Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence


Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence > Year 1966 > August 1966 Decisions > G.R. No. L-21885 August 3, 1966 GOVERNMENT OF THE PHIL. v. BONIFACIO ABIN, ET AL.:




PHILIPPINE SUPREME COURT DECISIONS

EN BANC

[G.R. No. L-21885. August 3, 1966.]

THE GOVERNMENT OF THE PHILIPPINES, represented by the Director of Lands, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. BONIFACIO ABIN, ET AL., claimants, ANTONIO P. CHUA, Movant-Appellant.

Jose Facundo for Movant-Appellant.

Solicitor General Arturo A. Alafriz, Assistant Solicitor General F. R. Rosete and Solicitor D. L. Quiroz for Plaintiff-Appellee.


D E C I S I O N


BENGZON, J.P., J.:


In Cadastral Case No. 1, G.L.R.O. Record No. 866, Sorsogon, entitled "Government of the Philippines versus Bonifacio Abin, Et. Al.", Apolinaria Tabuena appeared as claimant of Lot No. 3276. During the pendency of the cadastral proceedings she died. Settlement of her estate was brought under Special Proceedings No. 2259 in the Court of First Instance of Sorsogon. Enrique Tabuena, a son, was appointed special administrator. On April 26, 1928 the Cadastral Court awarded Lot No. 3276 to her heirs subject to the claims of creditors mentioned in its decision.

On September 21, 1928 Enrique Tabuena, as special administrator, sold Lot No. 3276 to the Sorsogon Chinese School for P2,281.60 in order to pay the claims of decedent’s creditors. Said sum was deposited with the clerk of the probate court. The sale was approved by the probate court on October 27, 1928 which ordered the proceeds to be applied to the debts of the deceased Apolinaria Tabuena and the remainder to be distributed among the heirs.

On August 7, 1934 — before the Philippine Constitution took effect — the Sorsogon Chinese School sold Lot No. 3276 to Chua Mang, a Chinese national. On March 27, 1962 Chua Mang sold it to Antonio P. Chua, a Filipino citizen.

On January 7, 1963 Antonio P. Chua filed with the Cadastral Court a motion praying for an order to issue the final decree of registration of Lot No. 3276 in the name of the original applicant, the late Apolinaria Tabuena, subject to his rights as successor-in- interest. No notice of this motion was sent to the heirs of said Apolinaria Tabuena.

On January 19, 1963 the Cadastral Court denied Chua’s motion on the ground that on July 16, 1928 it had ordered the issuance of the decree of title. On February 25, 1963 movant Antonio P. Chua filed a motion for reconsideration through the Land Registration Commission. Accordingly, the Land Registration Commissioner manifested on March 14, 1963 that no final decree has yet been issued, hence the decision of April 26, 1928 has not become final and may therefore still be amended.

No notice of the motion for reconsideration was given to the heirs of the late Apolinaria Tabuena.

On March 20, 1963 the Cadastral Court denied the motion for reconsideration on the ground that Antonio P. Chua has absolutely no right to be substituted since he did not derive his title from the awardees, the heirs of Apolinaria Tabuena. Chua filed another motion for reconsideration which was again denied for lack of merit. Antonio P. Chua, thereupon appealed to this Court on questions purely of law.

The records show that the heirs of the late Apolinaria Tabuena, namely, Eufracio Mendiola, the surviving spouse, Enrique, Josefa, Clemente, Paz, Pedro, Visitacion and Roque, all surnamed Tabuena, her children, to whom Lot No. 3276 was awarded by the Cadastral Court, were not given notice of Antonio P. Chua’s motion and the subsequent motions for reconsideration. Consequently, the hearing on the motion of Antonio P. Chua and his motions for reconsideration was held in the absence of said heirs. At this stage therefore we deem it more in consonance with practical justice and the requirements of the due process that the case be not decided upon the merits, until opportunity to be heard is given to the heirs in whose names the land was adjudicated.

In Carpio v. Carpio, 94 Phil. 133, involving a similar petition to change the adjudication in a cadastral case, where the hearing on a motion for reconsideration, touching upon the merits of the petition, was held in the absence of the heir of a deceased adjudicatee, we directed the trial court to hold a regular and formal hearing of the case with notice to both parties. The same procedure should be followed in this case where the persons who had been declared owners of the property did not have notice of the proceedings below in question herein.

Wherefore, the appealed order is set aside and the court a quo is hereby ordered to hold a regular and formal hearing of the motion of Antonio P. Chua filed on January 7, 1963, with notice to the heirs of Apolinaria Tabuena, and thereafter to resolve said motion. No costs. So ordered.

Concepcion, C.J., J.B.L. Reyes, Barrera, Dizon, Regala, Makalintal, Zaldivar, Sanchez and Castro, JJ., concur.




