Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence


Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence > Year 1967 > October 1967 Decisions > G.R. No. L-23715 October 30, 1967 - STATE BONDING & INSURANCE CO., INC. v. MANILA PORT SERVICE, ET AL.:




PHILIPPINE SUPREME COURT DECISIONS

EN BANC

[G.R. No. L-23715. October 30, 1967.]

STATE BONDING & INSURANCE CO., INC., Plaintiff-Appellee, v. MANILA PORT SERVICE and/or MANILA RAILROAD COMPANY, Defendants-Appellants.

Agusto D. Hilado for plaintiff and appellee.

D.F. Macaranas and A.M. Abrenica for defendants and appellants.


SYLLABUS


1. ARRASTRE SERVICE; PROVISIONAL CLAIM, SUFFICIENCY OF. — A provisional claim which describes the importation sufficiently to allow the arrastre operator a reasonable verification of the claim, even without a statement of the value of the goods lost or of the damages suffered, and without supporting papers attached thereto, is substantial compliance with the requirements of par. 15 of the Management Contract. Since the provisional claims in this case specify the number of the bill of lading, the name of the consignee, the marks and numbers on the goods, a description of said goods, the name of the carrying vessels and the date of arrival thereof, they satisfy the requirements. (State Bonding & Insurance Co., Inc. v. Manila Port Service, L-21833, Feb. 28, 1966; Atlantic Mutual Insurance Co v. United Philippine Lines, Inc., L-21546, March 31, 1966; Atlantic Mutual Insurance Co. v. Manila Port Service, Et Al., L-21907, April 29, 1966 and American Machinery & Parts Manufacturing Co., Inc. v. Manila Railroad, Et Al., L-21460, April 30, 1966).


D E C I S I O N


CONCEPCION, C.J.:


Appeal from a decision of the Court of First Instance of Manila, the dispositive part of which reads:jgc:chanrobles.com.ph

"WHEREFORE, judgment is hereby rendered in favor of plaintiff and against defendants, sentencing the latter to pay the former - on the first cause of action P376.48; on the second cause of action P1,259.38; and on the third cause of action P762.61; on the fourth cause of action P61.67; on the fifth cause of action, P38.99; on the sixth cause of action P111.41; and on the seventh cause of action P500.00, or a total of P3,370.54, with interest at the legal rate from the date of the filing of this case, and without pronouncement as to costs."cralaw virtua1aw library

As successor-in-interest and subrogee to the rights of the consignees of seven (7) shipments reserved by defendants, Manila Port Service and/or Manila Railroad Company, from carrying vessels and, either short-delivered, or delivered in damaged condition, to said consignees, plaintiff State Bonding & Insurance Co., Inc., filed the present action, in the Court of First Instance of Manila, to recover from said defendants the following amounts:jgc:chanrobles.com.ph

"First cause of action: P676.48 representing the value of eight (8) bags cocoa beans delivered in bad order and short by 663 lbs.;

"Second cause of action: P1,889.38 representing the value of nine (9) drums of emulsifier which defendants failed to deliver;

"Third cause action: P955.88 representing the value of four (4) packages of raw materials and parts of TV sets, delivered in bad order and short by 17 pcs. receiving tubes and 56 pcs. tuners;

"Fourth cause of action: P670.86 representing the value of four (4) drums of hydrogen peroxide delivered empty and 13 drums short in weight by 273 kilos;

"Fifth cause of action: P63.00 representing the value of seventeen (17) dozens Klenso erasers;

"Sixth cause of action: P142.88 representing the value of eleven (11) copies of college and high school text books;

"Seventh cause of action: P3,488.45 representing the value of one (1) box press brakes and dies which defendants failed to deliver;

"Eight cause of action: P1,370.89 representing actual damages suffered by plaintiff as a result of the negligence of the defendants; and

"Ninth cause of action: P1,000.00 for attorney’s fees."cralaw virtua1aw library

Sometime after the filing of its complaint, plaintiff waived its claims under the eight and the ninth causes of action. Subsequently, the case was submitted for decision upon a stipulation of facts. In due course, thereafter, said Court rendered the decision above referred to.

The issue for resolution before us, as in the lower court, is whether or not the provisional claims filed by or for the aforementioned consignees, admittedly within fifteen (15) days from the respective dates of discharge of the goods in question from the carrying vessels followed by formal claims filed beyond said period, have complied sufficiently with the requirements of paragraph 15 of the Management Contract between the defendants which, admittedly, is — under the circumstances obtaining in this case - binding upon the plaintiff herein. Said paragraph 15 reads:jgc:chanrobles.com.ph

