Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence


Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence > Year 1966 > May 1966 Decisions > G.R. No. L-20318 May 19, 1966 JOSEPH SOGLOU v. REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL.:




PHILIPPINE SUPREME COURT DECISIONS

EN BANC

[G.R. No. L-20318. May 19, 1966.]

JOSEPH SOGLOU alias GO SIOK DU alias JOSEPH GO, Petitioner-Appellee, v. REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES, Oppositor-Appellant.

Jesus R. Gaboya for the petitioner.

Solicitor General Arturo A. Alafriz, 1st Asst. Solicitor General Esmeraldo Umali and Solicitor Raul I. Goco for the appellant.


SYLLABUS


1. NATURALIZATION; ALIAS; -UNAUTHORIZED USE OF ALIAS. — An alien who used alias names without court authority in violation of Commonwealth Act 142 is disqualified to become a Filipino Citizen. The fact that after a number of years he thought of filing a petition to do away with his alias names cannot serve to mitigate his situation for it may be safely concluded that he decided to do so merely in contemplation of his desire to file a petition for naturalization. The change of name cannot cure his previous improper behavior it appearing that for a long period of time he contumaciously and willfully violated an existing statute, and the absence of any prosecution under Commonwealth Act 142 cannot erase the fact that his previous behavior is not one that can be expected from a person who desires to become a Filipino citizen.

2. ID.; PROPER AND IRREPROACHABLE CONDUCT; INVOLVEMENT IN GAMBLING. — Petitioner cannot claim that he had conducted himself in a proper and irreproachable manner, where it appears that when he was still a young lad of 14 years he already became involved in a gambling raid for which he was arrested, though actually no information was filed against him. His explanation that his involvement was merely due to a mistake cannot be given much weight. One who desires to become a Filipino citizen must show in a manner that can admit of no doubt that he is a man of integrity and possesses good moral character.


D E C I S I O N


BAUTISTA ANGELO, J.:


Petitioner seeks Philippine citizenship in a petition filed before the Court of First Instance of Cebu.

Petitioner’s full name is Joseph Soglou Go which is the name he was authorized to bear in an order issued by the court in a special proceeding instituted for the purpose. Prior to such change of name, petitioner was known as Go Siok Du, alias Joseph Go, alias Joseph Soglou Go.

Petitioner is a citizen of the Republic of National China under whose laws Filipinos may become naturalized Chinese citizens. He was born in Amoy, China on March 16, 1930 of Chinese parents. He emigrated to the Philippines as a son of a Chinese merchant having arrived there on March 13, 1938. He resided in Cebu City for one year but later went to Cagayan de Oro where he also for one year. Then he returned to Cebu City where he resided continuously since 1950 up to the present time.

His father was originally considered as a mestizo Filipino because his mother was a Filipina, but because his citizenship papers were destroyed during the liberation his brother-in law registered him as a Chinese. And as it is difficult for him to regain his status as a Filipino he applied for naturalization.

He took up his primary course in the Colegio dela Imaculada Concepcion, his intermediate course in the Colegio de Sto. Nino, and his high school course in the Cebu Institute of Technology. These schools were recognized by the Philippine Government where Philippine history civics, and government were included in their curriculae. He speaks and writes English and the Cebu dialect And on July 13, 1950 he filed his declaration of intention Office of the Solicitor General.

After hearing, wherein the Solicitor General was represented by an Assistant City Fiscal of Cebu, the court a quo rendered judgment granting the petition for nationalization.

The government has appealed.

There is merit in the claim of the government that petitioner is disqualified from becoming a Filipino citizen because of the use made by him of three different names prior to the petition he filed in court wherein he was authorized to finally use the name of Joseph Soglou Go. Thus, it is undisputed that before the filing of said petition petitioner made use of the following names, to wit: Joseph Go, Go Siok Du, and Joseph Soglou Go. These names he used not only in his transactions but even in his dealings with the public by interchanging one name for another, and it was only in 1959 when he decided to do away with his aliases by filing the petition for change of name in the proper court. Consequently, petitioner violated the provisions of Commonwealth Act 142 which prohibits the use of an alias name unless authorized by the court. This fact alone disqualifies him to become a Filipino citizen.

The fact that after a number of years he thought of filing a petition to do away with his alias names cannot serve to mitigate his situation for it may be safely concluded that he decided to do so merely in contemplation of his desire to file a petition for naturalization. For one thing, this change of name cannot cure his previous improper behavior it appearing that for a long period of time he contumaciously and willfully violated an existing statute which he is supposed to know expressly prohibits the use of an alias name without previous authority from the court. Evidently, petitioner cannot in all sincerity claim that he has done anything wrong even with the use of different names in the past for the simple reason that he has not been subjected to any prosecution under Commonwealth Act 142 because the absence of such prosecution cannot erase the fact that his previous behavior is not one that can be expected from a person who deserves to become a Filipino citizen.

