Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence


Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence > Year 1967 > December 1967 Decisions > G.R. No. L-21641 December 29, 1967 - MANUEL IBAVIOSA v. BENIGNO TUAZON, ET AL.:




PHILIPPINE SUPREME COURT DECISIONS

EN BANC

[G.R. No. L-21641. December 29, 1967.]

MANUEL IBAVIOSA, Petitioner, v. BENIGNO TUAZON, ET AL., Respondents.

Honorio V. Garcia, I for Petitioner.

Santiago F. Marcos for Respondents.

Benigno Tuazon for and his own behalf.


SYLLABUS


1. COURT OF AGRARIAN RELATIONS; FINALITY OF FINDINGS OF FACT. — The conclusion reached by the respondent agrarian court regarding the timeliness and validity of the tenant’s exercise of his right to change tenancy system between him and the landowner being a question of fact should not be disturbed on appeal.

2. AGRICULTURAL TENANCY ACT; CHANGE OF TENANCY SYSTEM; TIMELINESS OF NOTICE. — Where the tenant’s petition asking for a change in tenancy relationship beginning with the agricultural year 1960 — 1961 was filed on October 20, 1960 but in the decision of the respondent Court of Agrarian Relations, the change in the tenancy system was made effective Only beginning with the agricultural year 1963 — 1964, the requirement of the law regarding at least one month notice by the tenant to the landlord regarding the change of tenancy system had, therefore, been duly complied with.

3. ID.; ID.; CONSTITUTIONALITY THEREOF. — In a long line of decisions, this Court has already declared Section 14 of Republic Act 1199 providing for a change in tenancy relationship constitutional.


D E C I S I O N


ZALDIVAR, J.:


This is an appeal by certiorari to renew the decision rendered, on July 8, 1963, by the Court of Agrarian Relations, Second Regional District, Cabanatuan City, in CAR Case No. 2204-NE’60, relating to an action for a change of tenancy system from crop sharing to leasehold.

Respondent Benigno Tuazon — hereinafter referred to as tenant — is a share tenant of the petitioner, Manuel Ibaviosa — hereinafter referred to as landowner — on a parcel of first class riceland situated in barrio Malabon, municipality of Jaen, province of Nueva Ecija, with an area of 3.75 hectares, more or less, since the agricultural year 1957 — 1958, under the sharing arrangement of 50-50, with the tenant contributing to the production his labor, work animal, farm implements and expenses for final harrowing, and the landowner his land and expenses for transplanting. The relationship between the parties was not governed by any registered written tenancy contract.

On or about February 20, 1960, the tenant sent a letter, by registered mail, to the landowner, informing the latter of his (tenant’s) desire to change their tenancy relationship from share to leasehold effective with the agricultural year 1960-1961. On March 26, 1960, the landowner’s son, Constante Ibaviosa, replied to the tenant’s letter of February 20, 1960, acknowledging receipt of the same and denying the request contained therein regarding the change of tenancy system.

On October 20, 1960, the tenant filed a petition before the Court of Agrarian Relations, Second Regional District, Cabanatuan City, which was docketed as CAR Case No. 2204-NE’60, praying, among others, that judgment be rendered ordering the landowner to adopt the leasehold system of tenancy with the tenant, effective the current agricultural year 1960-1961 and to fix the legal rental therefor in the amount of 22 cavans.

Meanwhile, during the pendency of the case, the harvests for the agricultural years 1960-1961 up to 1962-1963 were temporarily liquidated by the parties under a sharing ratio of 70-30 in favor of the tenant, the said tenant having contributed all the items of production except the land.

After due hearing, the respondent agrarian court rendered a decision on July 8, 1963, approving the change in the tenancy system between the parties from share to leasehold effective with the agricultural year 1963-1964 and fixing the rental of the landholding at 53 cavans and 28 kilos of palay per agricultural year, consisting of the same variety actually and usually planted on said Landholding, payable immediately upon the threshing of the harvest at the threshing site. On July 16, 1963, the landowner filed a motion for reconsideration of the said decision, which motion was denied by the respondent agrarian court on July 23, 1963. Hence the instant appeal.