Back to Home | Back to Main




















chanrobles.com





ChanRobles On-Line Bar Review

ChanRobles Internet Bar Review : www.chanroblesbar.com

ChanRobles MCLE On-line

ChanRobles Lawnet Inc. - ChanRobles MCLE On-line : www.chanroblesmcleonline.com






August-1966 Jurisprudence                 

  • G.R. No. 15905 August 3, 1966 NICANOR T. JIMENEZ, ET AL. v. BARTOLOME CABANGBANG

  • G.R. No. L-17838 August 3, 1966 NASIPIT LABOR UNION v. COURT OF INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-21885 August 3, 1966 GOVERNMENT OF THE PHIL. v. BONIFACIO ABIN, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-14044 August 5, 1966 PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. BENEDICTO BALILI, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-20938 August 9, 1966 NEW HAMPSHIRE FIRE INSURANCE CO. v. MANILA PORT SERVICE, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-22534 August 9, 1966 INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA v. MARITIME COMPANY OF THE PHILIPPINES, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-13896 August 10, 1966 IN RE: ERNESTO TING v. REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL.

  • G.R. No. L-16488 August 12, 1966 PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. JUAN RAQUINIO

  • G.R. No. L-19520 August 12, 1966 FELIPE NACORDA, ET AL. v. NICASIO YATCO, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-24672 August 12, 1966 REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL. v. MODESTO R. RAMOLETE, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-25660 August 12, 1966 LEOPOLDO VENCILAO, ET AL. v. TEODORO VAÑO, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-11077 August 23, 1966 PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. LI BUN JUAN, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-20020 August 23, 1966 TAN TE BUNTIONG v. REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL.

  • G.R. No. L-17243 August 23, 1966 PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. IGNACIO VILLALBA

  • G.R. No. L-19832 August 23, 1966 IN RE: BERNARDO YAP v. REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL.

  • G.R. No. L-21768 August 23, 1966 BACHRACH TRANSPORTATION CO., INC., ET AL. v. RURAL TRANSIT EMPLOYEES ASSOCIATION, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-23286 August 23, 1966 QUERUBIN PERFECTO v. ALFREDO SAPICO, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-25635 August 23, 1966 JOSE C. ZULUETA, ET AL. v. CECILIA MUÑOZ, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-5796 August 29, 1966 PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. GUILLERMO CAPADOCIA, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-24439 August 29, 1966 HADJI ARSAD SALI v. BENJAMIN ABUBAKAR, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-18454 August 29, 1966 MARIANO CABILAO, ET AL. v. JUDGE OF THE CFI OF ZAMBOANGA, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-21230 August 29, 1966 GOLD STAR MINING CO., INC. v. SECRETARY OF AGRICULTURE AND NATURAL RESOURCES, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-21376 August 29, 1966 LUZ M. GIGARE v. COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS

  • G.R. No. L-21796 August 29, 1966 NATIONAL DEVELOPMENT COMPANY v. WORKMEN’S COMPENSATION COMMISSION, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-21287 August 31, 1966 ENRILE INTON v. JULIAN VILLANUEVA MATUTE

  • G.R. No. L-21930 August 31, 1966 AGAPITA PAJARILLO, ET AL. v. SOCIAL SECURITY SYSTEM

  • G.R. No. L-16759 August 31, 1966 RAFAEL MORALES v. COLLECTOR OF INTERNAL REVENUE

  • G.R. No. L-23635 August 31, 1966 TEODORO M. CASTRO v. RUFINO G. HECHANOVA, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-18726 August 31, 1966 THOMAS M. GONZALEZ v. DEMETRIO B. ENCARNACION, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-18961 August 31, 1966 ATLANTIC MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, ET AL. v. CEBU STEVEDORING CO., INC.

  • G.R. No. L-19376 August 31, 1966 TE ATTA UY VDA. DE CAJUCOM v. MANILA REMNANT CO., INC., ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-19833 August 31, 1966 IN RE: COSME GO TIAN AN v. REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL.

  • G.R. No. L-20809 August 31, 1966 IN RE: LIM ENG YU v. REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL.

  • G.R. No. L-20821 August 31, 1966 BEATRIZ M. VDA. DE CASTILLO, ET AL. v. BLANCA CASTILLO, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-21055 August 31, 1966 CALTEX (PHILIPPINES.) INC. v. MANILA PORT SERVICE, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-21223 August 31, 1966 PHILIPPINE BLOOMING MILLS CO., INC. v. SOCIAL SECURITY SYSTEM

  • G.R. No. L-21442 August 31, 1966 SALUD S. PAPA v. GERVACIO S. BANAAG

  • G.R. No. L-21512 August 31, 1966 PROSPERO SABIDO, ET AL. v. CARLOS CUSTODIO, ET AL.

  • G.R. Nos. L-21703-04 August 31, 1966 MATEO H. REYES, ET AL. v. MATEO RAVAL REYES

  • G.R. No. 21969 August 31, 1966 INDUSTRIAL TEXTILE MANUFACTURING COMPANY OF THE PHILIPPINES v. SOFIA REYES FLORZO, ET AL.

  • G.R. Nos. L-25994 and L-26004 to L-26046 August 31, 1966 BATANGAS LAGUNA TAYABAS BUS COMPANY v. PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-26376 August 31, 1966 PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. AURELIO BALISACAN