". . . The CONTRACTOR shall be solely responsible as an independent contractor for, and promptly pay to the steamship company, consignee, consignor, or other interested party or parties the invoice value of each package but which in no case shall be more than five hundred pesos (P500.00) for each package unless the value is otherwise specified or manifested, and the corresponding arrastre charges had been paid, ... in any event the CONTRACTOR shall be relieved and released of any and all responsibility or liability for loss, damage, misdelivery and/or non-delivery of goods, unless suit in the court of proper jurisdiction is brought within a period of one (1) year from date of discharge of the goods or from the date when the claim for the value of such goods have been rejected or denied by the CONTRACTOR, provided that such claim shall have been filed with the CONTRACTOR within fifteen (15) days from date of discharge of the last package from the carrying vessel. . . ."cralaw virtua1aw library

Defendants submitted a negative answer upon the ground that said provisional claims were mere form-letters, couched in general terms, stating that the goods therein referred to had been, either short-landed, or landed in bad order, without a statement of the extent of the loss or damage sustained, nor of the value of the same and without supporting documents, such as, invoices, bills of lading and packing lists.

Defendants maintain that the aforementioned paragraph of the management contract contemplates a claim for value fully documented, with supporting papers, so that they could make a reasonable appraisal of the merits of the claim and decide to approve or reject the same.

It has been repeatedly held, however, 1 that a provisional claim describing the importation concerned sufficiently to allow the arrastre operator a reasonable verification of the claim, even if without a statement of the value of the goods lost or of the damage suffered, and without supporting papers attached thereto, constitutes a substantial compliance with the requirements of the aforementioned paragraph. The provisional claims filed in the case at bar specify the number of the bill of lading, the name of the consignee, the marks and numbers appearing on the goods involved, a description of said goods, the name of the carrying vessels, and the date of arrival thereof. They satisfy the aforementioned requirements.

Wherefore, the decision appealed from should be, as it is hereby, affirmed, with costs against the defendants-appellants. It is so ordered.

Reyes, J.B.L., Dizon, Makalintal, Bengzon, J.P., Zaldivar, Sanchez, Ruiz Castro, Angeles and Fernando, JJ., concur.

Endnotes:



1. State Bonding & Insurance Co., Inc. v. Manila Port Service, L-21833, February 28, 1966; Atlantic Mutual Insurance Co. v. United Philippine Lines, Inc., L-21546, Mar. 31, 1966; Atlantic Mutual Insurance Co. v. Manila Port Service, Et Al., L-21907, April 29, 1966 and American Machinery & Parts Manufacturing Co., Inc. v. Manila Railroad, Et Al., L-21460, April 30, 1966.




Back to Home | Back to Main




















chanrobles.com





ChanRobles On-Line Bar Review

ChanRobles Internet Bar Review : www.chanroblesbar.com

ChanRobles MCLE On-line

ChanRobles Lawnet Inc. - ChanRobles MCLE On-line : www.chanroblesmcleonline.com






October-1967 Jurisprudence                 

  • G.R. No. L-27583 October 10, 1967 - MARGARITO J. LOFRANCO v. JESUS JIMENEZ, SR.

  • Adm. Case No. 528 October 11, 1967 - ANGEL ALBANO v. PERPETUA COLOMA

  • G.R. No. L-16315 October 10, 1967 - COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. HAWAIIAN-PHILIPPINE COMPANY

  • G.R. No. L-23124 October 11, 1967 - INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA v. MANILA PORT SERVICE, ET AL.

  • G.R. Nos. L-23638 and L-23662 October 12, 1967 - DIONISIO FERNANDEZ, ET AL. v. ISMAELA DIMAGIBA

  • G.R. No. L-27394 October 13, 1967 - ARMANDO V. AMPIL v. CORAZON JULIANO- AGRAVA, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-27516 October 19, 1967 - INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA v. REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL., ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-28071 October 13, 1967 - PHILIPPINE ASSOCIATION OF FREE LABOR UNIONS, ET AL. v. COURT OF INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS, ET AL.

  • A.C. No. 736 October 23, 1967 - MANUEL R. GO v. ROMULO CANDOY

  • G.R. No. L-19804 October 23, 1967 - LEON BALBAS, ET AL. v. MELECIO R. DOMINGO

  • G.R. No. L-24693 October 23, 1967 - ERMITA-MALATE HOTEL AND MOTEL OPERATORS ASSOCIATION, INC., ET AL. v. CITY MAYOR OF MANILA

  • G.R. No. L-25162 October 23, 1967 - CHAMPION AUTO SUPPLY CO., INC. v. BUREAU OF CUSTOMS, ETC.

  • G.R. No. L-25362 October 23, 1967 - HARTFORD FIRE INSURANCE CO. v. CUSTOMS ARRASTRE SERVICE, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-25477 October 23, 1967 - INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA v. REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL.

  • G.R. No. 25478 October 23, 1967 - AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY v. REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-25784 October 23, 1967 - FIREMEN’S INSURANCE COMPANY v. REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL., ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-25871 October 23, 1967 - INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA v. REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL., ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-26618 October 23, 1967 - FIREMAN’S FUND INSURANCE COMPANY v. REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL., ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-27077 October 23, 1967 - NORTHERN ASSURANCE COMPANY, LTD. v. REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL., ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-23181 October 24, 1967 - IN RE: TAN SEN v. REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL.

