Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence


Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence > Year 1966 > December 1966 Decisions > G.R. No. L-21950 December 28, 1966 AMBROCIO DE LA CRUZ, ET AL. v. PRIMITIVA BERROYA, ET AL.:




PHILIPPINE SUPREME COURT DECISIONS

EN BANC

[G.R. No. L-21950. December 28, 1966.]

AMBROCIO DE LA CRUZ and PAULINA SIGURADO, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. PRIMITIVA BERROYA and ELISA MANALO, Defendants-Appellees.

A. Garcia, for Plaintiffs-Appellants.

Bernardo T. Dominguez for Defendants-Appellees.


SYLLABUS


1. CIVIL PROCEDURE; MOTION TO DISMISS; RELEASE, A GROUND FOR A MOTION TO DISMISS. — Appellants’ contention that the release of their claim for civil indemnity is not a ground for a motion to dismiss but should have been pleaded as a matter of defense is without merit because under section 1 (h) of Rule 16 of the Rules of Court, release of the claim sought to be enforced is a ground upon which a motion to dismiss may be based.

2. ID.; ID.; ID.; RELEASE OF THE PARTY PRIMARILY LIABLE HAS THE EFFECT OF RELEASING THOSE SUBSIDIARILY LIABLE. — Although the appellees were not expressly named in the public document entitled "Release of Claim", the release of the erring driver, who was the party primarily liable, necessarily means likewise the release of appellees who might be held subsidiarily liable for the civil indemnity.

3. ID.; ID.; ID.; COMPULSORY COUNTERCLAIM; RELEASE NOT IN THE NATURE OF A COMPULSORY COUNTERCLAIM. — Release of claim is not in the nature of a compulsory counterclaim but a matter of defense.


D E C I S I O N


DIZON, J.:


On June 17, 1963, appellants commenced Civil Case No. 54255 in the Court of First Instance of Manila to enforce the subsidiary civil liability under Article 103 of the Revised Penal Code of the herein appellees, Primitiva Berroya and Elisa Manalo, alleging that sometime on January 6, 1960, the latter’s jeepney, while running along Juan Luna St., Tondo, Manila, driven by Igmidio Senin, hit appellants’ child, resulting in his death; that Senin was charged in the Court of First Instance of Manila with the crime of homicide thru reckless imprudence (Criminal Case No. 50955) and, after due trial, was found guilty and sentenced to suffer the corresponding penalty of imprisonment and to indemnify appellants in the amount of P6,000.00, with subsidiary imprisonment in case of insolvency; that on appeal, the Court of Appeals, while modifying the penalty of imprisonment, affirmed the award of civil indemnity; that, after the decision had become final and executory, a writ of execution was issued against the driver for his civil liability but the same was returned unsatisfied.

Appellees filed a motion to dismiss the complaint on the following grounds: (1) That the claim or demand set forth therein had been released, as evidenced by the document thereto attached entitled "Release of Claim" executed by appellants on January 8, 1960, wherein it was stated that "for the sole consideration of Seven Hundred and Fifty Pesos (P750.00) Philippine currency the receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged, I/We Ambrocio de la Cruz and Paulina Sigurado . . . do hereby release and forever discharge Igmidio Senin, E.N.P. Berroya Trans. Inc. of and from all actions, claims, demands and rights of action whatsoever that now exist or may hereafter develop and particularly on account of all known, unknown, and unanticipated injuries, damages and/or losses arising out of and as a consequence of an accident that occurred on or about 8:30 P.M., January 6, 1960 . . ." ; and (2) that the cause of action did not accrue against them on the ground that the owner and operator of the jeepney concerned was E.N.P. Berroya Trans., Inc., appellees being merely officers of said corporation.

In their opposition to said motion, appellants alleged that, the release not having been set up during the hearing of the aforesaid criminal case, appellees were barred from raising the same in the present case, in accordance with Section 6 of Rule 10 of the Rules of Court on compulsory counterclaims. They also prayed to be allowed to amend their complaint by changing the surname of appellee herein Elisa Manalo to Elisa Nolasco.

Finding appellees’ motion meritorious, the court, on July 22, 1963, issued the appealed order of dismissal. Hence the present appeal.

Appellants now claim that the lower court erred in dismissing their complaint, firstly, because the alleged release of their claim is not a proper ground for a motion to dismiss but should have been pleaded as a matter of defense, and secondly, that said defense, if invoked in appellees’ answer, was already barred because it was not raised — as a compulsory counterclaim — in the criminal case filed against the driver Igmidio Senin.

We find both contentions to be without merit.

Under the provisions of Rule 16, Section 1, paragraph (h) of the Rules of Court, payment, release, waiver, etc. of the claim sought to be enforced is a ground upon which a motion to dismiss may be based. In the present case appellees relied upon release of the claim in their motion to dismiss to which they attached the written release of claim. It does not appear that appellants had ever put in issue, as required by the Rules, the genuineness of said public document according to whose terms appellants had completely considered themselves fully paid as far as their right to indemnity was concerned.

It is true that appellees were not expressly named in the abovementioned instrument, but it is clear that the release of the party primarily liable necessarily means likewise the release of those who might be held subsidiarily liable.

With respect to the second issue, we need only say that the release of the claim is not in the nature of a compulsory counterclaim but a matter of defense. Consequently, appellants’ contention that the release may not now be invoked by appellees because it is barred, the same not having been invoked as a compulsory counterclaim in the criminal case against the driver, is without merit.

Wherefore, the appealed order being in accordance with law, the same is hereby affirmed, with costs.

Concepcion, C.J., Reyes, J.B.L., Regala, Makalintal, Bengzon, J.P., Zaldivar, Sanchez and Castro, JJ., concur.




