Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence


Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence > Year 1965 > July 1965 Decisions > G.R. No. L-17315 July 31, 1965 - OLYMPIA BALTAZAR v. SERGIO SERFINO:




PHILIPPINE SUPREME COURT DECISIONS

EN BANC

[G.R. No. L-17315. July 31, 1965.]

OLYMPIA BALTAZAR, in behalf of her minor son, ARMENIO SERFINO, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. SERGIO SERFINO, Defendant-Appellee.

Epifemio R. Tupas for plaintiffs-appellant.

Serafin M. Diego, for Defendant-Appellee.


SYLLABUS


1. SUPPORT; AMOUNT TO BE IN PROPORTION TO MEANS OF GIVER AND NEEDS OF RECIPIENT. — The amount of support, according to Article 296 of the Civil Code, shall be in proportion to the resources or means of the giver and to the needs of the recipients.

2. ID.; PAYMENT BEGINS FROM EXTRAJUDICIAL DEMANDS. — The obligation to give support shall be demandable from the time the person who has a right to receive the same needs it for maintenance, but it shall not be paid except from the date it is extrajudicially demanded.

3. ID.; ATTORNEY’S FEES RECOVERABLE. — Where the duty to support is admitted, but in spite of demands the duty is not complied with and the person to be supported has to resort to the court for the enforcement of his right, then the person obliged to give support must pay reasonable attorney’s fees. In actions for legal support, even in the absence of stipulation, attorney’s fees are recoverable.


D E C I S I O N


MAKALINTAL, J.:


Olympia Baltazar, in behalf of her minor son, Armenio Serfino, appeals from the decision of the Court of First Instance of Negros Occidental ordering Sergio Serfino to pay said minor the sum of P15.00 monthly as support from July 1960, when the said decision was rendered.

Armenio was born on December 19, 1943, the son of Olympia Baltazar, a widow, and Sergio Serfino, a married man. Appellants now allege (1) that the amount awarded should have been P50.00; (2) that it should be made payable from the time Armenio was born, except for the period beginning May 1957 to April 1959, during which period he was living with his father, and (3) that appellee should have been ordered to pay attorney’s fees in the sum of P1,000.00.

The amount of support, according to Article 296 of the Civil Code, shall be in proportion to the resources or means of the giver and to the needs of the recipient. The lower court found that appellee was earning P365.00 yearly from his rice mill and P720.00 from his ten-hectare parcel of land, the yearly produce of which was 120 cavans of palay, valued at P6.00 per cavan. The court thus concluded that his average annual income was P1,085.00 and used this as basis in computing the amount of support due to Armenio, taking into consideration that appellee was also supporting a wife and three legitimate children. In his answer, however, appellee admits that he has another source of income namely, a tailoring shop, which he says is not very profitable, although the evidence shows that in 1958 he realized P573.50 in gross receipts therefrom. It further appears that appellee has a house and lot in Kabankalan, Negros Occidental, and consequently does not have to pay rent for his family’s residence.

Upon the foregoing facts we believe that the amount of P15.00 awarded by the lower court should be increased to P25.00. As to when payment thereof should begin, the law says that the obligation to give support shall be demandable from the time the person who has a right to receive the same needs it for maintenance, but it shall not be paid except from the date it is extrajudicially demanded (Article 298, Civil Code). In this case payment should begin June 1959, for it was then that appellants made the extrajudicial demand on appellee.

Where the duty to support is admitted, but in spite of demands the duty is not complied with and the person to be supported has to resort to the court for the enforcement of his right, then the person obliged to give support must pay reasonable attorney’s fees (Mercado v. Ostrand, 37 Phil. 179; Fanlo de Peyer v. Peyer, 77 Phil. 366). In actions for legal support, even in the absence of stipulation, attorney’s fees are recoverable (par. 6 Article 2208, Civil Code). In our opinion the sum of P300.00 is a reasonable amount for this purpose.

The judgment appealed from is modified, and defendant-appellee is sentenced to pay Armenio Serfino the sum of P25.00 monthly from June 1959 and the sum of P300.00 as attorney’s fees, with costs.

Bengzon, C.J., Bautista Angelo, Reyes, J.B.L., Paredes, Dizon, Regala, Bengzon, J.P., and Zaldivar, JJ., concur.

Concepcion, J., took no part.

Barrera, J., is on leave.




