Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence


Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence > Year 1965 > November 1965 Decisions > G.R. No. L-20819 November 29, 1965 - IN RE: GAN TSITUNG v. REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL.:




PHILIPPINE SUPREME COURT DECISIONS

EN BANC

[G.R. No. L-20819. November 29, 1965.]

IN THE MATTER OF THE PETITION OF GAN TSITUNG, TO BE ADMITTED A CITIZEN OF THE PHILIPPINES. GAN TSITUNG, Petitioner-Appellant, v. REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES, Oppositor-Appellee.

Sycip, Salazar, Luna, & Associates for Petitioner-Appellant.

Solicitor General for Oppositor-Appellee.


SYLLABUS


1. NATURALIZATION; NOTICE AND HEARING THEREOF ONCE A WEEK FOR THREE CONSECUTIVE WEEKS. — Non-compliance with the provisions of Section 9 of the Revised Naturalization Act, relative to the publication of the notice of the filing of the petition and of the hearing thereof once a week for three consecutive weeks in the Official Gazette affects the jurisdiction of the court. It constitutes a fatal defect, for it impairs the very root or foundation of the authority to decide the case, regardless of whether the one to blame therefor is the clerk of court or the petitioner or his counsel.

2. ID.; ID.; VALIDITY OF DECISION RENDERED BY THE LOWER COURT WITHOUT JURISDICTION. — If the lower court had no jurisdiction to hear the petition for naturalization, it follows necessarily that the decision rendered therein is null and void, and so are, accordingly, the oath of allegiance taken and the certificate of naturalization issued pursuant thereto.


D E C I S I O N


CONCEPCION, J.:


Appeal from an order of the Court of First Instance of Manila annulling a decision thereof and cancelling the certificate of naturalization issued pursuant thereto.

On December 24, 1954, the Court of First Instance of Manila rendered a decision granting the petition for naturalization as citizen of the Philippines, filed on November 14, 1953, by appellant Gan Tsitung. On the latter’s motion, he was, on December 26, 1956, allowed to and did take his oath of allegiance as citizen of the Philippines and the corresponding certificate of naturalization was issued to him. Subsequently, or on May 10, 1962, the Solicitor General filed a petition praying that said decision and certificate of naturalization be respectively annulled and cancelled, upon the ground that the notice of the filing of said petition and of the hearing thereof had been published in the Official Gazette only once, instead of once a week for three (3) consecutive weeks, in violation of Section 9 of the Revised Naturalization Law. After due hearing said court issued on October 15, 1962, the order complained of granting the relief sought by the Solicitor General. Hence the present appeal.

The only issue in this appeal is whether said violation of the Revised Naturalization Law had deprived the lower court of its jurisdiction to hear said application and, accordingly, nullified the decision granting the same. Appellant maintains the negative view, relying upon Barretto v. Republic, 87 Phil. 731 (Dec. 21, 1950), and Delgado v. Republic, G. R. No. L-2546 (Jan. 28, 1950). The aforesaid issue was, however, neither decided nor raised in the Delgado case. Moreover, the view adopted in the Barreto case was abandoned in Ong Son Cui v. Republic, 101 Phil. 649 (May 29, 1957), in which we explicitly held that "there being only one publication of said notice of hearing in this case in the Official Gazette, the same is clearly incomplete and, therefore, insufficient to confer jurisdiction to the court a quo to try the case and grant the petition." This doctrine was reiterated in Celestino Co y Quing Reyes v. Republic, 104 Phil. 889 (November 29, 1958), upon the ground that non-compliance with the provisions of Section 9 of the Revised Naturalization Act, relative to the publication of the aforesaid notice once a week for three (3) consecutive weeks —

". . . affects the jurisdiction of the court. It constitutes a fatal defect, for it impairs the very root or foundation of the authority to decide the case, regardless of whether the one to blame therefor is the clerk of court or the petitioner or his counsel. . . ."cralaw virtua1aw library

The same conclusion was reached in Ng Bui Kui v. Republic, 104 Phil. 957 (Dec. 27, 1958) and Tan Cona v. Republic, 107 Phil. 710 (April 27, 1960). In the case last cited we declared that publication of said notice twice in the Official Gazette was sufficient to confer upon the lower court "jurisdiction to hear and render judgment therein.’

It is urged, however, that the rule laid down in these cases cannot retroactively affect the decision rendered in favor of appellant herein on December 24, 1954, and the oath of allegiance taken by him and the certificate of naturalization to him issued on December 26, 1956, but, if the lower court had no jurisdiction to hear appellant’s petition for naturalization, it follows necessarily that said decision is null and void, and that so are, accordingly, the oath of allegiance taken and the certificate of naturalization issued pursuant thereto. Pomeroy v. Director of Prisons, L-11284-85 (February 24, 1960), cited by appellant is not in point, for that case specifically limited its effect to final judgment which are valid, although tainted with an error that "in no wise affected the jurisdiction of the court . . . to render it"

WHEREFORE, the order appealed from is hereby affirmed, with costs against the petitioner. It is so ordered.

Bengzon, C.J., Bautista Angelo, Reyes, J.B.L., Dizon, Regala, Makalintal, Bengzon, J.P., and Zaldivar, JJ., concur.

Barrera, J., is on leave.




Back to Home | Back to Main




















chanrobles.com





ChanRobles On-Line Bar Review

ChanRobles Internet Bar Review : www.chanroblesbar.com

ChanRobles MCLE On-line

ChanRobles Lawnet Inc. - ChanRobles MCLE On-line : www.chanroblesmcleonline.com






November-1965 Jurisprudence                 

  • G.R. No. L-22697 November 2, 1965 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. DONION TAN Y CUI @ DIONING

  • G.R. No. L-17159 November 23, 1965 - AFAG VETERAN CORPS, INC. v. MARIANO G. PINEDA

  • G.R. No. L-20199 November 23, 1965 - COSMOPOLITAN INSURANCE CO., INC. v. ANGEL B. REYES

  • G.R. No. L-20715 November 27, 1965 - HENRY TIONG, ET AL. v. REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL.

