certificate of Title No. T-2125 as entries Nos. 15102 and 15104, respectively.

On March 14, 1960, Jalover wrote a letter to the register of deeds requesting the cancellation of the aforesaid entries alleging that their annotation was null and void being contrary to Section 26 of Commonwealth Act 459. The register of deeds denied the request on the ground that he had no authority to cancel the registration without an order of the court, whereupon Jalover elevated the matter en consulta to the Land Registration Commissioner who in due time rendered decision directing the register of deeds to file a petition with the proper court of land registration to secure the cancellation requested pursuant to Section 112 of Act 496. And complying with this directive, the register of deeds filed on June 28, 1960 a petition with the Court of First Instance of Iloilo praying for the cancellation of entries Nos. 15102 and 15104 from Transfer Certificate of Title No. T-2125.

On July 26, 1960, C. N. Hodges, the purchaser of the lot in question, opposed the petition on the grounds, among others, (1) that the court has no jurisdiction to entertain the petition because it is beyond its limited jurisdiction as court of land registration, and (2) Fermin Jalover has no right to avail of Section 26, Commonwealth Act No. 459, because said Act refers only to loans obtained from the Agricultural and Industrial Bank and not from the Rehabilitation Finance Corporation.

After hearing the petition, as well as the opposition interposed thereto, together with the memoranda submitted by the parties, the court on September 10, 1960 issued an order assuming jurisdiction over the case and ordering the cancellation of the entries requested.

Oppositor Hodges interposed the present appeal.

While Section 112 of Act 496, among other things, authorizes a person in interest to ask the court for any erasure, alteration, or amendment of a certificate of title upon the ground that the registered interests of any description, whether vested, contingent, expectant or inchoate, have terminated and ceased, such relief can only be granted if there is unanimity between the parties, or there is no adverse claim or serious objection on the part of any party in interest; otherwise, the case becomes controversial and should be threshed out in an ordinary case or in the case where the incident properly belongs (Tangunan, Et. Al. v. Republic of the Philippines, G.R. No. L-5545, December 29, 1953; See also Government of the Philippine Islands v. Jalandoni, 44 O.G. p. 1837). Here, the petition is seriously opposed by C. N. Hodges who purchased the lot in question at a public auction sale carried out by the sheriff of Iloilo City and in whose favor the entries which petitioner now seeks to cancel have been made. And the basis of his objection is important for it raises the validity of the claim that the properties encumbered in favor of the Rehabilitation Finance Corporation enjoy the same privilege of exemption from subsequent attachment as those encumbered with the defunct Agricultural and Industrial Bank. This is an important legal issue that cannot be determined under Section 112 of Act 496. There is, therefore, merit in the contention that the court a quo cannot act on the petition under consideration in its capacity as court of land registration.

Even if we hold that the court a quo could act on the matter, still we say that its finding that the lot in question is exempt from any additional encumbrance in the same manner as any property mortgaged to the defunct Agricultural and Industrial Bank is untenable, it appearing that said lot was encumbered to guarantee the payment of a loan obtained from the Rehabilitation Finance Corporation. Being a security created to secure a loan not originally obtained from the Agricultural and Industrial Bank, the same does not enjoy the privilege of exemption from subsequent attachment as provided for in Section 26 of Act No. 459. 1 Republic Act No. 85, which creates the Rehabilitation Finance Corporation, successor to the Agricultural and Industrial Bank, does not contain a similar provision with regard to loans obtained from said Corporation. The transitory provisions of Section 9 of Republic Act 85 which refer to the transfer of the powers and duties formerly conferred upon the Agricultural and Industrial Bank to the Rehabilitation Finance Corporation merely have reference to transactions contracted with the former, the latter having been charged merely with the duty of dealing with them as trustee until they are liquidated or terminated. In fact, said section provides that ‘The Agricultural and Industrial Bank shall stand abolished on the date when the Corporation shall begin to operate."cralaw virtua1aw library

WHEREFORE, the order appealed from is reversed. No costs.

Bengzon, C.J., Padilla, Labrador, Concepcion, Barrera, Paredes, Dizon, Regala and Makalintal, JJ., concur.

Reyes, J.B.L., took no part.

Endnotes:



1. "Securities on loans granted by the Agricultural and Industrial Bank shall not be subject to attachment, nor can they be included and obligations of the debtor to the Agricultural and Industrial in the properties of insolvent persons or institution, unless all debts Bank have been previously paid, including accrued interest, collection expenses and other charges."




Back to Home | Back to Main




















chanrobles.com





ChanRobles On-Line Bar Review

ChanRobles Internet Bar Review : www.chanroblesbar.com

ChanRobles MCLE On-line

ChanRobles Lawnet Inc. - ChanRobles MCLE On-line : www.chanroblesmcleonline.com






January-1963 Jurisprudence                 

  • G.R. No. L-19823 January 12, 1963 - RUPERTO ADVINCULA, ET AL. v. COMMISSION ON APPOINTMENTS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-13873 January 31, 1963 - GENERAL INSURANCE and SURETY CORPORATION v. REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL., ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-14311 January 31, 1963 - MANILA SANITARIUM & HOSPITAL v. FAUSTO GABUCO, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-14653 January 31, 1963 - IN RE: RICARDO SANTIAGO v. COMMISSIONER OF IMMIGRATION

  • G.R. No. L-14676 January 31, 1963 - CANDIDA VILLALUZ, ET AL. v. JUAN NEME, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-14801 January 31, 1963 - FILOMENA SILVA v. DOMINGO M. CABAÑGON, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-15151 January 31, 1963 - EDMUNDO GRACELLA v. EL COLEGIO DEL HOSPICIO DE SAN JOSE, INC.