In this appeal, the landowner raises two issues:chanrob1es virtual 1aw library

"I


The lower court erred in taking jurisdiction of the instant case in view of the fact that the petition had been filed without the period required by law.

II


The lower court erred in not finding Section 14 of Republic Act No. 1199 unconstitutional." 1

In support of the first assignment of error, the landowner contends that the respondent agrarian court did not acquire jurisdiction over the case because the notice for a change of tenancy relationship supposedly sent by the tenant to him (landowner) was never received by him and that he had never authorized his son Constante Ibaviosa to reply to the letter of the tenant; that it was not shown that Constante Ibaviosa was acting as agent of his father (the landowner); and finally that the tenant’s petition asking for a change in tenancy relationship beginning with the agricultural year 1960-1961 was not filed on time since the same was only filed in court on October 20, 1960 when it should have been filed at least before May 1, 1960, considering that the agricultural year began in the month of June or July, 1960, at the latest, and further, because the law (Section 14 of Republic Act No. 1199), requires at least one month before the agricultural year when the change shall be effected.

The landowner’s contentions are without any merit. Aside from the fact that the reasons advanced by the landowner relate to questions of fact which this Court will not now review, We find that the evidence on record supports the finding of the respondent agrarian court that the denial of the landowner regarding the receipt of the tenant’s letter of notification does not deserve any credence. The record shows that the landowner, himself, "admitted on the witness stand that his son, Constante Ibaviosa, had acted as his representative in dealing with the tenants," 2 including tenant Benigno Tuazon. The landowner’s admission, alone, is more than sufficient reason for the respondent agrarian court to reject the landowner’s denial of receipt of respondent’s letter. Moreover, as it appears in the record, the landowner’s son, Constante Ibaviosa, did not only receive the tenant’s letter of notification, but also, acting within his authority as his father’s representative with the tenants, sent a reply to tenant Tuazon acknowledging receipt of the latter’s letter of notification and at the same time denying the request contained therein regarding the change of tenancy system.

Likewise, the conclusion reached by the respondent agrarian court regarding the timeliness and validity of the tenant’s exercise of his right to change tenancy system between him and the landowner being a question of fact should not be disturbed. It is noteworthy that in the decision of the respondent Court of Agrarian Relations, the change in the tenancy system was made effective only beginning with the agricultural year 1963-1964, because as far as the harvests for the agricultural years 1960-1961 to 1962-1963 temporary liquidations were made on the 70-30 sharing basis. The requirement of the law regarding notice by the tenant to the landowner regarding the change of tenancy system had, therefore, been duly complied with.

With respect to the issue regarding the constitutionality of Section 14 of Republic 1199, We do not consider it necessary to dwell on this subject any more because this Court, in a long line of decisions, has already declared said section constitutional. 3

WHEREFORE, the decision appealed from should be, as it is hereby affirmed, with costs against petitioner-landowner, Manuel Ibaviosa. It is so ordered.

Concepcion, C.J., Reyes, J.B.L., Dizon, Makalintal, Bengzon, J.P., Sanchez, Castro and Angeles, JJ., concur.

Fernando, J., took no part.

Endnotes:



1. Respondents did not file any brief.

2. CAR decision, p. 13, Brief for Petitioner-Appellant.

3. Primero v. CAR, Et Al., 101 Phil., 675; Mateo de Ramas v. CAR, Et Al., L-19555, May 29, 1964; Caridad Vda. de Macasaet v. CAR, Et Al., L-19750, July 17, 1964; Uichanco, Et. Al. v. Gutierrez, Et Al., L-20275-79, May 31, 1965; Gamboa v. Pallarca, Et Al., L-20407, March 31, 1966; Marta A. Vda. de Cuizon v. Ortiz, Et Al., L-20905, April 30, 1966; Ilusorio, Et. Al. v. CAR, Et Al., L-20344, May 16, 1966; Enriquez v. Cabangon, Et Al., L-21697, September 23, 1966; and Diaz v. Molina, Et Al., L-21550, April 27, 1967.