  • G.R. No. L-20910 November 27, 1965 - YAO LONG v. REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL.

  • G.R. No. L-21138 November 27, 1965 - IN RE: ROBERTO TING TONG v. REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL.

  • G.R. No. L-20915 November 27, 1965 - IN RE: TEOFILO LU v. REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL.

  • G.R. No. L-15939 November 29, 1965 - ANGELES UBALDE PUIG, ET AL. v. ESTELA MAGBANUA PEÑAFLORIDA, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-16905 November 29, 1965 - ROSARIO OLIVEROS, ET., AL. v. JOSE QUERUBIN

  • G.R. No. L-17027 November 29, 1965 - YU KIMTENG CONSTRUCTION CORP. v. MANILA RAILROAD CO.

  • G.R. No. L-17059 November 29, 1965 - PEDRO MANIQUE, ET AL. v. CEFERINO F. CAYCO, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-17160 November 29, 1965 - PHIL. PRODUCTS CO. v. PRIMATERIA SOCIETE ANONYME POUR

    LE COMMERCE EXTERIEUR: PRIMATERIA (PHIL.) INC.

  • G.R. No. L-17294 November 29, 1965 - CU BIE, ET., AL. v. COURT OF APPEALS

  • G.R. No. L-17312 November 29, 1965 - ARTURO R. TANCO, JR. v. PHILIPPINE GUARANTY CO.

  • G.R. No. L-17406 November 29, 1965 - FINLEY J. GIBBS, ET AL. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-17640 November 29, 1965 - VIRGINIA I. VDA. DE LIMJOCO v. DIRECTOR OF COMMERCE

  • G.R. No. L-17884 November 29, 1965 - ADOLFO GASPAR v. LEOPOLDO DORADO

  • G.R. No. L-18669 November 29, 1965 - IN RE: TY BIO GIAO v. REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL.

  • G.R. No. L-18673 November 29, 1965 - ALEX LO KIONG v. UNITED STATES LINES CO.

  • G.R. No. L-19120 November 29, 1965 - LA MALLORCA v. ARMANDO MERCADO

  • G.R. No. L-19193 November 29, 1965 - FERNANDO O. PALAROAN v. AURORA A. ANAYA, ET., AL.

  • G.R. No. L-19585 November 29, 1965 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. NAPOLEON C. ORTIZ

  • G.R. No. L-19671 November 29, 1965 - PASTOR B. TENCHAVEZ v. VICENTA F. ESCAÑO, ET., AL.

  • G.R. No. L-20160 November 29, 1965 - IN RE: GREGORIO GO v. REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL.

  • G.R. No. L-20281 November 29, 1965 - DOMINGO MALOGA v. VICENTE G. GELLA, ET., AL.

  • G.R. No. L-20342 November 29, 1965 - GOVERNMENT SERVICE INSURANCE SYSTEM v. MANILA RAILROAD COMPANY, ET., AL.

  • G.R. No. L-20643 November 29, 1965 - PEOPLE’S HOMESITE & HOUSING CORP. v. MARCIANO BAYLON, ET., AL.

  • G.R. No. L-20764 November 29, 1965 - SANTOS JUAT v. COURT OF INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS

  • G.R. No. L-20799 November 29, 1965 - IN RE: JOSE T. UY v. REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL.

  • G.R. No. L-20805 November 29, 1965 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. IGNACIO DESIDERIO

  • G.R. No. L-20819 November 29, 1965 - IN RE: GAN TSITUNG v. REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL.

  • G.R. No. L-20845 November 29, 1965 - MANILA RAILROAD CO. v. LADISLAO MANALANG

  • G.R. No. L-20850 November 29, 1965 - EDWARD J. NELL COMPANY v. PACIFIC FARMS, INC.

  • G.R. No. L-20912 November 29, 1965 - LI TONG PEK v. REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL.

  • G.R. No. L-20980 November 29, 1965 - PHIL. INTERNATIONAL SURETY CO. v. COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS

  • G.R. No. L-21017 November 29, 1965 - IN RE: SENECIO DY ONG v. REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL.

  • G.R. No. L-21192 November 29, 1965 - IN RE: JESUS YAP v. REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL.

  • G.R. No. L-21217 November 29, 1965 - SERREE INVESTMENT CO. v. COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS

  • G.R. No. L-21255 November 29, 1965 - PHILIPPINE NATIONAL BANK v. JAIME R. NUEVAS

  • G.R. No. L-21316 November 29, 1965 - CEFERINA V. DAVID v. REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL.

  • G.R. No. L-21447 November 29, 1965 - JOSE REYES, ET., AL. v. FRANCISCO ARCA

  • G.R. No. L-21453 November 29, 1965 - AURORA VILLAMIN SY v. COMMISSIONER OF IMMIGRATION

  • G.R. No. L-21811 November 29, 1965 - SEE GUAN v. COMMISSIONER OF IMMIGRATION

  • G.R. No. L-22040 November 29, 1965 - YU CHI HAN v. REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL.

  • G.R. No. L-22712 November 29, 1965 - CANDIDO UY alias RICARDO UY v. REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL.

  • G.R. No. L-22778 November 29, 1965 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. TEOFILO B. BUSLON

  • G.R. No. L-24962 November 29, 1965 - VICE MAYOR ANTONIO C. JARO v. ROSARIO P. ISIDERIO, ET., AL.