Back to Home | Back to Main




















chanrobles.com





ChanRobles On-Line Bar Review

ChanRobles Internet Bar Review : www.chanroblesbar.com

ChanRobles MCLE On-line

ChanRobles Lawnet Inc. - ChanRobles MCLE On-line : www.chanroblesmcleonline.com






December-1966 Jurisprudence                 

  • G.R. No. L-21168 December 16, 1966 BACHRACH TRANSPORTATION CO., INC. v. GAVINO CAMUNAYAN

  • G.R. No. L-14441 December 17, 1966 PEDRO R. PALTING v. SAN JOSE PETROLEUM INCORPORATED

  • G.R. No. L-21915 December 17, 1966 GEORGE W. LUFT COMPANY, INC. v. NGO GUAN, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-21803 December 17, 1966 BAY VIEW HOTEL, INC. v. MANILA HOTEL WORKERS’ UNION-PTGWO, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-21775 December 17, 1966 CO PEK, ET AL. v. MARTINIANO VIVO

  • G.R. No. L-19457 December 17, 1966 VICTORIO MERCADO, ET AL. v. FELIX R. DOMINGO

  • G.R. No. L-18411 December 17, 1966 MAGDALENA ESTATES, INC. v. ANTONIO A. RODRIGUEZ, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-16394 December 17, 1966 JOSE STA. ANA, JR., ET AL. v. ROSA HERNANDEZ

  • G.R. No. L-18328 December 17, 1966 DIOSDADA SABINO v. CONRADO CUBA

  • G.R. No. L-21763 December 17, 1966 MUNICIPALITY OF COMPOSTELA, CEBU v. NATIONAL WATERWORKS AND SEWERAGE AUTHORITY

  • G.R. No. L-19740 December 17, 1966 SEVERINO GAGOLA v. COURT OF AGRARIAN RELATIONS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-18630 December 17, 1966 APOLONIO TANJANCO v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-17392 December 17, 1966 JOSE SORIANO v. COMPAÑIA GENERAL DE TABACOS DE FILIPINAS

  • G.R. No. L-21335 December 17, 1966 ABOITIZ SHIPPING CORPORATION v. VIVENCIA ANDO PEPITO, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-25641 December 17, 1966 RAFAEL M. ABAYA v. ANTONIO J. VILLEGAS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-21601 December 17, 1966 NIELSON & COMPANY, INC. v. LEPANTO CONSOLIDATED MINING COMPANY

  • G.R. No. L-19879 December 17, 1966 CINEMA, STAGE & RADIO ENTERTAINMENT FREE WORKERS v. COURT OF INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-18089 December 17, 1966 VICTORINA ZABALLERO MILLAR v. RURAL BANK OF LUCENA, INC.

  • G.R. No. L-16379 December 17, 1966 PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. LAO WAN SING

  • G.R. No. L-18393 December 17, 1966 USAFFE VETERANS ASSOCIATION, INC. v. TREASURER OF THE PHILIPPINES, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-19797 December 17, 1966 MARCIANA VILLOCINO, ET AL. v. PEDRO DOYON, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-20011 December 17, 1966 PEDRO CABALAG, ETC., ET AL. v. ROXAS Y CIA., ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-17742 December 17, 1966 DON VICENTE NOBLE v. MARIA S. NOBLE

  • G.R. No. L-18159 December 17, 1966 CASINO ESPAÑOL DE MANILA v. COURT OF INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-18826 December 17, 1966 ANTONIO Y. MAYUGA v. CESAR. R. MARAVILLA

  • G.R. No. L-23139 December 17, 1966 MOBIL PHILIPPINES EXPLORATION, INC. v. CUSTOMS ARRASTRE SERVICE, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-17571 December 17, 1966 HOSPICIA ENCABO, ET AL. v. CEBU PORTLAND CEMENT COMPANY

  • G.R. No. L-22395 December 17, 1966 STATE BONDING INSURANCE COMPANY, INC. v. MANILA PORT SERVICE, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-22209 December 17, 1966 PHILIPPINES INTERNATIONAL SURETY CO., INC. v. COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS

  • G.R. No. L-25503 December 17, 1966 LEON DEL ROSARIO v. HON. BIENVENIDO CHINGCUANGCO

  • G.R. No. L-16745 December 17, 1966 AURORA CAMARA VDA. DE ZUBIRI v. WENCESLAO ZUBIRI, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-19548 December 22, 1966 NICEFORO S. AGATON v. PATRICIO PEREZ, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-26723 December 22, 1966 ARTHUR MEDlNA Y YUMUL v. MARCELO F. OROZCO, JR.

  • G.R. No. L-20330 December 22, 1966 ADOLFO RACAZA v. SUSANA REALTY INC.

  • G.R. No. L-19297 December 22, 1966 MARVEX COMMERCIAL CO. INC. v. PETRA HAWPIA & CO., ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-19173 December 27, 1966 ROSE DESAMITO v. TRINIDAD CASAS-CUYEGKENG

  • G.R. No. L-21278 December 27, 1966 FEATI UNIVERSITY v. JOSE S. BAUTISTA

  • G.R. No. L-21950 December 28, 1966 AMBROCIO DE LA CRUZ, ET AL. v. PRIMITIVA BERROYA, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-19460 December 28, 1966 ROQUE BAIRAN v. AGUSTIN TAN SIU LAY, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-20406 December 29, 1966 ENRIQUE R. YU KING v. CITY OF ZAMBOANGA

  • G.R. No. L-19945 December 29, 1966 NATIONAL MARKETING CORPORATION v. PRISCO WORKERS UNION, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-18210 December 29, 1966 LAURENTIO ARMENTIA v. ERLINDA PATRIARCA, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-18735 December 29, 1966 NARCISO DEL ROSARIO v. YATCO, ET AL.