  • G.R. No. L-18440 October 25, 1967 - HAWAIIAN-PHILIPPINE COMPANY v. AUDITOR GENERAL OF THE PHIL.

  • G.R. No. L-24757 October 25, 1967 - MARCOS B. COMILANG v. GENEROSO A. BUENDIA, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-28089 October 25, 1967 - BARA LIDASAN v. COMMISSION ON ELECTIONS

  • G.R. No. L-21069 October 26, 1967 - MANILA SURETY & FIDELITY COMPANY, INC. v. RODOLFO R. VELAYO

  • G.R. No. L-22488 October 26, 1967 - MATEO C. BACALSO, ET AL. v. MODESTO R. RAMOLETE, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-22371 October 26, 1967 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. MARIANO DAGA

  • G.R. No. L-22392 October 26, 1967 - RURAL TRANSIT EMPLOYEES’ ASSOCIATION v. BACHRACH MOTOR CO., INC., ET AL.

  • G.R. Nos. L-24844 and L-24853 October 26, 1967 - MACARIO AROCHA v. MARTINIANO VIVO, ETC., ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-19012 October 30, 1967 - VICTORIA JULIO v. EMILIANO DALANDAN, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-20175 October 30, 1967 - MARIA A. GARCIA, ET AL. v. RITA LEGARDA, INC.

  • G.R. No. L-20432 October 30, 1967 - JOSE MANALANG, ET AL. v. ARTEX DEVELOPMENT CO., INC., ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-20911 October 30, 1967 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. SULPICIO DE LA CERNA, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-22082 October 30, 1967 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. ISABEL P. DEL CARMEN

  • G.R. No. L-23715 October 30, 1967 - STATE BONDING & INSURANCE CO., INC. v. MANILA PORT SERVICE, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-23797 October 30, 1967 - JUAN E. SEVILLA v. LEONCIO PARINA, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-23811 October 30, 1967 - PHILIPPINE EDUCATION CO., INC. v. MANILA PORT SERVICE, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-27341 October 30, 1967 - IN RE: P.J. KIENER COMPANY, LTD., ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-28055 October 30, 1967 - REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL. v. DELFIN MONTANO, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-21258 October 31, 1967 - FILIPINAS LIFE ASSURANCE COMPANY v. COURT OF TAX APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-22459 October 31, 1967 - ANTONIO V. ROQUE v. BIENVENIDO P. BUAN, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-22555 October 31, 1967 - PHILIPPINE IRON MINES, INC. v. TOMAS ABEAR, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-23090 October 31, 1967 - PANGASINAN TRANSPORTATION CO., INC. v. NICASIO A. YATCO, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-20303 October 31, 1967 - REPUBLIC SAVINGS BANK v. COURT OF INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-20346 October 31, 1967 - CITY MAYOR, ET AL. v. CHIEF PHILIPPINE CONSTABULARY, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-21473 October 31, 1967 - PERFECTO D. KORDOVEZ v. SOFRONIO C. CARMONA

  • G.R. No. L-21556 October 31, 1967 - PHILIPPINE SURETY & INSURANCE CO., INC. v. BEATRIZ ZABAL

  • G.R. No. L-22206 October 31, 1967 - FRANKLIN BAKER COMPANY OF THE PHIL. v. FLORENCIO DIAMANTE, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-22538 October 31, 1967 - PHILIPPINE NATIONAL BANK v. PRIMITIVA MALLORCA

  • G.R. No. L-22576 October 31, 1967 - ALPHA INSURANCE & SURETY CO. v. MANILA PORT SERVICE, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-23566 October 31, 1967 - ELENA L. GARCIA v. ANTONIO J. VILLEGAS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-23636 October 31, 1967 - TABACALERA INSURANCE COMPANY v. MANILA RAILROAD COMPANY, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-23848 October 31, 1967 - PORFIRIO RILLORAZA v. PEDRO ARCIAGA, ETC., ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-24154 October 31, 1967 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. GREGORIO D. MONTEJO, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-22357 October 31, 1967 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. FELIPE GUMAHIN

  • G.R. No. L-23196 October 31, 1967 - LAUREANO OLIVA v. NICOLAS V. LAMADRID, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-23300 October 31, 1967 - ANDRES MANARPAAC, ET AL. v. ROSALINO CABANATAN, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-23395 October 31, 1967 - AUYONG HIAN v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE

  • G.R. No. L-25945 October 31, 1967 - NORBERTO B. PAA v. QUINTIN CHAN

  • G.R. No. L-24106 October 31, 1967 - INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA v. WARNER, BARNES & CO., LTD., ET AL.