Back to Home | Back to Main




















chanrobles.com





ChanRobles On-Line Bar Review

ChanRobles Internet Bar Review : www.chanroblesbar.com

ChanRobles MCLE On-line

ChanRobles Lawnet Inc. - ChanRobles MCLE On-line : www.chanroblesmcleonline.com






December-1967 Jurisprudence                 

  • G.R. No. L-15829 December 4, 1967 - ROMAN R. SANTOS v. FLORENCIO MORENO

  • G.R. No. L-24717 December 4, 1967 - J. M. TUASON & CO., INC. v. GUILLERMO E. TORRES, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-28315 December 8, 1967 - AMBROCIO JANAIRO, ET AL. v. COMMISSION ON ELECTIONS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-28358 December 8, 1967 - JULIAN G. GINETE v. UBALDO Y. ARCANGEL, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-18857 December 11, 1967 - CAPITAL INSURANCE & SURETY CO., INC. v. ESTEBAN M. SADANG, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-21520 December 11, 1967 - PLARIDEL SURETY & INSURANCE COMPANY v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE

  • G.R. No. L-21616 December 11, 1967 - GERTRUDES F. CUAYCONG, ET AL. v. LUIS D. CUAYCONG, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-21849 December 11, 1967 - LOURDES VDA. DE MAGALONA v. WORKMEN’S COMPENSATION COMMISSION, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-22325 December 11, 1967 - CORAZON M. ESPINO v. CALIXTO ZALDIVAR, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-22471 December 11, 1967 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. SOLOMON A. LIZARDO

  • G.R. No. L-23508 December 11, 1967 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. NELLY P. CORTEZ

  • G.R. No. L-23817 December 11, 1967 - FRANCISCA LAZO v. J.M. TUASON & CO., ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-24221 December 11, 1967 - COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. INSULAR LUMBER COMPANY, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-24521 December 11, 1967 - EDILBERTO M. RAMOS v. RAMON A. DIAZ, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-25245 December 11, 1967 - FRANKLIN BAKER COMPANY OF THE PHILIPPINES v. MAURICIO ALILLANA, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-28348 December 15, 1967 - BERNARDINO ABES, ET AL. v. COMMISSION ON ELECTIONS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-21441 December 15, 1967 - RURAL TRANSIT EMPLOYEES ASSOCIATION, ET AL. v. BACHRACH TRANSPORTATION CO., INC., ET AL.

  • A.C. No. 546 December 18, 1967 - IN RE: DOMINADOR F. FLORES v. LUIS R. LOZADA

  • G.R. No. L-17587 September 12, 1967 - PHILIPPINE BANKING CORPORATION v. LUI SHE

  • G.R. No. L-22585 December 18, 1967 - NICANOR B. PAGKALINAWAN v. AMADOR E. GOMEZ, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-22753 December 18, 1967 - JESUS RAMOS, ET AL. v. COURT OF INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-23220 December 18, 1967 - CIRIACO INGCO v. BENEDICTO M. SANCHEZ, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-23699 December 18, 1967 - JUANITO CHAN v. GREGORIO B. MONTEJO

  • G.R. No. L-21422 December 18, 1967 - IN RE: CHUA TIONG SENG v. REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL.

  • G.R. No. L-27826 December 18, 1967 - PASTORA GASPAY, ET AL. v. CESAR SANGCO, ET AL.