Back to Home | Back to Main




















chanrobles.com





ChanRobles On-Line Bar Review

ChanRobles Internet Bar Review : www.chanroblesbar.com

ChanRobles MCLE On-line

ChanRobles Lawnet Inc. - ChanRobles MCLE On-line : www.chanroblesmcleonline.com






July-1965 Jurisprudence                 

  • G.R. No. L-16631 July 20, 1965 - DEV. BANK OF THE PHIL. v. MANUEL S. OZARRAGA

  • G.R. No. L-18172 July 20, 1965 - ROSA BUNGAY VDA. DE QUILLOSA, ET AL v. TARCILA SALAZAR

  • G.R. No. L-20125 July 20, 1965 - NIN BAY MINING CO. v. MUN. OF ROXAS, PROV. OF PALAWAN

  • G.R. No. L-16723 July 30, 1965 - CITY OF CEBU v. TEODORICO LEDESMA, ET AL

  • G.R. No. L-16933 July 30, 1965 - TALISAY-SILAY MILLING CO. INC. v. VICENTE G. BUNUAN, ETC., ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-17566 July 30, 1965 - TEOTIMO BILLONES, ET AL v. COURT OF INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS, ET AL

  • G.R. No. L-18001 July 30, 1965 - REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL. v. AMPARO NABLE, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-18150 July 30, 1965 - SUPERIOR BALDOZ v. SERAPIA PAPA, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-18770 July 30, 1965 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. EUGENIO PASILAN

  • G.R. Nos. L-19067-68 July 30, 1965 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. EDILBERTO DE LOS SANTOS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-19572 July 30, 1965 - DIONISIO B. GALLARDE v. CESAR S. MORAN, ET AL

  • G.R. No. L-19574 July 30, 1965 - DONATO M. ATEL v. EMILIO LUMONTAD, JR., ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-19783 July 30, 1965 - TECLA GARCIA v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL

  • G.R. No. L-19918 July 30, 1965 - VY TIAN v. REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL.

  • G.R. No. L-20080 July 30, 1965 - DIEGO BACORDO v. JACINTO ALCANTARA, ET AL

  • G.R. No. L-20749 July 30, 1965 - ROBERTO S. OCA, ET AL. v. LAURO MAIQUEZ

  • G.R. No. L-20751 July 30, 1965 - DOMINGO REBULLO v. NARCISO PALO, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-20838 July 30, 1965 - NATIONAL SHIPYARDS & STEEL CORP. v. COURT OF INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS, ET AL

  • G.R. No. L-20091 July 30, 1965 - PERPETUA ABUAN, ET AL v. EUSTAQUIO S. GARCIA, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-20230 July 30, 1965 - SHELL CO. OF THE PHIL., ET AL v. COMPANIA GENERAL DE TABACOS DE FILIPINAS, ET AL

  • G.R. No. L-20236 July 30, 1965 - PHILIPPINE NATIONAL BANK v. JOAQUIN BONDOC

  • G.R. No. L-20287 July 30, 1965 - CELESTINO TAN v. REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL.

  • G.R. No. L-20567 July 30, 1965 - PNB v. MANILA SURETY & FIDELITY CO., INC., ET AL

  • G.R. No. L-20862 July 30, 1965 - FREE EMPLOYEES & WORKERS ASSO. v. COURT OF INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS, ET AL

  • G.R. No. L-20876 July 30, 1965 - FRANCISCO JAMAGO, I.D. CHAN, ET AL v. ABUNDIO Z. ARRIETA, ET AL

  • G.R. No. L-21451 July 30, 1965 - DOMINADOR T. ALMEDA, ET AL v. CONCEPCION A. RUBIO, ET AL

  • G.R. No. L-21016 July 30, 1965 - BCI EMPLOYEES & WORKERS UNION v. PIO MARCOS, ET AL

  • G.R. No. L-21472 July 30, 1965 - DOLORES C. VDA. DE GIL v. AGUSTIN CANCIO

  • G.R. No. L-24224 July 30, 1965 - MALAYANG MANGGAGAWA SA ESSO, ET AL v. ESSO STANDARD EASTERN, INC., ET AL

  • G.R. No. L-24438 July 30, 1965 - ROSAURO PARAGAS v. FERNANDO A. CRUZ, ET AL

  • G.R. No. L-17315 July 31, 1965 - OLYMPIA BALTAZAR v. SERGIO SERFINO

  • G.R. No. L-18301 July 31, 1965 - ADRIANO ANTONIO v. BENJAMIN JALANDONI, ET AL

  • G.R. No. L-19399 July 31, 1965 - RUFINO COLOMA, ET AL v. ATANACIO COLOMA, ET AL

  • G.R. No. L-19865 July 31, 1965 - MARIA CARLA PIROVANO, ETC., ET AL. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE

  • G.R. No. L-19885 July 31, 1965 - PEDRO CRISOLOGO, ET AL v. ALFREDO L. DURAL

  • G.R. No. L-20796 July 31, 1965 - IMPERIAL INSURANCE, INC. v. PELAGIO B. SIMON

  • G.R. No. L-20808 July 31, 1965 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. BRAULIO DE VENECIA

  • G.R. No. L-23628 July 31, 1965 - FELICISIMA B. SALOMON v. JOSE M. MENDOZA, ET AL