There is another factor that belies petitioner’s claim that since his arrival in the Philippines he has conducted himself in a proper and irreproachable manner and that character and integrity are beyond reproach. An examination of the record shows that when he was still a young lad of 14 years he already became involved in a gambling raid for which he was arrested by the police of Cebu City though actually no information was filed against him. His explanation that his involvement was merely due to a mistake cannot be given much weight for that incident cannot erase the suspicion that if he was arrested he was really engaged in a gambling activity. One who desires to be a Filipino citizen must show in a manner that can admit of no doubt that he is a man of integrity an a possesses good moral character. This petitioner failed to do.

Wherefore, the decision appealed from is reversed. Petition is denied, with costs against petitioner.

Bengzon, C.J., Concepcion, Reyes, J.B.L., Barrera, Dizon, Regala, Makalintal, Bengzon, J.P., Zaldivar and Sanchez, JJ., concur.




Back to Home | Back to Main




















chanrobles.com





ChanRobles On-Line Bar Review

ChanRobles Internet Bar Review : www.chanroblesbar.com

ChanRobles MCLE On-line

ChanRobles Lawnet Inc. - ChanRobles MCLE On-line : www.chanroblesmcleonline.com






May-1966 Jurisprudence                 

  • G.R. No. L-20341 May 14, 1966 SIMEON S. CLARIDADES v. VICENTE C. MERCADER, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-20372 May 14, 1966 IN RE: BENJAMIN YAP v. REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL.

  • G.R. No. L-22989 May 14, 1966 BIENVENIDO CAPULONG v. TIMOTEO Y. ASERON

  • G.R. No. L-20992 May 14, 1966 IN RE: KOCK TEE YAP v. REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL.

  • G.R. No. L-21486 May 14, 1966 LA MALLORCA and PAMPANGA BUS COMPANY v. VALENTIN DE JESUS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-20344 May 16, 1966 POTENCIANO ILUSORIO, ET AL. v. COURT OF AGRARIAN RELATIONS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-21673 May 16, 1966 FRANCISO MACATANGAY v. SECRETARY OF PUBLIC WORKS AND COMMUNICATIONS, ET AL.

  • G.R. Nos. L-22511 and L-22343 May 16, 196

    ANDRES E. LAZARO v. THE COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS

  • G.R. Nos. L-22383 and L-22386 May 16, 1966 EXTENSIVE ENTERPRISES CORPORATION v. SARBRO & CO., ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-22058 May 17, 1966 EMILIANO D. MANUEL, ET AL. v. PEDRO JIMENEZ, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-22059 May 17, 1966 MARIO T. LIZARES v. RUFINO G. HECHANOVA, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-22990 May 19, 1966 BIENVENIDO CAPULONG v. THE ACTING COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS

  • G.R. No. L-17696 May 19, 1966 DIRECTOR OF LANDS v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-18138 May 19, 1966 HONORIO J. HERNANDO v. J. FRANCISCO, ET AL.

  • G.R. Nos. L-19815-16 May 19, 1966 FILEMON YEPES, ET AL. v. SAMAR EXPRESS TRANSIT

  • G.R. No. L-20209 May 19, 1966 TAN TIONG ENG v. CITY MAYOR, PASAY, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-20366 May 19, 1966 LEONORA S. PALMA, ET AL. v. Q. & S. INC., ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-20682 May 19, 1966 GREGORIO VILLARTA, ET AL. v. FAUSTA CUTAMORA VDA. DE CUYNO, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-21032 May 19, 1966 FRANCISCA GALEOS-VALDEHUEZA, ET AL. v. REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL., ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-21489 and L-21628 May 19, 1966 MIGUEL MAPALO, ET AL. v. MAXIMO MAPALO, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-21568 May 19, 1966 SERVANDA ENECILLA v. LUZ MAGSAYSAY

  • G.R. No. L-21587 May 19, 1966 BRISTOL MYERS COMPANY v. DIRECTOR OF PATENTS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-21598 May 19, 1966 ENCARNACION VDA. DE VALENCIA, ET AL. v. PEDRO DEUDOR, ET AL.

  • G.R. Nos. L-21919-20 May 19, 1966 ANGEL S. OLAES v. TEODORO TANDA, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-21952 May 19, 1966 IN RE: LIM CHIAO CUN v. REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL.

  • G.R. No. L-22041 May 19, 1966 MELECIO CLARINIO UJANO v. REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL.