  • G.R. Nos. L-24510 & L-24525 December 18, 1967 - MARTINIANO P. VIVO, ET AL. v. JESUS P. MORFE, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-23191 December 19, 1967 - GERONIMO G, ESGUERRA, ET AL. v. FELIPE M. VILLANUEVA, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-22269 December 20, 1967 - AMANDO AÑONUEVO, ET AL. v. ALBERTO AÑONUEVO, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-23661 December 20, 1967 - JOSE MANANGOL BARTOLOME, ET AL. v. JUSTO BARTOLOME

  • G.R. No. L-24572 December 20, 1967 - PHILIPPINE POSTAL SAVINGS BANK, ET AL. v. COURT OF INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-22265 December 22, 1967 - COLLECTOR OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. GOODRICH INTERNATIONAL RUBBER CO.

  • G.R. Nos. L-22512 & L-22514 December 22, 1967 - ANDRES E. LAZARO v. COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS

  • G.R. No. L-21150 December 26, 1967 - AMADO CAYANAN, ET AL. v. LEON DE LOS SANTOS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-21577 December 26, 1967 - REMEDIOS C. LEDESMA v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-22022 December 26, 1967 - EMILIANO T. RAMIREZ v. JOSE SY CHIT

  • G.R. No. L-23135 December 26, 1967 - MARIANO SUMILANG v. SATURNINA RAMAGOSA, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-23764 December 26, 1967 - JUAN SUMERARIZ v. DEVELOPMENT BANK OF THE PHILIPPINES, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-23887 December 26, 1967 - AGO TIMBER CORPORATION v. JESUS S. RUIZ, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-24200 December 26, 1967 - ELIZALDE & CO., INC. v. COURT OF AGRARIAN RELATIONS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-26947 December 26, 1967 - CALTEX (PHILIPPINES) INC. v. CUSTOMS ARRASTRE SERVICE, ET AL

  • G.R. No. L-28359 December 26, 1967 - ABDULLAH SANGKI v. COMMISSION ON ELECTIONS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-28395 December 26, 1967 - LILIA PEÑA, ET AL. v. DAMASO S. TENGCO, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-22517 December 26, 1967 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. GETULIO VERZO, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-23986 December 26, 1967 - ERNESTO DEL ROSARIO, ET AL. v. JACINTO CALLANTA

  • G.R. No. L-28349 December 28, 1967 - CONSUELO V. CALO, ET AL. v. MANUEL L. ENAGE, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-28206 December 28, 1967 - PRISCILO G. INTING v. ZOILA L. CLARIN

  • G.R. No. L-18649 December 29, 1967 - CEBU PORTLAND CEMENT COMPANY v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE

  • G.R. No. L-20156 December 29, 1967 - IN RE: MANUEL TO v. REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL.

  • G.R. No. L-20865 September 29, 1967 - ASELA P. TACTAQUIN v. JOSE B. PALILEO

  • G.R. No. L-21293 December 29, 1967 - REGINO G. AGUIZAP v. EUGENIO BASILIO, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-21641 December 29, 1967 - MANUEL IBAVIOSA v. BENIGNO TUAZON, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-22057 December 29, 1967 - ROMUALDO MONTESINO, ET AL. v. EUSEBIO RULLAN, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-23405 December 29, 1967 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. DOMINGO BATO

  • G.R. No. L-23773-74 December 29, 1967 - FRANCISCO PINEDA, ET AL. v. PASTOR DE GUZMAN

  • G.R. No. L-28328 December 29, 1967 - NICANOR C. IBUNA v. COMMISSION ON ELECTIONS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-28396 December 29, 1967 - AGRIPINO DEMAFILES v. COMMISSION ON ELECTIONS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-20894 December 29, 1967 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. ROGER M. PERETO, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-22169 December 29, 1967 - SERGIO ALABAT, ET AL. v. TORIBIA TANDOG VDA. DE ALABAT, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-21309 December 29, 1967 - BERNARDO PICARDAL, ET AL. v. CENON LLADAS

  • G.R. No. L-23504 December 29, 1967 - ALBERTO DE JOYA v. JUAN T. DAVID, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-23886 December 29, 1967 - FRANCISCO PERIQUET v. ANDRES REYES, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-28340 December 29, 1967 - JOSEPH EJERCITO ESTRADA v. PEDRO C. NAVARRO, ET AL.