  • G.R. No. L-15467 January 31, 1963 - JESUS LANCITA, ET AL. v. GONZALO MAGBANUA, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-15484 January 31, 1963 - REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL. v. RICARDO RAMOS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-15656 January 31, 1963 - ASSOCIATED INSURANCE & SURETY COMPANY, INC. v. WELLINGTON CHUA, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-15754 January 31, 1963 - NORTH CAMARINES LUMBER COMPANY, INC. v. METROPOLITAN INSURANCE COMPANY

  • G.R. No. L-15948 January 31, 1963 - PEDRO P. RIVERA v. CARLOS P. MACLANG

  • G.R. No. L-16257 January 31, 1963 - CAPITOL SUBDIVISION, INC. v. PROVINCE OF NEGROS OCCIDENTAL

  • G.R. No. L-16396 January 31, 1963 - BASILISA JUSTIVA v. JESUS GUSTILO, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-16417 January 31, 1963 - P. J. KIENER CO., LTD. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE

  • G.R. No. L-16435 January 31, 1963 - DIOSDADO ESPINOSA v. NICASIO A. YATCO, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-16489 January 31, 1963 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. RAUL BASBANIO, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-16525 January 31, 1963 - JOSEPH REICH v. EDMUND SCHWESINGER, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-16749 January 31, 1963 - IN RE: EDWARD E. CHRISTENSEN v. HELEN CHRISTENSEN GARCIA

  • G.R. No. L-16827 January 31, 1963 - J. M. TUASON & CO., INC. v. JOSE AGUIRRE

  • G.R. No. L-16884 January 31, 1963 - NATIONAL MINES AND ALLIED WORKERS’ UNION v. MELQUIADES G. ILAO

  • G.R. No. L-17085 January 31, 1963 - LUZON BROKERAGE COMPANY v. LUZON LABOR UNION

  • G.R. No. L-17625 January 31, 1963 - INSULAR LUMBER COMPANY v. SOCIAL SECURITY SYSTEM

  • G.R. No. L-17804 January 31, 1963 - NATIONAL MARKETING CORPORATION, ET AL. v. COURT OF INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-17837 January 31, 1963 - ORIENTAL KAPOK INDUSTRIES v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE

  • G.R. No. L-17878 January 31, 1963 - AMERICAN STEAMSHIP AGENCIES, INC. v. COURT OF INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-18096 January 31, 1963 - MARIA ABON, ET AL. v. AMPARO E. PABLO, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-18129 January 31, 1963 - C. N. HODGES v. MUNICIPAL BOARD OF THE CITY OF ILOILO, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-18178 January 31, 1963 - REGISTER OF DEEDS OF ILOILO v. C. N. HODGES

  • G.R. No. L-18184 January 31, 1963 - GAUDENCIO VERA, ET AL. v. PEOPLE OF THE PHIL., ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-18240 January 31, 1963 - SOFRONIO C. QUIMSON, ET AL. v. PASTOR L. DE GUZMAN

  • G.R. No. L-18290 January 31, 1963 - CITY OF BACOLOD v. LEANDRO GRUET

  • G.R. No. L-18360 January 31, 1963 - TATALON BARRIO COUNCIL, ET AL. v. CHIEF ACCOUNTANT, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-18389 January 31, 1963 - MANILA RAILROAD COMPANY v. COURT OF INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-18480 January 31, 1963 - LEOPOLDO SALCEDO v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-18515 January 31, 1963 - GERONIMO E. CAPARAS v. DOMINGO C. GONZALES, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-18518 January 31, 1963 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. FEDERICO TAGARO

  • G.R. No. L-18601-2 January 31, 1963 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. LUALHATI S. MACANDOG

  • G.R. No. L-18639 January 31, 1963 - JAVIER SECURITY SPECIAL WATCHMAN AGENCY, ET AL. v. SHELL CRAFT & BUTTON CORPORATION

  • G.R. No. L-18692 January 31, 1963 - MANUEL B. RUIZ v. J. M. TUASON & CO., INC., ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-18704 January 31, 1963 - OCEANIC AIR PRODUCTS, INC. v. COURT OF INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-18742 January 31, 1963 - OFELIA DE GREARTE, ET AL. v. LONDON ASSURANCE

  • G.R. No. L-18746 January 31, 1963 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. FREDERICK G. WEBER, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-18879 January 31, 1963 - LOPE DAMASCO v. ABUNDIO Z. ARRIETA

  • G.R. No. L-18941 January 31, 1963 - GERTRUDES MATA, ET AL. v. RITA LEGARDA, INC.

  • G.R. No. L-18982 January 31, 1963 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. RUPERTO SORIA

  • G.R. No. L-19423 January 31, 1963 - PEOPLE’S SURETY AND INSURANCE COMPANY, INC. v. CRISANTO ARAGON