  • G.R. No. L-22044 May 19, 1966 ZOILO C. PARAGAS v. ESTANISLAO R. BERNAL, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-22137 May 19, 1966 MANILA RAILROAD COMPANY, ET AL. v. CARMELINO ALVENDIA, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-22277 May 19, 1966 ALBERTO AÑONUEVO, ET AL. v. ROBERTO ZURBANO, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-17773 May 19, 1966 PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. EMETERIO ORZAME, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-22549 May 19, 1966 RENATO D. TAYAG, ET AL. v. ANGELES ELECTRIC CORPORATION

  • G.R. No. L-22550 May 19, 1966 REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL. v. ANDRES REYES, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-22811 May 19, 1966 MALAYAN INSURANCE CO., INC. v. DELGADO SHIPPING AGENCIES, INC., ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-21981 May 19, 1966 WILFREDO GO BON LEE v. REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL.

  • G.R. No. L-20318 May 19, 1966 JOSEPH SOGLOU v. REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL.

  • G.R. No. L-21197 May 19, 1966 IN RE: ONG HOCK LIAN v. REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL.

  • G.R. No. L-22823 May 19, 1966 GODOFREDO N. FAVIS v. NICOMEDES T. RUPISAN, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-18452 May 20, 1966 AUGUSTO COSIO, ET AL. v. CHERIE PALILEO

  • G.R. No. L-20552 May 20, 1966 FILIPINAS LIFE ASSURANCE CO., ET AL. v. GONZALO P. NAVA

  • G.R. No. L-21219 May 20, 1966 UY CHIN HONG v. REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL.

  • G.R. Nos. L-21353 and L-21354 May 20, 1966 GREGORIO ANURAN, ET AL. v. PEPITO BUÑO, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-21380 May 20, 1966 MISAMIS LUMBER CORPORATION v. CAPITAL INSURANCE & SURETY CO., INC.

  • G.R. No. L-25835 May 20, 1966 CITY OF MANILA, ET AL. v. ABELARDO SUBIDO, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-19660 May 24, 1966 PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. AMBROCIO P. CANO

  • G.R. No. L-20921 May 24, 1966 MARCELO SOTTO v. FILEMON SOTTO, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-20112 May 25, 1966 ROBERTO TOMADO v. JOAQUlN BILBAO

  • G.R. No. L-20874 May 25, 1966 IN RE: JOSELITO YU v. REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL.

  • G.R. No. L-20818 May 25, 1966 CESAR GUILLERGAN, ET AL. v. RODOLFO GANZON, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-15631 May 27, 1966 PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. HERMOSO SINAON

  • G.R. No. L-20962 May 27, 1966 PACENCIA O. ITCHON v. JUAN M. BALIGOD, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-18769 May 27, 1966 PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. DIEGO VILLANUEVA

  • G.R. No. L-19894 May 27, 1966 PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. CESAR E. REYES, ET AL.

  • G.R. Nos. L-21028-29 May 27, 1966 SANTIAGO LABOR UNION v. EMILIANO TABIGNE, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-22079 May 27, 1966 ASIAN SURETY & INSURANCE COMPANY, INC. v. ONG TING, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-22370 May 27, 1966 LILIA HERNAEZ v. YAN KAO

  • G.R. No. L-21021 May 27, 1966 INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA v. UNITED STATES LINES CO., ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-18383 May 30, 1966 CELESTINO C. JUAN v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-18892 May 30, 1966 PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. MAKALAHI REYES, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-20051 May 30, 1966 ANTIQUE SAWMILLS, INC. v. AQUILES R. ZAYCO, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-20417 May 30, 1966 REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL. v. GREGORIO A. VENTURANZA, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-21060 May 30, 1966 CESARIO V. INDUCIL v. VICTOR DE LOS SANTOS

  • G.R. No. L-20313 May 30, 1966 LAURO G. MARQUEZ, v. GABRIEL V. VALERO, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-22207 May 30, 1966 IN RE: NERIO TAN v. REPUBLIC OF THE PHILI.

  • G.R. No. L-23510 May 30, 1966 LUCIDO GARCON v. REDEMPTORIST FATHERS

  • G.R. No. L-21195 May 31, 1966 NANCY Q. SISON v. PEDRO M. GIMENEZ, ET AL.

  • G.R. Nos. L-24267-8 May 31, 1966 PERFECTO FERRER, ET AL. v. COURT OF INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-19066 May 31, 1966 JUANITO YARCIA, ET AL. v. ZOILO CASTRILLO, ET AL.

  • G.R. Nos. L-21821-22, L-211824-27 May 31, 1966 DIOSDADO C. TY v. FILIPINAS COMPAÑA DE SEGUROS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-20299 May 31, 1966 ANITA BUENSUCESO DE LAMERA v. COURT OF AGRARIAN RELATIONS, ETC., ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-21400 May 31, 1966 IN RE: WILLIAM CHUA SIONG HUA v. REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL.